1
|
Erjiang E, Carey JJ, Wang T, Ebrahimiarjestan M, Yang L, Dempsey M, Yu M, Chan WP, Whelan B, Silke C, O'Sullivan M, Rooney B, McPartland A, O'Malley G, Brennan A. Modelling future bone mineral density: Simplicity or complexity? Bone 2024:117178. [PMID: 38972532 DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2024.117178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporotic fractures are a major global public health issue, leading to patient suffering and death, and considerable healthcare costs. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement is important to identify those with osteoporosis and assess their risk of fracture. Both the absolute BMD and the change in BMD over time contribute to fracture risk. Predicting future fracture in individual patients is challenging and impacts clinical decisions such as when to intervene or repeat BMD measurement. Although the importance of BMD change is recognised, an effective way to incorporate this marginal effect into clinical algorithms is lacking. METHODS We compared two methods using longitudinal DXA data generated from subjects with two or more hip DXA scans on the same machine between 2000 and 2018. A simpler statistical method (ZBM) was used to predict an individual's future BMD based on the mean BMD and the standard deviation of the reference group and their BMD measured in the latest scan. A more complex deep learning (DL)-based method was developed to cope with multidimensional longitudinal data, variables extracted from patients' historical DXA scan(s), as well as features drawn from the ZBM method. Sensitivity analyses of several subgroups was conducted to evaluate the performance of the derived models. RESULTS 2948 white adults aged 40-90 years met our study inclusion: 2652 (90 %) females and 296 (10 %) males. Our DL-based models performed significantly better than the ZBM models in women, particularly our Hybrid-DL model. In contrast, the ZBM-based models performed as well or better than DL-based models in men. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning-based and statistical models have potential to forecast future BMD using longitudinal clinical data. These methods have the potential to augment clinical decisions regarding when to repeat BMD testing in the assessment of osteoporosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Erjiang
- School of Management, Guangxi Minzu Univeristy, Nanning, China
| | - John J Carey
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland; Department of Rheumatology, Galway University Hospitals, Galway, Ireland
| | - Tingyan Wang
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Lan Yang
- Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics, Data Science Institute, University of Galway, Ireland
| | - Mary Dempsey
- School of Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Galway, Ireland
| | - Ming Yu
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Wing P Chan
- Department of Radiology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan
| | - Bryan Whelan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland; Department of Rheumatology, Our Lady's Hospital, Manorhamilton, Co. Leitrim, Ireland
| | - Carmel Silke
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland; Department of Rheumatology, Our Lady's Hospital, Manorhamilton, Co. Leitrim, Ireland
| | - Miriam O'Sullivan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland; Department of Rheumatology, Our Lady's Hospital, Manorhamilton, Co. Leitrim, Ireland
| | - Bridie Rooney
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland
| | - Aoife McPartland
- Department of Rheumatology, Our Lady's Hospital, Manorhamilton, Co. Leitrim, Ireland
| | - Gráinne O'Malley
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Ireland; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland
| | - Attracta Brennan
- School of Computer Science, College of Science and Engineering, University of Galway, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naeimi SM, Darvish S, Salman BN, Luchian I. Artificial Intelligence in Adult and Pediatric Dentistry: A Narrative Review. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:431. [PMID: 38790300 PMCID: PMC11118054 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been recently introduced into clinical dentistry, and it has assisted professionals in analyzing medical data with unprecedented speed and an accuracy level comparable to humans. With the help of AI, meaningful information can be extracted from dental databases, especially dental radiographs, to devise machine learning (a subset of AI) models. This study focuses on models that can diagnose and assist with clinical conditions such as oral cancers, early childhood caries, deciduous teeth numbering, periodontal bone loss, cysts, peri-implantitis, osteoporosis, locating minor apical foramen, orthodontic landmark identification, temporomandibular joint disorders, and more. The aim of the authors was to outline by means of a review the state-of-the-art applications of AI technologies in several dental subfields and to discuss the efficacy of machine learning algorithms, especially convolutional neural networks (CNNs), among different types of patients, such as pediatric cases, that were neglected by previous reviews. They performed an electronic search in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Medline to locate relevant articles. They concluded that even though clinicians encounter challenges in implementing AI technologies, such as data management, limited processing capabilities, and biased outcomes, they have observed positive results, such as decreased diagnosis costs and time, as well as early cancer detection. Thus, further research and development should be considered to address the existing complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shayan Darvish
- School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA;
| | - Bahareh Nazemi Salman
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan 4513956184, Iran
| | - Ionut Luchian
- Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Delamare E, Fu X, Huang Z, Kim J. Panoramic imaging errors in machine learning model development: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2024; 53:165-172. [PMID: 38273661 PMCID: PMC11003661 DOI: 10.1093/dmfr/twae002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the management of imaging errors from panoramic radiography (PAN) datasets used in the development of machine learning (ML) models. METHODS This systematic literature followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and used three databases. Keywords were selected from relevant literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA PAN studies that used ML models and mentioned image quality concerns. RESULTS Out of 400 articles, 41 papers satisfied the inclusion criteria. All the studies used ML models, with 35 papers using deep learning (DL) models. PAN quality assessment was approached in 3 ways: acknowledgement and acceptance of imaging errors in the ML model, removal of low-quality radiographs from the dataset before building the model, and application of image enhancement methods prior to model development. The criteria for determining PAN image quality varied widely across studies and were prone to bias. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed significant inconsistencies in the management of PAN imaging errors in ML research. However, most studies agree that such errors are detrimental when building ML models. More research is needed to understand the impact of low-quality inputs on model performance. Prospective studies may streamline image quality assessment by leveraging DL models, which excel at pattern recognition tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduardo Delamare
- Sydney Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Digital Health and Data Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Xingyue Fu
- School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Zimo Huang
- School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| | - Jinman Kim
- School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hartoonian S, Hosseini M, Yousefi I, Mahdian M, Ghazizadeh Ahsaie M. Applications of artificial intelligence in dentomaxillofacial imaging-a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024:S2212-4403(23)01566-3. [PMID: 38637235 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.12.790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been increasingly developed in oral and maxillofacial imaging. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the applications and performance of the developed algorithms in different dentomaxillofacial imaging modalities. STUDY DESIGN A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases was performed. The search strategy was set as a combination of the following keywords: "Artificial Intelligence," "Machine Learning," "Deep Learning," "Neural Networks," "Head and Neck Imaging," and "Maxillofacial Imaging." Full-text screening and data extraction were independently conducted by two independent reviewers; any mismatch was resolved by discussion. The risk of bias was assessed by one reviewer and validated by another. RESULTS The search returned a total of 3,392 articles. After careful evaluation of the titles, abstracts, and full texts, a total number of 194 articles were included. Most studies focused on AI applications for tooth and implant classification and identification, 3-dimensional cephalometric landmark detection, lesion detection (periapical, jaws, and bone), and osteoporosis detection. CONCLUSION Despite the AI models' limitations, they showed promising results. Further studies are needed to explore specific applications and real-world scenarios before confidently integrating these models into dental practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serlie Hartoonian
- School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Matine Hosseini
- School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Iman Yousefi
- School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mina Mahdian
- Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, Stony Brook University School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Mitra Ghazizadeh Ahsaie
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shrivastava M, Ye L. Neuroimaging and artificial intelligence for assessment of chronic painful temporomandibular disorders-a comprehensive review. Int J Oral Sci 2023; 15:58. [PMID: 38155153 PMCID: PMC10754947 DOI: 10.1038/s41368-023-00254-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic Painful Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD) are challenging to diagnose and manage due to their complexity and lack of understanding of brain mechanism. In the past few decades' neural mechanisms of pain regulation and perception have been clarified by neuroimaging research. Advances in the neuroimaging have bridged the gap between brain activity and the subjective experience of pain. Neuroimaging has also made strides toward separating the neural mechanisms underlying the chronic painful TMD. Recently, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming various sectors by automating tasks that previously required humans' intelligence to complete. AI has started to contribute to the recognition, assessment, and understanding of painful TMD. The application of AI and neuroimaging in understanding the pathophysiology and diagnosis of chronic painful TMD are still in its early stages. The objective of the present review is to identify the contemporary neuroimaging approaches such as structural, functional, and molecular techniques that have been used to investigate the brain of chronic painful TMD individuals. Furthermore, this review guides practitioners on relevant aspects of AI and how AI and neuroimaging methods can revolutionize our understanding on the mechanisms of painful TMD and aid in both diagnosis and management to enhance patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayank Shrivastava
- Adams School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Liang Ye
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Santos GNM, da Silva HEC, Ossege FEL, Figueiredo PTDS, Melo NDS, Stefani CM, Leite AF. Radiomics in bone pathology of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2023; 52:20220225. [PMID: 36416666 PMCID: PMC9793454 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20220225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To define which are and how the radiomics features of jawbone pathologies are extracted for diagnosis, predicting prognosis and therapeutic response. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using eight databases and gray literature. Two independent observers rated these articles according to exclusion and inclusion criteria. 23 papers were included to assess the radiomics features related to jawbone pathologies. Included studies were evaluated by using JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. RESULTS Agnostic features were mined from periapical, dental panoramic radiographs, cone beam CT, CT and MRI images of six different jawbone alterations. The most frequent features mined were texture-, shape- and intensity-based features. Only 13 studies described the machine learning step, and the best results were obtained with Support Vector Machine and random forest classifier. For osteoporosis diagnosis and classification, filtering, shape-based and Tamura texture features showed the best performance. For temporomandibular joint pathology, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray level run length matrix (GLRLM), Gray Level Size Zone Matrix (GLSZM), first-order statistics analysis and shape-based analysis showed the best results. Considering odontogenic and non-odontogenic cysts and tumors, contourlet and SPHARM features, first-order statistical features, GLRLM, GLCM had better indexes. For odontogenic cysts and granulomas, first-order statistical analysis showed better classification results. CONCLUSIONS GLCM was the most frequent feature, followed by first-order statistics, and GLRLM features. No study reported predicting response, prognosis or therapeutic response, but instead diseases diagnosis or classification. Although the lack of standardization in the radiomics workflow of the included studies, texture analysis showed potential to contribute to radiologists' reports, decreasing the subjectivity and leading to personalized healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Nilce de Santos Melo
- Dentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - Cristine Miron Stefani
- Dentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil
| | - André Ferreira Leite
- Dentistry Department, Faculty of Health Science, University of Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tassoker M, Öziç MÜ, Yuce F. Comparison of five convolutional neural networks for predicting osteoporosis based on mandibular cortical index on panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2022; 51:20220108. [PMID: 35762349 PMCID: PMC10043616 DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20220108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the present study was to compare five convolutional neural networks for predicting osteoporosis based on mandibular cortical index (MCI) on panoramic radiographs. METHODS Panoramic radiographs of 744 female patients over 50 years of age were labeled as C1, C2, and C3 depending on the MCI. The data of the present study were reviewed in different categories including (C1, C2, C3), (C1, C2), (C1, C3), and (C1, (C2 +C3)) as two-class and three-class predictions. The data were separated randomly as 20% test data, and the remaining data were used for training and validation with fivefold cross-validation. AlexNET, GoogleNET, ResNET-50, SqueezeNET, and ShuffleNET deep-learning models were trained through the transfer learning method. The results were evaluated by performance criteria including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, AUC, and training duration. The Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) method was applied for visual interpretation of where deep-learning algorithms gather the feature from image regions. RESULTS The dataset (C1, C2, C3) has an accuracy rate of 81.14% with AlexNET; the dataset (C1, C2) has an accuracy rate of 88.94% with GoogleNET; the dataset (C1, C3) has an accuracy rate of 98.56% with AlexNET; and the dataset (C1,(C2+C3)) has an accuracy rate of 92.79% with GoogleNET. CONCLUSION The highest accuracy was obtained in the differentiation of C3 and C1 where osseous structure characteristics change significantly. Since the C2 score represent the intermediate stage (osteopenia), structural characteristics of the bone present behaviors closer to C1 and C3 scores. Therefore, the data set including the C2 score provided relatively lower accuracy results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melek Tassoker
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry, Konya, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Üsame Öziç
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Technology, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Fatma Yuce
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Okan University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Selection of Filtering and Image Texture Analysis in the Radiographic Images Processing of Horses' Incisor Teeth Affected by the EOTRH Syndrome. SENSORS 2022; 22:s22082920. [PMID: 35458905 PMCID: PMC9030967 DOI: 10.3390/s22082920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Equine odontoclastic tooth resorption and hypercementosis (EOTRH) is one of the horses’ dental diseases, mainly affecting the incisor teeth. An increase in the incidence of aged horses and a painful progressive course of the disease create the need for improved early diagnosis. Besides clinical findings, EOTRH recognition is based on the typical radiographic findings, including levels of dental resorption and hypercementosis. This study aimed to introduce digital processing methods to equine dental radiographic images and identify texture features changing with disease progression. The radiographs of maxillary incisor teeth from 80 horses were obtained. Each incisor was annotated by separate masks and clinically classified as 0, 1, 2, or 3 EOTRH degrees. Images were filtered by Mean, Median, Normalize, Bilateral, Binomial, CurvatureFlow, LaplacianSharpening, DiscreteGaussian, and SmoothingRecursiveGaussian filters independently, and 93 features of image texture were extracted using First Order Statistics (FOS), Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), Neighbouring Gray Tone Difference Matrix (NGTDM), Gray Level Dependence Matrix (GLDM), Gray Level Run Length Matrix (GLRLM), and Gray Level Size Zone Matrix (GLSZM) approaches. The most informative processing was selected. GLCM and GLRLM return the most favorable features for the quantitative evaluation of radiographic signs of the EOTRH syndrome, which may be supported by filtering by filters improving the edge delimitation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kavya R, Christopher J, Panda S, Lazarus YB. Machine Learning and XAI approaches for Allergy Diagnosis. Biomed Signal Process Control 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
10
|
Machine Learning and Intelligent Diagnostics in Dental and Orofacial Pain Management: A Systematic Review. Pain Res Manag 2021; 2021:6659133. [PMID: 33986900 PMCID: PMC8093041 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6659133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The study explored the clinical influence, effectiveness, limitations, and human comparison outcomes of machine learning in diagnosing (1) dental diseases, (2) periodontal diseases, (3) trauma and neuralgias, (4) cysts and tumors, (5) glandular disorders, and (6) bone and temporomandibular joint as possible causes of dental and orofacial pain. Method Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science (all databases) were searched by 2 reviewers until 29th October 2020. Articles were screened and narratively synthesized according to PRISMA-DTA guidelines based on predefined eligibility criteria. Articles that made direct reference test comparisons to human clinicians were evaluated using the MI-CLAIM checklist. The risk of bias was assessed by JBI-DTA critical appraisal, and certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Information regarding the quantification method of dental pain and disease, the conditional characteristics of both training and test data cohort in the machine learning, diagnostic outcomes, and diagnostic test comparisons with clinicians, where applicable, were extracted. Results 34 eligible articles were found for data synthesis, of which 8 articles made direct reference comparisons to human clinicians. 7 papers scored over 13 (out of the evaluated 15 points) in the MI-CLAIM approach with all papers scoring 5+ (out of 7) in JBI-DTA appraisals. GRADE approach revealed serious risks of bias and inconsistencies with most studies containing more positive cases than their true prevalence in order to facilitate machine learning. Patient-perceived symptoms and clinical history were generally found to be less reliable than radiographs or histology for training accurate machine learning models. A low agreement level between clinicians training the models was suggested to have a negative impact on the prediction accuracy. Reference comparisons found nonspecialized clinicians with less than 3 years of experience to be disadvantaged against trained models. Conclusion Machine learning in dental and orofacial healthcare has shown respectable results in diagnosing diseases with symptomatic pain and with improved future iterations and can be used as a diagnostic aid in the clinics. The current review did not internally analyze the machine learning models and their respective algorithms, nor consider the confounding variables and factors responsible for shaping the orofacial disorders responsible for eliciting pain.
Collapse
|