Management of nasal fractures

What Is the Relationship Between Maxillofacial Injury Location and Associated Injuries?

BACKGROUND

Patients sustaining maxillofacial fractures are at risk for associated injuries (AIs) to other body regions. The incidence of AIs is reported to be from 20 to 35%. AIs may be life-threatening and play a key role in considering first-line management at the emergency department, as well as planning the definitive treatment of maxillofacial fractures.

PURPOSE

The study aimed to determine the frequency and risk factors for AIs in patients with maxillofacial fractures.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

The investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of patients with facial fractures treated at Central Hospital (Lahti, Finland) from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2019. All adult patients with verified maxillofacial fractures were included. Patients under 18 years of age were excluded from the study.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The predictor variable was the location of the maxillofacial fractures grouped into three categories: mandible alone, midface alone, and both midface and mandible.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S)

The primary outcome variable was associated body region injuries coded as present or absent. The secondary outcome variable was the location of the AI categorized as skull, neck, thorax, pelvis, or extremity injuries.

COVARIATES

Other study variables included demographic data (age, sex, alcohol use), Glasgow Coma Scale, and etiology (fall, traffic- and bicycle accident, assault, pedestrian hit by motor vehicle, work-related, or sports/free-time injuries).

ANALYSES

Continuous variables were analyzed for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilks test and compared with categorical variables using the Mann-Whitney test. The univariate analyses of categorical variables were analyzed by the χ2 test (P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant).

RESULTS

During the study period, 443 adult (≥18) patients had maxillofacial fractures. AIs were present in 88 subjects (20%). The mean age was 47.6 years (range 18-91); 52 years with AIs (range 19-91), and 47 years (range 18-92) without AIs (P = .03). Subjects with midface and mandible + midface fractures had greater risk to AIs compared to mandibular fractures (relative risk 2.0, P = .002, relative risk 2.8, P = .009).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Every fifth maxillofacial trauma patient had an associated injury. Trauma patients should be evaluated in institutions with trauma protocols and imaging modalities before determining and executing the treatment plan for maxillofacial fractures.

The Role of Antibiotics in Nasal Fractures after Closed Reduction

Nasal fractures represent the most common fracture in facial trauma. The role of prophylactic antibiotics in these injuries is debated, given low infection rates and demonstrated risks of antibiotics. We studied the isolated effect of prophylactic antibiotics on infection rate in patients with nasal fracture after closed reduction.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of a prospectively maintained facial trauma database was conducted. Demographics, comorbidities, fracture classifications, and management of patients who received antibiotics at the time of closed nasal reduction were compared against those who did not receive antibiotics. Infection rates between groups were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was conducted to control for confounding variables. Qualitative analysis was performed for patients who experienced infection following nasal fracture.

Results

A total of 282 patients met inclusion criteria (n = 144, antibiotic; n = 138, nonantibiotic). Six patients experienced infection. There was no difference in infection rate between antibiotic and nonantibiotic groups (2.0% versus 2.2%; P = 0.90). On multivariate regression, antibiotics did not significantly decrease odds of infection (OR 1.7 [0.17-13.6]; P = 0.64). Moreover, patients with open nasal fractures did not have significantly higher odds of infection (OR 1.9 [0.08-20.8]; P = 0.64). Similarly, increasing severity of injury based on Rohrich classification did not significantly impact odds of infection (OR 0.68 [0.23-1.9]; P = 0.46). All six infections were managed at the bedside, with zero infections following operating room management (P = 0.32).

Conclusions

Prophylactic antibiotics do not decrease infection rates following nasal fractures managed by closed reduction. Bedside management may be a risk factor for the development of infection; however, this finding requires further evaluation.

Diagnosis of nasal bone fractures on plain radiographs via convolutional neural networks

This study aimed to assess the performance of deep learning (DL) algorithms in the diagnosis of nasal bone fractures on radiographs and compare it with that of experienced radiologists. In this retrospective study, 6713 patients whose nasal radiographs were examined for suspected nasal bone fractures between January 2009 and October 2020 were assessed. Our dataset was randomly split into training (n = 4325), validation (n = 481), and internal test (n = 1250) sets; a separate external dataset (n = 102) was used. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the DL algorithm and the two radiologists were compared. The AUCs of the DL algorithm for the internal and external test sets were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.83-0.86) and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93), respectively, and those of the two radiologists for the external test set were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.87) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68-0.82). The DL algorithm therefore significantly exceeded radiologist 2 (P = 0.021) but did not significantly differ from radiologist 1 (P = 0.142). The sensitivity and specificity of the DL algorithm were 83.1% (95% CI, 71.2-93.2%) and 83.7% (95% CI, 69.8-93.0%), respectively. Our DL algorithm performs comparably to experienced radiologists in diagnosing nasal bone fractures on radiographs.

Transnasal tension suture of external nasal splints: A reliable, novel technique

BACKGROUND

We routinely apply external nasal splints after closed nasal reduction or rhinoplasty and secure the splint by transnasal suturing. We seek to describe our technique and review our experience.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed to review patients who had an external nasal splint secured by transnasal suturing. The technique consists of steristrips applied across the dorsum and nasal bones. The Aquaplast is molded to the nose and a 2-0 polypropylene suture on a straightened tapered needle or a Keith needle is passed through the splint, the nasal sidewalls and septum, through the splint on the contralateral side, and back again in a horizontal mattress fashion. The suture is tied down to maintain the desired shape of the splint. The splint is removed in the first postoperative followup (10-14 days).

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 31.5 years, 82 male and 18 female patients were reviewed, 67 % of splints were placed for closed reduction of acute nasal trauma, and 33 % placed after elective rhinoplasty for late correction of functional and cosmetic traumatic deformity. No splints were inadvertently removed by patients prior to followup. Splints were removed an average of 12 days postoperatively, and mean followup was 27 weeks. There were no complications related to transnasal suturing of the splint, such as skin ulceration, pressure necrosis, identifiable scarring related to the suture entry points or breathing difficulty attributable to internal nasal valve narrowing.

CONCLUSION

Transnasal suturing is a safe and reliable method for fixation of an external nasal splint.

Nasal Bone Fractures: Differences Amongst Sub-Specialty Consultants

BACKGROUND

Nasal fractures constitute the largest proportion of facial trauma each year, however, there is no consensus management. In this study, we investingated the role of the consultant and the functional and aesthetic outcomes of procedures performed to address nasal bone fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained nasal bone fractures was conducted from 8/1/14 through 1/23/18. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-squared testing and Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, while continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U testing.

RESULTS

During the study period, 136 patients met inclusion criteria for full analysis. The mean age of this cohort was 47.6 ± 20.2 years with the majority identifying as African-American (53.7%) and male (67.2%). Otolaryngologists were significantly more likely to assess pre-operative nasal obstruction (100%) compared to plastic surgeons (24.1%) (P < .001). Otolaryngology elected operative management (53.3%) at a significantly higher rate than plastic surgery (24.1%) (P = .005). Additionally, otolaryngology was significantly more likely to manage patients in an outpatient setting (91.2%), whereas plastic surgery more commonly performed inpatient management (57.1%) (P = .006). Plastic surgery averaged a significantly shorter amount of time from presentation to operative management (7.3 ± 10.7 days) compared to otolaryngology (20 ± 27.7) (P = .019). Consulting service was not associated with a need for revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Consultants across subspecialties differ in the management of nasal bone trauma. A more standardized approach is warranted by all individuals involved in the care of maxillofacial trauma patients.

Nasal Bone Fractures: Analysis of 1193 Cases with an Emphasis on Coincident Adjacent Fractures

Importance: The nasal bone is one of the most commonly fractured bones of the midface. However, the frequency of coincident fractures of adjacent bones such as the frontal process of the maxillary bone, nasal septum, and medial or inferior orbital walls has not been fully evaluated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of fractures of adjacent structures in the setting of a nasal bone fracture. Second, we propose a new classification system of nasal bone fractures with involvement of adjacent bony structures. Design, Setting, and Participants: One thousand, one hundred ninety-three patients with midfacial fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics of fractures of the nasal bone and the incidence of coincident fractures of the frontal process of maxilla, bony nasal septum, medial, or inferior orbital walls were analyzed. Exposure: All patients included in the study presented with nasal trauma. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coincident fractures of adjacent midfacial structures were assessed, and a new classification of midfacial fractures based on computed tomography (CT) scan images was proposed. Results: Among the 1193 cases, bilateral fractures of the nasal bone were most common (69.24%), and coexistent fracture of the frontal process of the maxilla and bony nasal septum was 66.89% and 42.25%, respectively. Coincident fracture of the orbital walls was observed in 16.51% of cases. The major etiology of fracture for the younger and elderly groups was falls, compared with assault as the most common etiology in the adult group. A classification scheme was generated in which fractures of the nasal bone were divided into five types depending on coexisting fractures of adjacent structures. Conclusions and Relevance: External force applied to the nasal bone can also lead to coexistent fracture of adjacent bony structures including the frontal process of the maxilla, nasal septum, and orbital walls. The proposed classification of nasal fracture based on CT imaging helps to incorporate coincident disruption of adjacent structures.

Demographic Factors of Nasal Bone Fractures and Social Reflection

INTRODUCTION

The nose is the most protruding central part of the face, and nasal bone fractures are the most common of facial bone fractures, leading up to 39%. Despite its high frequency, not many studies handled the etiology of nasal bone fractures, leading to the necessity of a recent demographic study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1111 patients diagnosed with nasal bone fracture from 2013 to 2018 at our institute were evaluated. A retrospective review of the various demographic and etiologic characteristics was done.

RESULTS

Numerous factors associated with nasal bone fractures were analyzed. Male patients were 3.3 times greater than the number of female patients, and twenties were the most common age range. Violence was the overall most common cause of injury, while slip down was the most common cause for females. Upon monthly distribution, the highest incidence of nasal bone fractures occurred in September, followed by March and December. The authors further divided the patients by time zone of the fractures, and male patients were most commonly injured from midnight to 3 AM, while female patients were 6 PM to 9 PM.

CONCLUSION

Our findings represent a recent urban data of various etiologic factors of nasal bone fracture. The concept of school violence has been widely used since 1990s, and our data reflects that violence of the youth is a serious issue of the society. The mechanism of injury differed among sexes and age groups, and such discrepancies will aid physicians to better understand facial bone fracture patients and educate them in the future.

Dynamic changes of facial skeletal fractures with time

To investigate the characteristics of imaging changes with time of facial fractures, patients with facial fractures who had computed tomographic scan were enrolled including 500 patients who were divided into six groups based on the time of scanning: super early (<3 d), early (4–7 d), early-to-medium (8–14 d), medium (15–21d), medium-to-late (22d–2 months) and late stage (>2 months). The data were compared and analyzed. Forty two patients with frontal bone fractures had high-energy impact as the reason of fractures. The fracture line was clear and sharp within one week but blunt and sclerotic due to bone absorption at 2–3 weeks, and might exist for a long time. All patients had soft tissue swelling and paranasal sinus effusion at 1–2 weeks after injury. Air might gather in the adjacent soft tissues and/or intracranially within 3 days of injury if the fracture involved the frontal or other sinuses. Twelve of the 42 patients (28.6%) had intracranial hematoma, and five (11.9%) had epidural effusion. Subarachnoid hemorrhage was mostly absorbed within one week while epidural hematoma was completely absorbed over 3 weeks. Significant changes (P < 0.05) in the fracture lines, effusion of paranasal sinuses, soft tissue swelling and pneumocephalus were observed during the study period. For patients with medial orbital wall fractures, the fracture line was sharp and clear at early stages with concurrent sphenoid sinus effusion, and the fracture line became depressed 3 weeks later with disappearance of sphenoid sinus effusion. Significant changes (P < 0.05) were observed in the sharp fracture line, soft tissue swelling, sphenoid sinus effusion and smooth depression at fracture sites. For nasal fractures, the fracture line was sharp and clear at early stages with concurrent soft tissue swelling which disappeared one week later. The fracture line became smooth three weeks later. A significant (P < 0.05) difference was demonstrated in the changes of fracture line and soft tissue swelling with time. In conclusion, facial fractures have some dynamic alterations with time and identification of these characteristics may help reaching a correct clinical diagnosis with regard to fracture severity and time.

Fractures of the Nasal Bones: Is External Splinting Really Warranted?

BACKGROUND

It has been advocated that reduction of nasal bone fractures should be followed by internal packing and/or external splinting. Despite the ample literature concerning the advantages and limitations of various splint types, the necessity and effectiveness of external splinting has not been well documented.

OBJECTIVE

To present the authors' experience and review the literature on treatment of nasal bone fractures, focusing on the indications and effectiveness of external splinting following closed reduction.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis and literature review.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of all patients, treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the "KAT" General Hospital of Attica between January 2010 and December 2016 for facial trauma including nasal bone fractures, were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographic data, fracture type, applied treatment, complications, and final outcome were registered.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients (58 males; 19 females) were included in the study. The age range was 18 to 65 years (mean, 37.8). Closed reduction without external splinting was performed in 63 patients and open reduction with internal fixation in 6; 8 severely comminuted fractures were treated with closed reduction and external splinting. The mean follow-up was 4.8 months. All severely comminuted fractures presented complications.

CONCLUSIONS

External splinting following closed reduction of nasal bone fractures should not be used routinely but only in selected patients with severe comminution. Since the pertinent literature is inconclusive on the indications and effectiveness of external splinting, randomized controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the issue.

A chilling reminder: Pediatric facial trauma from recreational winter activities

BACKGROUND

Winter activities offer children and adolescents an outdoor recreational opportunity during the coldest months. Our objectives were to estimate the national incidence of facial injury associated with recreational winter activities. Furthermore, we analyze demographic trends and clinical characteristics of patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs).

METHODS

The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a population-based resource, was evaluated for ED visits from 2010 to 2014 for children injured from "active" winter -undertakings (snowboarding, skiing, ice skating) and sledding/tubing. Entry narratives were evaluated for demographics, diagnoses, and other clinical factors.

RESULTS

841 entries amounting to an estimated 27,618 patients were evaluated. The most common injuries were lacerations (69.4%), contusions/abrasions (19.5%), and fractures (5.5%), with the most common fracture sites being the nose (60.9%), orbit (15.2%), and mandible (10.9%). Median age was 9 years (IQR 5-12), and 65.8% were male. A greater proportion of adolescents sustained fractures than younger children (8.1% vs. 4.0%). The majority of fractures were to the nose.

CONCLUSION

With nearly 30,000 ED visits over five years, participation in winter sports can be perilous. Adolescents harbor a greater risk of sustaining serious injuries than younger children, and patients injured sledding/tubing had a greater fracture risk compared to those participating in more "active" winter activities. As upper/mid-face fractures occurred in only 1.4%, these findings reinforce a very limited role for CT. These findings suggest a need for greater use of facial protection and closer supervision of older children participating in these activities.

Common dental and orofacial trauma: evaluation and management

This article reviews common dental and orofacial traumatic injuries, and provides a broad overview and general principles of the diagnosis and management of common dental and orofacial injuries. Such knowledge will aid the physician in recognition and assessment of injury, proper treatment, and appropriate referral to the specialist. Although many of these injuries warrant appropriate consultation, a sound understanding of assessment and treatment protocol is important.

Identification of Nasal Bone Fractures on Conventional Radiography and Facial CT: Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy in Different Imaging Modalities and Analysis of Interobserver Reliability

Background

There has been no study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of an experienced radiologist with a trainee in nasal bone fracture.

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic accuracy between conventional radiography and computed tomography (CT) for the identification of nasal bone fractures and to evaluate the interobserver reliability between a staff radiologist and a trainee.

Patients and Methods

A total of 108 patients who underwent conventional radiography and CT after acute nasal trauma were included in this retrospective study. Two readers, a staff radiologist and a second-year resident, independently assessed the results of the imaging studies.

Results

Of the 108 patients, the presence of a nasal bone fracture was confirmed in 88 (81.5%) patients. The number of non-depressed fractures was higher than the number of depressed fractures. In nine (10.2%) patients, nasal bone fractures were only identified on conventional radiography, including three depressed and six non-depressed fractures. CT was more accurate as compared to conventional radiography for the identification of nasal bone fractures as determined by both readers (P <0.05), all diagnostic indices of an experienced radiologist were similar to or higher than those of a trainee, and κ statistics showed moderate agreement between the two diagnostic tools for both readers. There was no statistical difference in the assessment of interobserver reliability for both imaging modalities in the identification of nasal bone fractures.

Conclusion

For the identification of nasal bone fractures, CT was significantly superior to conventional radiography. Although a staff radiologist showed better values in the identification of nasal bone fracture and differentiation between depressed and non-depressed fractures than a trainee, there was no statistically significant difference in the interpretation of conventional radiography and CT between a radiologist and a trainee.