A generic superstructure modeling and optimization framework on the example of bi-criteria Power-to-Methanol process design

Simultaneous Optimization and Integration of Multiple Process Heat Cascade and Site Utility Selection for the Design of a New Generation of Sugarcane Biorefinery

Biorefinery plays a crucial role in the decarbonization of the current economic model, but its high investments and costs make its products less competitive. Identifying the best technological route to maximize operational synergies is crucial for its viability. This study presents a new superstructure model based on mixed integer linear programming to identify an ideal biorefinery configuration. The proposed formulation considers the selection and process scale adjustment, utility selection, and heat integration by heat cascade integration from different processes. The formulation is tested by a study where the impact of new technologies on energy efficiency and the total annualized cost of a sugarcane biorefinery is evaluated. As a result, the energy efficiency of biorefinery increased from 50.25% to 74.5% with methanol production through bagasse gasification, mainly due to its high heat availability that can be transferred to the distillery, which made it possible to shift the bagasse flow from the cogeneration to gasification process. Additionally, the production of DME yields outcomes comparable to methanol production. However, CO2 hydrogenation negatively impacts profitability and energy efficiency due to the significant consumption and electricity cost. Nonetheless, it is advantageous for surface power density as it increases biofuel production without expanding the biomass area.

Renewable Fuels from Integrated Power- and Biomass-to-X Processes: A Superstructure Optimization Study

This work presents a superstructure optimization study for the production of renewable fuels with a focus on jet fuel. Power-to-X via the methanol (MTJ) and Fischer–Tropsch (FT) route is combined with Biomass-to-X (BtX) via an algae-based biorefinery to an integrated Power- and Biomass-to-X (PBtX) process. Possible integration by algae remnant utilization for H2/CO2 production, wastewater recycling and heat integration is included. Modeling is performed using the novel Open sUperstrucTure moDeling and OptimizatiOn fRamework (OUTDOOR). Novel methods to account for advanced mass balances and uncertain input data are included. Economic optimization proposes a PBtX process. This process combines algae processing with MTJ and depicts a highly mass- and energy integrated plant. It produces fuels at 211 EUR/MWhLHV (ca. 2530 EUR/t), a cost reduction of 21% to 11.5% compared to stand-alone electricity- or bio-based production at algae costs of 25 EUR/tAlgae-sludge and electricity costs of 72 EUR/MWh. Investigation of uncertain data indicates that a combination of BtX and MTJ is economically superior to FT for a wide parameter range. Only for high algae costs of >40 EUR/tAlgae-sludge stand-alone electricity-based MTJ is economically superior and for high MTJ costs above 2000–2400 EUR/tJet FT is the optimal option.

Integrating multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment: a novel methodology for sustainable process design

This work presents a novel methodology for integrated multi-objective superstructure optimization and multi-criteria assessment. The method is tailored for sustainable process synthesis utilizing mixed-integer linear programming (MILP). The six-step algorithm includes 1) superstructure formulation, 2) criteria definition and implementation, 3) criteria weighting, 4) single-criterion optimization, 5) reformulation and 6) multi-criteria optimization. It is automated in the O pen s U perstruc T ure mo D eling and O ptimizati O n f R amework (OUTDOOR) and tested on integrated power-to-X and biomass-to-X processes for methanol production. Three criteria are considered, namely net production costs (NPC), net production greenhouse gas emissions (NPE) and net production fresh water demand (NPFWD). The optimization indicates NPC of 1307 €/tMeOH with NPE of −2.23 t CO 2 / t MeOH ${\text{t}}_{{\text{CO}}_{2}}/{\text{t}}_{\text{MeOH}}$ and NPFWD of −3.42 t H 2 O / t MeOH ${\text{t}}_{{\text{H}}_{2}\text{O}}/{\text{t}}_{\text{MeOH}}$ for an optimal trade-off plant. The plant configuration features low-pressure alkaline electrolysis for hydrogen supply, absorption-based CO2 capture and steam production from methanol purge gas for internal heat supply. Conducted variation and sensitivity analyses indicate that methanol costs can drop to about 500 €/tMeOH if electricity is free of charge, or to 805 €/tMeOH if biogas is available at large quantities, if a least-cost process layouts are considered. However, all performed multi-criteria analyses imply a robust optimal process design utilizing electricity-based methanol production.

Biogas Reforming as a Precursor for Integrated Algae Biorefineries: Simulation and Techno-Economic Analysis

Biogas is a significant by-product produced in algae processing and may be used for many different applications, not only as a renewable energy carrier but also as a chemical intermediate in integrated algae-based biorefineries. In this work, the reforming of biogas to H2/CO2 mixtures (referred to as SynFeed) as feed for the direct hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol is investigated. Two conventional processes, namely steam methane and autothermal reforming, with upstream CO2 separation from raw biogas are compared to novel concepts of direct biogas bi- and tri-reforming. In addition, downstream CO2 separation from SynFeed using the commercial Selexol process to produce pure H2 and CO2 is considered. The results show that upstream CO2 separation with subsequent steam methane reforming is the most economic process, costing 142.48 €/tSynFeed, and taking into consideration the revenue from excess hydrogen. Bi-reforming is the most expensive process, with a cost of 413.44 €/tSynFeed, due to the high demand of raw biogas input. Overall, SynFeed from biogas is more economical than SynFeed from CO2 capture and water electrolysis (464 €/tSynFeed), but is slightly more expensive than using natural gas as an input (107 €/SynFeed). Carbon capture using Selexol comes with costs of 22.58–27.19 €/tCO2, where approximately 50% of the costs are derived from the final CO2 compression.