NSCLC tumor shrinkage prediction using quantitative image features

Miller H, Hu X, Kumar R, T. Ngo P, Yan J, B. Frieboes H. Prediction of lung cancer immunotherapy response via machine learning analysis of immune cell lineage and surface markers

BACKGROUND: Although advances have been made in cancer immunotherapy, patient benefits remain elusive. For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have shown survival benefit compared to chemotherapy. Personalization of treatment would be facilitated by a priori identification of patients likely to benefit. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study applied a suite of machine learning methods to analyze mass cytometry data of immune cell lineage and surface markers from blood samples of a small cohort (n= 13) treated with Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, or Nivolumab as monotherapy. METHODS: Four different comparisons were evaluated between data collected at an initial visit (baseline), after 12-weeks of immunotherapy, and from healthy (control) samples: healthy vs patients at baseline, Responders vs Non-Responders at baseline, Healthy vs 12-week Responders, and Responders vs Non-Responders at 12-weeks. The algorithms Random Forest, Partial Least Squares Discriminant Analysis, Multi-Layer Perceptron, and Elastic Net were applied to find features differentiating between these groups and provide for the capability to predict outcomes. RESULTS: Particular combinations and proportions of immune cell lineage and surface markers were sufficient to accurately discriminate between the groups without overfitting the data. In particular, markers associated with the B-cell phenotype were identified as key features. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates a comprehensive machine learning analysis of circulating immune cell characteristics of NSCLC patients with the potential to predict response to immunotherapy. Upon further evaluation in a larger cohort, the proposed methodology could help guide personalized treatment selection in clinical practice.

Classifying early stages of cervical cancer with MRI-based radiomics

This study aims to establish a MRI-based classifier to distinguish early stages of cervical cancer with improved diagnostic performance to assist clinical diagnosis and treatment. 57 patients with pathological diagnosis of cervical cancer from January 2018 to May 2019 were enrolled in this study. MRI examinations, including T1-weighted image(T1WI), T2-weighted image(T2W), diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE), were performed before surgery. MR images from patients of stage Ib or IIa cervical cancer with tumor segmented were used as input. Feature extraction process extracted first-order statistics and texture and applied filters. The dimensionality of the radiomic features was reduced using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Models were trained by three machine-learning (k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR)) and diagnostic performance in differentiating stage Ib and stage IIa cases was evaluated. A total of 27 features were extracted to establish models, including 2 features from T1WI, 5 features from T2WI, 5 features from DWI (b = 50), 4 features from DWI (b = 800), 5 features from DCE, and 6 features from ADC. For each machine learning (ML) classifier, six sequences of training set and testing set are modeled and analyzed. Among all the models, the training set and testing set of T2WI model built by SVM classifier were the best (Area under the curve (AUC) 0.915) / (AUC 0.907). Radiomic analysis of ML-based texture features and first-order statistics features can be used to stage the early cervical cancer pre-operatively.

Radiomics for Predicting Lung Cancer Outcomes Following Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review

Lung cancer's radiomic phenotype may potentially inform clinical decision-making with respect to radical radiotherapy. At present there are no validated biomarkers available for the individualisation of radical radiotherapy in lung cancer and the mortality rate of this disease remains the highest of all other solid tumours. MEDLINE was searched using the terms 'radiomics' and 'lung cancer' according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Met-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Radiomics studies were defined as those manuscripts describing the extraction and analysis of at least 10 quantifiable imaging features. Only those studies assessing disease control, survival or toxicity outcomes for patients with lung cancer following radical radiotherapy ± chemotherapy were included. Study titles and abstracts were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The Radiomics Quality Score was applied to the full text of included papers. Of 244 returned results, 44 studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. End points frequently reported were local (17%), regional (17%) and distant control (31%), overall survival (79%) and pulmonary toxicity (4%). Imaging features strongly associated with clinical outcomes include texture features belonging to the subclasses Gray level run length matrix, Gray level co-occurrence matrix and kurtosis. The median cohort size for model development was 100 (15-645); in the 11 studies with external validation in a separate independent population, the median cohort size was 84 (21-295). The median number of imaging features extracted was 184 (10-6538). The median Radiomics Quality Score was 11% (0-47). Patient-reported outcomes were not incorporated within any studies identified. No studies externally validated a radiomics signature in a registered prospective study. Imaging-derived indices attained through radiomic analyses could equip thoracic oncologists with biomarkers for treatment response, patterns of failure, normal tissue toxicity and survival in lung cancer. Based on routine scans, their non-invasive nature and cost-effectiveness are major advantages over conventional pathological assessment. Improved tools are required for the appraisal of radiomics studies, as significant barriers to clinical implementation remain, such as standardisation of input scan data, quality of reporting and external validation of signatures in randomised, interventional clinical trials.

CT-based radiomics signatures can predict the tumor response of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy and targeted therapy

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomics signatures on pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) images of lungs to predict the tumor responses of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or a combination of both.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 322 NSCLC patients who were treated with first-line chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or a combination of both. Of these patients, 224 were randomly assigned to a cohort to help develop the radiomics signature. A total of 1946 radiomics features were obtained from each patient's CT scan. The top-ranked features were selected by the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR) feature-ranking method and used to build a lightweight radiomics signature with the Random Forest (RF) classifier. The independent predictive (IP) features (AUC > 0.6, p value < 0.05) were further identified from the top-ranked features and used to build a refined radiomics signature by the RF classifier. Its prediction performance was tested on the validation cohort, which consisted of the remaining 98 patients.

RESULTS

The initial lightweight radiomics signature constructed from 15 top-ranked features had an AUC of 0.721 (95% CI, 0.619-0.823). After six IP features were further identified and a refined radiomics signature was built, it had an AUC of 0.746 (95% CI, 0.646-0.846).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics signatures based on pre-treatment CT scans can accurately predict tumor response in NSCLC patients after first-line chemotherapy or targeted therapy treatments. Radiomics features could be used as promising prognostic imaging biomarkers in the future.

KEY POINTS

The radiomics signature extracted from baseline CT images in patients with NSCLC can predict response to first-line chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or both treatments with an AUC = 0.746 (95% CI, 0.646-0.846). The radiomics signature could be used as a new biomarker for quantitative analysis in radiology, which might provide value in decision-making and to define personalized treatments for cancer patients.

[Radiomics for Estimating Recurrence Risk of Patients with Lung Cancer by Using Survival Analysis]

PURPOSE

Because of the promotion of cancer screening, the number of patients with lung cancer detected at the early stage has increased. However, it was reported that 30-40% of the lung cancer patients at stage I relapsed. If the recurrence risk can be accurately predicted, it is possible to give medical care for improving the prognosis of lung cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to develop a method for the prediction of recurrence risk of patients with lung cancer by using survival analysis of radiomics approach.

METHOD

A public database was used in this study. Fifty patients (25 recurrences and 25 censored cases) classified as stage I or II were selected and their pretreatment computed tomography (CT) images were obtained. First, we selected one slice containing the largest tumor area and manually segmented the tumor regions. We subsequently calculated 367 radiomic features such as tumor size, shape, CT values, and texture. Radiomic features were selected by using least absolute shrinkage and selection (Lasso). Cox regression model and random survival forest (RSF) with the selected radiomic features were used for estimating the recurrence functions of fifty patients.

RESULT

The experimental result showed that average area under the curve (AUC) values of Cox regression model and RSF for the prediction accuracy were 0.81 and 0.93, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Since our scheme can predict recurrence risk of patients with lung cancer by using non-invasive image examinations, it would be useful for the selection of treatment and the follow-up after the treatment.

Radiomics in predicting treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status, challenges and future perspectives

OBJECTIVES

Radiomics is the extraction of quantitative data from medical imaging, which has the potential to characterise tumour phenotype. The radiomics approach has the capacity to construct predictive models for treatment response, essential for the pursuit of personalised medicine. In this literature review, we summarise the current status and evaluate the scientific and reporting quality of radiomics research in the prediction of treatment response in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database. A total of 178 articles were screened for eligibility and 14 peer-reviewed articles were included. The radiomics quality score (RQS), a radiomics-specific quality metric emulating the TRIPOD guidelines, was used to assess scientific and reporting quality.

RESULTS

Included studies reported several predictive markers including first-, second- and high-order features, such as kurtosis, grey-level uniformity and wavelet HLL mean respectively, as well as PET-based metabolic parameters. Quality assessment demonstrated a low median score of + 2.5 (range - 5 to + 9), mainly reflecting a lack of reproducibility and clinical evaluation. There was extensive heterogeneity between studies due to differences in patient population, cancer stage, treatment modality, follow-up timescales and radiomics workflow methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics research has not yet been translated into clinical use. Efforts towards standardisation and collaboration are needed to identify reproducible radiomic predictors of response. Promising radiomic models must be externally validated and their impact evaluated within the clinical pathway before they can be implemented as a clinical decision-making tool to facilitate personalised treatment for patients with NSCLC.

KEY POINTS

• The included studies reported several promising radiomic markers of treatment response in lung cancer; however, there was a lack of reproducibility between studies. • Quality assessment using the radiomics quality score (RQS) demonstrated a low median total score of + 2.5 (range - 5 to + 9). • Future radiomics research should focus on implementation of standardised radiomics features and software, together with external validation in a prospective setting.

Radiomics at a Glance: A Few Lessons Learned from Learning Approaches

Simple Summary

Radiomics has become a prominent component of medical imaging research and many studies show its specific value as a support tool for clinical decision-making processes. Radiomic data are typically analyzed with statistical and machine learning methods, which change depending on the disease context and the imaging modality. We found a certain bias in the literature towards the use of such methods and believe that this limitation may influence the capacity of producing accurate and reliable decisions. Therefore, in view of the relevance of various types of learning methods, we report their significance and discuss their unrevealed potential.

Abstract

Processing and modeling medical images have traditionally represented complex tasks requiring multidisciplinary collaboration. The advent of radiomics has assigned a central role to quantitative data analytics targeting medical image features algorithmically extracted from large volumes of images. Apart from the ultimate goal of supporting diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decisions, radiomics is computationally attractive due to specific strengths: scalability, efficiency, and precision. Optimization is achieved by highly sophisticated statistical and machine learning algorithms, but it is especially deep learning that stands out as the leading inference approach. Various types of hybrid learning can be considered when building complex integrative approaches aimed to deliver gains in accuracy for both classification and prediction tasks. This perspective reviews some selected learning methods by focusing on both their significance for radiomics and their unveiled potential.

Clinical value of texture analysis in differentiation of urothelial carcinoma based on multiphase computed tomography images

Identification of histologic grading of urothelial carcinoma still depends on histopathologic examination. As an emerging and promising imaging technology, radiomic texture analysis is a noninvasive technique and has been studied to differentiate various tumors. This study explored the value of computed tomography (CT) texture analysis for the differentiation of low-grade urothelial carcinoma (LGUC), high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC), and their invasive properties.Radiologic data were analyzed retrospectively for 94 patients with pathologically proven urothelial carcinomas from November 2016 to April 2019. Pathologic examination demonstrated that tumors were: high grade in 43 cases, and low grade in 51 cases; and nonmuscle invasive (NMI) in 37 cases, and muscle invasive (MI) in 37 cases. Maximum tumor diameters on CT scan were manually outlined as regions of interest and 78 texture features were extracted automatically. Three-phasic CT images were used to measure texture parameters, which were compared with postoperative pathologic grading and invasive results. The independent sample t test or Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in parameters. Receiver-operating characteristic curves for statistically significant parameters were used to confirm efficacy.Of the 78 features extracted from each phase of CT images, 26 (33%), 20 (26%), and 22 (28%) texture parameters were significant (P < .05) for differentiating LGUC from HGUC, while 19 (24%), 16 (21%), and 30 (38%) were significant (P < .05) for differentiating NMI from MI urothelial carcinoma. Highest areas the under curve for differentiating grading and invasive properties were obtained by variance (0.761, P < .001) and correlation (0.798, P < .001) on venous-phase CT images.Texture analysis has the potential to distinguish LGUC and HGUC, or NMI from MI urothelial carcinoma, before surgery.

Effects of alterations in positron emission tomography imaging parameters on radiomics features

Radiomics studies require large patient cohorts, which often include patients imaged using different imaging protocols. We aimed to determine the impact of variability in imaging protocol parameters and interscanner variability using a phantom that produced feature values similar to those of patients. Positron emission tomography (PET) scans of a Hoffman brain phantom were acquired on GE Discovery 710, Siemens mCT, and Philips Vereos scanners. A standard-protocol scan was acquired on each machine, and then each parameter that could be changed was altered individually. The phantom was contoured with 10 regions of interest (ROIs). Values for 45 features with 2 different preprocessing techniques were extracted for each image. To determine the impact of each parameter on the reliability of each radiomics feature, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated with the ROIs as the subjects and the parameter values as the raters. For interscanner comparisons, we compared the standard deviation of each radiomics feature value from the standard-protocol images to the standard deviation of the same radiomics feature from PET scans of 224 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. When the pixel size was resampled prior to feature extraction, all features had good reliability (ICC > 0.75) for the field of view and matrix size. The time per bed position had excellent reliability (ICC > 0.9) on all features. When the filter cutoff was restricted to values below 6 mm, all features had good reliability. Similarly, when subsets and iterations were restricted to reasonable values used in clinics, almost all features had good reliability. The average ratio of the standard deviation of features on the phantom scans to that of the NSCLC patient scans was 0.73 using fixed-bin-width preprocessing and 0.92 using 64-level preprocessing. Most radiomics feature values had at least good reliability when imaging protocol parameters were within clinically used ranges. However, interscanner variability was about equal to interpatient variability; therefore, caution must be used when combining patients scanned on equipment from different vendors in radiomics data sets.

Repeatability of texture features derived from magnetic resonance and computed tomography imaging and use in predictive models for non-small cell lung cancer outcome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the repeatability of MRI and CT derived texture features and to investigate the feasibility of use in predictive single and multi-modality models for radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: Fifty-nine texture features were extracted from unfiltered and wavelet filtered images. Repeatability of test-retest features from helical 4D CT scans, true fast MRI with steady state precession (TRUFISP), and volumetric interpolation breath-hold examination (VIBE) was determined by the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). A workflow was developed to predict overall survival at 12, 18, and 24 months and tumour response at end of treatment for tumour features, and normal muscle tissue features as a control. Texture features were reduced to repeatable and stable features before clustering. Cluster representative feature selection was performed by univariate or medoid analysis before model selection. P-values were corrected for false discovery rate. Results: Repeatable (CCC ≥ 0.9) features were found for both tumour and normal muscle tissue: CT: 54.4% for tumour and 78.5% for normal tissue, TRUFISP: 64.4% for tumour and 67.8% for normal tissue, and VIBE: 52.6% for tumour and 72.9% for normal muscle tissue. Muscle tissue control analysis found 7 significant models with 6 of 7 models utilizing the univariate representative feature selection technique. Tumour analysis revealed 12 significant models for overall survival and none for tumour response at end of treatment. The accuracy of significant single modality was about the same for MR and CT. Multi-modality tumour models had comparable performance to single modality models. Conclusion: MR derived texture features may add value to predictive models and should be investigated in a larger cohort. Control analysis demonstrated that the medoid representative feature selection method may result in more robust models. .

Comprehensive Investigation on Controlling for CT Imaging Variabilities in Radiomics Studies

Radiomics has shown promise in improving models for predicting patient outcomes. However, to maximize the information gain of the radiomics features, especially in larger patient cohorts, the variability in radiomics features owing to differences between scanners and scanning protocols must be accounted for. To this aim, the imaging variability of radiomics feature values was evaluated on 100 computed tomography scanners at 35 clinics by imaging a radiomics phantom using a controlled protocol and the commonly used chest and head protocols of the local clinic. We used a linear mixed-effects model to determine the degree to which the manufacturer and individual scanners contribute to the overall variability. Using a controlled protocol reduced the overall variability by 57% and 52% compared to the local chest and head protocols respectively. The controlled protocol also reduced the relative contribution of the manufacturer to the total variability. For almost all variabilities (manufacturer, scanner, and residual with different preprocesssing), the controlled protocol scans had a significantly smaller variability than the local protocol scans did. For most radiomics features, the imaging variability was small relative to the inter-patient feature variability in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patient cohorts. From this study, we conclude that using controlled scans can reduce the variability in radiomics features, and our results demonstrate the importance of using controlled protocols in prospective radiomics studies.

Validating a Predictive Atlas of Tumor Shrinkage for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To cross-validate and expand a predictive atlas that can estimate geometric patterns of lung tumor shrinkage during radiation therapy using data from 2 independent institutions and to model its integration into adaptive radiation therapy (ART) for enhanced dose escalation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 22 patients at a collaborating institution were obtained to cross-validate an atlas, originally created with 12 patients, for predicting patterns of tumor shrinkage during radiation therapy. Subsequently, the atlas was expanded by integrating all 34 patients. Each study patient was selected via a leave-one-out scheme and was matched with a subgroup of the remaining 33 patients based on similarity measures of tumor volume and surroundings. The spatial distribution of residual tumor was estimated by thresholding the superimposed shrinkage patterns in the subgroup. A Bayesian method was also developed to recalibrate the prediction using the tumor observed on the midcourse images. Finally, in a retrospective predictive treatment planning (PTP) study, at the initial planning stage, the predicted residual tumors were escalated to the highest achievable dose while maintaining the original prescription dose to the remainder of the tumor. The PTP approach was compared isotoxically to ART that replans with midcourse imaging and to PTP-ART with the recalibrated prediction.

RESULTS

Predictive accuracy (true positive plus true negative ratios based on predicted and actual residual tumor) were comparable across institutions, 0.71 versus 0.73, and improved to 0.74 with an expanded atlas including 2 institutions. Recalibration further improved accuracy to 0.76. PTP increased the mean dose to the actual residual tumor by an averaged 6.3Gy compared to ART.

CONCLUSION

A predictive atlas found to perform well across institutions and benefit from more diversified shrinkage patterns and tumor locations. Elevating tumoricidal dose to the predicted residual tumor throughout the entire treatment course could improve the efficacy and efficiency of treatment compared to ART with midcourse replanning.

Radiomics of CT Features May Be Nonreproducible and Redundant: Influence of CT Acquisition Parameters

Purpose To identify the reproducible and nonredundant radiomics features (RFs) for computed tomography (CT). Materials and Methods Two phantoms were used to test RF reproducibility by using test-retest analysis, by changing the CT acquisition parameters (hereafter, intra-CT analysis), and by comparing five different scanners with the same CT parameters (hereafter, inter-CT analysis). Reproducible RFs were selected by using the concordance correlation coefficient (as a measure of the agreement between variables) and the coefficient of variation (defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean). Redundant features were grouped by using hierarchical cluster analysis. Results A total of 177 RFs including intensity, shape, and texture features were evaluated. The test-retest analysis showed that 91% (161 of 177) of the RFs were reproducible according to concordance correlation coefficient. Reproducibility of intra-CT RFs, based on coefficient of variation, ranged from 89.3% (151 of 177) to 43.1% (76 of 177) where the pitch factor and the reconstruction kernel were modified, respectively. Reproducibility of inter-CT RFs, based on coefficient of variation, also showed large material differences, from 85.3% (151 of 177; wood) to only 15.8% (28 of 177; polyurethane). Ten clusters were identified after the hierarchical cluster analysis and one RF per cluster was chosen as representative. Conclusion Many RFs were redundant and nonreproducible. If all the CT parameters are fixed except field of view, tube voltage, and milliamperage, then the information provided by the analyzed RFs can be summarized in only 10 RFs (each representing a cluster) because of redundancy.

Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer (IBEX) for Radiomics

Imaging Biomarker Explorer (IBEX) is an open-source tool for medical imaging radiomics work. The purpose of this paper is to describe how to use IBEX's graphical user interface (GUI) and to demonstrate how IBEX calculated features have been used in clinical studies. IBEX allows for the import of DICOM images with DICOM radiation therapy structure files or Pinnacle files. Once the images are imported, IBEX has tools within the Data Selection GUI to manipulate the viewing of the images, measure voxel values and distances, and create and edit contours. IBEX comes with 27 preprocessing and 132 feature choices to design feature sets. Each preprocessing and feature category has parameters that can be altered. The output from IBEX is a spreadsheet that contains: 1) each feature from the feature set calculated for each contour in a data set, 2) image information about each contour in a data set, and 3) a summary of the preprocessing and features used with their selected parameters. Features calculated from IBEX have been used in studies to test the variability of features under different imaging conditions and in survival models to improve current clinical models.

Clinical applications of textural analysis in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Treatment pathways include regular cross-sectional imaging, generating large data sets which present intriguing possibilities for exploitation beyond standard visual interpretation. This additional data mining has been termed "radiomics" and includes semantic and agnostic approaches. Textural analysis (TA) is an example of the latter, and uses a range of mathematically derived features to describe an image or region of an image. Often TA is used to describe a suspected or known tumour. TA is an attractive tool as large existing image sets can be submitted to diverse techniques for data processing, presentation, interpretation and hypothesis testing with annotated clinical outcomes. There is a growing anthology of published data using different TA techniques to differentiate between benign and malignant lung nodules, differentiate tissue subtypes of lung cancer, prognosticate and predict outcome and treatment response, as well as predict treatment side effects and potentially aid radiotherapy planning. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the current published data and understand the potential future role of TA in managing lung cancer.