Methodological advancements in foodborne pathogen determination: from presence to behavior

Impact of Water Activity on the Inactivation and Gene Expression of Listeria monocytogenes during Refrigerated Storage of Pressurized Dry-Cured Ham

Listeria monocytogenes population and the expression patterns of three virulence (plcA, hly, and iap) and one stress-related (sigB) genes in dry-cured ham with different water activity (aw) values (0.92, 0.88, and 0.84) and treated with high pressure processing (HPP, 450 MPa/10 min and 600 MPa/5 min) were monitored throughout 30 days (d) at 4 °C. The antimicrobial effect of HPP at 600 MPa against L. monocytogenes S4-2 (serotype 1/2b) and S12-1 (serotype 1/2c) was greater in dry-cured ham with aw values of 0.92, with reductions of 2.5 and 2.8 log units, respectively. The efficacy of HPP treatments decreased at lower aw values. Regarding gene expression, L. monocytogenes strains responded differently to HPP. For strain S4-2, the four target genes were generally overexpressed in dry-cured ham immediately after HPP treatments at the three aw values investigated, although the extent of this induction was lower in the samples pressurized at 600 MPa and with aw values of 0.84. For strain S12-1, the expression of all target genes was repressed at the three aw values investigated. The antimicrobial efficacy of HPP against L. monocytogenes could be compromised by low aw values in food products. However, no growth of HPP-survival cells was observed during refrigerated storage in low-aw dry-cured ham, and the overexpression of virulence and stress-related genes decreased.

Antilisterial Effect and Influence on Listeria monocytogenes Gene Expression of Enterocin or Enterococcus faecalis in Sliced Dry-Cured Ham Stored at 7°C

In this study, we focused on the effect of an enterocin or an Enterococcus faecalis strain added onto sliced dry-cured ham that was artificially inoculated with Listeria monocytogenes and stored at 7°C. The population of L. monocytogenes and the expression of five genes were monitored throughout the storage period. A persistent and a nonpersistent strain were tested, and both were influenced by the presence of the enterocin; both populations were reduced by more than 2 Log CFU/g after 14 days compared with the control, noninoculated ham. The presence of E. faecalis, a bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacterium, had a less pronounced effect on the viable counts for both strains. Concerning gene expression, a common trend observed for both strains in the presence of enterocin was the down-regulation of genes tested after 30 min of storage at 7°C. For the remainder of the storage period, the expression fluctuated but was mostly reduced. Similarly, the presence of E. faecalis led to an overall down-regulation of genes. The effect on gene expression of both enterocin and E. faecalis was more pronounced on the nonpersistent L. monocytogenes strain. Although the potential of a bacteriocin and a bacteriocin-producing microorganism to control L. monocytogenes was confirmed, this study highlights that gene expression may be influenced and needs to be evaluated when considering such biopreservation interventions.