1
|
Halicka M, Cousins OR, Ten Brink AF, Vittersø AD, Proulx MJ, Bultitude JH. Reduced Visuospatial Attention in Personal Space is Not Limited to the Affected Limb in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. J Pain Res 2024; 17:1519-1529. [PMID: 38686102 PMCID: PMC11056436 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s437366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Alterations in spatial attention have been reported in people with chronic pain and may be relevant to understanding its cortical mechanisms and developing novel treatments. There is conflicting evidence as to whether people with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) have reduced visuospatial attention to their affected limb and/or its surrounding space, with some evidence that these deficits may be greater in personal (bodily) space. We aimed to test the competing hypotheses of whether the visuospatial attentional bias is specific to the personal space of the affected limb or generalizes to the personal space of other parts of the affected side of the body. Patients and Methods Using visual Temporal Order Judgement tasks, we measured spatial attention in the personal space of the hands and feet of patients with upper (n=14) or lower (n=14) limb CRPS and pain-free controls (n=17). Participants judged the order of two light flashes presented at different temporal offsets on each of their hands or feet. Slower processing of the flash on one side relative to the other reflects reduced attention to that side of space. Results Controls prioritized stimuli on the non-dominant (left) relative to dominant side, consistent with the well-documented normal leftward bias of attention (ie "pseudoneglect"). Regardless of the location (upper or lower limb) of the pain or visual stimuli, people with CRPS showed no such asymmetry, representing reduced attention to the affected side (compared to the greater attention of controls to their non-dominant side). More severe CRPS symptoms were associated with a greater tendency to deprioritize stimuli on the affected side. Conclusion Our findings suggest that relative visuospatial bias in CRPS is generalized to the personal space of the affected side of the body, rather than being specific to the personal space of the CRPS-affected limb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Halicka
- Institute of Neuroscience, Universite catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | | - Antonia F Ten Brink
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Axel D Vittersø
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | | | - Janet H Bultitude
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Manfron L, Filbrich L, Molitor V, Farnè A, Mouraux A, Legrain V. Perceptual simultaneity between nociceptive and visual stimuli depends on their spatial congruence. Exp Brain Res 2023:10.1007/s00221-023-06637-2. [PMID: 37222776 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-023-06637-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
To protect our body against physical threats, it is important to integrate the somatic and extra-somatic inputs generated by these stimuli. Temporal synchrony is an important parameter determining multisensory interaction, and the time taken by a given sensory input to reach the brain depends on the length and conduction velocity of the specific pathways through which it is transmitted. Nociceptive inputs are transmitted through very slow conducting unmyelinated C and thinly myelinated Aδ nociceptive fibers. It was previously shown that to perceive a visual stimulus and a thermo-nociceptive stimulus applied on the hand as coinciding in time, the nociceptive stimulus must precede the visual one by 76 ms for nociceptive inputs conveyed by Aδ fibers and 577 ms for inputs conveyed by C fibers. Since spatial proximity is also hypothesized to contribute to multisensory interaction, the present study investigated the effect of spatial congruence between visual and nociceptive stimuli. Participants judged the temporal order of visual and nociceptive stimuli, with the visual stimuli flashed either next to the stimulated hand or next to the opposite unstimulated hand, and with nociceptive stimuli evoking responses mediated by either Aδ or C fibers. The amount of time by which the nociceptive stimulus had to precede the visual stimulus for them to be perceived as appearing concomitantly was smaller when the visual stimulus occurred near the hand receiving the nociceptive stimulus as compared to when it occurred near the contralateral hand. This illustrates the challenge for the brain to process the synchrony between nociceptive and non-nociceptive stimuli to enable their efficient interaction to optimize defensive reaction against physical dangers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Manfron
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, boite COSY B1.53.04, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Lieve Filbrich
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, boite COSY B1.53.04, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Victoria Molitor
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, boite COSY B1.53.04, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Farnè
- INSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, ImpAct Team, Lyon, France
| | - André Mouraux
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, boite COSY B1.53.04, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Louvain Bionics, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Valéry Legrain
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 53, boite COSY B1.53.04, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
- Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
- Louvain Bionics, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Halicka M, Vittersø AD, Proulx MJ, Bultitude JH. Attention upturned: Bias toward and away from the affected side of the body and near space in a case of complex regional pain syndrome. Neuropsychologia 2021; 163:108079. [PMID: 34740614 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
People with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) following limb injury can show neuropsychological symptoms in the absence of observable brain pathologies. These can include sensory changes, distorted body representation, and inattention to their affected limb and its surrounding space, resembling post-stroke hemispatial neglect. The precise nature and mechanisms of these neuropsychological symptoms are unclear, however insights could be gained by testing for dissociations and associations that have been observed in stroke patients. Drawing from clinical and experimental methods for investigating spatial attention bias and related symptoms in stroke patients, we conducted a detailed investigation of neuropsychological symptoms in a woman with CRPS of her left arm who initially presented to us with pronounced inattention to her affected side. The patient showed visual and tactile neglect and extinction on her affected side on confrontation tests, but no attention deficits on "bedside" tests of neglect. On sensitive computer-based measures, attention biases were found in the patient's body and near space (in Temporal Order Judgements), but not far or imagined space (on the Greyscales task and Mental Number Line Bisection). Unique to the current literature, the patient showed a reversal in her Temporal Order Judgement bias across time, from inattention (first and second session) to hyperattention (third session) to her affected side. In contrast, pain and self-reported body representation distortion were similar across the three sessions. The patient had reduced central and peripheral visual acuity, however these deficits were near symmetrical and therefore could not explain her performance on the visual attention tasks. Given that spatial attention bias has been linked to imbalance in relative activation of the two cerebral hemispheres, we administered a Global-Local processing task to test for hemispheric asymmetry. This revealed no difference in global compared to local interference refuting any hemispheric imbalance. Instead, the patient showed impaired performance (compared to controls) on incongruent trials regardless of trial type, consistent with executive impairment. We conclude that spatial attention bias in CRPS can generalize across different sensory modalities and extend beyond the affected limb to the external space around it, independent of any low-level sensory disturbances. This bias is not necessarily directed away from the affected side or stable over time. People with CRPS can also demonstrate more generalized neuropsychological changes in sensory and executive functions. Our observations refute several existing theories about the mechanisms of attention bias in CRPS, and their relationship to pain, and have potential implications for treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Halicka
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
| | - Axel D Vittersø
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Department of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J Proulx
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Centre for Reality & Virtual Environments Augmentation Labs, Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Janet H Bultitude
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom; Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain (FMRIB), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Measuring the sensitivity of tactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind participants using the adaptive psi method. Atten Percept Psychophys 2021; 83:2995-3007. [PMID: 34036536 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02301-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Spatial locations of somatosensory stimuli are coded according to somatotopic (anatomical distribution of the sensory receptors on the skin surface) and spatiotopic (position of the body parts in external space) reference frames. This was mostly evidenced by means of temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks in which participants discriminate the temporal order of two tactile stimuli, one applied on each hand. Because crossing the hands generates a conflict between anatomical and spatial responses, TOJ performance is decreased in such posture, except for congenitally blind people, suggesting a role of visual experience in somatosensory perception. In previous TOJ studies, stimuli were generally presented using the method of constant stimuli-that is, the repetition of a predefined sample of stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOA) separating the two stimuli. This method has the disadvantage that a large number of trials is needed to obtain reliable data when aiming at dissociating performances of groups characterized by different cognitive abilities. Indeed, each SOA among a large variety of different SOAs should be presented the same number of times irrespective of the participant's performance. This study aimed to replicate previous tactile TOJ data in sighted and blind participants with the adaptive psi method in order to validate a novel method that adapts the presented SOA according to the participant's performance. This allows to precisely estimate the temporal sensitivity of each participant while the presented stimuli are adapted to the participant's individual discrimination threshold. We successfully replicated previous findings in both sighted and blind participants, corroborating previous data using a more suitable psychophysical tool.
Collapse
|
5
|
Manfron L, Vanderclausen C, Legrain V. No Evidence for an Effect of the Distance Between the Hands on Tactile Temporal Order Judgments. Perception 2021; 50:294-307. [PMID: 33653176 DOI: 10.1177/0301006621998877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Localizing somatosensory stimuli is an important process, as it allows us to spatially guide our actions toward the object entering in contact with the body. Accordingly, the positions of tactile inputs are coded according to both somatotopic and spatiotopic representations, the latter one considering the position of the stimulated limbs in external space. The spatiotopic representation has often been evidenced by means of temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks. Participants' judgments about the order of appearance of two successive somatosensory stimuli are less accurate when the hands are crossed over the body midline than uncrossed but also when participants' hands are placed close together when compared with farther away. Moreover, these postural effects might depend on the vision of the stimulated limbs. The aim of this study was to test the influence of seeing the hands, on the modulation of tactile TOJ by the spatial distance between the stimulated limbs. The results showed no influence of the distance between the stimulated hands on TOJ performance and prevent us from concluding whether vision of the hands affects TOJ performance, or whether these variables interact. The reliability of such distance effect to investigate the spatial representations of tactile inputs is questioned.
Collapse
|
6
|
Halicka M, Vittersø AD, McCullough H, Goebel A, Heelas L, Proulx MJ, Bultitude JH. Prism adaptation treatment for upper-limb complex regional pain syndrome: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain 2021; 162:471-489. [PMID: 32833791 PMCID: PMC7808368 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Initial evidence suggested that people with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) have reduced attention to the affected side of their body and the surrounding space, which might be related to pain and other clinical symptoms. Three previous unblinded, uncontrolled studies showed pain relief after treatment with prism adaptation, an intervention that has been used to counter lateralised attention bias in brain-lesioned patients. To provide a robust test of its effectiveness for CRPS, we conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial of prism adaptation for unilateral upper-limb CRPS-I. Forty-nine eligible adults with CRPS were randomized to undergo 2 weeks of twice-daily home-based prism adaptation treatment (n = 23) or sham treatment (n = 26). Outcomes were assessed in person 4 weeks before and immediately before treatment, and immediately after and 4 weeks after treatment. Long-term postal follow-ups were conducted 3 and 6 months after treatment. We examined the effects of prism adaptation vs sham treatment on current pain intensity and the CRPS symptom severity score (primary outcomes), as well as sensory, motor, and autonomic functions, self-reported psychological functioning, and experimentally tested neuropsychological functions (secondary outcomes). We found no evidence that primary or secondary outcomes differed between the prism adaptation and sham treatment groups when tested at either time point after treatment. Overall, CRPS severity significantly decreased over time for both groups, but we found no benefits of prism adaptation beyond sham treatment. Our findings do not support the efficacy of prism adaptation treatment for relieving upper-limb CRPS-I. This trial was prospectively registered (ISRCTN46828292).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Halicka
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Axel D. Vittersø
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Department of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Hayley McCullough
- Department of Translational Medicine, Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Goebel
- Department of Translational Medicine, Pain Research Institute, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Pain Medicine, Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Leila Heelas
- Optimise Pain Rehabilitation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michael J. Proulx
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Department of Computer Science, Centre for Real & Virtual Environments Augmentation Labs, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Janet H. Bultitude
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Broadbent P, Liossi C, Schoth DE. Attentional bias to somatosensory stimuli in chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2021; 162:332-352. [PMID: 32833792 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the evidence pertaining to attentional bias for painful and nonpainful somatosensory stimuli in individuals with chronic pain. Eligible studies were identified through searches of Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. Search terms were words and phrases organised into 3 concept blocks: pain condition, cognitive process, and stimuli/paradigm. The search identified 29 eligible studies (reporting 32 eligible experiments), of which quantitative meta-analysis was possible for 16 studies (19 experiments). The meta-analysis found that chronic pain patients, excluding somatoform pain patients, showed significantly greater attentional bias to stimuli in the somatosensory modality than healthy controls (k = 9, g = 0.34). In addition, meta-analysis of studies that used a temporal order judgement task found that patients with unilateral chronic pain showed a spatial attentional bias away from somatosensory stimuli (k = 7, effect estimate = 22.43 ms) and visual stimuli (k = 2, effect estimate = 13.75 ms) on or near the painful body side. Most studies of attentional bias to the somatosensory modality recruited samples of patients with fibromyalgia, whereas most studies of spatial attentional bias assessed patients with complex regional pain syndrome. The extent to which these results generalise to other pain conditions is therefore unclear. We recommend future research test spatial and modality attentional biases across chronic pain conditions and examine the psychometric properties of attentional bias measurement paradigms for use with chronic pain populations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019124510.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Broadbent
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Liossi
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Paediatric Psychology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel E Schoth
- Department of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Halicka M, Vittersø AD, McCullough H, Goebel A, Heelas L, Proulx MJ, Bultitude JH. Disputing space-based biases in unilateral complex regional pain syndrome. Cortex 2020; 127:248-268. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
9
|
Manfron L, Legrain V, Filbrich L. Seeing or not Seeing Where Your Hands Are. The Influence of Visual Feedback About Hand Position on the Interaction Between Nociceptive and Visual Stimuli. Multisens Res 2020; 33:457-478. [PMID: 31648189 DOI: 10.1163/22134808-20191448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Examining the mechanisms underlying crossmodal interaction between nociceptive and visual stimuli is crucial to understand how humans handle potential bodily threats in their environment. It has recently been shown that nociceptive stimuli can affect the perception of visual stimuli, provided that they occur close together in external space. The present study addresses the question whether these crossmodal interactions between nociceptive and visual stimuli are mediated by the visually perceived proximity between the visual stimuli and the limb on which nociceptive stimuli are applied, by manipulating the presence vs. absence of visual feedback about the position of the stimulated limb. Participants performed temporal order judgments on pairs of visual stimuli, shortly preceded by nociceptive stimuli, either applied on one hand or both hands simultaneously. The hands were placed near the visual stimuli and could either be seen directly, seen through a glass barrier, or hidden from sight with a wooden board. Unilateral nociceptive stimuli induced spatial biases to the advantage of visual stimuli presented near the stimulated hand, which were greater in the conditions in which the hands were seen than in the condition in which vision was prevented. Spatial biases were not modulated by the presence of the glass barrier, minimizing the possibility that the differential effect between the vision and no-vision conditions is solely due to the presence of the barrier between the hands and the visual stimuli. These findings highlight the importance of visual feedback for determining spatial mapping between nociceptive and visual stimuli for crossmodal interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Manfron
- 1Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,2Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Valéry Legrain
- 1Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,2Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Lieve Filbrich
- 1Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,2Psychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Halicka M, Vittersø AD, Proulx MJ, Bultitude JH. Pain reduction by inducing sensory-motor adaptation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS PRISMA): protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol 2020; 20:62. [PMID: 32075590 PMCID: PMC7031894 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-1604-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) presents as chronic, continuous pain and sensory, autonomic, and motor abnormalities affecting one or more extremities. People with CRPS can also show changes in their perception of and attention to the affected body part and sensory information in the affected side of space. Prism Adaptation (PA) is a behavioural intervention targeted at reducing attention deficits in post-stroke hemispatial neglect. PA also appears to reduce pain and other CRPS symptoms; however, these therapeutic effects have been demonstrated only in small unblinded studies. This paper describes the protocol for an ongoing double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial that will evaluate the efficacy of PA treatment for CRPS. The secondary aims of the study are to examine the relationships between neuropsychological changes (such as spatial attention, space and body representation, and motor spatial performance) and clinical manifestations of CRPS, as well as symptom improvement. METHODS Forty-two participants with upper-limb CRPS type I will undergo 2 weeks of twice-daily PA treatment or sham treatment. The primary outcome measures are current pain intensity and CRPS severity score, measured immediately before and after the treatment period. Secondary outcome measures include the results of self-report questionnaires about pain, movement, symptoms interference, and body representation; clinical assessments of sensory, motor, and autonomic functions; and computer-based psychophysical tests of neuropsychological functions. Data are collected in four research visits: 4 weeks and 1 day before treatment, and 1 day and 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Additional follow-up through postal questionnaires is conducted 3 and 6 months post-treatment. DISCUSSION It is hypothesised that participants undergoing PA treatment, compared to those receiving sham treatment, will show greater reduction in pain and CRPS severity score, and improvements on other clinical and neuropsychological measures. Also, more pronounced neuropsychological symptoms are predicted to correlate with more severe clinical CRPS symptoms. This study will provide the first randomized double-blind evaluation of the therapeutic effects of PA that could be implemented as a rehabilitation method for CRPS, and will contribute to the understanding of how neuropsychological changes in body representation and attention pertain to the manifestation and treatment of CRPS. TRIAL REGISTRATION (27/03/2017): ISRCTN46828292 (ISRCTN - ISRCTN46828292: Treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) with sensory-motor adaptation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Halicka
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Axel D. Vittersø
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
- Department of Sport & Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter, EX4 4SB UK
| | - Michael J. Proulx
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
- Centre for Real and Virtual Environments Augmentation Labs, Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| | - Janet H. Bultitude
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down Road, Bath, BA2 7AY UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nobusako S, Tsujimoto T, Sakai A, Shuto T, Furukawa E, Osumi M, Nakai A, Maeda T, Morioka S. Manual Dexterity is not Related to Media Viewing but is Related to Perceptual Bias in School-Age Children. Brain Sci 2020; 10:brainsci10020100. [PMID: 32069947 PMCID: PMC7071373 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10020100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the media can have both negative and positive effects on children’s cognitive and motor functions, its influence on their perceptual bias and manual dexterity is unclear. Thus, we investigated the association between media viewing time, media preference level, perceptual bias, and manual dexterity in 100 school-aged children. Questionnaires completed by children and their parents were used to ascertain media viewing time and preference levels. Perceptual bias and manual dexterity were measured using the visual-tactile temporal order judgment task and Movement Assessment Battery for Children—2nd edition, respectively. There were significant positive correlations between age and media viewing time and between media viewing time and media preference level. There was also a significant negative correlation between visual bias and manual dexterity. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis revealed that increasing visual bias was a significant predictor of decreasing manual dexterity. Further, children with low manual dexterity showed significant visual bias compared to those with high manual dexterity, when matched for age and gender. The present results demonstrated that, in school-aged children, although viewing media was not associated with perceptual bias and manual dexterity, there was a significant association between perceptual bias and manual dexterity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Nobusako
- Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, Japan
- Graduate School of Health Science, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-745-54-1601
| | - Taeko Tsujimoto
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nishide Clinic, Osaka 532-0002, Japan
| | - Ayami Sakai
- Department of Rehabilitation, Higashi Osaka Yamaji Hospital, Osaka 578-0925, Japan
| | - Takashi Shuto
- Department of Home-Visit Rehabilitation, Ishida Clinic, Osaka 592-0002, Japan
| | - Emi Furukawa
- Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, Japan
| | - Michihiro Osumi
- Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, Japan
- Graduate School of Health Science, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, Japan
| | - Akio Nakai
- Graduate School of Clinical Education & The Center for the Study of Child Development, Institute for Education, Mukogawa Women’s University, Hyogo 663-8558, Japan
| | - Takaki Maeda
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Shu Morioka
- Neurorehabilitation Research Center, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, Japan
- Graduate School of Health Science, Kio University, Nara 635-0832, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Testing the exteroceptive function of nociception: The role of visual experience in shaping the spatial representations of nociceptive inputs. Cortex 2020; 126:26-38. [PMID: 32062141 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Adequately localizing pain is crucial to protect the body against physical damage and react to the stimulus in external space having caused such damage. Accordingly, it is hypothesized that nociceptive inputs are remapped from a somatotopic reference frame, representing the skin surface, towards a spatiotopic frame, representing the body parts in external space. This ability is thought to be developed and shaped by early visual experience. To test this hypothesis, normally sighted and early blind participants performed temporal order judgment tasks during which they judged which of two nociceptive stimuli applied on each hand's dorsum was perceived as first delivered. Crucially, tasks were performed with the hands either in an uncrossed posture or crossed over body midline. While early blinds were not affected by the posture, performances of the normally sighted participants decreased in the crossed condition relative to the uncrossed condition. This indicates that nociceptive stimuli were automatically remapped into a spatiotopic representation that interfered with somatotopy in normally sighted individuals, whereas early blinds seemed to mostly rely on a somatotopic representation to localize nociceptive inputs. Accordingly, the plasticity of the nociceptive system would not purely depend on bodily experiences but also on crossmodal interactions between nociception and vision during early sensory experience.
Collapse
|
13
|
Legrain V, Manfron L, Garcia M, Filbrich L. Does Body Perception Shape Visuospatial Perception? Perception 2018; 47:507-520. [DOI: 10.1177/0301006618763269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
How we perceive our body is shaped by sensory experiences with our surrounding environment, as witnessed by poor performance in tasks during which participants judge with their hands crossed the temporal order between two somatosensory stimuli, one applied on each hand. This suggests that somatosensory stimuli are not only processed according to a somatotopic representation but also a spatiotopic representation of the body. We investigated whether the perception of stimuli occurring in external space, such as visual stimuli, can also be influenced by the body posture and somatosensory stimuli. Participants performed temporal order judgements on pairs of visual stimuli, one in each side of space, with their hands uncrossed or crossed. In Experiment 1, participants’ hands were placed either near or far from the visual stimuli. In Experiment 2, the visual stimuli were preceded, either by 60 ms or 360 ms, by tactile stimuli applied on the hands placed near the visual stimuli. Manipulating the time interval was intended to activate either a somatotopic or a spatiotopic representation of somatic inputs. We did not obtain any evidence for an influence of body posture on visual temporal order judgment, suggesting that body perception is less relevant for processing extrabody stimuli than the reverse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valéry Legrain
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Louise Manfron
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marynn Garcia
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieve Filbrich
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Clauwaert A, Torta DM, Danneels L, Van Damme S. Attentional Modulation of Somatosensory Processing During the Anticipation of Movements Accompanying Pain: An Event-Related Potential Study. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2018; 19:219-227. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2017] [Revised: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 10/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
15
|
Van Damme S, Vanden Bulcke C, Van Den Berghe L, Poppe L, Crombez G. Do patients with chronic unilateral orofacial pain due to a temporomandibular disorder show increased attending to somatosensory input at the painful side of the jaw? PeerJ 2018; 6:e4310. [PMID: 29379693 PMCID: PMC5786881 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic orofacial pain due to temporomandibular disorders (TMD) display alterations in somatosensory processing at the jaw, such as amplified perception of tactile stimuli, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study investigated one possible explanation, namely hypervigilance, and tested if TMD patients with unilateral pain showed increased attending to somatosensory input at the painful side of the jaw. METHODS TMD patients with chronic unilateral orofacial pain (n = 20) and matched healthy volunteers (n = 20) performed a temporal order judgment (TOJ) task indicated which one of two tactile stimuli, presented on each side of the jaw, they had perceived first. TOJ methodology allows examining spatial bias in somatosensory processing speed. Furthermore, after each block of trials, the participants rated the perceived intensity of tactile stimuli separately for both sides of the jaw. Finally, questionnaires assessing pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain vigilance, were completed. RESULTS TMD patients tended to perceive tactile stimuli at the painful jaw side as occurring earlier in time than stimuli at the non-painful side but this effect did not reach conventional levels of significance (p = .07). In the control group, tactile stimuli were perceived as occurring simultaneously. Secondary analyses indicated that the magnitude of spatial bias in the TMD group is positively associated with the extent of fear-avoidance beliefs. Overall, intensity ratings of tactile stimuli were significantly higher in the TMD group than in the control group, but there was no significant difference between the painful and non-painful jaw side in the TMD patients. DISCUSSION The hypothesis that TMD patients with chronic unilateral orofacial pain preferentially attend to somatosensory information at the painful side of the jaw was not statistically supported, although lack of power could not be ruled out as a reason for this. The findings are discussed within recent theories of pain-related attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefaan Van Damme
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | - Louise Poppe
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Movement and Sport Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Geert Crombez
- Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Center for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Investigating the spatial characteristics of the crossmodal interaction between nociception and vision using gaze direction. Conscious Cogn 2018; 57:106-115. [DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 10/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
|
17
|
Filbrich L, Alamia A, Verfaille C, Berquin A, Barbier O, Libouton X, Fraselle V, Mouraux D, Legrain V. Biased visuospatial perception in complex regional pain syndrome. Sci Rep 2017; 7:9712. [PMID: 28852115 PMCID: PMC5574889 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-10077-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain condition associating sensory, motor, trophic and autonomic symptoms in one limb. Cognitive difficulties have also been reported, affecting the patients’ ability to mentally represent, perceive and use their affected limb. However, the nature of these deficits is still a matter of debate. Recent studies suggest that cognitive deficits are limited to body-related information and body perception, while not extending to external space. Here we challenge that statement, by using temporal order judgment (TOJ) tasks with tactile (i.e. body) or visual (i.e. extra-body) stimuli in patients with upper-limb CRPS. TOJ tasks allow characterizing cognitive biases to the advantage of one of the two sides of space. While the tactile TOJ tasks did not show any significant results, significant cognitive biases were observed in the visual TOJ tasks, affecting mostly the perception of visual stimuli occurring in the immediate vicinity of the affected limb. Our results clearly demonstrate the presence of visuospatial deficits in CRPS, corroborating the cortical contribution to the CRPS pathophysiology, and supporting the utility of developing rehabilitation techniques modifying visuospatial abilities to treat chronic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieve Filbrich
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Andrea Alamia
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Verfaille
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne Berquin
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.,University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivier Barbier
- University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.,Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Xavier Libouton
- University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.,Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Virginie Fraselle
- University Hospital Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.,Faculty of Motor Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dominique Mouraux
- Faculty of Motor Sciences, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.,University Hospital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Valéry Legrain
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Filbrich L, Alamia A, Blandiaux S, Burns S, Legrain V. Shaping visual space perception through bodily sensations: Testing the impact of nociceptive stimuli on visual perception in peripersonal space with temporal order judgments. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0182634. [PMID: 28777824 PMCID: PMC5544212 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 07/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Coordinating spatial perception between body space and its external surrounding space is essential to adapt behaviors to objects, especially when they are noxious. Such coherent multisensory representation of the body extended into external space is conceptualized by the notion of peripersonal reference frame, mapping the portion of space in which somatic and extra-somatic inputs interact closely. Studies on crossmodal interactions between nociception and vision have been scarce. Here we investigated how the perception of visual stimuli, especially those surrounding the body, can be impacted by a nociceptive and potentially harmful stimulus inflicted on a particular body part. In two temporal order judgment tasks, participants judged which of two lateralized visual stimuli, presented either near or far from the body, had been presented first. Visual stimuli were preceded by nociceptive stimuli, either applied unilaterally (on one single hand) or bilaterally (on both hands simultaneously). In Experiment 1 participants' hands were always placed next to the visual stimuli presented near the trunk, while in Experiment 2 they could also be placed next to the visual stimuli presented far from the trunk. In Experiment 1, the presence of unilateral nociceptive stimuli prioritized the perception of visual stimuli presented in the same side of space as the stimulated hand, with a significantly larger effect when visual stimuli were presented near the body than when presented farther away. Experiment 2 showed that these visuospatial biases were related to the spatial congruency between the hand on which nociceptive stimuli were applied and the visual stimuli, independently of the relative distance of both the stimulated hand and the visual stimuli from the trunk. Indeed, nociceptive stimuli mostly impacted the perception of the closest visual stimuli. It is hypothesized that these crossmodal interactions may rely on representations of the space directly surrounding specific body parts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieve Filbrich
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrea Alamia
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Séverine Blandiaux
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Soline Burns
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Valéry Legrain
- Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Remapping nociceptive stimuli into a peripersonal reference frame is spatially locked to the stimulated limb. Neuropsychologia 2017; 101:121-131. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Revised: 05/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
20
|
Filbrich L, Alamia A, Burns S, Legrain V. Orienting attention in visual space by nociceptive stimuli: investigation with a temporal order judgment task based on the adaptive PSI method. Exp Brain Res 2017; 235:2069-2079. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4951-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
21
|
Attentional bias to pain-relevant body locations: New methods, new challenges. Conscious Cogn 2016; 43:128-32. [PMID: 27286272 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In a recent issue of Consciousness and Cognition, Filbrich, Torta, Vanderclausen, Azanon, and Legrain (2016) commented on a paper in which we used a tactile Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) task to show that expecting pain on a specific body location biased attention to that location (Vanden Bulcke, Crombez, Durnez, & Van Damme, 2015). Their main criticism is that the effects are likely to reflect response bias rather than genuine attentional bias. We agree that the TOJ task used may be susceptible to response bias, and welcome the authors' methodological suggestions to control for such bias. However, we feel that certain aspects of our work are misrepresented in their paper. Most importantly, we contest their argument that our instructions made the threat location task-relevant, thereby increasing risk of response bias. Further, we reply to other methodological and theoretical issues raised by these authors.
Collapse
|