A novel approach for quantification of time–intensity curves in a DCE-MRI image series with an application to prostate cancer

Quantitative and Qualitative Parameters of DCE-MRI Predict CDKN2A/B Homozygous Deletion in Gliomas

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Homozygous deletion (HD) of CDKN2A/B holds important prognostic value in gliomas. This study aimed to explore the predictive potential of conventional MRI characteristics combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameters in predicting CDKN2A/B HD status in gliomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative MRI data of 105 patients (69 without CDKN2A/B HD, and 36 with CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion) with gliomas were retrospectively collected. Conventional MRI features and dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI qualitative parameter time-intensity curve type, quantitative parameters Ktrans, Kep, Ve, Vp, and iAUC were obtained. Logistic regression models for prediction of CDKN2A/B HD status were constructed in all types of gliomas and both subtypes of IDH-mutant and IDH-wild gliomas.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis for all patients demonstrated that age (OR=1.103, p = 0.002) and Ktrans (OR=1.051, p < 0.001) independently predicted CDKN2A/B HD. In IDH-mutant subgroup, multivariate analysis results indicated that Ktrans (OR=1.098, p = 0.031) emerged as autonomous predictors of CDKN2A/B HD. In IDH-wild subgroup, age (OR=1.111, p = 0.002) and Ktrans (OR=1.032, p = 0.001) were independent predictors of CDKN2A/B HD according to the multivariate analysis. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the corresponding models were 0.90, 0.95 and 0.84, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Ktrans can serve as valuable predictive parameters for identifying CDKN2A/B HD status in all types of gliomas and both subtypes of IDH-mutant and IDH-wild gliomas. These findings provide a foundation for precise preoperative non-invasive diagnosis and personalized treatment approaches for glioma patients.

Research related to the diagnosis of prostate cancer based on machine learning medical images: A review

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is currently the second most prevalent cancer among men. Accurate diagnosis of prostate cancer can provide effective treatment for patients and greatly reduce mortality. The current medical imaging tools for screening prostate cancer are mainly MRI, CT and ultrasound. In the past 20 years, these medical imaging methods have made great progress with machine learning, especially the rise of deep learning has led to a wider application of artificial intelligence in the use of image-assisted diagnosis of prostate cancer.

METHOD

This review collected medical image processing methods, prostate and prostate cancer on MR images, CT images, and ultrasound images through search engines such as web of science, PubMed, and Google Scholar, including image pre-processing methods, segmentation of prostate gland on medical images, registration between prostate gland on different modal images, detection of prostate cancer lesions on the prostate.

CONCLUSION

Through these collated papers, it is found that the current research on the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer using machine learning and deep learning is in its infancy, and most of the existing studies are on the diagnosis of prostate cancer and classification of lesions, and the accuracy is low, with the best results having an accuracy of less than 0.95. There are fewer studies on staging. The research is mainly focused on MR images and much less on CT images, ultrasound images.

DISCUSSION

Machine learning and deep learning combined with medical imaging have a broad application prospect for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer, but the research in this area still has more room for development.

Coarse-to-fine registration and time-intensity curves constraint for liver DCE-MRI synthesis

Image registration plays a crucial role in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), used as a fundamental step for the subsequent diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors. However, the registration process encounters significant challenges due to the substantial intensity changes observed among different time points, resulting from the injection of contrast agents. Furthermore, previous studies have often overlooked the alignment of small structures, such as tumors and vessels. In this work, we propose a novel DCE-MRI registration framework that can effectively align the DCE-MRI time series. Specifically, our DCE-MRI registration framework consists of two steps, i.e., a de-enhancement synthesis step and a coarse-to-fine registration step. In the de-enhancement synthesis step, a disentanglement network separates DCE-MRI images into a content component representing the anatomical structures and a style component indicating the presence or absence of contrast agents. This step generates synthetic images where the contrast agents are removed from the original images, alleviating the negative effects of intensity changes on the subsequent registration process. In the registration step, we utilize a coarse registration network followed by a refined registration network. These two networks facilitate the estimation of both the coarse and refined displacement vector fields (DVFs) in a pairwise and groupwise registration manner, respectively. In addition, to enhance the alignment accuracy for small structures, a voxel-wise constraint is further conducted by assessing the smoothness of the time-intensity curves (TICs). Experimental results on liver DCE-MRI demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches, offering more robust and accurate alignment results.

Tissue response curve-shape analysis of dynamic glucose-enhanced and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with brain tumor

Dynamic glucose-enhanced (DGE) MRI is used to study the signal intensity time course (tissue response curve) after D-glucose injection. D-glucose has potential as a biodegradable alternative or complement to gadolinium-based contrast agents, with DGE being comparable with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. However, the tissue uptake kinetics as well as the detection methods of DGE differ from DCE MRI, and it is relevant to compare these techniques in terms of spatiotemporal enhancement patterns. This study aims to develop a DGE analysis method based on tissue response curve shapes, and to investigate whether DGE MRI provides similar or complementary information to DCE MRI. Eleven patients with suspected gliomas were studied. Tissue response curves were measured for DGE and DCE MRI at 7 T and the area under the curve (AUC) was assessed. Seven types of response curve shapes were postulated and subsequently identified by deep learning to create color-coded "curve maps" showing the spatial distribution of different curve types. DGE AUC values were significantly higher in lesions than in normal tissue (p < 0.007). Furthermore, the distribution of curve types differed between lesions and normal tissue for both DGE and DCE. The DGE and DCE response curves in a 6-min postinjection time interval were classified as the same curve type in 20% of the lesion voxels, which increased to 29% when a 12-min DGE time interval was considered. While both DGE and DCE tissue response curve-shape analysis enabled differentiation of lesions from normal brain tissue in humans, their enhancements were neither temporally identical nor confined entirely to the same regions. Curve maps can provide accessible and intuitive information about the shape of DGE response curves, which is expected to be useful in the continued work towards the interpretation of DGE uptake curves in terms of D-glucose delivery, transport, and metabolism.

Evaluation of blood-brain barrier integrity by the analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI - a comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative methods

Disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a key feature of various brain disorders. To assess its integrity a parametrization of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI) with a contrast agent (CA) is broadly used. Parametrization can be done quantitatively or semi-quantitatively. Quantitative methods directly describe BBB permeability but exhibit several drawbacks such as high computation demands, reproducibility issues, or low robustness. Semi-quantitative methods are fast to compute, simply mathematically described, and robust, however, they do not describe the status of BBB directly but only as a variation of CA concentration in measured tissue. Our goal was to elucidate differences between five semi-quantitative parameters: maximal intensity (Imax), normalized permeability index (NPI), and difference in DCE values between three timepoints: baseline, 5 min, and 15 min (delta5-0, delta15-0, delta15-5) and two quantitative parameters: transfer constant (Ktrans) and an extravascular fraction (Ve). For the purpose of comparison, we analyzed DCE data of four patients 12-15 days after the stroke with visible CA enhancement. Calculated parameters showed abnormalities spatially corresponding with the ischemic lesion, however, findings in individual parameters morphometrically differed. Ktrans and Ve were highly correlated. Delta5-0 and delta15-0 were prominent in regions with rapid CA enhancement and highly correlated with Ktrans. Abnormalities in delta15-5 and NPI were more homogenous with less variable values, smoother borders, and less detail than Ktrans. Moreover, only delta15-5 and NPI were able to distinguish vessels from extravascular space. Our comparison provides important knowledge for understanding and interpreting parameters derived from DCE MRI by both quantitative and semi-quantitative methods.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging is a non-invasive technique used for the evaluation of tissue vascularity features through imaging series acquisition after contrast medium administration. Over the years, the study technique and protocols have evolved, seeing a growing application of this method across different imaging modalities for the study of almost all body districts. The main and most consolidated current applications concern MRI imaging for the study of tumors, but an increasing number of studies are evaluating the use of this technique also for inflammatory pathologies and functional studies. Furthermore, the recent advent of artificial intelligence techniques is opening up a vast scenario for the analysis of quantitative information deriving from DCE. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive update on the techniques, protocols, and clinical applications - both established and emerging - of DCE in whole-body imaging.

Liver DCE-MRI registration based on sparse recovery of contrast agent curves

PURPOSE

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) registration is a challenging task because of the effect of remarkable intensity changes caused by contrast agent injections. Unrealistic deformation usually occurs by using traditional intensity-based algorithms. To alleviate the effect of contrast agent on registration, we proposed a DCE-MRI registration strategy and investigated the registration performance on the clinical DCE-MRI time series of liver.

METHOD

We reconstructed the time-intensity curves of the contrast agent through sparse representation with a predefined dictionary whose columns were the time-intensity curves with high correlations with respect to a preselected contrast agent curve. After reshaping 1D-reconstructed contrast agent time-intensity curves into a 4D contrast agent time series, we aligned the original time series to the reconstructed contrast agent time series through traditional free-form deformation (FFD) registration scheme combined with a residual complexity (RC) similarity and an iterative registration strategy. This study included the DCE-MRI time series of 20 patients with liver cancer.

RESULTS

Qualitatively, the time-cut images and subtraction images of different registration methods did not obviously differ. Quantitatively, the mean (standard deviation) of temporal intensity smoothness of all the patients achieved 54.910 (18.819), 54.609 (18.859), and 53.391 (19.031) in FFD RC, RDDR, Zhou et al.'s method and the proposed method, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) of changes in the lesion volume were 0.985 (0.041), 0.983 (0.041), 0.981 (0.046), and 0.989 (0.036) in FFD RC, RDDR, Zhou et al.'s method and the proposed method.

CONCLUSION

Our proposed method would be an effective registration strategy for DCE-MRI time series, and its performance was comparable with that of three advanced registration methods.

A Hybrid End-to-End Approach Integrating Conditional Random Fields into CNNs for Prostate Cancer Detection on MRI

Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the most common oncological disease in Western men. Even though a growing effort has been carried out by the scientific community in recent years, accurate and reliable automated PCa detection methods on multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) are still a compelling issue. In this work, a Deep Neural Network architecture is developed for the task of classifying clinically significant PCa on non-contrast-enhanced MR images. In particular, we propose the use of Conditional Random Fields as a Recurrent Neural Network (CRF-RNN) to enhance the classification performance of XmasNet, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture specifically tailored to the PROSTATEx17 Challenge. The devised approach builds a hybrid end-to-end trainable network, CRF-XmasNet, composed of an initial CNN component performing feature extraction and a CRF-based probabilistic graphical model component for structured prediction, without the need for two separate training procedures. Experimental results show the suitability of this method in terms of classification accuracy and training time, even though the high-variability of the observed results must be reduced before transferring the resulting architecture to a clinical environment. Interestingly, the use of CRFs as a separate postprocessing method achieves significantly lower performance with respect to the proposed hybrid end-to-end approach. The proposed hybrid end-to-end CRF-RNN approach yields excellent peak performance for all the CNN architectures taken into account, but it shows a high-variability, thus requiring future investigation on the integration of CRFs into a CNN.

Quantitative parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and characterization of prostate cancer

Objectives

to assess the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI in multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in comparison to the histopathology (including Gleason grade) of prostate cancer.

Patients and methods

150 men with suspected prostate cancer (abnormal digital rectum examination and or elevated prostate-specific antigen) received pre-biopsy 3T mpMRI and were recruited into peer-reviewed, protocol-based prospective study. The DCE-MRI quantitative parameters (K^trans (influx transfer constant) and k_ep (efflux rate constant)) of the cancerous and normal areas were recorded using four different kinetic models employing Olea Sphere (Olea Medical, La Ciotat, France). The correlation between these parameters and the histopathology of the lesions (biopsy and in a sub-cohort 41 radical prostatectomy specimen) was assessed.

Results

The quantitative parameters showed a significant difference between non-cancerous (benign) and cancerous lesions (Gleason score≥3+3) in the prostate gland. The cut-off values for prostate cancer differentiation were: K^trans (0.205 min⁻¹) and k_ep (0.665 min⁻¹) in the extended Tofts model (ET) and K^trans(0.205 min⁻¹ and k_ep (0.63 min⁻¹) in the Lawrence and Lee delay (LD) models respectively. The mean K^trans value also showed a difference between low-grade cancer (Gleason score=3+3) and high-grade cancer (Gleason score ≥ 3+4). With the addition of DCE-MRI quantitative parameters, the sensitivity of the PIRAD scoring system was increased from 56.6% to 92.1% (K^trans_ET), 93.1% (k_ep_ET), 91.0%, (K^trans_LD) and 89.4% (k_ep_LD).

Conclusion

Quantitative DCE-MRI parameters improved the diagnostic performance of conventional MRI in distinguishing normal and prostate cancers, including characterization of grade of cancers. The ET and LD models in post-image processing analysis provided better cut-off values for prostate cancer differentiation than the other quantitative DCE-MRI parameters.