1
|
Ruttle JE, 't Hart BM, Henriques DYP. Reduced feedback barely slows down proprioceptive recalibration. J Neurophysiol 2022; 128:1625-1633. [PMID: 36417308 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00082.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introducing altered visual feedback of the hand produces quick adaptation of reaching movements. Our lab has shown that the associated shifts in estimates of the felt position of the hand saturate within a few training trials. The current study investigates whether the rapid changes in felt hand position that occur during classic visuomotor adaptation are diminished or slowed when training feedback is reduced. We reduced feedback by either providing visual feedback only at the end of the reach (terminal feedback) or constraining hand movements to reduce motor adaptation-related error signals such as sensory prediction errors and task errors (exposure). We measured changes as participants completed reaches with a 30° rotation, a -30° rotation, and clamped visual feedback, with these two "impoverished" training conditions, along with classic visuomotor adaptation training, while continuously estimating their felt hand position. Training with terminal feedback slightly reduced the initial rate of change in overall adaptation. However, the rate of change in hand localization, as well as the asymptote of hand localization shifts in both the terminal feedback group and the exposure training group was not noticeably different from those in the classic training group. Taken together, shifts in felt hand position are rapid and robust responses to sensory mismatches and are at best slightly modulated when feedback is reduced. This suggests that given the speed and invariance to the quality of feedback of proprioceptive recalibration, it could immediately contribute to all kinds of reach adaptation.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Reaching to targets with altered visual feedback about hand position leads to adaptation of movements as well as shifts in estimates of felt hand position. Felt hand position can shift in as little as one trial, and here we show that there is no noticeable reduction in speed when the feedback about movements is impoverished, indicating the robustness of the process of recalibrating felt hand position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer E Ruttle
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bernard Marius 't Hart
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Denise Y P Henriques
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruttle JE, 't Hart BM, Henriques DYP. Implicit motor learning within three trials. Sci Rep 2021; 11:1627. [PMID: 33452363 PMCID: PMC7810862 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81031-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
In motor learning, the slow development of implicit learning is traditionally taken for granted. While much is known about training performance during adaptation to a perturbation in reaches, saccades and locomotion, little is known about the time course of the underlying implicit processes during normal motor adaptation. Implicit learning is characterized by both changes in internal models and state estimates of limb position. Here, we measure both as reach aftereffects and shifts in hand localization in our participants, after every training trial. The observed implicit changes were near asymptote after only one to three perturbed training trials and were not predicted by a two-rate model's slow process that is supposed to capture implicit learning. Hence, we show that implicit learning is much faster than conventionally believed, which has implications for rehabilitation and skills training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer E Ruttle
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada. .,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Bernard Marius 't Hart
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Denise Y P Henriques
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gastrock RQ, Modchalingam S, 't Hart BM, Henriques DYP. External error attribution dampens efferent-based predictions but not proprioceptive changes in hand localization. Sci Rep 2020; 10:19918. [PMID: 33199805 PMCID: PMC7669896 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76940-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In learning and adapting movements in changing conditions, people attribute the errors they experience to a combined weighting of internal or external sources. As such, error attribution that places more weight on external sources should lead to decreased updates in our internal models for movement of the limb or estimating the position of the effector, i.e. there should be reduced implicit learning. However, measures of implicit learning are the same whether or not we induce explicit adaptation with instructions about the nature of the perturbation. Here we evoke clearly external errors by either demonstrating the rotation on every trial, or showing the hand itself throughout training. Implicit reach aftereffects persist, but are reduced in both groups. Only for the group viewing the hand, changes in hand position estimates suggest that predicted sensory consequences are not updated, but only rely on recalibrated proprioception. Our results show that estimating the position of the hand incorporates source attribution during motor learning, but recalibrated proprioception is an implicit process unaffected by external error attribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphael Q Gastrock
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada. .,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.
| | - Shanaathanan Modchalingam
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada
| | | | - Denise Y P Henriques
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON, M3J 1P3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vachon CM, Modchalingam S, ‘t Hart BM, Henriques DYP. The effect of age on visuomotor learning processes. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0239032. [PMID: 32925937 PMCID: PMC7489529 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Knowing where our limbs are in space is essential for moving and for adapting movements to various changes in our environments and bodies. The ability to adapt movements declines with age, and age-related cognitive decline can explain a decreased ability to adopt and deploy explicit, cognitive strategies in motor learning. Age-related sensory decline could also lead to a reduced fidelity of sensory position signals and error signals, each of which can affect implicit motor adaptation. Here we investigate two estimates of limb position; one based on proprioception, the other on predicted sensory consequences of movements. Each is considered a measure of an implicit adaptation process and may be affected by both age and cognitive strategies. Both older (n = 38) and younger (n = 42) adults adapted to a 30° visuomotor rotation in a centre-out reaching task. We make an explicit, cognitive strategy available to half of participants in each age group with a detailed instruction. After training, we first quantify the explicit learning elicited by instruction. Instructed older adults initially use the provided strategy slightly less than younger adults but show a similar ability to evoke it after training. This indicates that cognitive explanations for age-related decline in motor learning are limited. In contrast, training induced much larger shifts of state estimates of hand location in older adults compared to younger adults. This is not modulated by strategy instructions, and appears driven by recalibrated proprioception, which is almost twice as large in older adults, while predictions might not be updated in older adults. This means that in healthy aging, some implicit processes may be compensating for other changes to maintain motor capabilities, while others also show age-related decline (data: https://osf.io/qzhmy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Michael Vachon
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shanaathanan Modchalingam
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Denise Y. P. Henriques
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mostafa AA, ‘t Hart BM, Henriques DYP. Motor learning without moving: Proprioceptive and predictive hand localization after passive visuoproprioceptive discrepancy training. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221861. [PMID: 31465524 PMCID: PMC6715176 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
An accurate estimate of limb position is necessary for movement planning, before and after motor learning. Where we localize our unseen hand after a reach depends on felt hand position, or proprioception, but in studies and theories on motor adaptation this is quite often neglected in favour of predicted sensory consequences based on efference copies of motor commands. Both sources of information should contribute, so here we set out to further investigate how much of hand localization depends on proprioception and how much on predicted sensory consequences. We use a training paradigm combining robot controlled hand movements with rotated visual feedback that eliminates the possibility to update predicted sensory consequences (‘exposure training’), but still recalibrates proprioception, as well as a classic training paradigm with self-generated movements in another set of participants. After each kind of training we measure participants’ hand location estimates based on both efference-based predictions and afferent proprioceptive signals with self-generated hand movements (‘active localization’) as well as based on proprioception only with robot-generated movements (‘passive localization’). In the exposure training group, we find indistinguishable shifts in passive and active hand localization, but after classic training, active localization shifts more than passive, indicating a contribution from updated predicted sensory consequences. Both changes in open-loop reaches and hand localization are only slightly smaller after exposure training as compared to after classic training, confirming that proprioception plays a large role in estimating limb position and in planning movements, even after adaptation. (data: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/zfdth, preprint: https://doi.org/10.1101/384941)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed A. Mostafa
- CVR / Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Physical Education, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Bernard Marius ‘t Hart
- CVR / Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Modchalingam S, Vachon CM, ‘t Hart BM, Henriques DYP. The effects of awareness of the perturbation during motor adaptation on hand localization. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0220884. [PMID: 31398227 PMCID: PMC6688819 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Awareness of task demands is often used during rehabilitation and sports training by providing instructions which appears to accelerate learning and improve performance through explicit motor learning. However, the effects of awareness of perturbations on the changes in estimates of hand position resulting from motor learning are not well understood. In this study, people adapted their reaches to a visuomotor rotation while either receiving instructions on the nature of the perturbation, experiencing a large rotation, or both to generate awareness of the perturbation and increase the contribution of explicit learning. We found that instructions and/or larger rotations allowed people to activate or deactivate part of the learned strategy at will and elicited explicit changes in open-loop reaches, while a small rotation without instructions did not. However, these differences in awareness, and even manipulations of awareness and perturbation size, did not appear to affect learning-induced changes in hand-localization estimates. This was true when estimates of the adapted hand location reflected changes in proprioception, produced when the hand was displaced by a robot, and also when hand location estimates were based on efferent-based predictions of self-generated hand movements. In other words, visuomotor adaptation led to significant shifts in predicted and perceived hand location that were not modulated by either instruction or perturbation size. Our results indicate that not all outcomes of motor learning benefit from an explicit awareness of the task. Particularly, proprioceptive recalibration and the updating of predicted sensory consequences appear to be largely implicit. (data: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/mx5u2, preprint: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/y53c2)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanaathanan Modchalingam
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Chad Michael Vachon
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Denise Y. P. Henriques
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rand MK, Heuer H. Visual and proprioceptive recalibrations after exposure to a visuomotor rotation. Eur J Neurosci 2019; 50:3296-3310. [PMID: 31077463 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Adaptation to a visuomotor rotation in a cursor-control task is accompanied by proprioceptive recalibration, whereas the existence of visual recalibration is uncertain and has even been doubted. In the present study, we tested both visual and proprioceptive recalibration; proprioceptive recalibration was not only assessed by means of psychophysical judgments of the perceived position of the hand, but also by an indirect procedure based on movement characteristics. Participants adapted to a gradually introduced visuomotor rotation of 30° by making center-out movements to remembered targets. In subsequent test trials, they made center-out movements without visual feedback or observed center-out motions of a cursor without moving the hand. In each test trial, they judged the endpoint of hand or cursor by matching the position of the hand or of a visual marker, respectively, moving along a semicircular path. This path ran through all possible endpoints of the center-out movements. We observed proprioceptive recalibration of 7.3° (3.1° with the indirect procedure) and a smaller, but significant, visual recalibration of 1.3°. Total recalibration of 8.6° was about half as strong as motor adaptation, the adaptive shift of the movement direction. The evidence of both proprioceptive and visual recalibration was obtained with a judgment procedure that suggests that recalibration is restricted to the type of movement performed during exposure to a visuomotor rotation. Consequently, identical physical positions of the hand can be perceived differently depending on how they have been reached, and similarly identical positions of a cursor on a monitor can be perceived differently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miya K Rand
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Herbert Heuer
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Dortmund, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ruttle JE, 't Hart BM, Henriques DYP. The fast contribution of visual-proprioceptive discrepancy to reach aftereffects and proprioceptive recalibration. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200621. [PMID: 30016356 PMCID: PMC6049908 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Adapting reaches to altered visual feedback not only leads to motor changes, but also to shifts in perceived hand location; "proprioceptive recalibration". These changes are robust to many task variations and can occur quite rapidly. For instance, our previous study found both motor and sensory shifts arise in as few as 6 rotated-cursor training trials. The aim of this study is to investigate one of the training signals that contribute to these rapid sensory and motor changes. We do this by removing the visuomotor error signals associated with classic visuomotor rotation training; and provide only experience with a visual-proprioceptive discrepancy for training. While a force channel constrains reach direction 30o away from the target, the cursor representing the hand unerringly moves straight to the target. The resulting visual-proprioceptive discrepancy drives significant and rapid changes in no-cursor reaches and felt hand position, again within only 6 training trials. The extent of the sensory change is unexpectedly larger following the visual-proprioceptive discrepancy training. Not surprisingly the size of the reach aftereffects is substantially smaller than following classic visuomotor rotation training. However, the time course by which both changes emerge is similar in the two training types. These results suggest that even the mere exposure to a discrepancy between felt and seen hand location is a sufficient training signal to drive robust motor and sensory plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer E Ruttle
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bernard Marius 't Hart
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Denise Y P Henriques
- Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada.,School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
‘t Hart BM, Henriques DYP. Separating Predicted and Perceived Sensory Consequences of Motor Learning. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0163556. [PMID: 27658214 PMCID: PMC5033392 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
During motor adaptation the discrepancy between predicted and actually perceived sensory feedback is thought to be minimized, but it can be difficult to measure predictions of the sensory consequences of actions. Studies attempting to do so have found that self-directed, unseen hand position is mislocalized in the direction of altered visual feedback. However, our lab has shown that motor adaptation also leads to changes in perceptual estimates of hand position, even when the target hand is passively displaced. We attribute these changes to a recalibration of hand proprioception, since in the absence of a volitional movement, efferent or predictive signals are likely not involved. The goal here is to quantify the extent to which changes in hand localization reflect a change in the predicted sensory (visual) consequences or a change in the perceived (proprioceptive) consequences. We did this by comparing changes in localization produced when the hand movement was self-generated (‘active localization’) versus robot-generated (‘passive localization’) to the same locations following visuomotor adaptation to a rotated cursor. In this passive version, there should be no predicted consequences of these robot-generated hand movements. We found that although changes in localization were somewhat larger in active localization, the passive localization task also elicited substantial changes. Our results suggest that the change in hand localization following visuomotor adaptation may not be based entirely on updating predicted sensory consequences, but may largely reflect changes in our proprioceptive state estimate.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zbib B, Henriques DYP, Cressman EK. Proprioceptive recalibration arises slowly compared to reach adaptation. Exp Brain Res 2016; 234:2201-13. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4624-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
11
|
Wilke C, Synofzik M, Lindner A. Sensorimotor recalibration depends on attribution of sensory prediction errors to internal causes. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54925. [PMID: 23359818 PMCID: PMC3554678 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2012] [Accepted: 12/20/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Sensorimotor learning critically depends on error signals. Learning usually tries to minimise these error signals to guarantee optimal performance. Errors can, however, have both internal causes, resulting from one’s sensorimotor system, and external causes, resulting from external disturbances. Does learning take into account the perceived cause of error information? Here, we investigated the recalibration of internal predictions about the sensory consequences of one’s actions. Since these predictions underlie the distinction of self- and externally produced sensory events, we assumed them to be recalibrated only by prediction errors attributed to internal causes. When subjects were confronted with experimentally induced visual prediction errors about their pointing movements in virtual reality, they recalibrated the predicted visual consequences of their movements. Recalibration was not proportional to the externally generated prediction error, but correlated with the error component which subjects attributed to internal causes. We also revealed adaptation in subjects’ motor performance which reflected their recalibrated sensory predictions. Thus, causal attribution of error information is essential for sensorimotor learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Wilke
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthis Synofzik
- Department of Neurodegeneration, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Centre for Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Axel Lindner
- Department of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Proprioceptive recalibration in the right and left hands following abrupt visuomotor adaptation. Exp Brain Res 2011; 217:187-96. [PMID: 22198532 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2985-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2011] [Accepted: 12/09/2011] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that after reaching with misaligned visual feedback of the hand, one adapts his or her reaches and partially recalibrates proprioception, such that sense of felt hand position is shifted to match the seen hand position. However, to date, this has only been demonstrated in the right (dominant) hand following reach training with a visuomotor distortion in which the rotated cursor distortion was introduced gradually. As reach adaptation has been shown to differ depending on how the distortion is introduced (gradual vs. abrupt), we sought to examine proprioceptive recalibration following reach training with a cursor that was abruptly rotated 30° clockwise relative to hand motion. Furthermore, because the left and right arms have demonstrated selective advantages when matching visual and proprioceptive targets, respectively, we assessed proprioceptive recalibration in right-handed subjects following training with either the right or the left hand. On average, we observed shifts in felt hand position of approximately 7.6° following training with misaligned visual feedback of the hand, which is consistent with our previous findings in which the distortion was introduced gradually. Moreover, no difference was observed in proprioceptive recalibration across the left and right hands. These findings suggest that proprioceptive recalibration is a robust process that arises symmetrically in the two hands following visuomotor adaptation regardless of the initial magnitude of the error signal.
Collapse
|