Pain control in first-trimester and second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: a systematic review

Self-reported elevated pain levels: A coping strategy used by women undergoing medical abortion procedures

PURPOSE

Epidural analgesia alleviates pain during normal labour but women who undergo medical abortion procedures using epidural analgesia continue to express high pain levels. To understand this we assessed if patients undergoing medical abortions, treated with epidural analgesia, use their pain for psychological benefits.

METHODS

This study comprised 105 patients over 13 weeks of gestational age diagnosed with foetal abnormalities after selecting a medical abortion procedure using epidural analgesia. Three questionnaires were handed-out: 1) 'Need for Affect', assessed the motivation to react to emotions; 2) 'Pain-Levels' 3) PANA- 'Positive Affect' (PA), 'Negative Affect' (NA) assessed emotions pre-abortion and post-abortion.

RESULTS

Patients with a strong Need for Affect and high Pain-Levels expressed a stronger PA post-abortion (b = .69, se = .11, β = .68, p < .001, 95%CI [.48,.90]). Patients with a strong NA pre-abortion and high Pain-Levels expressed a higher NA post-abortion (b = .48, se = .11, β = .53, p < .001, 95%CI [.26, .70]).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a strong Need for Affect who express a strong PA pre-abortion intensify their pain to fulfill their Need for Affect, which then helps recovery. Patients with a strong NA pre-abortion and high Pain-Levels indicate a less favourable outcome.

Factors associated with a negative Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) response with intrauterine device placement: A retrospective survey of HER Salt Lake participants

OBJECTIVES

In an established cohort of HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative participants with a prior intrauterine device (IUD) placement, we sought to (1) define the proportion of participants who reported a negative Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) response, (2) explore factors associated with an unacceptable PASS response, and (3) identify pain management preferences for IUD placement.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective survey was sent to 1440 HER Salt Lake IUD users. A PASS question queried IUD placement pain experience acceptability. We explored associations between an unacceptable PASS response and sociodemographic, reproductive and other individual characteristics using t-tests, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of those surveyed, 620 responded (43%), and 41.6% reported an unacceptable PASS response. Those with an unacceptable PASS response reported a significantly higher experienced pain level (79.2 mm vs 51.8 mm; p < 0.01) than those with an acceptable response, were more likely to have an anxiety diagnosis (47.7% vs 37.1%; p < 0.01), and have a trauma history (33.7% vs 25.1%; p = 0.02). Most patients were not offered pain control options, but 29.4% used ibuprofen and 25.3% had a support person. Regardless of PASS response, if offered, 59.0% desired numbing medication, 56.8% ibuprofen, 51% heating pad, 33.2% support person, and 31.8% anti-anxiety medication, among others. In our multivariable logistic regression model, higher pain was associated with unacceptable PASS response (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The common finding of unacceptable pain experiences with IUD placement may cause negative perceptions of an otherwise desirable method. Incorporation of the PASS response into IUD pain management studies could expand our pain experience understanding.

IMPLICATIONS

IUD placement resulted in unacceptable pain experiences for 41.6% of respondents. Screening for anxiety and trauma history could identify at-risk patients to individualize pain management strategies. Incorporation of the PASS into future IUD pain management studies could result in a more comprehensive, patient-centered measure of patient experiences.

[Pain assessment during medical abortion up to 14 weeks: A 1-year prospective comparative study]

OBJECTIVES

Pain assessment of patients requesting a medical abortion according to the term, up to 14 weeks, by a numerical rating scale (NRS).

METHODS

This was a single-centre prospective observational study conducted at the University Hospitals of Strasbourg from 1st October 2019 to 31st December 2020.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in pain assessed by the NRS for medical abortion performed between 7-9 weeks and those performed between 9-14 weeks (6.5±2.5 vs. 6.6±2.2, P=0.85). Regardless of the term (before 7 weeks, between 7-9 weeks and between 9-14 weeks), patients felt relieved by taking painkillers in the case of medical abortion in 88.9%, 80.3% and 87.3% of cases respectively (P=0.18). The use of analgesics allowed a decrease of 3 points of the NRS in the 3 groups (P=0.67). Patients were more painful in case of medical protocol vs. surgical (maximum pain at 6.0±2.6 vs. 1.4±2.0, P<0.01), but declared to be relieved by analgesics in 85.1 and 94.3% of cases (P=0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

As pain is similar whatever the term in the case of medical abortion, and its management by analgesics seems to be effective, this criterion should not guide the professional in the choice of method, particularly between 9 and 14 weeks. This choice must be made by the patient.

Vaginal Bleeding Before 20 Weeks Gestation

Conditions that often present with vaginal bleeding before 20 weeks are common and can cause morbidity and mortality. Clinically stable patients can choose their management options. Clinically unstable patients require urgent procedural management: uterine aspiration, dilation and evacuation, or surgical removal of an ectopic pregnancy. Septic abortion requires prompt procedural management, intravenous antibiotics, and intravenous fluids. Available data on prognosis with expectant management of pre-viable rupture of membranes in the United States are poor for mothers and fetuses.

Gabapentin as an adjunct for pain management during dilation and evacuation: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the analgesic efficacy of preoperative gabapentin among patients undergoing dilation and evacuation (D&E) with moderate sedation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial among patients undergoing same-day D&E at 14 to 19 weeks gestation under moderate sedation. We randomized participants 1:1 to gabapentin 600 mg or placebo after cervical preparation at least 1 hour prior to D&E. We assessed pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale before, during, and after the procedure. The primary outcome was postoperative recall of maximum procedural pain with a 13-mm a priori threshold for clinical significance. We standardized initial fentanyl and midazolam dosing. We assessed satisfaction with pain control, nausea, and vomiting via Likert scales and anxiety using a validated instrument.

RESULTS

We enrolled 126 participants and randomized 61 to gabapentin and 65 to placebo, with study medication administered a mean of 211 (SD 64) minutes preoperatively. Recall of maximum pain was 41 mm for gabapentin and 49 mm for placebo (p = 0.24). Gabapentin resulted in reduced pain during uterine aspiration (56 vs 71 mm, p= 0.003) compared to placebo, but not for any other time points. The gabapentin group had higher satisfaction (78% vs 65% very or somewhat satisfied, p= 0.01). Median fentanyl dose was lower in the gabapentin group (75 vs 100 mcg, p = 0.005). Midazolam dose, nausea, vomiting, and anxiety did not differ between groups. No serious adverse events occurred in the gabapentin group. Sedation reversal was not required.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of gabapentin to moderate sedation during D&E did not result in lower maximum recalled procedural pain. Gabapentin resulted in reduced intra-operative pain during uterine aspiration and increased satisfaction with pain control.

IMPLICATIONS

Gabapentin reduces intraoperative pain and improves satisfaction with pain management when administered prior to second-trimester surgical abortion and may be considered as an adjunct to intravenous sedation. Moderate sedation may impair assessment and recall of pain. Additional research is needed to identify the most effective pain management regimens for D&E.

Pain management for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Abortion is common worldwide and increasingly abortions are performed at less than 14 weeks' gestation using medical methods, specifically using a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol. Medical abortion is known to be a painful process, but the optimal method of pain management is unclear. We sought to identify and compare pain management regimens for medical abortion before 14 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted our search in August 2019 and included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies of any pain relief intervention (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) for mifepristone-misoprostol combination medical abortion of pregnancies less than 14 weeks' gestation.

RESULTS

We included four RCTs and one observational study. Due to the heterogeneity of study designs, interventions and outcome reporting, meta-analysis was not possible. Only one study found evidence of an effect between interventions on pain score: a prophylactic dose of ibuprofen 1600mg likely reduces the pain score when compared to a dose of paracetamol 2000mg (MD 2.26/10 [CI 3-1.52 lower]). For other interventions (pregabalin 300mg vs placebo; ibuprofen 800mg vs placebo; therapeutic vs prophylactic administration of ibuprofen 800mg; ambulation vs non-ambulation during treatment) there appeared to be little to no difference with comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this review provide some support for the use of ibuprofen as a single dose given with misoprostol prophylactically, or in response to pain as needed. The optimal dosing of ibuprofen is unclear, but a single dose of ibuprofen 1600mg was shown to be effective and it was less certain whether 800mg was effective.

Evaluation efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in second-trimester induced labor: A single-center, prospective, non-randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Second-trimester induced labor in pregnant women was often more likely to suffer from psychological and physiological double pain. However, the analgesic management received less attention, and the optimal analgesic mode for second-trimester induced labor had not been determined. Our objective was to evaluate the feasible of epidural analgesia (EA) in second-trimester induced labor.

METHODS

From January 2020 to December 2021, Primipara who planned to undergo second-trimester induced labor in the First Affiliated Hospital of Yangtze University were collected. The method of labor induction was oral mifepristone + amniotic cavity injection of Ethacridine Lactate. Based on whether or not patients received epidural analgesia, which were divided into EA group (30 cases) and non-EA (NEA) group (30 cases). The primary outcome were visual analog scale (VAS) score of pain and result of follow-up, the secondary outcomes included relative clinical parameter and labor duration.

RESULTS

Vaginal induction of labor was successful in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in VAS of pain between the two groups before analgesia (P > .05), but the VAS of pain in the EA group was significantly lower than the NEA group (P < .05) after analgesia or at delivery. The following outcomes showed no statistical difference between two groups: labor duration, postpartum hemorrhage, hemorrhage ≥ 500 mL, intrapartum injury, second days hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, antibiotic therapy days, hospitalizations days, and placenta residue (P > .05). The median hospitalization costs of EA group was 4697.5 yuan, and NEA group was 3673 yuan, the difference was statistically significant (P < .001). No adverse events related to EA occurred during hospitalization, only 3 patients showed mild lumbago and back pain after follow-up to three months postpartum, which was significantly relieved after proper rest.

CONCLUSION

EA can significantly reduce the pain of parturients, which may be effective and safe in the second-trimester induced labor.

Patient-controlled intravenous versus on-demand oral, intramuscular or intravenous administration of oxycodone during medical induced abortion from 64 to 128 days of gestation: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare oxycodone administration via intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) vs on-demand administration during late-first- and second-trimester medically induced abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized controlled study. We enrolled women between 64 to 128 days of gestation in the study between June 2016 and August 2018. Participants were randomized to receive oxycodone either via IVPCA or given on-demand orally, intramuscularly or intravenously. Pain intensity and satisfaction with care were measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100mm).

RESULTS

Altogether 99 participants were randomized: 48 in IVPCA group and 51 in on-demand group. Median gestational age was similar between groups (74 days [Interquartile range, IQR 69-81] in the IVPCA group vs 72 [69-80] in the control group, p=0.587). Peak maximal pain was severe in both groups (median pain VAS was 62 [IQR 44-84] and 71 [IQR 56-90], p=0.52). The odds for severe pain (highest pain VAS≥70) were similar between the groups (IVPCA group OR 0.51 [95% Confidence Interval 0.22-1.18], p=0.118). In contrast, the odds for mild or tolerable pain (highest pain VAS≤40) were higher in the IVPCA group (OR 4.06 [95% CI 1.05-16.04], p=0.043). Nevertheless, satisfaction with care was high (VAS 94 [89-100]) in both groups. Of those experiencing severe pain, 94.0% declared pain medication as adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

Women often experience severe pain during medical abortion irrespective of the mode of opiate administration. Oxycodone administration via IVPCA permits women to self-administer analgesics when experiencing pain, raising the odds for mild or tolerable pain during abortion care. Satisfaction with care was high.

Intravaginal misoprostol versus uterine curettage for missed abortion: A cost-effectiveness analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a strategy based on direct-acting uterine curettage (UC) versus a pre-direct-acting misoprostol (1600 mg) in patients with missed abortion (MA), from the perspective of a National Health System.

METHODS

An open prospective cohort study was carried out at Reina Sofía University Hospital (Córdoba, Spain) from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 in 180 patients diagnosed with MA. The patients chose medical treatment with intravaginal misoprostol (800 μg/4 h) or UC after receiving complete and detailed information. The effectiveness, clinical characteristics of the patients, costs of treating and managing the disease, and satisfaction with the procedures were recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-five patients (80.6%) chose misoprostol versus 35 patients (19.4%) who chose UC. The effectiveness of misoprostol has been 42% evaluated at 48 h; UC success rate has been 100%. The incidence of side effects is significantly higher in patients treated with misoprostol (p < 0.05); as well as the number of care received by the patient (p < 0.05). Satisfaction is higher in patients treated with UC (p < 0.05). However, the cost is almost 5-folds higher in patients treated with UC (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

UC has a higher success rate, greater satisfaction, and a lower incidence of side effects, although significantly increases the cost compared to misoprostol in MA.

Overnight pain and opioid use after osmotic cervical dilator placement for second trimester dilation and evacuation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate pain following overnight osmotic cervical dilator placement for second trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study surveyed pain and quantified prescription opioid use among 100 women who underwent overnight osmotic cervical dilator placement for D&E. Participants were given opioid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) prescriptions and were asked to rate their level of pain on a Likert scale (1-10). Demographic and medical information was abstracted from electronic medical records. Bivariate analyses of demographic and clinical characteristics by pain score and opioid use were conducted. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed for pain score. A multivariate logistic regression model was fitted for factors associated with opioid use.

RESULTS

Gestational age ranged from 14 to 23 weeks (average 19 ± 3 weeks). The mean score of worst pain experienced was 5.3 out of 10. Participants reported 3.4 h of moderate pain (4-6 out of 10) and 1.0 h of severe pain (7-10 out of 10); 54% of women took at least one opioid (mean 2.8 ± 1.5). Multivariate analysis showed that higher pain was associated with younger age (p = .0363) and no prior vaginal delivery (p = .0296). The number of osmotic cervical dilators was associated with pain in the bivariate analysis (r = 0.216, p = .0311) but was not significant in the multivariate analysis (p = .0634). An increasing number of cervical dilators (p = .0323) and a higher pain score (p = .004) were associated with opioid use.

CONCLUSION

Most participants with overnight cervical dilators for D&E experienced at least moderate pain and used opioid pain medication in addition to NSAIDs when available. A shared decision-making model may be appropriate for determining which patients may benefit from opioids.

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation to Reduce Pain With Medication Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (hfTENS) reduces pain during medication abortion.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Participants who were undergoing medication abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol through 70 days of gestation either received active 80 Hz hfTENS or sham to use for a minimum of 60 minutes within 8 hours of misoprostol. Maximum pain on an 11-point numerical rating scale at 8 hours after misoprostol was the primary outcome. We estimated 20 per group for 80% power to detect a 2-point difference and up to 10% attrition. Secondary outcomes included a maximum pain score at 24 hours, additional analgesia use, the difference in score before and after treatment, the experience of side effects, abortion outcomes, and acceptability. We collected data at baseline, time of misoprostol (0-hour), 8-hour and 24 hours using real-time electronic surveys, and at follow-up.

RESULTS

Between June 2019 and March 2020, we screened 251 patients and randomized 40-20 each to hfTENS or sham-with one postrandomization exclusion and two patients lost to follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar. Median maximum pain scores at 8 hours were 7.0 (interquartile range 3.0) and 10.0 (interquartile range 3.0) for hfTENS and sham, respectively. The distribution of these scores was lower among hfTENS users compared with sham (mean rank 15.17 vs 22.63, P=.036). High-frequency TENS users also experienced a significant reduction in posttreatment pain score (-2.0 [interquartile range 2.5] vs 0 [interquartile range 1.5], P=.008). We found no statistically significant differences in use of additional analgesia, distribution of maximum pain scores at 24 hours, side effects, or measures of acceptability.

CONCLUSION

High-frequency TENS reduced maximum pain scores within 8 hours of misoprostol and reduced pain scores immediately after treatment compared with placebo. High-frequency TENS offers an effective nonpharmacologic option for pain management during medication abortion.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03925129.

Two prophylactic pain management regimens for medical abortion ≤63 days' gestation with mifepristone and misoprostol: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine if either prophylactic tramadol 50 mg or ibuprofen 400 mg/metoclopramide 10 mg result in lower maximal pain compared to placebo in women ≤63 days' gestation having a mifepristone-misoprostol medical abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Nepal, South Africa, and Vietnam. Participants seeking medical abortion received active treatment or placebo, taken at time of misoprostol and repeated 4 hours later. All had access to additional analgesia. The primary outcome was mean maximum pain score within 8 hours. Participants self-assessed maximum pain using an 11-point numeric rating scale recorded in paper diaries; we analyzed these data using intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included use of additional analgesia, side effects, and satisfaction.

RESULTS

We enrolled 563 patients between June 2016 and October 2017; 5 participants failed to follow up. Mean adjusted maximum pain scores within 8 hours in both active arms were lower than placebo (tramadol: n = 188, 6.78 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.46, 7.11); ibuprofen/metoclopramide: n = 187, 6.43 (95% CI 6.10, 6.75); placebo: n = 188, 7.42 (95% CI 7.10, 7.74); p = 0.0001). Additional analgesia was used by 97 (52.2%) participants in the tramadol group, 80 (43.0%) in the ibuprofen/metoclopramide group, and 103 (55.7%) in the placebo group, p = 0.04. More dizziness (p = 0.004), headache (p = 0.03), and vomiting (p < 0.001) occurred in the tramadol group. More participants reported experienced pain was the same or less than expected in the ibuprofen/metoclopramide group (p = 0.05); overall abortion satisfaction did not differ by group (p = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, tramadol or ibuprofen/metoclopramide co-administered with misoprostol and repeated 4 h later resulted in lower mean maximum pain scores that failed to achieve clinical significance. Women who received ibuprofen/metoclopramide were least likely to use additional analgesia and reported fewer side effects.

IMPLICATIONS

Given that tramadol, ibuprofen, and metoclopramide are inexpensive, globally available; and, ibuprofen and metoclopramide are included on the World Health Organization Essential Medicines List, these medicines could be considered for prophylactic pain management during medical abortion.

Auricular acupressure and acupuncture as adjuncts for pain management during first trimester medication abortion: A randomized three-arm trial

OBJECTIVES

To measure pain during first trimester medication abortion using auricular acupressure or auricular acupuncture as an adjunct to pain management. We measured anxiety as a secondary outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

This randomized, double-blinded, 3-arm trial enrolled women seeking medication abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. Participants received auricular acupressure, auricular acupuncture, or inert auricular placebo patches immediately after receiving mifepristone. In addition, all participants received ibuprofen to use at home as needed. The study started with 1:1:1 randomization, but later overenrolled into the acupressure group after retraining for greater fidelity to that intervention. Participants reported pain and anxiety using numeric rating scales via text message for 4 days, and using a visual analog scale at follow-up. Analyses compared median pain scores of those receiving acupressure, acupuncture, or placebo.

RESULTS

We randomized 136 participants of whom 57 received acupressure, 40 received acupuncture, and 39 received placebo. Groups had similar baseline characteristics. One hundred thirty-two participants (97%) reported outcomes by text message and 120 (88%) completed a follow-up interview. For acupressure, acupuncture and placebo groups the median maximum pain scores reported via text message were 60.0, 75.0, and 55.0 (p = 0.38); median maximum pain scores reported at follow-up were 76.5, 60.0, and 71.0 (p = 0.97), respectively. Acupressure results were similar before and after retraining. Maximum anxiety scores reported via text message were 10.0, 45.0, and 30.0 (p = 0.57). Maximum anxiety scores reported at follow-up were 10.5, 20.0, and 13.0 (p = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Pain and anxiety during medication abortion were similar among women receiving acupressure, acupuncture or placebo.

IMPLICATIONS

We found no benefit in administering auricular acupressure or auricular acupuncture during medication abortion. These modalities are intended to be simple to use, but perhaps the brief provider training for this study was insufficient. These modalities should not be used in clinical practice without further study.

Medication Abortion Up to 70 Days of Gestation

Medication abortion, also referred to as medical abortion, is a safe and effective method of providing abortion. Medication abortion involves the use of medicines rather than uterine aspiration to induce an abortion. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication abortion regimen includes mifepristone and misoprostol. The purpose of this document is to provide updated evidence-based guidance on the provision of medication abortion up to 70 days (or 10 weeks) of gestation. Information about medication abortion after 70 days of gestation is provided in other ACOG publications [1].

Satisfaction with medication abortion and marijuana use: A prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

This exploratory study compared self-reported satisfaction rates and pain scores between patients who used marijuana during their medication abortion versus non-users.

STUDY DESIGN

We recruited medication abortion patients at a University-affiliated abortion clinic in Denver, Colorado. Participants completed a pre-abortion questionnaire, pain diary, and follow-up survey that assessed satisfaction with pain control, symptoms, and abortion experience. Using medians test, we compared the sums of median satisfaction scores between patients who used marijuana versus non-users. Based on diary entries, we also compared reported pain over 24 h after misoprostol (area under the curve [AUC]) between cohorts.

RESULTS

We enrolled 51 participants; 16 marijuana users and 35 non-marijuana users. Marijuana users and non-users had similar sums of median satisfaction scores (22 vs. 20 out of 30, p = 0.90) and median question-specific satisfaction scores (range 7-8 vs. 6.5-8, p = 0.6-1.0). Sixteen marijuana users (100%) and 20 (57%) non-users completed their pain diary; median AUCs for pain were similar (65.0 vs. 59.5, p = 0.73). Thirteen (81%) patients subjectively correlated marijuana use with pain reduction, seven (44%) with anxiety reduction, and six (38%) with nausea/vomiting improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference in measures of medication abortion satisfaction and pain when comparing marijuana users to non-users. However, marijuana users often attributed symptom improvement during their medication abortion to marijuana use.

IMPLICATIONS

Until randomized studies are available, clinicians can counsel patients that marijuana use may not necessarily affect satisfaction or pain with medication abortion. It remains unknown whether marijuana has potential benefits in a marijuana-naïve population undergoing medication abortion. Future studies should explore the role that marijuana and its derivatives may play for pain and side effect management during medication abortion among marijuana-naïve patients.

Pain management for medical and surgical termination of pregnancy between 13 and 24 weeks of gestation: a systematic review

Background

High‐quality care for termination of pregnancy (TOP) requires pain to be effectively managed; however, practices differ, and the available guidelines do not specify optimal strategies.

Objective

To guide providers in effective pain management for second‐trimester medical and surgical TOP.

Search strategy

We searched PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases, and the US National Library of Medicine clinical trials registry, from inception to the end of June 2019, and hand‐searched reference lists.

Selection criteria

Trials comparing pain management strategies with no treatment, placebo or active interventions during induced medical or surgical TOP, occurring between 13 and 24 weeks of gestation, and reporting direct or indirect measures of pain.

Data collection and analysis

Both authors summarised and systematically assessed the evidence and risk of bias using standard tools.

Main results

We included seven medical and four surgical TOP studies, with 453 and 349 participants, respectively. The heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes prevented pooled analyses. Medical TOP: women receiving routine or continuous epidural analgesia experienced mild pain. The prophylactic use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) decreased pain (mean difference −0.5, P < 0.001) and additional opioid requirements (3.5 versus 7 mg, P = 0.04) compared with placebo/other treatment. Paracervical block was ineffective. No studies assessed intramuscular (IM)/intravenous (IV) opioid or nonpharmacological treatment. Surgical TOP: general anaesthesia/deep IV sedation alleviated pain. Nitrous oxide was ineffective. No studies assessed moderate IV sedation, IV/IM opioid, paracervical block without sedation, NSAID or nonpharmacological treatment.

Conclusion

Based on limited data, regional analgesia and NSAIDs mitigated second‐trimester medical TOP pain; general anaesthesia/deep IV sedation alleviated surgical TOP pain.

Tweetable abstract

Although women experience intense pain during second‐trimester termination of pregnancy, few data are available to inform their treatment.

Although women experience intense pain during second‐trimester termination of pregnancy, few data are available to inform their treatment.

Gabapentin for Perioperative Pain Management for Uterine Aspiration: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of oral gabapentin in conjunction with usual oral pain management regimens of lorazepam, ibuprofen, oxycodone, and acetaminophen for surgical abortion on pain 5 minutes postprocedure.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of patients from 6 0/7-14 6/7 weeks of gestation scheduled to undergo surgical abortion at the Duke Family Planning Clinic. Participants were administered 600 mg of oral gabapentin compared with placebo with usual oral pain management. Pain score was assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale, with the primary outcome being pain score 5 minutes after the procedure. The effect of gabapentin was assessed using a linear regression model controlling for baseline pain. We also measured pain perception 24 hours after the procedure. Secondary outcome measures included anxiety, side effects, and usage of opiate pain medication in the 24-hour postoperative period.

RESULTS

Out of 113 women screened for this study; 96 women were recruited, enrolled, and randomized to study treatment arm from August 2016 to June 2018. Pain at 5 minutes after the procedure was similar between the gabapentin and placebo groups ((Equation is included in full-text article.)=3.40; 95% CI -8.20 to 15.0; P=.56). Gabapentin and placebo were well tolerated, with no statistically significant difference in side effects or anxiety levels. Although prescription of opioids after the procedure was not standardized among patients, 73% of women received a short-term prescription for oxycodone. A lower percentage of women in the gabapentin group self-reported taking opioids in the 24 hours postprocedure (18% vs 47%; odds ratio 0.26; 95% CI 0.09-0.75).

CONCLUSION

The addition of gabapentin to usual oral pain management regimens with paracervical block did not reduce postoperative pain for patients undergoing outpatient surgical abortion. Although the addition of gabapentin was well tolerated and reduced oral opiate use 24 hours postprocedure, it did not affect the experience of pain during and immediately after the procedure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02725710.

Experiences with pain of early medical abortion: qualitative results from Nepal, South Africa, and Vietnam

Background

Medical abortion (MA) has become an increasingly popular choice for women even where surgical abortion services are available. Pain is often cited by women as one of the worst aspects of the MA experience, yet we know little about women’s experience with pain management during the process, particularly in low resource settings. The aim of this study is to better understand women’s experiences of pain with MA and strategies for improving quality of care.

Methods

This qualitative study was conducted as part of a three-arm randomized, controlled trial in Nepal, Vietnam, and South Africa to investigate the effect of prophylactic pain management on pain during MA through 63 days’ gestation. We purposively sampled seven parous and seven nulliparous women with a range of reported maximum pain levels from each country, totaling 42 participants. Thematic content analysis focused on MA pain experiences and management of pain compared to menstruation, labor, and previous abortions.

Results

MA is relatively less painful compared to giving birth and relatively more painful than menstruation, based on four factors: pain intensity, duration, associated symptoms and side effects, and response to pain medications. We identified four types of pain trajectories: minimal overall pain, brief intense pain, intermittent pain, and constant pain. Compared to previous abortion experiences, MA pain was less extreme (but sometimes longer in duration), more private, and less frightening. There were no distinct trends in pain trajectories by treatment group, parity, or country. Methods of coping with pain in MA and menstruation are similar in each respective country context, and use of analgesics was relatively uncommon. The majority of respondents reported that counseling about pain management before the abortion and support during the abortion process helped ease their pain and emotional stress.

Conclusions

Pain management during MA is increasingly essential to ensuring quality abortion care in light of the growing proportion of abortions completed with medication around the world. Incorporating a discussion about pain expectations and pain management strategies into pre-MA counseling and providing access to information and support during the MA process could improve the quality of care and experiences of MA patients.

Trial registration

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000017729, registered January 8, 2013.

Management of physical pain during induced second-trimester medical abortions: a cross-sectional study of methodological quality and recommendations in local clinical practice guidelines at Swedish hospitals

AIM

The aim was to assess the methodological quality and describe recommendations for pain management in local clinical practice guidelines about induced second-trimester medical abortions at Swedish university and county hospitals.

METHODS

In 2017, Swedish university and county hospitals that provided abortion care in the second trimester of pregnancy were contacted (n = 29), and guidelines from 25 were received (university: n = 6, county: n = 19). Guideline quality was assessed according to two systematic instruments. Recommendations were systematically assessed regarding frequency and tools for pain measurement, prophylactic pharmacologic treatment, as needed pharmacologic treatment and nonpharmacologic treatment.

RESULTS

Overall methodological quality was poor across both instruments, as the majority of the guidelines did not fulfil the investigated quality criteria. For pain measurements, no guideline recommended measurement frequency and four recommended specific measurement tools. Prophylactic pharmacologic treatment, described in 23 (92%) guidelines, included paracetamol (n = 23, 92%), anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 23, 92%) and opioids (n = 18, 72%). As needed pharmacologic treatment, described in 23 (92%) guidelines, included anaesthetics (n = 21, 84%), opioids (n = 21, 84%) and paracetamol (n = 1, 4%). Recommendations for as needed anaesthetics included paracervical block (n = 21, 84%), epidural analgesia (n = 16, 64%) and inhalation of nitrous oxide (n = 5, 20%). Nonpharmacologic treatments were recommended in nine (36%) guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that local clinical practice guidelines about induced second-trimester medical abortions are of inadequate methodological quality and that a large majority lack recommendations concerning systematic pain measurements. Although most recommend prophylactic and as needed pharmacologic management, national inconsistencies exist in Sweden with regard to recommendations of epidural analgesia, nitrous oxide and nonpharmacologic methods. In Sweden, there is room for improvement in the development of these guidelines.

Induced abortion

Abortion is common. Data on abortion rates are inexact but can be used to explore trends. Globally, the estimated rate in the period 2010-2014 was 35 abortions per 1000 women (aged 15-44 years), five points less than the rate of 40 for the period 1990-1994. Abortion laws vary around the world but are generally more restrictive in developing countries. Restrictive laws do not necessarily deter women from seeking abortion but often lead to unsafe practice with significant mortality and morbidity. While a legal framework for abortion is a prerequisite for availability, many laws, which are not evidence based, restrict availability and delay access. Abortion should be available in the interests of public health and any legal framework should be as permissive as possible in order to promote access. In the absence of legal access, harm reduction strategies are needed to reduce abortion-related mortality and morbidity. Abortion can be performed surgically (in the first trimester, by manual or electric vacuum aspiration) or with medication: both are safe and effective. Cervical priming facilitates surgery and reduces the risk of incomplete abortion. Diagnosis of incomplete abortion should be made on clinical grounds, not by ultrasound. Septic abortion is a common cause of maternal death almost always following unsafe abortion and thus largely preventable. While routine follow-up after abortion is unnecessary, all women should be offered a contraceptive method immediately after the abortion. This, together with improved education and other interventions, may succeed in reducing unintended pregnancy.

A prospective study of the frequency of severe pain and predictive factors in women undergoing first-trimester surgical abortion under local anaesthesia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of severe pain among women and to identify the associated predictive factors during first-trimester surgical abortion under local anaesthesia (LA).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study from November 2013 to January 2014 at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rennes, France. The study population was composed of one hundred and ninety-four patients who underwent an elective first-trimester surgical abortion under LA. In an anonymized questionnaire, the participants were asked to self-record their perceived pain level 30 min after the completion of the procedure using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The main outcome measure was the frequency of severe pain among women, defined as VAS ≥ 7. Secondary outcome measure was the risk factor(s) for severe pain.

RESULTS

Severe pain (i.e. VAS ≥ 7) was experienced by 46% (95% CI: 39%-53%) of the population. Multivariate analysis confirmed that >10 weeks of gestation (OR: 2.530 [95% CI: 1.1-5.81], p = .0287) and having 0 or 1 child (OR: 5.206 [95% CI: 1.87-14.49], p = .0016) were significant independent factors of severe pain.

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of the women experienced severe pain. More than 10 weeks of gestation and parity were predictive factors of severe pain. These findings should be useful in counselling women undergoing surgical abortion under LA.

Pain and Analgesia During Labor and Delivery Between 16 0/7 and 22 6/7 Weeks of Gestation

OBJECTIVE

To describe severity of pain during labor at previable estimated gestational age and to determine the effectiveness of various methods of analgesia in this population.

METHODS

In this retrospective review of the records of women undergoing induction or augmentation of labor between 16 0/7 and 22 6/7 weeks of gestation, we examined pain scores (numeric rating scale 0-10) documented throughout labor and analgesia method (none, systemic, or neuraxial). We compared relevant patient and labor characteristics such as gestational age, fetal weight, time interval from induction to delivery as well as pain data including analgesia type and pain scores before and after analgesia. We compared analgesia response in patients who received neuraxial analgesia and those who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients met inclusion criteria: four requested no analgesia, 56 used systemic analgesia only, 11 used systemic analgesia initially and then requested neuraxial analgesia, and nine used neuraxial without using systemic analgesia first. Median peak pain score was 7 among all patients. Patients who chose neuraxial analgesia had higher estimated gestational age (21 compared with 20 weeks of gestation, P=.03), fetal weight (362 compared with 268 g, P=.047), and admission-to-delivery time intervals (19.25 compared with 10.3 hours, P=.003) than those who chose no or systemic analgesia. Immediate preanalgesia peak pain scores were not different between groups, but patients who received neuraxial analgesia had lower immediate postanalgesia nadir scores than those who chose systemic pain relief.

CONCLUSION

Pain during induction of labor at previable gestational ages may be greater than is commonly appreciated. Neuraxial analgesia may provide more optimal pain relief for patients with higher estimated gestational age and fetal weight, particularly after 22 weeks of estimated gestational age.

Two prophylactic medication approaches in addition to a pain control regimen for early medical abortion < 63 days' gestation with mifepristone and misoprostol: study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pain is often cited as one of the worst features of medical abortion. Further, inadequate pain management may motivate some women to seek unnecessary clinical care. There is a need to identify effective methods for pain control in this setting.

METHODS/DESIGN

We propose a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. 576 participants (288 nulliparous; 288 parous) from study sites in Nepal, South Africa and Vietnam will be randomly allocated to one of three treatments: (1) ibuprofen 400 mg PO and metoclopramide 10 mg PO; (2) tramadol 50 mg PO and a placebo; or (3) two placebo pills, to be taken immediately before misoprostol and repeated once four hours later. All women will be provided with supplementary analgesia for use as needed during the medical abortion. We hypothesize that women receiving prophylactic analgesia will report lower maximal pain scores in the first 8 h following misoprostol administration compared to women receiving placebos for medical abortion through 63 days' gestation. Our primary objective is to determine whether prophylactic administration of ibuprofen and metoclopramide or tramadol provides superior pain relief compared to analgesia administration after pain begins, measured during the first eight hours after misoprostol administration. Secondary objectives include identifying covariates associated with higher reported pain scores; determining any impact of the study medicines on medical abortion success; and, qualitatively exploring women's physical experiences of medical abortion, especially related to pain, and how can they be improved. Data sources include medical records, participant symptom diaries and interview data obtained on the day of enrollment, during the medical abortion, and at follow-up. Participants will be contacted via telephone on day 3 and return for follow-up will occur approximately 14 days after mifepristone, concluding study participation. A subset of 42 women will also be invited to undergo in-depth qualitative interviews following study completion.

DISCUSSION

Although pain is one of the most common side effects encountered with medical abortion, little is known about optimal pain management for this process. This multi-arm trial design offers an efficient approach to evaluating two prophylactic pain management regimens compared to use of pain medication as needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12613000017729 (Prospectively registered 8/1/2013).

Postabortion Care: 20 Years of Strong Evidence on Emergency Treatment, Family Planning, and Other Programming Components

Worldwide 75 million women need postabortion care (PAC) services each year following safe or unsafe induced abortions and miscarriages. We reviewed more than 550 studies on PAC published between 1994 and 2013 in the peer-reviewed and gray literature, covering emergency treatment, postabortion family planning, organization of services, and related topics that impact practices and health outcomes, particularly in the Global South. In this article, we present findings from studies with strong evidence that have major implications for programs and practice. For example, vacuum aspiration reduced morbidity, costs, and time in comparison to sharp curettage. Misoprostol 400 mcg sublingually or 600 mcg orally achieved 89% to 99% complete evacuation rates within 2 weeks in multiple studies and was comparable in effectiveness, safety, and acceptability to manual vacuum aspiration. Misoprostol was safely introduced in several PAC programs through mid-level providers, extending services to secondary hospitals and primary health centers. In multiple studies, postabortion family planning uptake before discharge increased by 30-70 percentage points within 1-3 years of strengthening postabortion family planning services; in some cases, increases up to 60 percentage points in 4 months were achieved. Immediate postabortion contraceptive acceptance increased on average from 32% before the interventions to 69% post-intervention. Several studies found that women receiving immediate postabortion intrauterine devices and implants had fewer unintended pregnancies and repeat abortions than those who were offered delayed insertions. Postabortion family planning is endorsed by the professional organizations of obstetricians/gynecologists, midwives, and nurses as a standard of practice; major donors agree, and governments should be encouraged to provide universal access to postabortion family planning. Important program recommendations include offering all postabortion women family planning counseling and services before leaving the facility, especially because fertility returns rapidly (within 2 to 3 weeks); postabortion family planning services can be quickly replicated to multiple sites with high acceptance rates. Voluntary family planning uptake by method should always be monitored to document program and provider performance. In addition, vacuum aspiration and misoprostol should replace sharp curettage to treat incomplete abortion for women who meet eligibility criteria.

Experiences of termination of pregnancy for a fetal anomaly: A qualitative study of virtual community messages

OBJECTIVE

to explore experiences described by posters in Swedish virtual communities before, during and after termination of pregnancy due to a fetal anomaly.

DESIGN

cross-sectional qualitative study of messages in virtual communities. The messages were purposefully selected in 2014 and analyzed with inductive qualitative manifest content analysis.

SETTING

two large and active Swedish virtual communities.

SAMPLE

1623 messages from 122 posters (112 females, 1 male, and 9 did not disclose their sex), written between 2008 and 2014. The majority of the posters were females (91%) with recent experience of termination of pregnancy following different prenatal diagnoses (63% less than one year since the termination).

MEASUREMENTS AND FINDINGS

before the termination, posters experienced an emotional shock and a difficult decision. During the termination, they needed compassionate care from present caregivers, experienced intense emotional and physical pain, lacked an understanding about the abortion, and expressed varied feelings about the option to view the fetus. After the termination, posters used different strategies to come to terms with and accept the decision, experienced a perinatal loss, expressed fears of recurrence, and longed for a new child.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

spanning across the time before, during and after the abortion, women who terminate a pregnancy due to a fetal anomaly express considerable physical and emotional pain, with psychosocial and reproductive consequences.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

information and preparation, including the decision whether or not to view the fetus, are important aspects to consider when caring for individuals who have decided to terminate a pregnancy for a fetal anomaly. The findings indicate a need for structures that offer support to women who suffer from fears of recurrence in future pregnancies.

Analgesia for Medically Induced Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy: A Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy between intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in women undergoing medically induced second trimester termination of pregnancy (TOP).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial in a Canadian quaternary care hospital. We included in the study women of gestational age 12 weeks to 23+6 weeks who were undergoing second trimester induction of labour between June 2012 and January 2014. Participants were computer-randomized to receive either IVPCA with fentanyl or PCEA with bupivacaine and fentanyl, with the option to cross over between treatment groups. We administered Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaires pre-procedure, at the time of discharge, and 24 hours after discharge. Pain scores, satisfaction scores, and obstetrical complications also were noted.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-eight women were approached for participation in the study; 80 declined and 16 were ineligible, leaving 42 participants. Three women subsequently withdrew consent, and two were not included in the results because of protocol violations. A total of 37 women completed the study. Twenty (54%) were allocated to the IVPCA group and 17 (46%) to the PCEA group. Although the QoR-40 values at the time of discharge and at 24 hours after discharge were significantly higher in the PCEA group, they also were significantly higher before the procedure in that group. The within-group differences in QoR-40 (between QoR-40 at discharge and QoR pre-procedure, and between QoR-40 at 24 hours after discharge and QoR pre-procedure), maximum pain scores, satisfaction, and obstetrical complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

IVPCA and PCEA provide similar quality of recovery, quality of analgesia, and satisfaction for women undergoing second trimester TOP.

Paracervical block as pain treatment during second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy: an RCT with bupivacaine versus sodium chloride

STUDY QUESTION

Can paracervical block (PCB) administered before the onset of pain decrease women's pain experience during second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MToP)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There were no clinically significant differences between groups receiving PCB with bupivacaine or saline with regard to the highest and lowest pain intensity, morphine consumption or induction-to abortion interval.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The most common side effect of misoprostol is pain; nevertheless, there are sparse studies in pain and pain treatment during MToP, especially in second-trimester abortion. Pain reported in second-trimester medical abortion is often intense, and peaks when the fetal expulsion occurs.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A double-blinded RCT was carried out from May 2012 until April 2015. A power calculation was based on a previous pilot study showing that the proportion of women with severe pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) ≥7] was 63%. A clinically significant reduction was considered to yield 35% with severe pain, and with a power of 80% and significance level of 5% (two-sided) 112 women were needed. Accounting for a 20% drop-out rate, a total of 140 women were needed. The primary outcome, pain intensity measured as any VAS ≥7, was analysed using a generalized estimating equations model. The level of significance was set to P < 0.05 two-sided. A computer generated randomization list with block size of 10 was used. The treatment allocation was placed in a sealed, opaque, envelope and picked consecutively.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 589 women attending a gynaecological clinic had a second-trimester abortion during the study period and 276 were invited to participate. A total of 113 women undergoing abortion from 13 weeks of gestation and above were recruited, of which 55 were randomly allocated to receive a PCB with bupivacaine and 58 a PCB with sodium chloride 1 h after the first dose of misoprostol. The full analysis set (FAS) population was defined as all randomized women that had at least one value for any of the outcomes (n = 102). The per-protocol (PP) population was defined as a subset of the FAS excluding patients with major protocol deviations or without a value for the primary outcome (n = 99). Pain was measured by VAS at misoprostol initiation (baseline) and repeated every 30 min until fetal expulsion. The primary outcome was the highest VAS pain intensity at any time point.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The highest pain intensity, did not show any differences at a cut-off of VAS ≥7 [risk ratio (RR): 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-1.5; P = 0.0.292]. In the PP analyses, there were 75% women in the bupivacaine group and 64% in the sodium chloride group with VAS ≥7 (RR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.9-1.5; P = 0.235). Most women did not experience pain at the misoprostol start, 19 women scored a VAS of >0, ranging from 1 to 4 with a mean of 1.8 and median of 2 (P = 1.000). Immediately prior to PCB, 61 women scored a VAS of >0, from 1 to 10 with a mean of 2.0 and median of 1 (P = 0.771). There was a 48% loss of VAS scores at the time of expulsion and the remaining scores did not differ between groups (RR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.9-2.5). A subgroup analysis of primipara did not show any difference in highest pain intensity VAS ≥7 (RR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.9-1.6; P = 0.283). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups with regard to the highest and lowest (P = 553 and 0.182) pain intensity and morphine consumption (P = 0.772). Side effects were reported by 28 women (14 women in each group), with no differences between groups. Most common was nausea and vomiting in connection to morphine injection.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Nearly 60% of the invited women did not want to participate in the study (fear of needles and fear of receiving the placebo) therefore women who tolerate pain may have been overrepresented in the study population. Data collection was stopped, in error, when 113 participants had been recruited. The loss to follow-up was, however, only 11 women (10%), which was lower than expected but intrinsically the study did not fully reach the intended number of women, which may have influenced the results. In addition, the obstetrical and gynaecological background of participating women differs. The participants were informed that they had a 50% chance of receiving a PCB with active substance, which could theoretically have affected their expectations and pain experience (placebo effect). The frequent attention at VAS scoring and the overall care provided may also have affected the participants in a positive way, and helped women to feel supported and more relaxed during the abortion.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The highest pain intensity was severe (VAS: 7-10) among 65-75% of the participants, as reported for first-trimester medical abortion; however, the maximal pain scores remain high despite the PCB. There is, therefore, a clear need for more optimal pain treatment but only limited data exist on pain treatment during MToP over all gestational lengths. As PCB was well tolerated, did not cause any serious side effects and had no negative impact on the abortion process and efficacy, another approach may be worth exploring, namely PCB given on demand at the onset of painful contractions.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (grant no: 2012-2844), ALF (Karolinska Institutet - Stockholm County Council, Agreement on Medical Research and Training) funding, the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm South General Hospital, and Swedish Nurses in the Area of Pain - SSOS together with GlaxoSmithKline. None of the authors have any conflicts of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01617564) and The EudraCT (number: 2010-020780-21) and was approved by The Regional Ethical Review Board at Karolinska Institutet (dnr: 2007/1277-31/2 and 2010/410-31/1).

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

Clinical trial registration was done in May 2012 before initiation of patient recruitment.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT

29 May 2012.

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for pain relief during termination of pregnancy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Pain is a major concern during medical abortion but no evidence-based recommendations for optimal analgesia during medical termination of pregnancy are available. We compared two methods of epidural analgesia during second trimester termination of pregnancy, with the primary aim of assessing the incidence of motor block.

METHODS

Women were randomly assigned to receive continuous epidural infusion (CEI Group; n=52) or programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB Group; n=52). Assessment of motor block was performed every hour. Patients with a modified Bromage score <6 were considered to have motor block.

RESULTS

Motor block occurred more frequently in the CEI Group compared with the PIEB Group (46.2% vs. 5.8%, P<0.001). Pain scores were low and comparable between groups. Patients in the CEI Group experienced nausea more frequently than those in the PIEB Group (34.6% vs. 13.5%, P=0.022). The degree of satisfaction was higher in the PIEB Group compared with the CEI Group.

CONCLUSIONS

During second trimester termination of pregnancy in our patient groups, a programmed intermittent epidural bolus technique was associated with less motor block and greater patient satisfaction than continuous epidural infusion. Both techniques had similar analgesic efficacy.

An overview of medical abortion for clinical practice

Medical abortion is a safe, convenient, and effective method for terminating an early unintended pregnancy. Medical abortion can be performed up to 63 days from the last menstrual period and may even be used up to 70 days for women who prefer medical abortion over surgical abortion. Counseling on the adverse effects and expectations for medical abortion is critical to success. Medical abortion can be performed in a clinic without special equipment, and it is perceived as more "natural" than a surgical abortion by many women. Follow-up for medical abortion can be simplified to include only serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurements when necessary, although obtaining an ultrasound remains the criterion standard. Pain associated with medical abortion is best treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, possibly in combination with opioid analgesics. Medical abortion can contribute to continuity of care for women who wish to remain with their primary care providers for management of their abortion.

Simultaneous determination of acetaminophen and dihydrocodeine in human plasma by UPLC-MS/MS: Its pharmacokinetic application

An ultra performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated to determine acetaminophen (AAP) and dihydrocodeine (DHC) in human plasma simultaneously. Plasma samples were prepared using protein precipitation with acetonitrile, the two analytes and the internal standard midazolam were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column and mass spectrometric analysis was performed using a QTrap5500 mass spectrometer coupled with an electro-spray ionization (ESI) source in the positive ion mode. The MRM transitions of m/z 151.2→110.0 and m/z 302.3→199.2 were used to quantify for AAP and DHC, respectively. The linearity of this method was found to be within the concentration range of 50-10000ng/mL for AAP, and 1-100ng/mL for DHC in human plasma, respectively. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) was 50ng/mL and 1ng/mL for AAP and DHC in human plasma, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD) of intra and inter precision were less than 10% for both AAP and DHC. The analysis time of per sample was 1.0min. The developed and validated method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of AAP (500mg) with DHC (20mg) capsule in Chinese healthy volunteers (N=20).

Cancer treatment in pregnant women

In general, strategies for the treatment of cancer in pregnancy should not differ significantly from the treatment regimens in non-pregnant women. However, this is difficult due to either the effects of anticancer drugs on the developing foetus or the possibility of long-term complications after the exposure to drugs and radiation. The decision about the introduction and continuation of treatment in the event of pregnancy should be preceded by a detailed analysis of the potential benefits and risks. There are no data to suggest that pregnancy termination alters the biological behaviour of the tumour or patient prognosis in the presence of appropriate antineoplastic therapy. All patients should be given appropriate advice and informed that there are insufficient scientific data to determine any generally accepted consensus. It is very important to always respect the will of the patient, and the moral judgment of the physician should have no impact on the decisions taken by the woman. If the woman decides to undergo active treatment and maintain her pregnancy, it is necessary to carry out consultations with experts in the field appropriate to the type of cancer. This paper presents a basic review of the literature on the targeted therapies currently used in selected cancers diagnosed during pregnancy: breast cancer, cervical cancer, Hodgkin's disease, melanoma, thyroid cancer, ovarian cancer, and colorectal cancer.

Pain during medical abortion, the impact of the regimen: a neglected issue? A review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate pain and other early adverse events associated with different regimens of medical abortion up to nine weeks of amenorrhoea.

METHODS

The literature was searched for comparative studies of medical abortion using mifepristone followed by the prostaglandin analogue misoprostol. Publications, which included pain assessment were further analysed.

RESULTS

Of the 1459 publications on medical abortion identified, only 23 comparative, prospective trials corresponded to the inclusion criteria. Patients in these studies received different dosages of mifepristone in combination with different dosages of misoprostol administered via diverse routes or at various intervals. Information on pain level was reported in 12/23 papers (52%), information regarding systematic administration of analgesics in 12/23 articles (52%) and information concerning analgesia used was available for only 10/23 studies (43%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither pain nor its treatment are systematically reported in clinical trials of medical abortion; this shortcoming reflects a neglect of the individual pain perception. When data are mentioned, they are too inconsistent to allow for any comparison between different treatment protocols. Standardised evaluation of pain is needed and the correlation between the dosage of misoprostol and the intensity of pain must be assessed in future studies.

An exploration of women's reasons for termination timing in the setting of fetal abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Over 3% of pregnancies are complicated by a fetal abnormality, of which, approximately 80% are terminated. Despite early screening options, women often present at the cusp of legal limits for termination.

STUDY DESIGN

A qualitative study was conducted with women terminating pregnancies for fetal abnormalities. Semi-structured interviews explored reasons for termination timing. Analysis utilized latent content and constant comparative methods.

RESULTS

Of 30 participants between 13+4 and 23+5 weeks gestation, their median age was 35 years, 73.3% were white, 70% were religiously affiliated, and 60% had children. The median time from abnormality identification until termination was 16.5 days (range 2-73). The major themes for termination timing included (1) an abrupt shift in "low-risk" pregnancy perception; (2) challenging medical interactions; (3) an emotional decision-making process; and (4) termination access barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Timing of termination for fetal abnormalities is attributable to multiple issues. Future research should identify optimal prenatal counseling strategies, address systemic barriers, and identify patient decision-making resources.