Weekly contraception with mifepristone

Promising selective progesterone receptor modulators: what's new in female contraception?

INTRODUCTION

Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs), such as mifepristone and ulipristal acetate (UPA), have demonstrated high efficacy and safety as single dose treatments for medication abortion and emergency contraception (EC). Other obstetrical and gynecologic applications have emerged, both for episodic and ongoing uses. The potential of these compounds to provide estrogen-free, ongoing contraception is promising; however, the rare, but serious, hepatic injury cases seen with UPA have put at least a temporary halt to further research in this area.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the biophysical impacts and clinical applications of SPRMs in women's reproductive health, with a focus on the roles of mifepristone and UPA in family planning. Given the political environment, especially in the United States where these applications may be threatened, extensive description is dedicated to mechanisms of action of these agents.

EXPERT OPINION

Both mifepristone and ulipristal acetate are first-line options for single use applications. There continues to be a need for estrogen-free ongoing contraception that does not have unpopular impacts on bleeding caused by contraceptive methods and for treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding. However, current restrictions on UPA limit longer term use. Perhaps other SPRMs without hepatic impacts may emerge to fill this need.

Clinical Update on Uses for Mifepristone in Obstetrics and Gynecology

IMPORTANCE

Mifepristone (RU-486) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator that has antagonist properties on the uterus and cervix. Mifepristone is an effective abortifacient, prompting limitations on its use in many countries. Mifepristone has many uses outside of induced abortion, but these are less well known and underutilized by clinicians because of challenges in accessing and prescribing this medication.

OBJECTIVES

To provide clinicians with a history of the development of mifepristone and mechanism of action and safety profile, as well as detail current research on uses of mifepristone in both obstetrics and gynecology.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A PubMed search of mifepristone and gynecologic and obstetric conditions was conducted between January 2018 and December 2021. Other resources were also searched, including guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society of Family Planning.

RESULTS

Mifepristone is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for first-trimester medication abortion but has other off-label uses in both obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetric uses that have been investigated include management of early pregnancy loss, intrauterine fetal demise, treatment of ectopic pregnancy, and labor induction. Gynecologic uses that have been investigated include contraception, treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, and as an adjunct in treatment of gynecologic cancers.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Mifepristone is a safe and effective medication both for its approved use in first-trimester medication abortion and other off-label uses. Because of its primary use as an abortifacient, mifepristone is underutilized by clinicians. Providers should consider mifepristone for other indications as clinically appropriate.

Clinical Utility of Mifepristone: Apprising the Expanding Horizons

Mifepristone is a progesterone and glucocorticoid receptor antagonist. Medical abortion with mifepristone and prostaglandin has revolutionized the abortion process extending abortion care to the doors of females. From as low as 2 mg/day to doses extending to 600 mg, from daily dosing to single dosage treatment, mifepristone has a wide perspective in the treatment of various pathologies. Cervical dilatation and myometrial contractility have made the utility of mifepristone feasible for second-trimester termination of pregnancy and induction of labor awaiting Food and Drug Administration approvals. Its anti-progesterone action on the menstrual cycle has a new dimension of use as a contraceptive, as well as use as a menstruation inductive agent. Its role in endometriosis, ectopic pregnancy, and adenomyosis requires more intensive research. Apoptotic action of mifepristone, interference of heterotypic cell adhesion to the basement membrane, cell migration, growth inhibition of various cancer cell lines, decreased epidermal growth factor expression, suppression of invasive and metastatic cancer potential, increase in tumor necrosis factor, downregulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2, B-cell lymphoma 2, and Nuclear factor kappa B have opened its potential to be explored as anti-cancer treatment and its effects on leiomyoma. The drug needs to be studied more for the prospectus of its anti-glucocorticoid actions in a wider dimension beyond its acquiescence for the treatment of Cushing syndrome.

Molecular characterization of PRM-associated endometrial changes, PAEC, following mifepristone treatment

OBJECTIVE

The progesterone receptor modulator (PRM) mifepristone holds the potential to be developed for regular contraception. However, long-term treatment can cause thickening of the endometrium and PRM-associated endometrial changes (PAEC). The objective of this study was to explore the molecular expression of endometrium displaying PAEC after mifepristone treatment in order to understand the future implications of PAEC and safety of long-term use.

STUDY DESIGN

Endometrial biopsies were obtained from premenopausal women following 3 months of continuous mifepristone treatment. The biopsies were evaluated regarding occurrence of PAEC and followed up by a comparative analysis of gene expression in PAEC endometrium (n=7) with endometrium not displaying PAEC (n=4). Methods used included microarray analysis, Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Three genes relevant within endometrial function were up-regulated with PAEC: THY1 (p=.02), ADAM12 (p=.04) and TN-C (p=.04). The proliferation marker MKi67 was not altered (p=.31). None of the differentially regulated genes were involved in the endometrial cancer-signaling pathway (based on IPA knowledge database).

CONCLUSION

The genes altered in endometrium displaying PAEC after 3 months of mifepristone exposure are mainly involved in the structural architecture of tissue.

IMPLICATIONS

PAEC features may be explained by the altered genes and their networks affecting tissue architecture although not involved in endometrial cancer signaling pathways, and thus, treatment with mifepristone at this dosage does not show any adverse effect at endometrial level.

Effects of low doses of mifepristone on human embryo implantation process in a three-dimensional human endometrial in vitro co-culture system

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to explore the effects of two different low doses (0.5μM and 0.05μM) of mifepristone, exposed during the receptive period, on the human embryo implantation process, using a well-established three-dimensional in vitro cell culture model, specifically developed to study this process.

METHODS

An in vitro three-dimensional cell culture model was constructed using human endometrial cells isolated from the endometrium of proven fertile women, collected on cycle day LH+4. After 5 days of culture, supernumerary human embryos were added and cultured for another 5 days with mifepristone 0.5μM (n=8) or 0.05μM (n=10) or vehicle as control (n=10). The cultures were checked for embryo attachment and terminated. We studied the expression of 16 reported endometrial receptivity markers in the endometrial constructs using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

None of the embryos in 0.5μM of mifepristone attached to the endometrial constructs (p=.004), whereas 4 out of 10 in 0.05μM (p=.3698) and 7 out of 10 embryos in the control group attached to the cultures. We found that most of the studied receptivity markers were significantly altered with mifepristone exposure in a similar direction in both treatment groups. Only IL6 was significantly differentially expressed between the treatment groups (p=.017).

CONCLUSION

We report for the first time that exposure to a low concentration (0.5μM) of mifepristone during the receptive period successfully inhibits human embryo implantation process in vitro. Further, we observed a dose-dependent effect of mifepristone on endometrial receptivity at the functional level.

IMPLICATION

This study contributes new knowledge that low dose of mifepristone during the short period of receptive phase can inhibit endometrial receptivity, which further promotes mifepristone as a contraceptive agent. This could give women a treatment choice to avoid unwanted pregnancy with high efficacy and minimal side effects.

Investigational hormone receptor agonists as ongoing female contraception: a focus on selective progesterone receptor modulators in early clinical development

INTRODUCTION

As efforts are made to continue to increase the safety of contraceptive methods, those without estrogen have attracted new attention. Progestin-only options are available in many delivery systems, but most cause disturbed bleeding patterns. For gynecologic patients, selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) have been approved for medical abortion, for ovulation suppression in emergency contraception, and for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding due to leiomyoma.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses the role of SPRMs in controlling fertility on an ongoing basis with particular emphasis on mifepristone and ulipristal acetate (UPA), since none of the other compounds has progressed out of early Phase I - II testing. It also discusses important information about the mechanisms of action and safety of these two SPRMs.

EXPERT OPINION

Of all the investigational hormone agonist/antagonists, SPRMs have demonstrated the greatest potential as ongoing female contraceptives. They have the ability to suppress ovulation after initiation of the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge without affecting ovarian production of estrogen or inducing any significant metabolic changes. SPRMs may well be able to provide longer term contraception as oral agents, vaginal rings, and perhaps even intrauterine devices. UPA has the greatest promise. Current research needs to be expanded.

Mifepristone: a potential clinical agent based on its anti-progesterone and anti-glucocorticoid properties

Nowadays, unwanted pregnancy is a major globe tragedy for millions of women, associated with significant direct and indirect costs, no matter for individuals or society. The progesterone receptor antagonist steroid, mifepristone has been widely and effectively using throughout the world for medical abortion, but to a lesser extent for emergency contraception. In this review, we hope to explore the role of mifepristone as a contraceptive, particularly for emergency contraception. Studies of mifepristone have also been expanding to the fields of endometriosis and uterine fibroids. Furthermore, this initially considered reproductive medicine has been investigated in some psychotic diseases and various disorders of hypercortisolism, because of its glucocorticoid receptor antagonism. Mifepristone was approved suitable for patients with hyperglycemia secondary to Cushing's syndrome by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012. The aim of this article is to review published reports on the anti-progesterone and anti-glucocorticoid properties of mifepristone as a clinical agent. There is a new insight into systematically describing and evaluating the potential efficiency of mifepristone administrated in the field of endocrine and neuroendocrine, not only in obstetrics and gynecology.

The immninent dawn of SPRMs in obstetrics and gynecology

Selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) have been developed since the late 70s when mifepristone was first described. They act through nuclear progesterone receptors and can have agonist or mixed agonist antagonist actions depending on the cell and tissue. Mifepristone has unique major antagonist properties allowing its use for pregnancy termination. Ulipristal acetate has been marketed in 2009 for emergency contraception and has been recently approved for preoperative myoma treatment. Further perspectives for SPRMs use include long term estrogen free contraception, endometriosis treatment. However long term applications will be possible only after confirmation of endometrial safety.

Effects of antiprogestins on the uterus

Progesterone-receptor modulators (PRMs) are progesterone-receptor ligands that can exert agonistic, antagonistic or mixed agonist-antagonist effects depending on the cellular context. The mechanisms of action of these compounds are still incompletely understood. PRMs already have several applications in women's health such as emergency contraception, pregnancy termination, management of early fetal demise and cervical maturation. The main indications that will be developed in the future include dysfunctional bleeding and preoperative treatment of uterine myomas. Other future indications may include estrogen-free contraception, treatment of endometriosis and prevention and treatment of breast cancer. However, the available data from mid- to long-term continuous administration studies has raised the issue of endometrial safety. For this reason, long-term applications of PRMs are currently postponed, although windows of treatment with a short course of progestin therapy, or even by a short interruption of treatment, could improve endometrial aspects if needed.

Recent advances in hormonal contraception

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The rapid increase in the world population makes it mandatory to develop new contraceptive methods. Disseminating reversible inexpensive and practical hormonal methods to developing countries is a target of many international agencies and funds.

RECENT FINDINGS

The safety of combined oral contraceptives is the main issue. The main guideline is to find women at risk before prescribing combined oral contraceptives. Lowering the estrogen dose should be attempted. New progestins are emerging, but their safety can be assessed only retrospectively. There is an increasing trend to extend the cycles in order to have fewer bleeding days. Progestin-only contraception seems safer than estrogen-progestin combinations in relation to thromboembolic events. A new progestin-only pill and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system have a good acceptability and high continuation rate. New administration methods are being developed and the possible role of mifepristone has been investigated.

SUMMARY

There are more contraceptive choices available than ever before. To educate healthcare providers as to the methods available and to inform and educate consumers are cornerstones for successful contraception.