Droplet on a liquid substrate: Wetting, dewetting, dynamics, instabilities

Spreading of aqueous surfactant solutions on oil substrates: Superspreaders vs non-superspreaders

HYPOTHESIS

The question of why aqueous solutions of some surfactants demonstrate a rapid spreading (superspreading) over hydrophobic solid substrates, while solutions of other similar surfactants do not, has no definitive explanation despite numerous previous studies. The suggested hypothesis for this study assumes that once the spreading coefficient of surfactant is positive, there is a concentration range for solutions of any surfactant which demonstrates rapid spreading. As it is impossible to calculate spreading coefficients for solid substrates, we compare the spreading performance of known superspreaders and non-superspreaders on liquid (oil) substrate.

EXPERIMENTS

The kinetics of spreading of aqueous solutions of a series of branched ionic surfactants and non-ionic trisiloxane surfactants on two liquid substrates was studied and compared with the spreading of a surfactant-free liquid, silicone oil. Both dynamic and equilibrium spreading coefficients were calculated using measured surface and interfacial tensions.

FINDINGS

There is no difference in spreading rate on liquid substrate between solutions of surfactants proven as superspreaders (while spreading on solid substrate) or non-superspreaders. A rapid spreading (superspreading) with the characteristic rate of spreading O(102-103) mm2/s occurs if the dynamic spreading coefficients exceeds the positive threshold value. If the dynamic spreading coefficient is negative or slightly positive, complete wetting still occurs, but the spreading is slow with the spreading rate is O(1) mm2/s. Spreading exponents for surfactant solutions in the rapid spreading regime are considerably larger than for the surfactant-free liquid. A number of spreading and dewetting patterns were observed depending on the surfactant type, its concentration and substrate.

Interaction of impinging marangoni fields

HYPOTHESIS

Surface tension gradient driven Marangoni flows originating from multiple sources are important to many industrial and medical applications, but the theoretical literature focuses on single surfactant sources. Understanding how two spreading surfactant sources interact allows insights from single source experiments to be applied to multi-source applications. Two key features of multi-source spreading - source translation and source deformation - can be explained by transport modeling of a two-source system.

MODELING

Numerical simulations of two oleic acid disks placed at varying initial separation distances on a glycerol subphase were performed using COMSOL Multiphysics and compared to spreading of a single surfactant source.

FINDINGS

Interaction of two spreading sources can be split into three regimes: the independent regime - where each source is unaffected by the other, the interaction regime - where the presence of a second source alters one or more features of the spreading dynamics, and the quasi-one disk regime - where the two sources merge together. The translation of the sources, manifested as increasing separation distance between disk centers of mass, is driven by the flow fields within the subphase and the resultant surface deformation, while deformation of the sources occurs only once the surfactant fronts of the two sources meet.

Accessing Thin Film Wetting Regimes during Polymer Growth by Initiated Chemical Vapor Deposition

We investigate the growth of a fluorinated polymer via initiated chemical vapor deposition onto a suite of isotropic and mesogenic liquids with a range of refractive indices. The polymer morphology at fluid interfaces was found to deviate from conformal films predicted by the positive spreading coefficient, and the resulting morphology is attributed to long-range van der Waals interactions during the deposition process. Experiments systematically vary the deposition conditions and compare the liquid phase (isotropic or nematic) to evaluate the effect of kinetic factors and the liquid substrate phase on the interfacial polymer morphology and spatial organization.