1
|
Fischer K, Ranjan R, Friess JO, Erdoes G, Mikasi J, Baumann R, Schoenhoff FS, Carrel TP, Brugger N, Eberle B, Guensch DP. Study design for a randomized crossover study investigating myocardial strain analysis in patients with coronary artery disease at hyperoxia and normoxemia prior to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (StrECHO-O 2). Contemp Clin Trials 2021; 110:106567. [PMID: 34517140 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supplemental oxygen (O2) is used routinely during anesthesia. In the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, it has been established that hyperoxia is to be avoided, whereas information on benefit and risk of hyperoxia in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remain scarce, especially in the setting of general anesthesia. This study will compare the immediate effects of normoxemia and hyperoxia on cardiac function, with a primary focus on changes in peak longitudinal left-ventricular strain, in anesthetized stable chronic CAD patients using peri-operative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS A single-center randomized cross-over clinical trial will be conducted, enrolling 106 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. After the induction of anesthesia and prior to the start of surgery, cardiac function will be assessed by 2D and 3D TEE. Images will be acquired at two different oxygen states for each patient in randomized order. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) will be titrated to a normoxemic state (oxygen saturation of 95-98%) and adjusted to a hyperoxic state (FIO2 = 0.8). TEE images will be analyzed in a blinded manner for standard cardiac function and strain parameters. CONCLUSION By using myocardial strain assessed by TEE, early and subtle signs of biventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction can be promptly measured intraoperatively prior to the onset of severe signs of ischemia. The results may help anesthesiologists to better understand the effects of FIO2 on cardiac function and potentially tailor oxygen therapy to patients with CAD undergoing general anesthesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kady Fischer
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rajevan Ranjan
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan-Oliver Friess
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gabor Erdoes
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Mikasi
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Rico Baumann
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Florian S Schoenhoff
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thierry P Carrel
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Brugger
- Department of Cardiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Balthasar Eberle
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Dominik P Guensch
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernandez-Prado R, Peña-Esparragoza JK, Santos-Sánchez-Rey B, Pereira M, Avello A, Gomá-Garcés E, González-Rivera M, González-Martin G, Gracia-Iguacel C, Mahillo I, Ortiz A, González-Parra E. Ultrafiltration rate adjusted to body weight and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Nefrologia 2021; 41:426-435. [PMID: 36165111 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Mortality among hemodialysis patients remains high. An elevated ultrafiltration rate adjusted by weight (UFR/W) has been associated with hypotension and higher risk of death and/or cardiovascular events. METHODS We evaluated the association between UFR/W and mortality in 215 hemodialysis patients. The mean follow-up was 28 ± 6.12 months. We collected patients' baseline characteristics and mean UFR/W throughout the follow-up. RESULTS Mean UFR/W was 9.0 ± 2,4 and tertiles 7.1 y 10.1 mL/kg/h. We divided our population according to the percentage of sessions with UFR/W above the limits described in the literature associated with increased mortality (10.0 ml/kg/h and 13.0 mL/kg/h). Patients with higher UFR/W were younger, with higher interdialytic weight gain and weight reduction percentage but lower dry, pre and post dialysis weight. Throughout the follow-up, 46 (21.4%) patients died, the majority over 70 years old, diabetic or with cardiovascular disease. There were neither differences regarding mortality between groups nor differences in UFR/W among patients who died and those who did not. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find an association between UFR/W and mortality, maybe due to a higher prevalence in the use of cardiovascular protection drugs and lower UFR/W. CONCLUSIONS The highest UFR/W were observed in younger patients with lower weight and were not associated with an increased mortality.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ertuglu LA, Demiray A, Basile C, Afsar B, Covic A, Kanbay M. Sodium and ultrafiltration profiling in hemodialysis: A long-forgotten issue revisited. Hemodial Int 2021; 25:433-446. [PMID: 34133065 DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Sodium and ultrafiltration profiling are method of dialysis in which dialysate sodium concentration and ultrafiltration rate are altered during the course of the dialysis session. Sodium and ultrafiltration profiling have been used, commonly simultaneously, to improve hemodynamic stability during hemodialysis. Sodium profiling is particularly effective in decreasing the incidence of intradialytic hypotension, while ultrafiltration profiling is suggested to decrease subclinical repeated end organ ischemia during dialysis. However, complications such as increased interdialytic weight gain and thirst due to sodium excess have prevented widespread use of sodium profiling. Evidence suggest that different sodium profiling techniques may lead to different clinical results, and preferring sodium balance neutral sodium profiling may mitigate adverse effects related to sodium overload. However, evidence is lacking on the long-term clinical outcomes of different sodium profiling methods. Optimal method of sodium profiling as well as the utility of sodium/ultrafiltration profiling in routine practice await further clinical investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lale A Ertuglu
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Atalay Demiray
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Carlo Basile
- Division of Nephrology, Miulli General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Baris Afsar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University School of Medicine, Isparta, Turkey
| | - Adrian Covic
- Department of Nephrology, Grigore T. Popa' University of Medicine, Iasi, Romania
| | - Mehmet Kanbay
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernandez-Prado R, Peña-Esparragoza JK, Santos-Sánchez-Rey B, Pereira M, Avello A, Gomá-Garcés E, González-Rivera M, González-Martin G, Gracia-Iguacel C, Mahillo I, Ortiz A, González-Parra E. Ultrafiltration rate adjusted to body weight and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Nefrologia 2021. [PMID: 33663812 DOI: 10.1016/j.nefro.2020.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Mortality among hemodialysis patients remains high. An elevated ultrafiltration rate adjusted by weight (UFR/W) has been associated with hypotension and higher risk of death and/or cardiovascular events. METHODS We evaluated the association between UFR/W and mortality in 215 hemodialysis patients. The mean follow-up was 28 ± 6.12 months. We collected patientś baseline characteristics and mean UFR/W throughout the follow-up. RESULTS Mean UFR/W was 9.0 ± 2,4 and tertiles 7.1 y 10.1 mL/kg/h. We divided our population according to the percentage of sessions with UFR/W above the limits described in the literature associated with increased mortality (10.0 mL/kg/h and 13.0 mL/kg/h). Patients with higher UFR/W were younger, with higher interdialytic weight gain and weight reduction percentage but lower dry, pre and post dialysis weight. Throughout the follow-up, 46 (21.4%) patients died, the majority over 70 years old, diabetic or with cardiovascular disease. There were neither differences regarding mortality between groups nor differences in UFR/W among patients who died and those who did not. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find an association between UFR/W and mortality, maybe due to a higher prevalence in the use of cardiovascular protection drugs and lower UFR/W. CONCLUSIONS The highest UFR/W were observed in younger patients with lower weight and were not associated with an increased mortality.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sloan CE, Zhong J, Mohottige D, Hall R, Diamantidis CJ, Boulware LE, Wang V. Fragmentation of care as a barrier to optimal ESKD management. Semin Dial 2020; 33:440-448. [PMID: 33128300 DOI: 10.1111/sdi.12929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Caring for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the United States is challenging, due in part to the complex epidemiology of the disease's progression as well as the ways in which care is delivered. As CKD progresses toward ESKD, the number of comorbidities increases and care involves multiple healthcare providers from multiple subspecialties. This occurs in the context of a fragmented US healthcare delivery system that is traditionally siloed by provider specialty, organization, as well as systems of payment and administration. This article describes the role of care fragmentation in the delivery of optimal ESKD care and identifies research gaps in the evidence across the continuum of care. We then consider the impact of care fragmentation on ESKD care from the patient and health system perspectives and explore opportunities for system-level interventions aimed at improving care for patients with ESKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline E Sloan
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Judy Zhong
- Duke University Trinity College of Arts & Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rasheeda Hall
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Clarissa J Diamantidis
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Leight E Boulware
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Virginia Wang
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Flythe JE, Tugman MJ, Narendra JH, Assimon MM, Li Q, Wang Y, Brunelli SM, Hinderliter AL. Effect of ultrafiltration profiling on outcomes among maintenance hemodialysis patients: a pilot randomized crossover trial. J Nephrol 2020; 34:113-123. [PMID: 32975783 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-020-00862-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND More rapid fluid removal during hemodialysis is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and longer dialysis recovery times. The effect of ultrafiltration (UF) profiling, independent of concomitant sodium profiling, on markers of intradialytic hemodynamics and other outcomes has been inadequately studied. METHODS Four-phase, blinded crossover trial. Participants (UF rates > 10 mL/h/kg) were assigned in random order to receive hemodialysis with UF profiling (constantly declining UF rate, intervention) vs. hemodialysis with conventional UF (control). Each 3-week 9-treatment period was followed by a 1-week 3-treatment washout period. Participants crossed into each study arm twice (2 phases/arm); 18 treatments per treatment type. The primary outcomes were intradialytic hypotension, pre- to post-dialysis troponin T change, and change from baseline in left ventricular global longitudinal strain. Other outcomes included intradialytic symptoms and blood volume measured-plasma refill (post-dialysis volume status measure), among others. Each participant served as their own control. RESULTS On average, the 34 randomized patients (mean age 56 years, 24% female, mean dialysis vintage 6.3 years) had UF rates > 10 mL/h/kg in 56% of treatments during the screening period. All but 2 patients completed the 15-week study (prolonged hospitalization, kidney transplant). There was no significant difference in intradialytic hypotension, troponin T change, or left ventricular strain between hemodialysis with UF profiling and conventional UF. With UF profiling, participants had significantly lower odds of light-headedness and plasma refill compared to hemodialysis with conventional UF. CONCLUSIONS Ultrafiltration (UF) profiling did not reduce the odds of treatment-related cardiac stress but did reduce the odds of light-headedness and post-dialysis hypervolemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03301740 (registered October 4, 2017).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer E Flythe
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, UNC School of Medicine, 7024 Burnett-Womack CB #7155, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7155, USA. .,Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Matthew J Tugman
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, UNC School of Medicine, 7024 Burnett-Womack CB #7155, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7155, USA
| | - Julia H Narendra
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, UNC School of Medicine, 7024 Burnett-Womack CB #7155, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7155, USA
| | - Magdalene M Assimon
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina (UNC) Kidney Center, UNC School of Medicine, 7024 Burnett-Womack CB #7155, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7155, USA
| | - Quefeng Li
- Department of Biostatistics, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Yueting Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Alan L Hinderliter
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|