Reliable prediction of difficult airway for tracheal intubation from patient preoperative photographs by machine learning methods

Difficult Airway Assessment Based on Multi-View Metric Learning

The preoperative assessment of difficult airways is of great significance in the practice of anesthesia intubation. In recent years, although a large number of difficult airway recognition algorithms have been investigated, defects such as low recognition accuracy and poor recognition reliability still exist. In this paper, we propose a Dual-Path Multi-View Fusion Network (DMF-Net) based on multi-view metric learning, which aims to predict difficult airways through multi-view facial images of patients. DMF-Net adopts a dual-path structure to extract features by grouping the frontal and lateral images of the patients. Meanwhile, a Multi-Scale Feature Fusion Module and a Hybrid Co-Attention Module are designed to improve the feature representation ability of the model. Consistency loss and complementarity loss are utilized fully for the complementarity and consistency of information between multi-view data. Combined with Focal Loss, information bias is effectively avoided. Experimental validation illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed method, with the accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and F1 score reaching 77.92%, 75.62%, 82.50%, and 71.35%, respectively. Compared with methods such as clinical bedside screening tests and existing artificial intelligence-based methods, our method is more accurate and reliable and can provide a reliable auxiliary tool for clinical healthcare personnel to effectively improve the accuracy and reliability of preoperative difficult airway assessments. The proposed network can help to identify and assess the risk of difficult airways in patients before surgery and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for predicting the need for intubation in methanol-poisoned patients: a study comparing deep and machine learning models

The need for intubation in methanol-poisoned patients, if not predicted in time, can lead to irreparable complications and even death. Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques like machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) greatly aid in accurately predicting intubation needs for methanol-poisoned patients. So, our study aims to assess Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for predicting intubation necessity in methanol-poisoned patients, comparing deep learning and machine learning models. This study analyzed a dataset of 897 patient records from Loghman Hakim Hospital in Tehran, Iran, encompassing cases of methanol poisoning, including those requiring intubation (202 cases) and those not requiring it (695 cases). Eight established ML (SVM, XGB, DT, RF) and DL (DNN, FNN, LSTM, CNN) models were used. Techniques such as tenfold cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning were applied to prevent overfitting. The study also focused on interpretability through SHAP and LIME methods. Model performance was evaluated based on accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, F1-score, and ROC curve metrics. Among DL models, LSTM showed superior performance in accuracy (94.0%), sensitivity (99.0%), specificity (94.0%), and F1-score (97.0%). CNN led in ROC with 78.0%. For ML models, RF excelled in accuracy (97.0%) and specificity (100%), followed by XGB with sensitivity (99.37%), F1-score (98.27%), and ROC (96.08%). Overall, RF and XGB outperformed other models, with accuracy (97.0%) and specificity (100%) for RF, and sensitivity (99.37%), F1-score (98.27%), and ROC (96.08%) for XGB. ML models surpassed DL models across all metrics, with accuracies from 93.0% to 97.0% for DL and 93.0% to 99.0% for ML. Sensitivities ranged from 98.0% to 99.37% for DL and 93.0% to 99.0% for ML. DL models achieved specificities from 78.0% to 94.0%, while ML models ranged from 93.0% to 100%. F1-scores for DL were between 93.0% and 97.0%, and for ML between 96.0% and 98.27%. DL models scored ROC between 68.0% and 78.0%, while ML models ranged from 84.0% to 96.08%. Key features for predicting intubation necessity include GCS at admission, ICU admission, age, longer folic acid therapy duration, elevated BUN and AST levels, VBG_HCO3 at initial record, and hemodialysis presence. This study as the showcases XAI's effectiveness in predicting intubation necessity in methanol-poisoned patients. ML models, particularly RF and XGB, outperform DL counterparts, underscoring their potential for clinical decision-making.