1
|
González-Chordá VM, Aleixos DL, Reverter IL, Cervera-Gash À, Machancoses FH, Moreno-Casbas MT, Arasil PF, Chillerón MJV. Diagnostic accuracy study of the VALENF instrument in hospitalization units for adults: a study protocol. BMC Nurs 2023; 22:401. [PMID: 37891575 PMCID: PMC10604410 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01567-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, the VALENF instrument, Nursing Assessment by its acronym in Spanish, was developed as a meta-tool composed of only seven items with a more parsimonious approach for nursing assessment in adult hospitalization units. This meta-tool integrates the assessment of functional capacity, the risk of pressure injuries and the risk of falls. The general objective of this project is to validate the VALENF instrument by studying its diagnostic accuracy against the instruments commonly used in nursing to assess functional capacity, the risk of pressure injuries and the risk of falls. An observational, longitudinal, prospective study is presented, with recruitment and random selection based on admissions to six adult hospitalization units of the Hospital Universitario de La Plana. The study population will be made up of patients hospitalized in these units. The inclusion criteria will be patients over 18 years of age with a nursing assessment within the first 24 h of admission and an expected length of stay greater than 48 h and who sign the informed consent form. The exclusion criteria will be transfers from other units or centers. A sample of 521 participants is estimated as necessary. The evaluation test will be the VALENF instrument, and the reference tests will be the Barthel, Braden and Downton indices. Sociodemographic variables related to the care process and results such as functional loss, falls or pressure injuries will be collected. The evolution of functional capacity, the risk of falls and the risk of pressure injuries will be analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values of the VALENF instrument will be calculated and compared to those of the usual instruments. A survival analysis will be performed for pressure injuries, falls and patients with functional loss. The VALENF instrument is expected to have at least the same diagnostic validity as the original instruments.Trial registration The study will be retrospectively registered (ISRCTN 17699562, 25/07/2023).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor M González-Chordá
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF-241), Ministerio de Ciencia E Innovación, Universitat Jaume I, Investén-ISCIII, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Castellón de La Plana, Spain
| | - David Luna Aleixos
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF-241), Unidad de Hospitalización De Traumatología y Corta Estancia, Hospital Universitario de La Plana, Universitat Jaume I, EnfermeroCastellón de La Plana, Spain
| | - Irene Llagostera Reverter
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF-241, Universitat Jaume I, Avda Sos Baynat Sn. 12071, Castellón de La Plana, Spain.
| | - Àgueda Cervera-Gash
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF-241, Universitat Jaume I, Avda Sos Baynat Sn. 12071, Castellón de La Plana, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jedwab RM, Manias E, Redley B, Dobroff N, Hutchinson AM. Impacts of technology implementation on nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction and well-being: A realist review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:6037-6060. [PMID: 37082879 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
AIM To examine current literature for causal explanations on how, why and under what circumstances, implementation of a new hospital electronic medical record system or similar technology impacts nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction or well-being. BACKGROUND Implementation of new technology, such as electronic medical record systems, affects nurses and their work, workflows and inter-personal interactions in healthcare settings. Multiple individual and organisational-level factors can affect technology adoption by nurses and may have negative consequences for nurses and patient safety. DESIGN Five-step realist review method and Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards checklist was used to guide this review. Eight initial theories (programme theories) were used as the basis to explore, examine and refine literature from a range of sources. DATA SOURCES Literature from five databases (APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, Embase, IEEE Xplore and MEDLINE Complete) and grey literature (from 1 January 2000 to 31 October 2021) were systematically searched and retrieved on 4 November 2021. RESULTS In all, 8980 records were screened at the title and abstract level, of which 1027 full texts were screened and 10 were included in the review. Seven studies assessed concepts in both pre- and post-technology implementation. Most common contexts related to knowledge, rationale and skills to use new technology. Mechanisms that impacted nurses or nursing care delivery included: nurses' involvement in technology implementation processes; nurses' perceptions, understanding and limitations of technology impact(s) on patient care delivery; social supports; skills; implementation attitude and hardware. Work satisfaction was the most frequently examined outcome. An analysis led to nine final programme theories (including two original, six revised and one new programme theory). CONCLUSION Nurses must be informed about the rationale for new technology and have the knowledge and skills for its use. Understanding nurses' work motivation and attitudes related to technology adoption in the workplace can support work engagement, satisfaction and well-being. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION Complex contexts and mechanisms play a role in nurses' work motivation, engagement, satisfaction and well-being with the implementation of new technology into healthcare settings. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Nurses, their work and workflows are all influenced by the implementation of new technologies (such as electronic medical records), which in turn has consequences for patient safety and quality of care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public contribution. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020131875 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=131875).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca M Jedwab
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Health Nursing and Midwifery Informatics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Manias
- Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bernice Redley
- Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Naomi Dobroff
- Monash Health Nursing and Midwifery Informatics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alison M Hutchinson
- Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University School of Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Forde-Johnston C, Butcher D, Aveyard H. An integrative review exploring the impact of Electronic Health Records (EHR) on the quality of nurse-patient interactions and communication. J Adv Nurs 2023; 79:48-67. [PMID: 36345050 PMCID: PMC10100205 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM To explore how nurses' use of electronic health records impacts on the quality of nurse-patient interactions and communication. DESIGN An integrative review. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE®, CINAHL®, PscyINFO, PubMed, BNI and Cochrane Library databases were searched for papers published between January 2005 and April 2022. REVIEW METHODS Following a comprehensive search, the studies were appraised using a tool appropriate to the study design. Data were extracted from the studies that met the inclusion criteria relating to sample characteristics, methods and the strength of evidence. Included empirical studies had to examine interactions or communication between a nurse and patient while electronic health records were being used in any healthcare setting. Findings were synthesized using a thematic approach. RESULTS One thousand nine hundred and twenty articles were initially identified but only eight met the inclusion criteria of this review. Thematic analysis revealed four key themes, indicating that EHR: impedes on face-to-face communication, promotes task-orientated and formulaic communication and impacts on types of communication patterns. CONCLUSION Research examining nurse-patient interactions and communication when nurses' use electronic health records is limited but evidence suggests that closed nurse-patient communications, reflecting a task-driven approach, were predominantly used when nurses used electronic health records, although some nurses were able to overcome logistical barriers and communicate more openly. Nurses' use of electronic health records impacts on the flow, nature and quality of communication between a nurse and patient. IMPACT The move to electronic health records has taken place largely without consideration of the impact that this might have on nurse-patient interaction and communication. There is evidence of impact but also evidence of how this might be mitigated. Nurses must focus future research on examining the impact that these systems have, and to develop strategies and practice that continue to promote the importance of nurse-patient interactions and communication. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Studies examined within this review included patient participants that informed the analysis and interpretation of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol Forde-Johnston
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.,Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Dan Butcher
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Helen Aveyard
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luna-Aleixos D, Llagostera-Reverter I, Castelló-Benavent X, Aquilué-Ballarín M, Mecho-Montoliu G, Cervera-Gasch Á, Valero-Chillerón MJ, Mena-Tudela D, Andreu-Pejó L, Martínez-Gonzálbez R, González-Chordá VM. Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part I). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14622. [PMID: 36429341 PMCID: PMC9690557 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Nursing assessment is the basis for performing interventions that match patient needs, but nurses perceive it as an administrative load. This research aims to develop and validate a meta-instrument that integrates the assessment of functional capacity, risk of pressure ulcers and risk of falling with a more parsimonious approach to nursing assessment in adult hospitalization units. Specifically, this manuscript presents the results of the development of this meta-instrument (VALENF instrument). A cross-sectional study based on recorded data was carried out in a sample of 1352 nursing assessments. Socio-demographic variables and assessments of Barthel, Braden and Downton indices at the time of admission were included. The meta-instrument's development process includes: (i) nominal group; (ii) correlation analysis; (iii) multiple linear regressions models; (iv) reliability analysis. A seven-item solution showed a high predictive capacity with Barthel (R2adj = 0.938), Braden (R2adj = 0.926) and Downton (R2adj = 0.921) indices. Likewise, reliability was significant (p < 0.001) for Barthel (ICC = 0.969; τ-b = 0.850), Braden (ICC = 0.943; τ-b = 0.842) and Downton (ICC = 0.905; κ = 7.17) indices. VALENF instrument has an adequate predictive capacity and reliability to assess the level of functional capacity, risk of pressure injuries and risk of falls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Luna-Aleixos
- Hospital Universitario de La Plana, Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | - Irene Llagostera-Reverter
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | | | - Marta Aquilué-Ballarín
- Hospital Comarcal Universitario de Vinarós, Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | | | - Águeda Cervera-Gasch
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | - María Jesús Valero-Chillerón
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | - Desirée Mena-Tudela
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | - Laura Andreu-Pejó
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
| | | | - Víctor M. González-Chordá
- Nursing Research Group (GIENF Code 241), Nursing Department, Universitat Jaume I, 12006 Castelló de la Plana, Spain
- Nursing and Healthcare Research Unit (INVESTÉN-ISCIII), Institute of Health Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ebnehoseini Z, Tabesh H, Deghatipour A, Tara M. Development an extended-information success system model (ISSM) based on nurses' point of view for hospital EHRs: a combined framework and questionnaire. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:71. [PMID: 35317784 PMCID: PMC8939199 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-01800-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding the hospital EHR success rate has great benefits for hospitals. The present study aimed to 1-Propose an extended-ISSM framework and a questionnaire in a systematic manner for EHR evaluation based on nurses’ perspectives, 2-Determine the EHR success rate, and 3-Explore the effective factors contributing to EHR success. Methods The proposed framework was developed using ISSM, TAM3, TTF, HOT-FIT, and literature review in seven steps. A self-administrated structured 65-items questionnaire was developed with CVI: 90.27% and CVR: 94.34%. Construct validity was conducted using EFA and CFA. Eleven factors were identified, collectively accounting for 71.4% of the total variance. In the EFA step, 15 questions and two questions in EFA were excluded. Finally, 48 items remained in the framework including dimensions of technology, human, organization, ease of use, usefulness, and net benefits. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value was 93.4%. In addition, the hospital EHR success rate was determined and categorized. In addition, effective factors on EHR success were explored. Results In total, 86 nurses participated in the study. On average, the “total hospital EHR success rate” was moderate. The total EHR success rates was ranging from 47.09 to 74.96%. The results of the Kruskal–Wallis test showed that there was a significant relationship between “gender” and “self-efficacy” (p-value: 0.042). A reverse relation between “years of experience using computers” and “training” (p-value: 0.012) was observed. “Years of experience using EHR” as well as “education level” (p-value: 0.001) and “ease of use” had a reverse relationship (p-value: 0.034). Conclusions Our findings underscore the EHR success based on nurses’ viewpoint in a developing country. Our results provide an instrument for comparison of EHR success rates in various hospitals. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-022-01800-1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Ebnehoseini
- Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hamed Tabesh
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Amir Deghatipour
- Ibn-Sina Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Mahmood Tara
- Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arikan F, Kara H, Erdogan E, Ulker F. Barriers to Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems from the Perspective of Nurses: A Cross-sectional Study. Comput Inform Nurs 2021; 40:236-243. [PMID: 34812779 DOI: 10.1097/cin.0000000000000848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
This study report aimed to investigate the barriers to implementation of electronic health record systems from the perspective of nurses. The research data comprised responses from nurses working in a university hospital. Our data collection instruments were the Participant Information Form and EHR Nurse Opinion Questionnaire, which were developed by the researchers. Data analysis was presented as summary statistics, including mean values of variables, standard deviation, frequency, and percentages. A total of 160 nurses participated in the study. The mean age of participants was 30.94 ± 0.59 years, and 77.5% were university graduates. Barriers to adoption of the electronic health record system included high number of patients (82.8%), limited time (79%), lack of knowledge and skills for effective use of the system (22.9%), lack of user-friendly interface and inability to create a common language within the team (17.8%), and attachment to the traditional method (17.2%). Although most nurses thought that the electronic health record system offered some advantages, they reported that factors such as large numbers of patients, limited time, and lack of user-friendly interface hindered its adoption. Innovative strategies should be explored to develop user-friendly designs for electronic health records and to produce solutions for nursing shortages to increase the time allocated for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Arikan
- Author Affiliations: Faculty of Nursing (Dr Arikan) and Akdeniz University Hospital (Ms Kara, Ms Erdogan, Ms Ulker), Akdeniz University, Antalya/Turkey
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pinevich Y, Clark KJ, Harrison AM, Pickering BW, Herasevich V. Interaction Time with Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12:788-799. [PMID: 34433218 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1733909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The amount of time that health care clinicians (physicians and nurses) spend interacting with the electronic health record is not well understood. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the time that health care providers spend interacting with electronic health records (EHR). METHODS Data are retrieved from Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, (Ovid) Embase, CINAHL, and SCOPUS. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Peer-reviewed studies that describe the use of EHR and include measurement of time either in hours, minutes, or in the percentage of a clinician's workday. Papers were written in English and published between 1990 and 2021. PARTICIPANTS All physicians and nurses involved in inpatient and outpatient settings. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS A narrative synthesis of the results, providing summaries of interaction time with EHR. The studies were rated according to Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. RESULTS Out of 5,133 de-duplicated references identified through database searching, 18 met inclusion criteria. Most were time-motion studies (50%) that followed by logged-based analysis (44%). Most were conducted in the United States (94%) and examined a clinician workflow in the inpatient settings (83%). The average time was nearly 37% of time of their workday by physicians in both inpatient and outpatient settings and 22% of the workday by nurses in inpatient settings. The studies showed methodological heterogeneity. CONCLUSION This systematic review evaluates the time that health care providers spend interacting with EHR. Interaction time with EHR varies depending on clinicians' roles and clinical settings, computer systems, and users' experience. The average time spent by physicians on EHR exceeded one-third of their workday. The finding is a possible indicator that the EHR has room for usability, functionality improvement, and workflow optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuliya Pinevich
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Kathryn J Clark
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Andrew M Harrison
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Brian W Pickering
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Vitaly Herasevich
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dunn Lopez K, Chin CL, Leitão Azevedo RF, Kaushik V, Roy B, Schuh W, Banks K, Sousa V, Morrow D. Electronic health record usability and workload changes over time for provider and nursing staff following transition to new EHR. APPLIED ERGONOMICS 2021; 93:103359. [PMID: 33556884 DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
The ubiquity of EHRs in healthcare means that small EHR inefficiencies can have a major impact on clinician workload. We conducted a sequential explanatory mixed methods study to: 1) identify EHR-associated workload and usability effects for clinicians following an EHR change over time, 2) determine workload and usability differences for providers (MD and Advance Practice Nurses) versus nurses (RNs and MAs), 3) determine if usability predicts workload, 4) identify potential sources of EHR design flaws. Workload (NASA-Task Load Index) and usability (System Usability Scale) measures were administered pre, 6-8 month and 30-32 months post-implementation. We found significant increase in perceived workload post-implementation that persisted for 2.5 years (p < .001). The workload increase was associated with usability ratings, which in turn may relate to EHR interface design violations identified by a heuristic evaluation. Our findings suggest further innovation and attention to interface design flaws are needed to improve EHR usability and reduce clinician workload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chieh-Li Chin
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, School of Information Sciences, United States
| | - Renato Ferreira Leitão Azevedo
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Education, United States; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Beckman Institute, United States
| | - Varsha Kaushik
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Beckman Institute, United States
| | - Bidisha Roy
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Beckman Institute, United States
| | | | | | - Vanessa Sousa
- Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira (Unilab), Redenção, Brazil
| | - Daniel Morrow
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Education, United States; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Beckman Institute, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, Wright G, Flowerday S, Koch S. Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content. Life (Basel) 2020; 10:E327. [PMID: 33291615 PMCID: PMC7761950 DOI: 10.3390/life10120327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the great advances in the field of electronic health records (EHRs) over the past 25 years, implementation and adoption challenges persist, and the benefits realized remain below expectations. This scoping review aimed to present current knowledge about the effects of EHR implementation and the barriers to EHR adoption and use. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore Digital Library and ACM Digital Library for studies published between January 2005 and May 2020. In total, 7641 studies were identified of which 142 met the criteria and attained the consensus of all researchers on inclusion. Most studies (n = 91) were published between 2017 and 2019 and 81 studies had the United States as the country of origin. Both positive and negative effects of EHR implementation were identified, relating to clinical work, data and information, patient care and economic impact. Resource constraints, poor/insufficient training and technical/educational support for users, as well as poor literacy and skills in technology were the identified barriers to adoption and use that occurred frequently. Although this review did not conduct a quality analysis of the included papers, the lack of uniformity in the use of EHR definitions and detailed contextual information concerning the study settings could be observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Hsi Tsai
- Health Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.H.T.); (A.E.); (N.D.)
| | - Aboozar Eghdam
- Health Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.H.T.); (A.E.); (N.D.)
| | - Nadia Davoody
- Health Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.H.T.); (A.E.); (N.D.)
| | - Graham Wright
- Department of Information Systems, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa; (G.W.); (S.F.)
| | - Stephen Flowerday
- Department of Information Systems, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa; (G.W.); (S.F.)
| | - Sabine Koch
- Health Informatics Centre, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; (C.H.T.); (A.E.); (N.D.)
| |
Collapse
|