Liaskos M, Savelonas MA, Asvestas PA, Papageorgiou D, Matsopoulos GK. Vertebrae, IVD and spinal canal boundary extraction on MRI, utilizing CT-trained active shape models.
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021;
16:2201-2214. [PMID:
34643884 DOI:
10.1007/s11548-021-02502-1]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE
Vertebrae, intervertebral disc (IVD) and spinal canal (SC) displacements are in the root of several spinal cord pathologies. The localization and boundary extraction of these structures, along with the quantification of their displacements, provide valuable clues for assessing each pathological condition. In this work, we propose a computational method for boundary extraction of vertebrae, IVD and SC in magnetic resonance images (MRI).
METHOD
Vertebrae shape priors derived from computed tomography (CT) images are used to guide vertebrae, IVD and SC boundary extraction in MRI. This strategy is dictated by three considerations: (1) CT is the modality of choice for highlighting solid structures such as vertebrae, (2) vertebrae boundaries indirectly impose constraints on the boundaries of neighbouring structures (IVD and SC), and (3) it can be observed that edges are similarly located in CT and MR images; therefore, gradient profiles and shape priors learned by active shape models (ASMs) from CT are also valid in MRI.
RESULTS
Experimental comparisons on two MR image datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach obtains segmentation results, which are comparable to the state of the art. Moreover, the adopted bimodal strategy is validated by demonstrating that CT-derived shape priors lead to more accurate boundary extraction than MRI-derived shape priors, even in the case of MR image applications.
CONCLUSION
Unlike existing bimodal methods, the proposed one is not dependent on the availability of CT/MR image pairs, which are not usually acquired from the same patient. In addition, unlike state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods, it is not dependent on large amounts of training data. The proposed method requires a limited amount of user intervention.
Collapse