Combined or Staged Temporomandibular Joint and Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Internal Derangement and Dentofacial Deformities

Concomitant Temporomandibular Joint Replacement and Orthognathic Surgery

The treatment of patients with severe temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders and associated skeletal discrepancies presents a complex challenge for oral and maxillofacial surgeons. It is widely recognized that TMDs can impact the stability and outcomes of surgical treatments for dentofacial deformities. Consequently, addressing TMDs prior to or in conjunction with orthodontic or surgical interventions may be necessary to achieve optimal and long-lasting results. Alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) and orthognathic surgery have emerged as the standard approach due to their predictability, long-term stability and excellent outcomes when addressing end-stage TMJ disease in conjunction with DFDs as it provides a comprehensive solution to address both functional and aesthetic aspects of these patients' conditions. Understanding the appropriate utilization of TMJR in conjunction with orthognathic surgery can lead to improved treatment planning and successful outcomes for patients with complex TMJ disorders and associated dentofacial deformities. This review aims to discuss the indications, preoperative evaluation, staging, sequencing, and surgical considerations involved in utilizing alloplastic TMJ replacement in the presence of dentofacial deformities.

Treatment Strategy for Condyle/Ramus Deficiency Using 3D Virtual Surgery and CAD/CAM Technologies; Total Joint Replacement or Inverted-L Osteotomy

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a guideline for selecting proper surgical modalities for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion with moderate-to-severe vertical height deficiency (VHD) of the condyle/ramus complex (CRC) using bimaxillary surgery in conjunction with total joint replacement (TJR) or inverted-L osteotomy (ILO) assisted by 3D virtual surgical planning and CAD/CAM technologies.

CASES

Four cases of severe skeletal Class II patients with moderate-to-severe VHD of CRC were presented. They underwent bimaxillary surgery using Le Fort I osteotomy in the maxilla and TJR or ILO in the mandible, with the help of virtual surgical planning (VSP) and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-printed surgical guides and osteosynthesis plates. Guidelines are as follows: (1) if a patient has a moderate degree of VHD and the function of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is normal, ILO would be preferred for vertical elongation of the ramus; (2) if a patient has congenitally small condyle or severe condylar resorption, TJR would be preferred to resolve severe VHD of CRC; and (3) when a patient has a metal allergy, foreign body reaction or anatomic limitations (ie, thin cranial base cortex for fossa fixation), ILO would be a better option than TJR.

RESULTS

TJR or ILO using VSP and CAD/CAM-printed surgical guides, wafers, and customized plates can provide a proper selection of the surgical plan, accurate transfer of surgical plans to actual surgical procedures, and esthetic improvement of the facial profile.

CONCLUSION

This guideline based on the degree of VHD and functional aspects of CRC might help clinicians to select effective surgical modality for correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion with moderate-to-severe VHD of CRC.

Total Temporomandibular Joint Replacement and Simultaneous Orthognathic Surgery Using Computer-Assisted Surgery

Background

Disorders of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) are frequent and are usually associated with other disorders of the facial skeleton. Surgery might be needed to correct TMJ anatomy and function and, in cases where pathologies coexist, a two-stage corrective surgery might be needed. However, the current fashion of single-stage procedures is feasible with the aid of new technologies such as computer-assisted surgery (CAS). This is a step forward toward performing complex procedures such as a TMJ replacement with simultaneous orthognathic surgery. CAS allows designing patient-fitted prosthesis and more predictable and accurate surgeries. Moreover, intraoperative development can be controlled in real time with intraoperative navigation, and postoperative results can be measured and compared afterwards.

Aims

The primary purpose of this article is to present the protocol used in our institution for orthognathic surgery associated with unilateral and bilateral TMJ replacement with patient-fitted prostheses guided with CAS.

Materials and methods

We present two cases to illustrate our protocol and its results.

Results

In the first case, the difference in millimeters between planning and surgical outcomes was 1.72 mm for the glenoid component and 2.16 mm for the condylar prosthesis; for the second case, differences in the right side were 2.59 mm for the glenoid component and 2.06 mm for the ramus, and in the left side, due to the anatomy the difference was a little greater, without clinical significance.

Conclusion

Combined surgery of the midface and mandible with total TMJ replacement is feasible and beneficial for the patient. CAS facilitates the planning and design of custom-fit prosthesis and execution of these procedures.