Subcortical encoding of summary statistics in humans

Perception of visual variance is mediated by subcortical mechanisms

Variance characterizes the structure of the environment. This statistical concept plays a critical role in evaluating the reliability of evidence for human decision-making. The present study examined the involvement of subcortical structures in the processing of visual variance. To this end, we used a stereoscope to sequentially present two circle arrays in a dichoptic or monocular fashion while participants compared the perceived variance of the two arrays. In Experiment 1, two arrays were presented monocularly to the same eye, dichopticly to different eyes, or binocularly to both eyes. The variance judgment was less accurate in different-eye condition than the other conditions. In Experiment 2, the first circle array was split into a large-variance and a small-variance set, with either the large-variance or small-variance set preceding the presentation of the second circle array in the same eye. The variance of the first array was judged larger when the second array was preceded by the large-variance set in the same eye, showing that the perception of variance was modulated by the visual variance processed in the same eye. Taken together, these findings provide evidence for monocular processing of visual variance, suggesting that subcortical structures capture the statistical structure of the visual world.

Continuous time causal structure induction with prevention and generation

Most research into causal learning has focused on atemporal contingency data settings while fewer studies have examined learning and reasoning about systems exhibiting events that unfold in continuous time. Of these, none have yet explored learning about preventative causal influences. How do people use temporal information to infer which components of a causal system are generating or preventing activity of other components? In what ways do generative and preventative causes interact in shaping the behavior of causal mechanisms and their learnability? We explore human causal structure learning within a space of hypotheses that combine generative and preventative causal relationships. Participants observe the behavior of causal devices as they are perturbed by fixed interventions and subject to either regular or irregular spontaneous activations. We find that participants are capable learners in this setting, successfully identifying the large majority of generative, preventative and non-causal relationships but making certain attribution errors. We lay out a computational-level framework for normative inference in this setting and propose a family of more cognitively plausible algorithmic approximations. We find that participants' judgment patterns can be both qualitatively and quantitatively captured by a model that approximates normative inference via a simulation and summary statistics scheme based on structurally local computation using temporally local evidence.

Nonadditive integration of visual information in ensemble processing

Statistically summarizing information from a stimulus array into an ensemble representation (e.g., the mean) improves the efficiency of visual processing. However, little is known about how the brain computes the ensemble statistics. Here, we propose that ensemble processing is realized by nonadditive integration, rather than linear averaging, of individual items. We used a linear regression model approach to extract EEG responses to three levels of information: the individual items, their local interactions, and their global interaction. The local and global interactions, representing nonadditive integration of individual items, elicited rapid and independent neural responses. Critically, only the neural representation of the global interaction predicted the precision of the ensemble perception at the behavioral level. Furthermore, spreading attention over the global pattern to enhance ensemble processing directly promoted rapid neural representation of the global interaction. Taken together, these findings advocate a global, nonadditive mechanism of ensemble processing in the brain.

Invisible social grouping facilitates the recognition of individual faces

Emerging evidence suggests a specialized mechanism supporting perceptual grouping of social entities. However, the stage at which social grouping is processed is unclear. Through four experiments, here we showed that participants' recognition of a visible face was facilitated by the presence of a second facing (thus forming a social grouping) relative to a nonfacing face, even when the second face was invisible. Using a monocular/dichoptic paradigm, we further found that the social grouping facilitation effect occurred when the two faces were presented dichoptically to different eyes rather than monocularly to the same eye, suggesting that social grouping relies on binocular rather than monocular neural channels. The above effects were not found for inverted face dyads, thereby ruling out the contribution of nonsocial factors. Taken together, these findings support the unconscious influence of social grouping on visual perception and suggest an early origin of social grouping processing in the visual pathway.