Second trimester termination of pregnancy: a review by site and procedure type

Comparison of induction-to-expulsion interval during second-trimester medication abortion in pregnancies with anencephaly and other congenital anomalies compared to those without anomalies: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the induction-to-expulsion interval during second-trimester medication abortion in pregnancies complicated by anencephaly or other fetal anomalies is prolonged compared to pregnancies without fetal anomalies STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women who had second-trimester medication abortion at St. Paul's Hospital Millennium Medical College (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia). We assigned subjects to one of three groups based on fetal diagnosis: 1) anencephaly group, 2) other congenital anomaly group, and 3) no anomaly group. Data were collected by reviewing patients' charts. We used SPSS version 23 to analyze the data. Simple descriptive analysis and χ2 test were performed as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 303 women had second-trimester medication at 14-28 weeks, of which 58 had anencephaly, 19 had congenital anomalies other than anencephaly, and the remaining 226 had no fetal anomalies. The mean induction-to-expulsion interval was 18.4 hours in the anencephaly group versus 19.4 hours in the other congenital anomaly group versus 19.2 hours in those without anomaly (p-value = 0.924). The 24-hour nonexpulsion rate was also comparable among the groups, with 5.25% rate of nonexpulsion in the anencephaly group versus 15.8% in the other congenital anomaly group versus 11.15% in the no anomaly group (p-value = 0.594). In multivariable regression analysis after controlling for parity, the 24-hour nonexpulsion rate was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, pregnancies undergoing second-trimester medication abortion for fetal anomalies had comparable induction-to-expulsion interval and 24-hour expulsion rates compared to those who had the same procedure for other or no anomalies.

IMPLICATIONS

Second-trimester medication abortion procedure length in pregnancies complicated by anencephaly is similar to those pregnancies without anomalies.

Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Management of hemorrhage at the time of abortion

Hemorrhage after abortion is rare, occurring in fewer than 1% of abortions, but associated morbidity may be significant. Although medication abortion is associated with more bleeding than procedural abortion, overall bleeding for the two methods is minimal and not clinically different. Hemorrhage can be caused by atony, coagulopathy, and abnormal placentation, as well as by such procedure complications as perforation, cervical laceration, and retained tissue. Evidence for practices around postabortion hemorrhage is extremely limited. The Society of Family Planning recommends preoperative identification of individuals at high risk of hemorrhage as well as development of an organized approach to treatment. Specifically, individuals with a uterine scar and complete placenta previa seeking abortion at gestations after the first trimester should be evaluated for placenta accreta spectrum. For those at high risk of hemorrhage, referral to a higher-acuity center should be considered. We propose an algorithm for treating postabortion hemorrhage as follows: (1) assessment and examination, (2) uterine massage and medical therapy, (3) resuscitative measures with laboratory evaluation and possible reaspiration or balloon tamponade, and (4) interventions such as embolization and surgery. Evidence supports the use of oxytocin as prophylaxis for bleeding with dilation and evacuation; methylergonovine prophylaxis, however, is associated with more bleeding at the time of dilation and evacuation. Future research is needed on tranexamic acid as prophylaxis and treatment and misoprostol as prophylaxis. Structural inequities contribute to bleeding risk. Acknowledging how our policies hinder or remedy health inequities is essential when developing new guidelines and approaches to clinical services.

Anesthetic Considerations for Second-Trimester Surgical Abortions

Although most abortion care takes place in the office setting, anesthesiologists are often asked to provide anesthesia for the 1% of abortions that take place later, in the second trimester. Changes in federal and state regulations surrounding abortion services may result in an increase in second-trimester abortions due to barriers to accessing care. The need for interstate travel will reduce access and delay care for everyone, given limited appointment capacity in states that continue to support bodily autonomy. Therefore, anesthesiologists may be increasingly involved in care for these patients. There are multiple, unique anesthetic considerations to provide safe and compassionate care to patients undergoing second-trimester abortion. First, a multiday cervical preparation involving cervical osmotic dilators and pharmacologic agents results in a time-sensitive, nonelective procedure, which should not be delayed or canceled due to risk of fetal expulsion in the preoperative area. In addition, a growing body of literature suggests that the older anesthesia dogma that all pregnant patients require rapid-sequence induction and an endotracheal tube can be abandoned, and that deep sedation without intubation is safe and often preferable for this patient population through 24 weeks of gestation. Finally, concomitant substance use disorders, preoperative pain from cervical preparation, and intraoperative management of uterine atony in a uterus that does not yet have mature oxytocin receptors require additional consideration.

Rates of complication for dilation and evacuation versus induction of labor in treatment of second trimester intrauterine fetal demise

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical differences in the safety of dilation and evacuation (D&E) and induction of labor (IOL) for the treatment of intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) between 14 and 24 weeks gestation.

STUDY DESIGNS

A retrospective chart review was conducted at a single institution comparing rates of major and minor complications between patients who undergo D&E and those that undergo IOL in the treatment of IUFD between 14 and 24 weeks gestation. Demographic and medical variables were stratified by management method and analyzed using chi-squared and t-tests where appropriate.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent IOL were of a more advanced gestational age and more likely to be uninsured. Patients who underwent D&E were more likely to be privately insured. Hospital time for an IOL was significantly longer than for D&E. Composite rates of complication did not differ significantly between management groups. Patients treated with D&E were more likely to require uterine aspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

D&E and IOL are equally safe methods for the management of IUFD between 14 and 24 weeks gestation. Both options should be made available to patients who experience this rare pregnancy outcome.

Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Management of individuals with bleeding or thrombotic disorders undergoing abortion

Individuals who have bleeding disorders, thrombophilias, a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), or who are taking anticoagulation medication for other reasons may present for abortion. Clinicians should be aware of risk factors and histories concerning for excessive bleeding and thrombotic disorders around the time of abortion. This document will focus on how to approach abortion planning in these individuals. For first-trimester abortion, procedural abortion (sometimes called surgical abortion) is generally preferred over medical management for individuals with bleeding disorders or who are on anticoagulation. First-trimester procedural abortion in an individual on anticoagulation can generally be done without interruption of anticoagulation. The decision to interrupt anticoagulation for a second-trimester procedure should be individualized. Individuals at high risk for VTE can be offered anticoagulation post-procedure. Individuals with bleeding disorders or who are anticoagulated can safely be offered progestin intrauterine devices. Future research is needed to better assess quantitative blood loss and complications rates with abortion in these populations.

Demographic, Clinical, and Counseling Factors Associated with the Selection of Pregnancy Termination Method in the Second Trimester for Fetal and Pregnancy Anomalies

OBJECTIVE

Despite women's preference for induction of labor (IOL) or dilation and evacuation (D&E) for pregnancy termination in the setting of second trimester fetal or pregnancy abnormality, many women are not given a choice between delivery methods. We investigated patient and clinical related factors associated with selecting IOL or D&E.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort experienced pregnancy termination at 17-24 weeks of gestation for fetal anomaly, intrauterine fetal demise, or premature previable rupture. We compared the demographic, reproductive, social, and clinical experience variables between women who select IOL and D&E, adjusting for confounders through logistic regression.

RESULTS

One hundred eleven women (21.6%) selected IOL and 403 (78.4%) selected D&E. Greater proportions of women of color (p < .01), lower education (p < .01), lower employment (p < .01), and lower status jobs (p < .01) selected IOL. Women selected D&E more often for chromosomal anomaly (p < .01). In adjusted analyses, women with intrauterine fetal demise (odds ratio [OR], 9.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-34.7), premature previable rupture (OR, 110; 95% CI, 23.0-526.8), prior substance use disorder (OR, 35.5; 95% CI-2.7, 473.7), or counseling from obstetrics (OR, 3.3; 95% CI-1.3, 8.4), pediatrics (OR, 3.3; 95% CI-1.3, 8.6), or social services (OR, 12.6; 95% CI, 4.2-37.3) had higher odds of selecting IOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient characteristics, medical factors, and type of counseling are associated with the selection between D&E and IOL for anomalous pregnancies. Institutional, regional, and state policies should permit women both delivery methods to preserve autonomous decision-making at the time of pregnancy termination.

The costs and cost effectiveness of providing second-trimester medical and surgical safe abortion services in Western Cape Province, South Africa

Background

In South Africa, access to second-trimester abortion services, which are generally performed using medical induction with misoprostol alone, is challenging for many women. We aimed to estimate the costs and cost effectiveness of providing three safe second-trimester abortion services (dilation and evacuation (D&E)), medical induction with mifepristone and misoprostol (MI-combined), or medical induction with misoprostol alone (MI-misoprostol)) in Western Cape Province, South Africa to aid policymakers with planning for service provision in South Africa and similar settings.

Methods

We derived clinical outcomes data for this economic evaluation from two previously conducted clinical studies. In 2013–2014, we collected cost data from three public hospitals where the studies took place. We collected cost data from the health service perspective through micro-costing activities, including discussions with site staff. We used decision tree analysis to estimate average costs per patient interaction (e.g. first visit, procedure visit, etc.), the total average cost per procedure, and cost-effectiveness in terms of the cost per complete abortion. We discounted equipment costs at 3%, and present the results in 2015 US dollars.

Results

D&E services were the least costly and the most cost-effective at $91.17 per complete abortion. MI-combined was also less costly and more cost-effective (at $298.03 per complete abortion) than MI-misoprostol (at $375.31 per complete abortion), in part due to a shortened inpatient stay. However, an overlap in the plausible cost ranges for the two medical procedures suggests that the two may have equivalent costs in some circumstances.

Conclusion

D&E was most cost-effective in this analysis. However, due to resistance from health care providers and other barriers, these services are not widely available and scale-up is challenging. Given South Africa’s reliance on medical induction, switching to the combined regimen could result in greater access to second-trimester services due to shorter inpatient stays without increasing costs.

Estimated versus measured blood loss during dilation and evacuation: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To compare estimated versus measured blood loss at the time of dilation and evacuation (D&E).

STUDY DESIGN

We measured blood loss for all D&E procedures between 16 and 24 weeks at one abortion clinic over 9 months. We weighed all blood-containing items and measured blood captured in the D&E tray. Providers recorded estimated blood loss before weighing or measuring blood. We compared median measured blood loss (MBL) and estimated blood loss (EBL) for each gestational week.

RESULTS

We measured blood loss in 371 of the 534 D&Es in the study period; we excluded 163 procedures because of failure to measure blood loss or contamination with amniotic fluid. Included and excluded procedures had similar median EBLs. Median EBL differed significantly from MBL for each week gestation from 16 to 24 weeks (p≤.001 for all comparisons); MBL was approximately twice as high as EBL for each gestational week. EBL and MBL increased with increasing gestation, as did the difference between EBL and MBL.

CONCLUSION

Providers consistently and significantly underestimate blood loss at the time of D&E. D&E providers may want to consider using a new heuristic for estimating blood loss.

IMPLICATIONS

Providers significantly underestimate blood loss at the time of D&E. Future research should confirm these findings (particularly at 22-24 weeks gestation), evaluate the efficacy of interventions to improve estimations of blood loss, and determine best practices for decreasing blood loss.

Obesity as a Risk Factor for Complications After Second-Trimester Abortion by Dilation and Evacuation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30 or higher) and dilation and evacuation (D&E) complications.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent D&E abortion from February 2009 to April 2013 at a hospital-based abortion practice in California. We evaluated the association between obesity and risk of complication after D&E using logistic regression. We defined complications a priori as cervical laceration, hemorrhage, uterine atony, anesthesia complications, uterine perforation, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and retained products of conception. We defined major complications as those requiring hospitalization, transfusion, or further surgical intervention.

RESULTS

Complications occurred in 442 of 4,520 D&Es (9.8%), with equal proportions in obese and nonobese women (9.8%). Major complications occurred in 78 (1.7%) patients. After adjustment for age, ethnicity, prior vaginal delivery, prior cesarean delivery, and gestational duration, there was no association between BMI and D&E complications. Any individual complication was associated with each additional week of gestation (odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-1.4), prior vaginal delivery (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9) and prior cesarean delivery (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3). Major complications were associated with each additional week of gestation (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.4) and cesarean delivery (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1).

CONCLUSION

We found no association between obesity and D&E complications. Our findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that later gestational duration is associated with an increased risk of complications. Obesity may not warrant referral to a high-risk abortion center, particularly because referral-associated delay might increase the risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Uterine evacuation for second-trimester fetal death and maternal morbidity

OBJECTIVE

To estimate maternal morbidity associated with uterine evacuation for second-trimester fetal demise compared with that associated with induced second-trimester abortion.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared the maternal outcomes of two cohorts: 1) women diagnosed with fetal demise between 14 and 24 weeks who subsequently underwent dilation and evacuation or induction of labor; and 2) women undergoing induced abortion between 14 and 24 weeks by either dilation and evacuation or induction of labor. The primary outcome was major maternal morbidity. Assuming morbidity rates of 11% for fetal demise and 1% for induced second-trimester abortion, 94 patients were needed per group to detect significant difference in maternal morbidity (80% power, 5% alpha).

RESULTS

We identified 121 women with fetal demise and 121 women who underwent induced abortion for inclusion. There were no maternal deaths. In crude and adjusted analyses, treatment for fetal demise was not associated with increased maternal morbidity (25 of 121) compared with induced abortion (27 of 121) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-2.32). There were more blood transfusions in the fetal demise group (N=7) compared with the induced-abortion group (N=1) (P=.07). Induction of labor was more morbid than dilation and evacuation after adjusting for confounders (OR 5.36; 95% CI 2.46-11.69), primarily as a result of increased odds of infection requiring intravenous antibiotics. Gestational age of 20 weeks or greater was significantly associated with maternal morbidity (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.39-4.84).

CONCLUSION

In the second trimester, uterine evacuation for fetal demise was not significantly associated with maternal morbidity compared with induced abortion. Induction of labor was more morbid than dilation and evacuation as a result of an increased risk of presumed infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

The New York City mayoral abortion training initiative at public hospitals

BACKGROUND

We set out to describe and understand the first-ever abortion training political initiative on the provision of abortion services and abortion residency training.

STUDY DESIGN

We completed in-depth interviews with 22 participants (response rate of 92%) who have knowledge of abortion training and services in the New York City (NYC) public hospital system before and/or after the initiative. We used grounded theory to describe the initiative's effects.

RESULTS

Respondents identified strategies that helped achieve renovation of abortion facilities, updating of abortion services and protocols, and training of abortion providers. Respondents also identified public health impacts including improvement of abortion services, empowerment of abortion providers, and legitimization of abortion training and services.

CONCLUSION

This NYC political initiative can be a model for other city governments to influence obstetrics and gynecology resident training and the provision of abortion services.

A randomized comparative study on vaginal administration of acetic acid-moistened versus dry misoprostol for mid-trimester pregnancy termination

PURPOSE

Absorption and effectiveness of vaginally administered misoprostol tablets may vary according to the medium in which it is placed. This study was directed to compare the outcomes of vaginal administrations of acetic acid-moistened misoprostol tablets with those of dry tablets for induction of second-trimester abortion.

METHODS

A randomized comparative trial where 322 women at 13-20 weeks gestation, requiring medical abortion, were randomly assigned to vaginal administration of either acetic acid-moistened or dry misoprostol tablets with a dose schedule of 400 μg three-hourly, up to a maximum five doses over 24 h. The same doses were repeated for another 24 h in nonresponders. Primary outcome measure was complete abortion rate at 24 and 48 h, and the secondary outcome measures were induction-abortion interval, failure rate and side effects. A difference of 15% in success rates at 24 h was used to calculate the sample size required with a power of 0.8 at the 5% significance level.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in the complete abortion rates were observed at 24 h (70.95 vs. 68.71%, P = 0.675) and at 48 h (86.49 vs. 84.35%, P = 0.604) when both groups were compared. The difference in mean induction-abortion interval was also statistically insignificant between the groups (12.5 ± 1.6 vs. 12.8 ± 1.5 h, P = 0.97). Other outcome measures were also comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Moistening misoprostol tablets with 5% acetic acid before vaginal application creates no difference in outcomes when compared with those after the vaginal application of dry tablets for the termination of second-trimester pregnancy.

Association between gestational age and induction-to-abortion interval in mid-trimester pregnancy termination using misoprostol

OBJECTIVE

The study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, outcome, and pain intensity of the vaginal administration of misoprostol for the induction of abortion between 13 and 24 gestational weeks.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted at our tertiary medical center from January 2006 to December 2009 on 122 consecutive women who underwent termination of pregnancy (TOP) in the mid-trimester. They were given 400 mcg of vaginal misoprostol every 6h, up to four doses. The induction-to-abortion interval and the level of pain experienced during the process were assessed. Success was defined by the fetus being expelled within 48 h.

RESULTS

Vaginal misoprostol was effective in 84% (98/122) of patients. The median duration of the induction-to-abortion interval was 16 (5-48)h. The induction-to-abortion interval was correlated with gestational age, while inversely correlated with parity. A correlation was also found between gestational age and pain intensity at 12h from induction.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol is safe and effective in mid-trimester abortion induction. The induction-to-abortion interval is shorter and abortion less painful with lower gestational age. Higher parity is also associated with shorter induction to abortion interval.

Young age and termination of pregnancy during the second trimester are risk factors for repeat second-trimester abortion

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to characterize women undergoing a termination of pregnancy (TOP) during the second trimester and to evaluate the risk factors and timing of repeat TOP.

STUDY DESIGN

This nationwide retrospective cohort study investigated 41,750 women who underwent TOP during the first (n = 39,850) or second (n = 1900) trimester in Finland in 2000-2005. The follow-up time was until repeat TOP or until Dec. 31, 2006.

RESULTS

TOP during the second trimester increases the risk of repeat TOP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-1.6), repeat second-trimester TOP (HR, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.9-5.1), and repeat TOP after 16 weeks of gestation (HR, 5.0; 95% CI, 3.3-7.7). The other risk factor for these is young age (HR, 7.0, 95% CI, 5.3-9.3; and HR, 12.5; 95% CI, 3.1-50.4 for age <20 years).

CONCLUSION

Second-trimester TOP and young age are risk factors for repeat second-trimester TOP. Special focus on these women might be effective in decreasing repeat abortions.

Safety of late second-trimester pregnancy termination by laminaria dilatation and evacuation in patients with previous multiple cesarean sections

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether there is an increased perioperative risk in termination of late second-trimester pregnancy after multiple cesarean sections by laminaria dilatation and evacuation.

STUDY DESIGN

During the period between January 2002 and June 2008, 636 consecutive patients underwent late second-trimester (17-24 weeks) pregnancy terminations by dilatation and evacuation. Patients were divided into 3 subgroups: those with no previous cesarean section (n = 545), those with 1 previous cesarean section (n = 59), and those with several previous cesarean sections (n = 32).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in major perioperative complications, such as anesthetic complications, need for blood transfusion, and cervical lacerations comparing the 3 subgroups. Importantly, there were neither cases of uterine perforation nor retained products of conception in the 3 subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Late second-trimester pregnancy termination after multiple cesarean sections by laminaria dilatation and evacuation is probably not associated with an increased perioperative risk. Larger studies are needed to empower this study.

Second-trimester surgical abortion

Surgical abortion in the second trimester became popularized in the 1970s, and now accounts for the majority of abortion procedures performed in this country. Dilation and evacuation is the most commonly used method in the second trimester, but dilation and curettage can be used with earlier gestations, and intact dilation and extraction accounts for a minority of later procedures. These various procedures will be addressed in detail. Other considerations such as preoperative and intraoperative use of ultrasound, use of uterotonics, pain management, appropriate location for second-trimester abortion provision, and routine postoperative care will also be reviewed.