1
|
Bowness B, Henderson C, Akhter Khan SC, Akiba M, Lawrence V. Participatory research with carers: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Health Expect 2024; 27:e13940. [PMID: 39102730 PMCID: PMC10734554 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly common, research-based recommendations on its principles and impacts have been established. The specifics of conducting PPI are likely to differ when involving different groups. Family/informal carers for those with health conditions or disabilities have a lot to contribute to research, but instances of their involvement have yet to be reviewed. OBJECTIVE To systematically review and synthesize studies where family/informal carers have been involved in the research process, to develop an understanding of the benefits, barriers and facilitating factors. METHODS A search of five electronic databases was conducted using a combination of terms relating to carers, involvement and research. A grey literature search, expert consultation and hand-searching were also used. Following screening, data extraction and quality assessment, a narrative synthesis incorporating thematic analysis was conducted. FINDINGS A total of 55 studies met the inclusion criteria, with diverse design and participatory approaches. Four themes were identified, relating to the outcomes, challenges, and practicalities of involving carers: (re) building relationships with carers; carers as equals not afterthoughts; carers have unique experiences; carers create change. Full involvement throughout the research was not always possible, due to barriers from the research world and responsibilities of the caring role. The literature demonstrated ways for carers to contribute in ways that suited them, maximizing their impact, while attending to relationships and power imbalances. CONCLUSION By summarizing the reported instances of carer involvement in research, this review brings together different examples of how successful research partnerships can be built with carers, despite various challenges. Carers are a heterogeneous group, and participatory approaches should be tailored to specific situations. Wider understanding of the challenges of conducting empowering research with carers, and the resources required to address these, are needed. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The initial findings and themes were presented to a group of carers who had been involved in research and whose reflections informed the final synthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryher Bowness
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | - Claire Henderson
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | | | - Mia Akiba
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- King's College London, Institute of PsychiatryPsychology and NeuroscienceLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gilfoyle M, Melro C, Koskinas E, Salsberg J. Recruitment of patients, carers and members of the public to advisory boards, groups and panels in public and patient involved health research: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072918. [PMID: 37832980 PMCID: PMC10582988 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objectives of this scoping review are to: (1) identify the distribution of and context of the recruitment strategies used, (2) explore the facilitators, benefits, barriers and ethical issues of the identified recruitment strategies, (3) distinguish the varying terminology for involvement (ie, panels, boards, individual) and (4) determine if the individual recruitment strategies used were to address issues of representation or bias. DESIGN A scoping review. SETTING This scoping review follows the framework by Peters et al. Seven electronic databases were explored including Scopus, Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO (conducted July 2021). The search strategy was codeveloped among the research team, PPI research experts and a faculty librarian. Two independent reviewers screened articles by title and abstract and then at full text based on predetermined criteria. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Explore recruitment strategies used, facilitators, benefits, barriers and ethical issues of the identified recruitment strategies. Identify terminology for involvement. Explore recruitment strategies used to address issues of representation or bias. RESULTS The final sample was from 51 sources. A large portion of the extracted empirical literature had a clinical focus (37%, n=13) but was not a randomised control trial. The most common recruitment strategies used were human networks (78%, n=40), such as word of mouth, foundation affiliation, existing networks, clinics or personal contacts. Within the reviewed literature, there was a lack of discussion pertaining to facilitators, benefits, barriers and ethical considerations of recruitment strategies was apparent. Finally, 41% (n=21) of studies employed or proposed recruitment strategies or considerations to address issues of representation or bias. CONCLUSION We conclude with four key recommendations that researchers can use to better understand appropriate routes to meaningfully involve patients, carers and members of the public to cocreate the evidence informing their care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Gilfoyle
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Elena Koskinas
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Jon Salsberg
- School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller EM, Porter JE, Barbagallo MS. Patient and family members' experiences with language and environment when receiving bad news: A qualitative exploratory study. Palliat Support Care 2023:1-7. [PMID: 36718557 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951522001845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Receiving bad news about one's health can be devastating, yet little is known about how the therapeutic nature of the environment where bad news is delivered affects the experience. The current study aimed to explore how patients and their families were affected by the language and the built, natural, social, and symbolic environments when receiving bad news, through the Therapeutic Landscapes theoretical framework. METHODS Patients diagnosed with a life-limiting illness living in regional Victoria who had a hospital admission within 24 months and a diagnostic/prognostic conversation were invited to participate, as well as a family member who witnessed the conversation. Participants were recruited through social media and snowballing, resulting in 14 online semi-structured interviews being conducted between November 2021 and March 2022, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to develop the themes. RESULTS Fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with women aged between 30 and 77 years. Interviews lasted between 45 and 120 minutes, with an average of 69 minutes, and were conducted online or via mobile phone. Four central themes were developed: "Hearing bad news for the first time," "Preferences for having hard conversations," "Creating a sense of safety for ongoing care," and "The therapeutic nature of the ward." SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS This body of work will help inform practice and future policy regarding bad news delivery and the design and aesthetics of environments where bad news is delivered. It is essential that bad news is delivered within a quiet, calm, and emotionally safe environment within a supportive therapeutic relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth M Miller
- Collaborative Evaluation & Research Group (CERG), Federation University Australia, Churchill, VIC, Australia
| | - Joanne E Porter
- Collaborative Evaluation & Research Group (CERG), Federation University Australia, Churchill, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael S Barbagallo
- Collaborative Evaluation & Research Group (CERG), Federation University Australia, Churchill, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Low C, Namasivayam P, Barnett T. Co-designing Community Out-of-hours Palliative Care Services: A systematic literature search and review. Palliat Med 2023; 37:40-60. [PMID: 36349547 PMCID: PMC9843546 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221132089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to provide responsive, individualised and personalised care, there is now greater engagement with patients, families and carers in designing health services. Out-of-hours care is an essential component of community palliative care. However, little is known about how patients, families and carers have been involved in the planning and design of these services. AIM To systematically search and review the research literature that reports on how out-of-hours palliative care services are provided in the community and to identify the extent to which the principles of co-design have been used to inform the planning and design of these services. DESIGN Systematic literature search and review. DATA SOURCES A systematic search for published research papers from seven databases was conducted in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Emcare, PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science, from January 2010 and December 2021. Reference list searches of included papers were undertaken to source additional relevant literature. A manifest content analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS A total of 77 papers were included. The majority of out-of-hours services in the community were provided by primary care services. The review found little evidence that patients, families or carers were involved in the planning or development of out-of-hours services. CONCLUSION Incorporating patients, families and carers priorities and preferences in the planning and designing of out-of-hours palliative care service is needed for service providers to deliver care that is more patient-centred. Adopting the principles of co-design may improve how out-of-hours care scan be delivered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Low
- Centre for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| | | | - Tony Barnett
- Centre for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Virdun C, Luckett T, Lorenz K, Davidson P, Phillips J. Preferences of patients with palliative care needs and their families for engagement with service improvement work within the hospital setting: A qualitative study. Palliat Med 2022; 36:1129-1139. [PMID: 35634933 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221100108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is growing recognition of the importance of involving patients and families with lived experiences of illness in healthcare service quality improvement, research and implementation initiatives. Ensuring input from people with palliative care needs is important, but how to enable this is not well understood. AIM To seek the perspectives of Australian patients with palliative care needs, and their family members, to elicit their views on how to best contribute to inpatient palliative care quality improvement initiatives. DESIGN An exploratory qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Eligible participants were adult patients with palliative care needs receiving care within a hospital setting, and their family members. Recruitment occurred through: five hospitals in New South Wales, Australia; and snowballing. RESULTS Fifty participants took part (21 patients and 29 family members). Results confirmed four themes: (1) Mechanisms for providing feedback about care quality need to be supportive and individualised; (2) The clinician-patient/family power imbalance makes real time feedback challenging to provide; (3) Willingness to contribute varies according to diagnosis, timing and role and (4) Face to face feedback is preferred for health service improvement work. CONCLUSIONS Enabling meaningful consumer input to quality improvement requires careful consideration due to the unique requirements of the palliative care population. Embedding tailored outcome and experience measures to inform real-time care provision coupled with focussed opportunities for input into service improvement may best foster improvements in inpatient palliative care, founded in what matters most for people requiring this care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Virdun
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.,Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Karl Lorenz
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Patricia Davidson
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW, Australia.,University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Phillips
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia.,Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Milley K, Chima S, McIntosh JG, Ackland E, Emery JD. Long-term consumer involvement in cancer research: Working towards partnership. Health Expect 2021; 24:1263-1269. [PMID: 33949071 PMCID: PMC8369080 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Meaningful consumer involvement in health research is important. There are limited data on how to maintain long‐term consumer involvement. Objective To identify barriers and facilitators to meaningful long‐term consumer involvement in research. Design Six semi‐structured interviews were conducted with members of the Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4) Community Advisory Group (CAG) and included the review of 40 supporting documents. Interviews and documents were analysed using inductive thematic analysis; the themes were mapped onto the domains of Cancer Australia's National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Results Equality, respect and feeling valued were facilitators to long‐term involvement. These elements were part of an overarching theme of organizational commitment. Creating balance, managing competing deadlines and integrating a consumer role with a personal life were key barriers to involvement. These themes mapped strongly to the National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control domains of committed organizations, capable consumers, inclusive groups and shared focus. Conclusion Research networks should reflect on several factors to maintain long‐term consumer involvement. Networks should aim to build a meaningful relationship, using clear communication and education, that reinforces the value and scope of a consumers contributions. We found that consumer education needs do not diminish over time and adequate skill development, support and feedback need to be on‐going. Creating regular opportunities for feedback and reflection are important to continue to meet best practice guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristi Milley
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Sophie Chima
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jennifer G McIntosh
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Elle Ackland
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Community Advisory Group, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Jon D Emery
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group, Centre for Cancer Research, University of Melbourne, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Virdun C, Luckett T, Lorenz K, Davidson PM, Phillips J. Hospital patients' perspectives on what is essential to enable optimal palliative care: A qualitative study. Palliat Med 2020; 34:1402-1415. [PMID: 32857012 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320947570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of expected deaths in high income countries occur in hospital where optimal palliative care cannot be assured. In addition, a large number of patients with palliative care needs receive inpatient care in their last year of life. International research has identified domains of inpatient care that patients and carers perceive to be important, but concrete examples of how these might be operationalised are scarce, and few studies conducted in the southern hemisphere. AIM To seek the perspectives of Australian patients living with palliative care needs about their recent hospitalisation experiences to determine the relevance of domains noted internationally to be important for optimal inpatient palliative care and how these can be operationalised. DESIGN An exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Participants were recruited through five hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. RESULTS Twenty-one participants took part. Results confirmed and added depth of understanding to domains previously identified as important for optimal hospital palliative care, including: Effective communication and shared decision making; Expert care; Adequate environment for care; Family involvement in care provision; Financial affairs; Maintenance of sense of self/identity; Minimising burden; Respectful and compassionate care; Trust and confidence in clinicians and Maintenance of patient safety. Two additional domains were noted to be important: Nutritional needs; and Access to medical and nursing specialists. CONCLUSIONS Taking a person-centred focus has provided a deeper understanding of how to strengthen inpatient palliative care practices. Future work is needed to translate the body of evidence on patient priorities into policy reforms and practice points.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Virdun
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia
| | - Karl Lorenz
- VA Palo Alto-Stanford Palliative Care Program and Professor of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Patricia M Davidson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Nursing and Member of IMPACCT, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.,Cardiovascular Research, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Phillips
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|