Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument for the assessment of nurses’ knowledge on capnography

Improving Capnography Use for Critically Ill Emergency Patients: An Implementation Study

OBJECTIVES

Capnography has established benefit during intubation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Implementation within emergency departments (EDs) has lagged. We sought to address barriers to improve documented capnography use for patients requiring intubation or CPR.

METHODS

A controlled before- and after-implementation study was performed in 2 urban EDs. The control site had an existing policy for capnography use. Interventions for the experimental site included a 5-minute informational video, placement of capnography monitors with a shortened warm-up period in all resuscitation rooms, laminated reminder cards, and feedback during staff meetings. Staff members were surveyed about knowledge before and after the intervention. Records were reviewed for documented capnography use for 3 months before and 6 months after the intervention. Change in documented use at the experimental site was compared with the control site.

RESULTS

At the experimental site, 118 providers participated and 190 records were reviewed; 544 records were reviewed from the control site. There was a significant increase in the proportion of documented capnography use at the experimental site (8% versus 19%, P = 0.04) compared with the control site (64% versus 71%, P = 0.10). However, there was no significant trend over time at the experimental site after the intervention (P = 0.86). Despite high baseline knowledge about capnography, providers had improvements in survey responses regarding indications for intubation and CPR, normal values, and minimum effective values during CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

Documented capnography use increased with simple interventions but with no positive trend. Additional work is needed to improve use, including further evaluation of capnography's implementation in the ED.

A focused ethnography of how endoscopy practitioners utilize capnography in sedated patients

The literature shows that respiratory complications are common with sedation. Given the inherent risk, capnography monitoring is recommended whenever sedation is administered. We aimed to explore sedation practitioners’ behavior patterns and perceptions regarding capnography monitoring during endoscopy sedation and examine how capnography influenced clinical decision making when assessing respiration. We conducted a focused ethnography with triangulated observations and semi-structured interviews, and we purposively sampled and recruited five sedation practitioners as participants at a hospital in Saudi Arabia. Through data analysis, we identified representative themes and found cultural differences between anesthesia practitioners and nurses when using capnography during sedation. Anesthesia practitioners linked safety and the use of capnography to maintain adequate respiration, while nurses believed capnography was a secondary supportive monitor to patient observation and assessment. Findings also captured the unique cultures and values of each professional group to be associated with the varying perceptions. We also identified several factors facilitating and barring adequate utilization of capnography. In conclusion, professional culture, hospital policy, knowledge and previous experience with capnography guided the monitoring practice of endoscopy practitioners when assessing respiration during sedation.