Management of Oroantral Communications

The Treatment and Management of Oroantral Communications and Fistulas: A Systematic Review and Network Metanalysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this work was to systematically review and carry out a statistical metanalysis to identify the best treatment for close oroantral communications and fistulas and to avoid the risk of recurrence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic search was conducted on the MEDLINE database (Pubmed), Scopus, and Google scholar using the following keywords: "oro antral communication (OAC)" OR "oro antral fistula (OAF)" OR "antro-oral communication" OR "communication between maxillary sinus and oral cavity" OR "oro-sinusal communication" OR "oro-sinusal fistula" OR "sinus communication" OR "sinus fistula" OR "antral communication" AND "treatment" OR "management" OR "surgical treatment" OR "surgical interventions". This work was performed in accordance with the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses). After article screening, 9 RCTs (randomized controlled trials), comparing two or more techniques, were included in this review.

RESULTS

A statistically significant difference was detected in favor of the buccal fat pad compared to the buccal advancement flap and palatal rotational flap.

CONCLUSIONS

With the limitations of this study, the buccal fat pad showed the best results in terms of communication closure and reducing the risk of relapse.

Diagnosis and Management of oro-antral fistula: Case series and review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

The oro-antral communication (OAC) is a pathological opening between the maxillary sinus and the oral cavity. When it does not close spontaneously or if it is not treated, it remains permeable and epithelializes to develop into an oro-antral fistula (OAF) and can cause maxillary sinusitis.

CASES PRESENTATION

The authors present through 5 clinical cases the different steps of the surgical protocols opting for the buccal fat pad flap and the advanced buccal flap to treat OAF/OAC.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Surgical closure of the OAC within 48 h is recommended to avoid complications. Several alternative techniques have been described over the years for the management of the OAC and OAF, with their advantages and limitations. The most commonly used surgical flaps are of two types: the advanced buccal flap and the buccal fat pad (BFP) flap.

CONCLUSION

The adequate availability of the advanced buccal flap and the buccal fat pad (BFP) flap in the majority of patients, the easy handling, the minimal donor site morbidity as well as the excellent blood supply make them perfect flaps for the closure of OAF/OAC. However, follow-up remains a key point and very important to avoid complications. The present case series was limited by the small number of patients and the authors recommend a study with larger groups.

Odontogenic Sinusitis: From Diagnosis to Treatment Possibilities-A Narrative Review of Recent Data

The maxillary sinus is a structure at the border of specialties: otorhinolaryngology and maxillofacial surgery. Due to this fact, regarding etiology, it can be affected by both the rhinogenic and odontogenic path and can impose diagnostic difficulties. The etiopathogenic mechanisms that can affect the Schneiderian membrane are mainly inflammatory, iatrogenic, traumatic, and tumorous in nature. From a microbiological point of view, the bacteriology is polymorphic, including both aerobic and anaerobic species in acute OS, the predominating species in acute OS being aerobic, and in chronic anaerobic germs. The role of fungi in the determination of this pathology and in the production of the biofilm that leads to resistance to antibiotic treatment is also discussed. The present paper aims to present the etiopathogenesis, bacteriology, clinical manifestations, as well as treatment of odontogenic sinusitis (OS) from an updated perspective through reviewing the literature. If unilateral maxillary sinusitis is usually due to odontogenic causes, this does not clinically exclude the possibility of strictly rhinogenic causes in the occurrence of sinusitis. This underlines the important role of complex oral and rhinological clinical examination as well as the role of preclinical examinations in specifying the certainty diagnosis. Simple radiography, orthopantomography, CT, and CBCT are compared in terms of diagnostic accuracy. The treatment of OS is complex, involving medication, dental, and surgical measures. The value of endoscopic surgery is emphasized, comparing its advantages over the classic Caldwell-Luc technique.

Foreign Bodies in Sinonasal Tissues: A Potential Pitfall yet a Hint to Oroantral Fistulas

Foreign bodies in the maxillary sinus are infrequent findings with various organic and inorganic materials have been reported. Most are iatrogenic due to abnormal communications between the oral cavity and the sinus cavity, predominantly secondary to dental and oral procedures. Oroantral fistulas might be asymptomatic incidental findings or may present with sinusitis-related symptoms. Even though oroantral fistulas are frequently encountered iatrogenic complications, most studies focused on radiologic findings and surgical closure procedures. A few cases reported the histopathologic findings of foreign body-related antral sinusitis. Our aim is to report three cases of chronic maxillary sinusitis induced by various foreign bodies of oral and dental origin associated with oroantral fistulas. Our focus is to highlight the different histopathologic patterns, potential pitfalls and helpful clues of foreign body-induced maxillary sinusitis. Altered foreign bodies in procured sinus specimens might be missed, misinterpreted or ignored by pathologists. Obvious vegetable food remnants were detected, but subtle vegetable residuals showed pulse granuloma, rings and sheet-like patterns embedded in the granulation tissue and fibrous stroma. Some materials mimicked fungal hyphae while others were ignored as nonspecific debris. Periodic acid Schiff stain and polarizing light helped delineate their nature. Other helpful hints included the presence of oral-type squamous epithelium, crystals, hemosiderin pigments, dental materials such as alvogyl, and microorganisms of oral origin for example Actinomyces. Our series emphasizes the importance of correct recognition of foreign bodies of oral and dental origin in paranasal specimens to guide clinicians to the possibility of oroantral fistula-associated odontogenic sinusitis versus conventional rhinosinusitis.