In silico identification of endogenous and exogenous agonists of Estrogen-related receptor α

In Silico Prediction of ERRα Agonists Based on Combined Features and Stacking Ensemble Method

Estrogen-related receptor α (ERRα) is considered a very promising target for treating metabolic diseases such as type 2 diabetes. Development of a prediction model to quickly identify potential ERRα agonists can significantly reduce the time spent on virtual screening. In this study, 298 ERRα agonists and numerous nonagonists were collected from various sources to build a new dataset of ERRα agonists. Then a total of 90 models were built using a combination of different algorithms, molecular characterization methods, and data sampling techniques. The consensus model with optimal performance was also validated on the test set (AUC=0.876, BA=0.816) and external validation set (AUC=0.867, BA=0.777) based on five selected baseline models. Furthermore, the model's applicability domain and privileged substructures were examined, and the feature importance was analyzed using the SHAP method to help interpret the model. Based on the above, it's hoped that our publicly accessible data, models, codes, and analytical techniques will prove valuable in quick screening and rational designing more novel and potent ERRα agonists.

Review of in silico studies dedicated to the nuclear receptor family: Therapeutic prospects and toxicological concerns

Being in the center of both therapeutic and toxicological concerns, NRs are widely studied for drug discovery application but also to unravel the potential toxicity of environmental compounds such as pesticides, cosmetics or additives. High throughput screening campaigns (HTS) are largely used to detect compounds able to interact with this protein family for both therapeutic and toxicological purposes. These methods lead to a large amount of data requiring the use of computational approaches for a robust and correct analysis and interpretation. The output data can be used to build predictive models to forecast the behavior of new chemicals based on their in vitro activities. This atrticle is a review of the studies published in the last decade and dedicated to NR ligands in silico prediction for both therapeutic and toxicological purposes. Over 100 articles concerning 14 NR subfamilies were carefully read and analyzed in order to retrieve the most commonly used computational methods to develop predictive models, to retrieve the databases deployed in the model building process and to pinpoint some of the limitations they faced.

Simplex representation of molecular structure as universal QSAR/QSPR tool

We review the development and application of the Simplex approach for the solution of various QSAR/QSPR problems. The general concept of the simplex method and its varieties are described. The advantages of utilizing this methodology, especially for the interpretation of QSAR/QSPR models, are presented in comparison to other fragmentary methods of molecular structure representation. The utility of SiRMS is demonstrated not only in the standard QSAR/QSPR applications, but also for mixtures, polymers, materials, and other complex systems. In addition to many different types of biological activity (antiviral, antimicrobial, antitumor, psychotropic, analgesic, etc.), toxicity and bioavailability, the review examines the simulation of important properties, such as water solubility, lipophilicity, as well as luminescence, and thermodynamic properties (melting and boiling temperatures, critical parameters, etc.). This review focuses on the stereochemical description of molecules within the simplex approach and details the possibilities of universal molecular stereo-analysis and stereochemical configuration description, along with stereo-isomerization mechanism and molecular fragment "topography" identification.

Examining the evidence of non-monotonic dose-response in Androgen Receptor agonism high-throughput screening assay

Modern High-Throughput Screening (HTS) techniques allow to determine in vitro bioactivity of tens of thousands of chemicals within a relatively short period of time and tested compounds are usually interpreted as either active or inactive. The interpretation is mostly based on the assumption of monotonic dose-response. This approach ignores potential abnormal dose-response relationships, such as non-monotonic dose-response (NMDR). NMDR presents a serious challenge to toxicologists and pharmacologists, since they undermine the usefulness of such concepts as lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) and no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL). The possible presence of the NMDR in Androgen receptor (AR) agonism was examined for a structurally diverse set of chemicals (~8 300 unique compounds) from Tox21 project library. The source of activity data is Tox21 AR agonism luciferase-based HTS on the MDA-MB-453 cell line. The examination of curve fitting for 35,328 dose-response data entries was based on modified version of existing criteria for determination of NMDR. The bias that arises from compounds' cytotoxicity and interference with firefly luciferase protein was also studied. The examination has shown evidence of NMDR for several compounds, including known AR antagonists (e. g. Cyproterone acetate) and other known endocrine disruptors (e. g. Tranilast). Compounds were divided into 3 groups based on chemical class, known biological activity profile and the shape of dose-response curve. The challenges of using HTS data to determine NMDR and benefits of this analysis are discussed.