Descriptions of the dynamic joint space of the temporomandibular joint

Evaluation of the effect of unilateral mastication on the morphology of temporomandibular joint from the perspective of dynamic joint space

BACKGROUND

Unbalanced alterations of temporomandibular joint morphology were associated with unilaterally masticatory habits.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of unilateral mastication on the remodelling of the temporomandibular joint using dynamic joint space.

METHODS

Twelve volunteers with non-maxillofacial deformity and healthy temporomandibular joints were recruited. The 3D models of the mandible and the maxilla were reconstructed according to computed tomography. The subjects were asked to masticate French fries and peanuts unilaterally, which was recorded by a 3D motion capture system. The dynamic joint space during unilateral mastication was analysed.

RESULTS

During early closure, the joint space reduction on the non-masticatory side was significantly greater than on the masticatory side (p < .05). During later closure, the joint space reduction on the non-masticatory side was significantly lower than that on the masticatory side (p < .05). The difference in joint space reduction between both sides was greater than the French fries while masticating the peanuts.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral mastication resulted in a different major pressure area on the bilateral TMJs. Therefore, unilateral mastication might be an essential factor in the bilateral asymmetrical remodelling of the TMJ.

Investigation of the accuracy of dynamic condylar position: A model study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate dynamic condylar positions by integrating mandibular movement recording data and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to investigate its accuracy via dynamic model experiments.

METHODS

A polyvinyl chloride skull model was utilized. A robot arm was used to operate the mandible to perform mouth opening, closing, protrusion, and lateral movements. A recording device, worn on the skull, was used to record the dynamic process and an optical position tracking (OPT) system was used to simultaneously trace the movements. A self-developed software module was used to evaluate the dynamic condylar position by integrating the dynamic tracing data and a virtual skull model derived from CBCT images. Errors were defined as differences between the dynamic coordinates of six landmarks around the condylar area derived from the software module (test) and OPT system (gold standard).

RESULTS

The condylar position errors were 0.76 ± 0.31, 0.55 ± 0.15, and 0.68 ± 0.23 mm for mouth opening, bilateral, and protrusion movements, respectively. Furthermore, the errors for small, moderate, and large mouth opening movements were 0.62 ± 0.19, 0.69 ± 0.29, and 0.94 ± 0.31 mm, respectively. The errors for all movements, except for large mouth opening, were significantly less than 1 mm (P < 0.05). The error was not different from 1 mm in the large mouth opening movement (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our developed method of achieving dynamic condylar position by integrating mandibular movement recording data and CBCT images is clinically reliable.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study proved the reliability of evaluating dynamic condylar position using a commercial dynamic recording instrument and CBCT images.