Electrophoretic motion of a liquid droplet and a bubble normal to an air–water interface

Mechanistic studies of droplet electrophoresis: A review

Electrophoresis (EP) of droplets is an intriguing phenomenon that has applications in biological systems, separation strategies, and reactor engineering. Droplet EP is significantly different from the classic particle EP because of droplet characteristics such as a mobile surface charge and the nonrigidity of the interface. Also, the liquid-liquid system, where there is an interplay between the hydrodynamic and electrokinetic forces in both phases, adds to the complexity of electrophoretic motion. Due to the vast amount of potential applications of droplet EP, a mechanistic understanding of the droplet motion in the presence of an external electric field is crucial. This review provides a background on the mechanism of droplet EP and summarizes the intrinsic interplay between the different relevant forces in these systems. The review also describes the key differences between droplet EP and particle EP, and the impact of these differences on droplet mobility. Additionally, we schematically summarize the effects of key parameters on droplet EP mobility, such as electric double layer polarization, the development of internal flow inside a droplet and boundary effects.

Effect of Deformation on Droplet Contact Charge Electrophoresis

The effect of deformation on the droplet contact charge electrophoresis (CCEP) was investigated for consistent droplet movement control. Through systematic experiments and numerical simulations, it has been found that overcharging by deformation is up to about 130% of the sphere and is mainly driven by the concentration of the electric field near the tip of the droplet rather than an increase in the surface area. Dimensional analysis revealed a consistent droplet CCEP motion with the electric capillary number range of 0.01-0.09. We also found that the dimensionless droplet charge follows a universal curve proportional to the electric capillary number, regardless of the droplet size, and the weak dependence on the droplet size shown in the experimental results is due to hydrodynamic effects, not electrostatic ones. Changes in droplet velocity distribution with droplet size and the electric capillary number were also investigated. Using the perfect conductor theory and Stokes law, we derived an analytical relationship between the droplet center velocity and the electric capillary number and analyzed the experimental results based on this relationship. This study implies that if proper hydrodynamic correction is applied, the droplet CCEP and its deformation effect can be explained by a perfect conductor theory.

Wall Effects on Hydrodynamic Drag and the Corresponding Accuracy of Charge Measurement in Droplet Contact Charge Electrophoresis

Droplet size dependent wall effects on hydrodynamic drag and the corresponding droplet contact charge estimations were experimentally and theoretically investigated. The consistent reduction in the dimensionless droplet contact charges proportional to droplet size was reported and explained by the parallel and approaching wall effects on the drag coefficient. Extrapolation of the size dependent droplet charge data showed that the droplet charge follows the perfect conductor theory when the droplet radius approaches zero. The proposed model was applied to the drag calculation to estimate and compare dimensionless charges before and after consideration of the wall effects. The droplet free fall test concluded that the droplets in the current experimental setup follow Stokes' law. The theoretical velocity profile of the droplet approaching the wall perpendicularly is proposed considering the approaching wall effect on hydrodynamic drag and verified by comparison with the experiment. The droplet size dependent velocity profile shape change was also explained by this approaching wall effect. The shape of the asymmetric velocity profile along the direction of droplet movement was explained by the effect of the image charge through direct numerical calculation of the electric force. The direct calculation of the electric force also showed that the electric correction at the center of the cuvette is negligible; thus, it is sufficient to consider only hydrodynamic correction for accurate charge measurement in this experimental system. The present study will contribute to the accurate measurement of the droplet charges under contact charge electrophoresis. It also provides the basis for precise control of droplet movement in lab-on-a-chip devices.

Electrostatic Origins of the Positive and Negative Charging Difference in the Contact Charge Electrophoresis of a Water Droplet

The positive and negative charging difference in the contact charge electrophoresis of a water droplet suspended in oil was investigated to find out the origin of this charging difference. Through numerous experiments and numerical analysis, the charging difference has been found to be mainly originated from electrostatic sources. Two electrostatic sources were found in the present experimental setup, and by excluding those two sources the charging difference was successfully diminished. The present findings well explain previous experimental results and also provide design guidelines for consistent droplet movement control in contact charge electrophoresis-based digital microfluidic systems. Finally, further discussions on the obtained results, its implications, and future work are discussed.