1
|
Tang VM, Blumberger DM, Weissman CR, Dimitrova J, Throop A, McClintock SM, Voineskos D, Rajji TK, Downar J, Knyahnytska Y, Mulsant BH, Fitzgerald PB, Daskalakis ZJ. A pilot study of magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Depress Anxiety 2021; 38:161-171. [PMID: 32949052 DOI: 10.1002/da.23097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing interest in the potential of neuromodulation options in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Magnetic seizure therapy (MST), is a new treatment intervention in which generalized seizures are induced with transcranial magnetic stimulation. We conducted a pilot study to assess the efficacy and cognitive effects of MST in patients with treatment-resistant OCD. METHODS In an open-label pilot study, participants with treatment-resistant OCD and a baseline Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores of ≥16 were treated with up to 24 acute treatments. The primary clinical outcomes were clinical response (Y-BOCS score reduction ≥30%) and remission (final Y-BOCS score ≤8). A neurocognitive battery, the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (QIDS-SR), the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) were also completed as secondary measures. RESULTS Ten participants with OCD who had not responded to medications or psychotherapy enrolled in the study and seven completed an adequate trial (defined as ≥8 treatments). MST was associated with minimal cognitive effects except for some decrease in autobiographical memory and no serious adverse effects. Only one participant met the predefined criteria for response, and none for remission. The baseline and endpoint Y-BOCS scores were not statistically different. CONCLUSION Overall, MST was not beneficial in a small group of patients with treatment-resistant OCD. At this time, other studies of MST for OCD are not warranted until different coil placements targeting other brain circuits can be proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Tang
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cory R Weissman
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia Dimitrova
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Alanah Throop
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shawn M McClintock
- Neurocognitive Research Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daphne Voineskos
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tarek K Rajji
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Downar
- Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Mental Health and Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuliya Knyahnytska
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Benoit H Mulsant
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul B Fitzgerald
- Department of Psychiatry, Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth Healthcare, Monash University, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zafiris J Daskalakis
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Campbell Family Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kayser S, Bewernick BH, Hurlemann R, Soehle M, Schlaepfer TE. Comparable seizure characteristics in magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive therapy for major depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 23:1541-50. [PMID: 23820052 DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2012] [Revised: 12/20/2012] [Accepted: 04/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is highly effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD); however, its use for less severe forms of depression is somewhat limited by a lack of control over current spreading to medial temporal lobe memory structures, resulting in various cognitive side effects. In contrast, magnetic seizure therapy (MST), which uses high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for local seizure induction, has been associated with reduced cognitive side effects. To assess whether different characteristics of seizures induced by both methods are responsible for the differences in neuropsychological side-effect profile, we studied seven TRD-patients undergoing both MST and ECT in an open-label, within subject, controlled crossover pilot study. Comparison parameters included seizure-related ictal characteristics, including motor activity, electromyogram (EMG), electroencephalogram (EEG), and postictal recovery and reorientation times.Our results showed no differences in motor activity or EMG and EEG characteristics, thus implicating similar electrophysiological processes in seizure induction with MST and ECT. In line with previous studies, we observed shorter postictal recovery and reorientation times following MST.The ictal characteristics of induced seizures were found similar with ECT and MST suggesting that the more focal seizure induction associated with MST may account for the more beneficial neuropsychological side effect profile of MST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kayser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peterchev AV, Murphy DL, Lisanby SH. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters (cTMS). ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2011; 2010:2922-6. [PMID: 21095986 DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2010.5626287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
We describe a novel transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) device that uses a circuit topology incorporating two energy-storage capacitors and two insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) to generate near-rectangular electric field E-field) pulses with adjustable number, polarity, duration, and amplitude of the pulse phases. This controllable-pulse-parameter TMS (cTMS) device can induce E-field pulses with phase widths of 5-200 µs and positive/negative phase amplitude ratio of 1-10. Compared to conventional monophasic and biphasic TMS, cTMS reduces energy dissipation by 78-82% and 55-57% and decreases coil heating by 15-33% and 31-41%, respectively. We demonstrate repetitive TMS (rTMS) trains of 3,000 pulses at frequencies up to 50 Hz with E-field pulse amplitude and width variability of less than 1.7% and 1%, respectively. The reduced power consumption and coil heating, and the flexible pulse parameter adjustment offered by cTMS could enhance existing TMS paradigms and could enable novel research and clinical applications with potentially enhanced potency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel V Peterchev
- Division of Brain Stimulation and Therapeutic Modulation, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University/NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Malhi GS, Loo C, Cahill CM, Lagopoulos J, Mitchell P, Sachdev P. "Getting physical": the management of neuropsychiatric disorders using novel physical treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2006; 2:165-79. [PMID: 19412461 PMCID: PMC2671781 DOI: 10.2147/nedt.2006.2.2.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize and review the utility of physical interventions in the treatment of psychiatric disorders. METHODS A systematic review of the literature pertaining to novel physical interventions, namely, transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, and neurosurgery, was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PSYCHLIT. Bibliographies of papers were scrutinized for further relevant references along with literature known to the authors. RESULTS Currently available physical interventions worldwide are reviewed with respect to efficacy, applications, and putative indications. Physical interventions have experienced a resurgence of interest for both the investigation of brain function and the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. The widespread availability of neuroimaging technology has advanced our understanding of brain function and allowed closer examination of the effects of physical treatments. Clinically, transcranial magnetic stimulation seems likely to have a role in the management of depression, and its use in other neuropsychiatric disorders appears promising. Following on from its success in the management of intractable epilepsy, vagus nerve stimulation is undergoing evaluation in the treatment of depression with some success in refractory cases. Deep brain stimulation has improved mood in patients with Parkinson's disease and may also relieve symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neurosurgery has re-invented itself by way of increased technical sophistication, and although further assessment of its efficacy and clinical utility is still needed, its widespread practice reflects its increasing acceptance as a viable treatment of last resort. CONCLUSION It is clear that physical treatments are here to stay and "getting physical" offers a useful addition to the neuropsychiatrist's therapeutic armamentarium. However, like all new treatments these interventions need to remain under rigorous scientific scrutiny to determine accurately their immediate and long-term effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gin S Malhi
- School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|