Efficacy and safety of an ascending-dose, extended-regimen levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol combined oral contraceptive

Tolerability and safety of the estetrol/drospirenone combined oral contraceptive: Pooled analysis of two multicenter, open-label phase 3 trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate tolerability and safety of estetrol (E4) 15 mg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg oral contraceptive using pooled data from two, multicenter, phase 3 trials.

STUDY DESIGN

The two trials enrolled participants aged 16-50 years with a body mass index ≤35.0 kg/m² to use E4/DRSP in a 24/4-day regimen for up to 13 cycles. We pooled data from participants who used at least one E4/DRSP dose and had a follow-up assessment to analyze adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory parameters, including serum lipids, glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and potassium. We consolidated similar Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms into groupings.

RESULTS

Of 3725 participants enrolled, we included 3417 in the analyses of whom 1786 (52.3%) reported ≥1 AE. Most participants with reported AEs had AEs that investigators rated as mild or moderate (n = 1665, 93.2%); of participants reporting AEs, 1105 (61.9%) did so during cycles 1 to 3. In total, 981 (28.7%) participants experienced ≥1 treatment-related AE, most frequently related to bleeding complaints (n = 323, 9.5%), breast pain or tenderness (n = 136, 4.0%), acne (n = 113, 3.3%), and mood disturbance (n = 111, 3.2%). Discontinuation due to treatment-related AEs occurred in 272 participants (8.0%), with only bleeding complaints (n = 97, 2.8%) and mood disturbance (n = 38, 1.1%) at rates exceeding 1%. Three participants experienced serious AEs, which the site investigators considered treatment-related: one venous thromboembolism, one worsening of depression, and one ectopic pregnancy. We found no clinically relevant changes in weight, blood pressure, heart rate, or laboratory parameters during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

E4/DRSP is associated with a favorable tolerability and safety profile.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

Pooling data allowed for a robust assessment of tolerability and safety, including relatively infrequent events. Other than bleeding complaints and mood disturbance, no adverse event resulted in E4/DRSP discontinuation at rates >1%. Post-marketing surveillance studies are needed to evaluate long-term safety of the E4/DRSP COC and population-based venous thromboembolism risks.

Variability in Contraceptive Clinical Trial Design and the Challenges in Making Comparisons Across Trials

Clinical trials of contraceptives have often differed in their study designs, making cross-trial comparisons difficult. This brief report outlines some of the technical design features that can vary from trial to trial. For example, the overall number of menstrual cycles in a study has substantial impact on the final efficacy determination; however, the rules related to qualifying cycles can differ based on the length of the study and the statistical analysis plan. In two commonly used methods of calculating efficacy, the Pearl Index and the time-to-event analysis, inclusion of fewer menstrual cycles results in higher calculated failure rates. Statistical analysis plans for contraceptive trials have sometimes excluded menstrual cycles because of an absence of documented vaginal intercourse and the concomitant use of another birth control method. Other design features that have varied between contraceptive trials relate to body mass index inclusion/exclusion criteria and the definition of "on-treatment" pregnancy. In addition, study designs of non-hormonal products can differ from those of hormonal products in their length and rules for qualifying cycles. The Draft Guidance for Hormonal Contraception, published in 2019 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), will hopefully lead to more uniform trial design in the future, particularly for hormonal products. In the meantime, health care providers and patients should be aware of the nuances in trial design that make direct comparisons about relative efficacy challenging.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol transdermal delivery system: Phase 3 clinical trial results

OBJECTIVE

To assess the contraceptive efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a contraceptive transdermal delivery system, (TDS; TWIRLA^Ⓡ) containing levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE).

STUDY DESIGN

This single-arm, open-label, multicenter, 1-year (13 cycle), phase 3 study enrolled sexually active women ≥18 years old at risk for pregnancy irrespective of body mass index (BMI). Women used patches in 28-day cycles (3 consecutive administrations of 7-day patches followed by 7 days off-treatment/patch-free week). We assessed contraceptive efficacy by the Pearl Index (PI) in women 18 to 35 years, excluding cycles without intercourse or when other contraceptive methods were used.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 2032 demographically diverse women in the US, of which 35.3% had a BMI ≥30 kg/m². In the primary efficacy analysis, the PI (95% confidence interval) was 5.8 (4.5-7.2) pregnancies per 100 woman-years. PIs trended higher as BMI increased; the PI was 4.3 (2.9-5.8) in women with BMI <30 kg/m² and 8.6 (5.8-11.5) in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m². Hormone-related treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea (4.1%) and headache (3.6%); 11% of women discontinued due to adverse events. Four women (all with BMIs ≥30 kg/m²) reported thromboembolic events considered related to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The low-dose LNG/EE TDS was effective in preventing pregnancy in a population of women representative of US demographics. Efficacy was reduced in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m². The TDS safety and tolerability profile was consistent with other similar dose combined hormonal contraceptives. Results of this phase 3 study supported the US Food and Drug Administration approval of TWIRLA^Ⓡ for prevention of pregnancy in women with BMI <30 kg/m².

IMPLICATIONS

TDS (120 µg/day levonorgestrel and 30 µg/day ethinyl estradiol) is an effective, low-dose transdermal contraceptive patch with favorable tolerability profile approved for prevention of pregnancy in women with BMI <30 kg/m². TDS has reduced effectiveness in women with BMI ≥30 kg/m².

A novel vaginal pH regulator: results from the phase 3 AMPOWER contraception clinical trial

Objective

The objective was to evaluate the contraceptive effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a novel vaginal pH regulator over seven cycles of use.

Study design

A single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted across 112 sites in the United States in sexually active 18–35-year-old women at risk of pregnancy. Women administered the study treatment ≤ 1 h before each episode of intercourse. Women recorded use of study drug, coital information, and any symptoms experienced in electronic diaries. The primary outcome was the seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy rate as calculated using the Kaplan–Meier methodology; secondary outcomes included safety. Overall satisfaction was assessed via written questionnaires.

Results

A total of 1384 women were enrolled in the study from July 2017 to November 2018. Mean age was 27.7 ± 4.4 years; most women were white (69.0%). The seven-cycle cumulative pregnancy percentage was 13.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.0%–17.5%], meeting the prespecified primary endpoint of having the upper bound 95% CI ≤ 21%. Most common adverse events (AEs) occurring in ≥ 2% of women were vulvovaginal burning sensation, vulvovaginal pruritus, urinary tract infection, vulvovaginal pain, mycotic infection, bacterial vaginosis, and nasopharyngitis. Of 1330 women who used the study drug at least once, fewer than 2% of women discontinued due to any AEs, and < 1% of women discontinued due to genitourinary symptoms. Overall, > 80% of women reported being “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with study treatment.

Conclusions

In this phase 3 study, the novel vaginal pH regulator demonstrated 86.3% contraceptive effectiveness, was safe and well tolerated, and was highly acceptable.

Implications

This novel vaginal pH regulator is a safe, nonhormonal, woman-controlled method of contraception that expands women's options.

Efficacy of the 1-year (13-cycle) segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system: results of two multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials

Background

A ring-shaped, contraceptive vaginal system designed to last 1 year (13 cycles) delivers an average of 0·15 mg segesterone acetate and 0·013 mg ethinylestradiol per day. We evaluated the efficacy of this contraceptive vaginal system and return to menses or pregnancy after use.

Methods

In two identically designed, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trials (one at 15 US academic and community sites and one at 12 US and international academic and community sites), participants followed a 21-days-in, 7-days-out segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system schedule for up to 13 cycles. Participants were healthy, sexually active, non-pregnant, non-sterilised women aged 18–40 years. Women were cautioned that any removals during the 21 days of cyclic use should not exceed 2 h, and used daily paper diaries to record vaginal system use. Consistent with regulatory requirements for contraceptives, we calculated the Pearl Index for women aged 35 years and younger, excluding adjunctive contraception cycles, as the primary efficacy outcome measure. We also did intention-to-treat Kaplan-Meier life table analyses and followed up women who did not use hormonal contraceptives or desired pregnancy after study completion for 6 months for return to menses or pregnancy. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00455156 and NCT00263341.

Findings

Between Dec 19, 2006, and Oct 9, 2009, at the 15 US sites, and between Nov 1, 2006, and July 2, 2009, at the 12 US and international sites we enrolled 2278 women. Our overall efficacy analysis included 2265 participants (1130 in the US study and 1135 in the international study) and 1303 (57·5%) participants completed up to 13 cycles. The Pearl Index for the primary efficacy group was 2·98 (95% CI 2·13–4·06) per 100 woman-years, and was well within the range indicative of efficacy for a contraceptive under a woman's control. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the contraceptive vaginal system was 97·5% effective, which provided further evidence of efficacy. Pregnancy occurrence was similar across cycles. All 290 follow-up participants reported return to menses or became pregnant (24 [63%] of 38 women who desired pregnancy) within 6 months.

Interpretation

The segesterone acetate and ethinylestradiol contraceptive vaginal system is an effective contraceptive for 13 consecutive cycles of use. This new product adds to the contraceptive method mix and the 1-year duration of use means that women do not need to return to the clinic or pharmacy for refills every few months.

Funding

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health, the US Agency for International Development, and the WHO Reproductive Health Research Department.

Segesterone acetate/ethinyl estradiol 12-month contraceptive vaginal system safety evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate safety outcomes from clinical studies of a 12-month contraceptive vaginal system (CVS) releasing an average of segesterone acetate (SA) 150 mcg and ethinyl estradiol (EE) 13 mcg daily.

STUDY DESIGN

We integrated clinical safety data from nine studies in which women used the CVS for 21 consecutive days and removed it for 7 days of each 28-day cycle. Four studies used the final manufactured CVS, including a 1-year pharmacokinetic study, two 1-year phase 3 trials and a second-year treatment extension study. We assessed safety by evaluating adverse events women reported in a daily diary. We also included data from focused safety studies evaluating endometrial biopsies, vaginal microbiology and liver proteins from one of the phase 3 studies.

RESULTS

The combined studies included 3052 women; 2308 women [mean age 26.7±5.1 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 24.1±3.7 kg/m²] received the final manufactured CVS, of whom 999 (43.3%) completed 13 cycles of use. Women using the final CVS most commonly reported adverse events of headache (n=601, 26%), nausea (n=420, 18%), vaginal discharge/vulvovaginal mycotic infection (n=242, 10%) and abdominal pain (n=225, 10%). Few (<1.5%) women discontinued for these complaints. Four (0.2%) women experienced venous thromboembolism (VTE), three of whom had risk factors for thrombosis [Factor V Leiden mutation (n=1); BMI>29 kg/m² (n=2)]. During 21,482 treatment cycles in the phase 3 studies evaluable for expulsion, women reported partial expulsions in 4259 (19.5%) cycles and complete expulsions in 1509 (7%) cycles, most frequently in the initial cycle [499/2050 (24.3%) and 190/2050 (9.3%), respectively]. Safety-focused studies revealed no safety concerns.

CONCLUSION

The 1-year SA/EE CVS has an acceptable safety profile. Additional studies are warranted in obese women at higher risk of VTE.

IMPLICATIONS

This 1-year contraceptive vaginal system represents a new long-term, user-controlled and procedure-free option with a safety profile similar to other combination hormonal contraceptives. The same precautions currently used for combination hormonal contraceptive prescriptions apply to this new contraceptive vaginal system.

Use of Short Acting Reversible Contraception in Adolescents: The Pill, Patch, Ring and Emergency Contraception

Long acting reversible contraception (LARC) is the recommend form of birth control for adolescents by both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Congress of Obstetrics and Gynecology, but the majority of adolescents continue to use short acting reversible contraception (SARC) such as the oral contraceptive pill, vaginal ring, and transdermal patch. For this reason, it is important for medical providers to be familiar with how to prescribe and manage SARC in adolescents, paying particular attention to which patients are eligible to use them, which benefits the methods have outside of contraception, what side effects to be aware of, and special considerations for adolescents. Many adolescents will choose not to use any form of hormonal contraception-thus having a knowledge about and comfort with use of emergency contraception is of equal importance.

Extended regimen combined oral contraception: A review of evolving concepts and acceptance by women and clinicians

Objectives: The clinical utility of extended regimen combined oral contraceptives (COCs) is increasingly being recognised. Our objective was to understand the attitudes of women and clinicians about the use of these regimens. We present the rationale for extended regimen COCs from a historical perspective, and trace their evolution and growing popularity in light of their clinical benefits. We conclude by offering potential strategies for counselling women about extended regimen COC options.

Methods: We conducted a MEDLINE search to identify and summarise studies of extended regimen COCs, focusing on attitudes of women and clinicians regarding efficacy, safety/tolerability and fewer scheduled bleeding episodes and other potential benefits.

Results: The body of contemporary literature on extended regimen COCs suggests that their contraceptive efficacy is comparable to that of conventional 28-day (i.e., 21/7) regimens. For women seeking contraception that allows infrequent scheduled bleeding episodes, particularly those who suffer from hormone withdrawal symptoms and cyclical symptoms (e.g., headache, mood changes, dysmenorrhoea, heavy menstrual bleeding), extended regimen COCs are an effective and safe option. Although satisfaction with extended regimen COCs in clinical trials is high, misperceptions about continuous hormone use may still limit the widespread acceptance of this approach.

Conclusions: Despite the widespread acceptance among clinicians of extended regimen COCs as an effective and safe contraceptive option, these regimens are underused, likely due to a lack of awareness about their availability and utility among women. Improved patient education and counselling regarding the safety and benefits of extended regimen COCs may help women make more informed contraceptive choices.

An update on new orally administered contraceptives for women

INTRODUCTION

The focus in contraception is shifting from oral contraceptives to more effective methods, such as implants and intrauterine devices. Generics are favored by third-party payors. As a result, potentially exciting developments in branded pills to increase safety or to reduce side effects may have gone unnoticed.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the features of each of the four new oral contraceptives that have been introduced in the United States and/or Europe in the last few years. The motivation for the development of each product is outlined as is its efficacy, safety, tolerability and the noncontraceptive applications that have been explored are described.

EXPERT OPINION

The hypothesis that using estradiol in place of ethinyl estradiol would reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism is still to be proven. However, the stronger progestogens used in these formulations may offer other tangible benefits for selected women. The new products for extended cycle pill use may have less impact. The flexible regimen can be adopted using any pill, but the approved product does provide convenience to patients. Cost will continue to be the determining factor in the acceptance of these new products, unless substantial health benefits can be conclusively proven.

Efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active combined oral contraceptive with continuous low-dose ethinyl estradiol

OBJECTIVE

Substituting low-dose ethinyl estradiol (EE) for the hormone-free interval in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) may enhance ovarian suppression and improve tolerability. This noncomparative phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of desogestrel (DSG)/EE followed by 7days of EE.

STUDY DESIGN

This multicenter, open-label, phase 3, single-arm study enrolled sexually active women aged 18-40years at risk for pregnancy. Women received up to 1year, or 13 consecutive 28-day cycles, of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg for 21days and EE 10mcg alone for 7days. Participants kept diaries to record compliance, bleeding/spotting and other contraceptive use. Efficacy was measured using the Pearl Index (PI) and life-table approach. Safety and tolerability were assessed primarily through reported adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 2858 women enrolled and 1680 completed the study. Forty-six pregnancies in 2401 women aged 18-35years occurred after COC initiation and up to 7days after last DSG/EE or EE-only tablet was taken. When cycles in which another contraceptive method was used were excluded, the PI was 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.96-3.57]. The cumulative pregnancy rate after 1year of treatment was 2.47% (95% CI, 1.85-3.29) for all users aged 18-35years. When only cycles during which women considered compliant were included, the PI was 2.00 (95% CI, 1.39-2.80). AEs were similar to those seen with other oral contraceptives.

CONCLUSIONS

This 21/7-active DSG/EE COC with 7days of low-dose EE was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

This phase 3 open-label study demonstrated that a 21/7-active COC regimen including 21days of DSG 150mcg/EE 20mcg and 7days of EE 10mcg was efficacious and well tolerated for pregnancy prevention.

Safety and tolerability of a new low-dose contraceptive patch in obese and nonobese women

OBJECTIVE

The safety and tolerability of a new low-dose levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol (LNG/EE) contraceptive patch was compared with 2 combination oral contraceptives in 2 clinical studies in which approximately 30% of enrolled participants were obese.

STUDY DESIGN

Two phase 3, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trials compared the LNG/EE contraceptive patch (n = 1579) with combination oral contraceptives (n = 581) in healthy women 17-40 years of age. Combination oral contraceptives were LNG 100 μg per EE 20 μg (combination oral contraceptive 20; n = 375) or LNG 150 μg per EE 30 μg (combination oral contraceptive 30; n = 206). Safety and tolerability data from the 2 trials were evaluated in integrated safety analyses.

RESULTS

Treatment-emergent adverse events of 2% or greater in the LNG/EE contraceptive patch were nasopharyngitis (5.2%), nausea (4.1%), upper respiratory infection (3.5%), headache (3.4%), sinusitis (2.9%), cervical dysplasia (2.3%), and urinary tract infection (2.1%). Including skin reaction-related treatment-emergent adverse events, the proportion of women who experienced any treatment-emergent adverse event was similar among women randomized to the contraceptive patch (47.5%), the combination oral contraceptive 20 (47.4%), or the combination oral contraceptive 30 (46.8%). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in obese vs nonobese participants in all groups. Serious adverse events occurred in less than 1% of participants in any of the treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

The LNG/EE contraceptive patch and combination oral contraceptives were well tolerated and associated with similar treatment-emergent adverse event incidences in obese and nonobese women.

Self-reported and verified compliance in a phase 3 clinical trial of a novel low-dose contraceptive patch and pill

OBJECTIVE

Pregnancy rates in US contraceptive clinical trials are increasing due to decreased treatment compliance. This study compared compliance with a new low-dose levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) contraceptive patch (CP, Twirla™) with that of a low-dose combination oral contraceptive (COC) in a demographically diverse population.

STUDY DESIGN

This analysis was part of an open-label, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3 study that randomized healthy sexually active women (17-40years) to 13cycles of LNG/EE CP or 6cycles of COC, then 7cycles of LNG/EE CP. We defined self-reported compliance as cycles that, according to diaries, show 21days of patch wear without missed days or any patch worn >7days or 21days of pill-taking without missed pill days. We verified compliance by detectable plasma presence of LNG and EE at cycles 2, 6, and 13.

RESULTS

Of the intention-to-treat population with diary information (N=1328, mean age 26.4years, 46% minorities, 33% obese), 10.0% of the CP (n=998) versus 21.2% of the COC group (n=330) self-reported noncompliance after 6cycles (p<.001). Laboratory assessments verified 10-14% of participants in both groups as noncompliant. Self-reported perfect use did not vary between obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m(2)] versus nonobese (BMI <30kg/m(2)) participants in both groups or when stratified by age, education, or race/ethnicity in the CP group.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported compliance was significantly greater in the CP than COC group and did not vary by obesity status. Discrepancies between self-reported and verified compliance question reliability of patient diaries.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

This paper, based on an analysis of a phase 3 trial, shows that compliance was significantly greater with a new weekly transdermal CP than with a once-daily COC in obese as well as nonobese participants. Discrepancies between self-reported compliance and laboratory-verified compliance raise questions regarding the reliability of patient diaries.