GTransU-CAP: Automatic labeling for cyclic alternating patterns in sleep EEG using gated transformer-based U-Net framework

Deep-Learning-Based Classification of Cyclic-Alternating-Pattern Sleep Phases

Determining the cyclic-alternating-pattern (CAP) phases in sleep using electroencephalography (EEG) signals is crucial for assessing sleep quality. However, most current methods for CAP classification primarily rely on classical machine learning techniques, with limited implementation of deep-learning-based tools. Furthermore, these methods often require manual feature extraction. Herein, we propose a fully automatic deep-learning-based algorithm that leverages convolutional neural network architectures to classify the EEG signals via their time-frequency representations. Through our investigation, we explored using time-frequency analysis techniques and found that Wigner-based representations outperform the commonly used short-time Fourier transform for CAP classification. Additionally, our algorithm incorporates contextual information of the EEG signals and employs data augmentation techniques specifically designed to preserve the time-frequency structure. The model is developed using EEG signals of healthy subjects from the publicly available CAP sleep database (CAPSLPDB) on Physionet. An experimental study demonstrates that our algorithm surpasses existing machine-learning-based methods, achieving an accuracy of 77.5% on a balanced test set and 81.8% when evaluated on an unbalanced test set. Notably, the proposed algorithm exhibits efficiency and scalability, making it suitable for on-device implementation to enhance CAP identification procedures.

Towards automatic EEG cyclic alternating pattern analysis: a systematic review

This study conducted a systematic review to determine the feasibility of automatic Cyclic Alternating Pattern (CAP) analysis. Specifically, this review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to address the formulated research question: is automatic CAP analysis viable for clinical application? From the identified 1,280 articles, the review included 35 studies that proposed various methods for examining CAP, including the classification of A phase, their subtypes, or the CAP cycles. Three main trends were observed over time regarding A phase classification, starting with mathematical models or features classified with a tuned threshold, followed by using conventional machine learning models and, recently, deep learning models. Regarding the CAP cycle detection, it was observed that most studies employed a finite state machine to implement the CAP scoring rules, which depended on an initial A phase classifier, stressing the importance of developing suitable A phase detection models. The assessment of A-phase subtypes has proven challenging due to various approaches used in the state-of-the-art for their detection, ranging from multiclass models to creating a model for each subtype. The review provided a positive answer to the main research question, concluding that automatic CAP analysis can be reliably performed. The main recommended research agenda involves validating the proposed methodologies on larger datasets, including more subjects with sleep-related disorders, and providing the source code for independent confirmation.

Subject-level Normalization to Improve A-phase Detection of Cyclic Alternating Pattern in Sleep EEG

Automatic detection systems for activation phases (A-phase) of the cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in electroencephalograms (EEG) are designed to automatically score A-phases in any individual but typically fail to factor in EEG signal variations between individuals, e.g. due to sleep disorders, recording site differences or equipment differences. Here, we investigate the effect of subject-level normalization on the performance of an automatic A-phase detection system consisting of a recurrent neural network. We compared the classification performance of various subject-level normalization methods to the standard training set normalization. Systems were trained and tested on subjects with different sleep disorders using the publicly available CAP Sleep Database on Physionet. Subject-level normalization using Zscore or median and interquartile range (IQR) increases the F1-score for A1-phases by +11-22% (Z-Score: +11-20%, Median/IQR: +16-22%), for A2-phases by +2-9% (Z-Score: +59%, Median/IQR: +2-7%), for A3-phases by -1 - +8% (Z-Score: +3-8%, Median/IQR: -1-+5%) as compared to the standard training data normalization when tested across sleep disorders. Our results show that subject-level normalization drastically improves the precision of A-phase detection in case the training population differs from the testing population.Clinical Relevance- Subject-level normalisation improves the automatic CAP scoring system performances for the general population by minimizing the effect of individual EEG differences.

Computerized detection of cyclic alternating patterns of sleep: A new paradigm, future scope and challenges

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Sleep quality is associated with wellness, and its assessment can help diagnose several disorders and diseases. Sleep analysis is commonly performed based on self-rating indices, sleep duration, environmental factors, physiologically and polysomnographic-derived parameters, and the occurrence of disorders. However, the correlation that has been observed between the subjective assessment and objective measurements of sleep quality is small. Recently, a few automated systems have been suugested to measure sleep quality to address this challenge. Sleep quality can be assessed by evaluating macrostructure-based sleep analysis via the examination of sleep cycles, namely Rapid Eye Movement (REM) and Non Rapid Eye Movement (NREM) with N1, N2, and N3 stages. However, macrostructure sleep analysis does not consider transitory phenomena like K-complexes and transient fluctuations, which are indispensable in diagnosing various sleep disorders. The CAP, part of the microstructure of sleep, may offer a more precise and relevant examination of sleep and can be considered one of the candidates to measure sleep quality and identify sleep disorders such as insomnia and apnea. CAP is characterized by very subtle changes in the brain's electroencephalogram (EEG) signals that occur during the NREM stage of sleep. The variations among these patterns in healthy subjects and subjects with sleep disorders can be used to identify sleep disorders. Studying CAP is highly arduous for human experts; thus, developing automated systems for assessing CAP is gaining momentum. Developing new techniques for automated CAP detection installed in clinical setups is essential. This paper aims to analyze the algorithms and methods presented in the literature for the automatic assessment of CAP and the development of CAP-based sleep markers that may enhance sleep quality assessment, helping diagnose sleep disorders.

METHODS

This literature survey examined the automated assessment of CAP and related parameters. We have reviewed 34 research articles, including fourteen ML, nine DL, and ten based on some other techniques.

RESULTS

The review includes various algorithms, databases, features, classifiers, and classification performances and their comparisons, advantages, and limitations of automated systems for CAP assessment.

CONCLUSION

A detailed description of state-of-the-art research findings on automated CAP assessment and associated challenges has been presented. Also, the research gaps have been identified based on our review. Further, future research directions are suggested for sleep quality assessment using CAP.