Revisiting the relationship between compositional sequence complexity and periodicity

Uncovering patterns of the evolution of genomic sequence entropy and complexity

The lack of consensus concerning the biological meaning of entropy and complexity of genomes and the different ways to assess these data hamper conclusions concerning what are the causes of genomic entropy variation among species. This study aims to evaluate the entropy and complexity of genomic sequences of several species without using homologies to assess relationships among these variables and non-molecular data (e.g., the number of individuals) to seek a trigger of interspecific genomic entropy variation. The results indicate a relationship among genomic entropy, genome size, genomic complexity, and the number of individuals: species with a small number of individuals harbors large genome, and hence, low entropy but a higher complexity. We defined that the complexity of a genome relies on the entropy of each DNA segment within genome. Then, the entropy and complexity of a genome reflects its organization solely. Exons of vertebrates harbor smaller entropies than non-exon regions (likely by the repeats that accumulated from duplications), whereas other taxonomic groups do not present this pattern. Our findings suggest that small initial population might have defined current genomic entropy and complexity: actual genomes are less complex than ancestral ones. Besides, our data disagree with the relationship between phenotype and genomic entropies previously established. Finally, by establishing the relationship between genomic entropy/complexity with the number of individuals and genome size, under an evolutive perspective, ideas concerning the genomic variability may emerge.

Sequence-dependent histone variant positioning signatures

Background

Nucleosome, the fundamental unit of chromatin, is formed by wrapping nearly 147bp of DNA around an octamer of histone proteins. This histone core has many variants that are different from each other by their biochemical compositions as well as biological functions. Although the deposition of histone variants onto chromatin has been implicated in many important biological processes, such as transcription and replication, the mechanisms of how they are deposited on target sites are still obscure.

Results

By analyzing genomic sequences of nucleosomes bearing different histone variants from human, including H2A.Z, H3.3 and both (H3.3/H2A.Z, so-called double variant histones), we found that genomic sequence contributes in part to determining target sites for different histone variants. Moreover, dinucleotides CA/TG are remarkably important in distinguishing target sites of H2A.Z-only nucleosomes with those of H3.3-containing (both H3.3-only and double variant) nucleosomes.

Conclusions

There exists a DNA-related mechanism regulating the deposition of different histone variants onto chromatin and biological outcomes thereof. This provides additional insights into epigenetic regulatory mechanisms of many important cellular processes.

Upstream curved sequences in E. coli are related to the regulation of transcription initiation

The advancement in Escherichia coli genome research has made the information regarding transcription start sites of many genes available. A study relying on the availability of transcription start locations was performed. The first question addressed was what an average DNA curvature profile upstream of genes would look like when these genes are aligned by transcription start sites in comparison to alignment by translation start sites. Since it was hypothesized that curvature plays a role in transcription regulation, the expectation was that curvature measurements relative to transcription starts, rather than translation, should strengthen the signal. Our study justified this expectation. The second question aimed to clarify the relation between DNA curvature and promoter strength. Through clustering based on DNA curvature profiles along promoter regions, a strong positive correlation between the promoter strength and the curved DNA was found. The third question dealt with dinucleotide periodicity in E. coli to see whether a periodicity pattern specific to promoter regions exists. Such unknown pattern might shed new light on transcription regulation mechanisms in E. coli. A sequence periodicity of about 11 bp is characteristic to the whole E. coli genome, and is especially well-expressed in intergenic regions. Here it was shown that regions of the size of about 100-150 bp centered 70-100 bp upstream to transcription starts carry hidden periodicity with a period of about 10.3 bp.