1
|
Nguyen AT, Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Kortsmit K, Brittain AW, Snyder EM, Cohen MA, Zapata LB, Whiteman MK. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024; 73:1-126. [PMID: 39106314 PMCID: PMC11315372 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7304a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette T. Nguyen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kathryn M. Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Naomi K. Tepper
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katherine Kortsmit
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anna W. Brittain
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Emily M. Snyder
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Megan A. Cohen
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lauren B. Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Maura K. Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Houtchens MK. Pregnancy and reproductive health in women with multiple sclerosis: an update. Curr Opin Neurol 2024; 37:202-211. [PMID: 38587068 DOI: 10.1097/wco.0000000000001275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated, inflammatory, neuro-degenerative disease of the central nervous system, prevalent in women of reproductive age. Today, many women want to start a family after MS diagnosis. There are over 20 treatments for MS, and safely navigating family planning is important. We review updated information on family planning, preconception, and peri-partum considerations, and reproductive concerns in special populations with MS. RECENT FINDINGS There are no MS-related restrictions on any available and appropriate contraceptive method in women with MS. The question of MS and pregnancy outcomes following assisted reproduction, remains somewhat unsettled. In many studies, no elevated relapse risk is confirmed regardless of the type of fertility treatment. MRI status may offer better assessment of postpartum disease stability than relapse rate alone. Ongoing effective MS treatments during fertility assistance and before pregnancy, can further reduce the relapse risk. B-cell depleting therapies are emerging as safe and effective treatments for peripartum MS patients. SUMMARY Patients with MS should receive accurate support and counseling related to their reproductive options. The general outlook on pregnancy and MS remains positive. The ever-increasing therapeutic complexity of MS calls for ongoing education and updated guidance for neuroimmunology and obstetrics healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria K Houtchens
- Brigham Multiple Sclerosis Center, Building for Transformative Medicine, 1set Floor, 60 Fenwood Road, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Horner-Johnson W, Klein KA, Campbell J, Guise JM. "It Would Have Been Nice to Have a Choice": Barriers to Contraceptive Decision-making among Women with Disabilities. Womens Health Issues 2022; 32:261-267. [PMID: 35148954 PMCID: PMC9167240 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Engaging in contraceptive decisions is an important part of reproductive health for women and other people with the capacity for pregnancy. However, not all individuals capable of pregnancy have equal access to information and/or opportunities to make fully informed decisions. The goal of this study was to understand barriers women with disabilities experience around contraceptive decision-making and whether these differ based on type of disability. METHODS We conducted focus groups with 17 reproductive age adult women (aged 18-45 years). Focus groups were homogenous with regard to disability type and consisted of one group for each of the following disability categories: 1) physical disability, 2) intellectual and developmental disabilities, 3) blind or low vision, and 4) Deaf users of American Sign Language. Data were collected in the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area during 2016-2017. We analyzed focus group transcripts using content analysis. RESULTS Barriers to informed contraceptive decision-making emerged in five main thematic areas: 1) lack of information in accessible formats, 2) incomplete information about contraceptive side effects, 3) limited clinician knowledge and relevant research specific to the care of women with disabilities, 4) taboos around discussing sexual activity, and 5) limited opportunities for shared contraceptive decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Women with disabilities faced numerous barriers to contraceptive decision-making. Although the barriers differed somewhat by disability type, many barriers were consistent across groups, suggesting commonalities associated with the experience of disability in the context of contraceptive decision-making. Increased attention to the reproductive health needs of people with disabilities is important for improving health care equity and quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willi Horner-Johnson
- Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
| | | | | | - Jeanne-Marie Guise
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kopp TI, Lidegaard Ø, Magyari M. Hormone therapy and disease activity in Danish women with multiple sclerosis - a population-based cohort study. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:1753-1762. [PMID: 35196406 PMCID: PMC9314629 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Sex differences in multiple sclerosis (MS) prevalence and disease course are thought to be driven by hormones. Exogenous exposure to estrogens may affect MS disease course. Thus, our aim was to investigate the association between hormone therapy (HT) and disease activity and disability accrual among women with MS. Methods A register‐based cohort study was conducted with prospectively enrolled cases from the Danish MS registry. Information on hormone exposure was retrieved from the National Prescription Registry. Outcomes were relapse rate, relapse rate ratio, recurrent relapses, 6‐month confirmed and sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) milestones 4 and 6, and recurrent EDSS worsening. Results In all, 3325 women were eligible for analyses, of whom 333 (10%) were ever on HT at some time during follow‐up. We found no association between HT and disability accrual, although a trend for increasing risk with increasing length of use was seen. The risk of reaching 6‐month confirmed and sustained EDSS 4 among users was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3–1.2) after <1 year of use and 1.4 (95% CI = 0.9–2.2) after >5 years of HT compared to never use. The risk of recurrent relapse was increased by 20% (95% CI = 1.0–1.4) among current users of HT compared to nonusers. However, the risk of recurrent relapses was driven by the first calendar period (1996–2005) before the introduction of high‐efficacy disease‐modifying therapy. Conclusions Our findings from this nationwide MS population suggest that HT does not affect disability accrual in women with MS, especially if used for <5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine Iskov Kopp
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Øjvind Lidegaard
- Department of Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melinda Magyari
- The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Simone IL, Tortorella C, Ghirelli A. Influence of Pregnancy in Multiple Sclerosis and Impact of Disease-Modifying Therapies. Front Neurol 2021; 12:697974. [PMID: 34276545 PMCID: PMC8280312 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.697974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose of this Review: This article is a systematic review on the influence pregnancy has on multiple sclerosis and the resulting impact of disease-modifying therapies. Findings: Multiple sclerosis predominantly affects young women with a clinical onset most often during the child-bearing age. The impact of multiple sclerosis and disease-modifying therapies on fertility, pregnancy, fetal outcome, and breastfeeding is a pivotal topic when it comes to clinical practice. The introduction of disease-modifying therapies has changed not only the natural history of the disease but also the perspective of pregnancy in women with multiple sclerosis. Family planning requires careful consideration, especially because many disease-modifying drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy. In this article, we review current evidence collected from published literature and drug-specific pregnancy registers on the use of disease-modifying therapies. Additionally, we discuss safety profiles for each drug and correlate them to both risk for the exposed fetus and risk for the mothers interrupting treatments when seeking pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Laura Simone
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Carla Tortorella
- Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alma Ghirelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krysko KM, Graves JS, Dobson R, Altintas A, Amato MP, Bernard J, Bonavita S, Bove R, Cavalla P, Clerico M, Corona T, Doshi A, Fragoso Y, Jacobs D, Jokubaitis V, Landi D, Llamosa G, Longbrake EE, Maillart E, Marta M, Midaglia L, Shah S, Tintore M, van der Walt A, Voskuhl R, Wang Y, Zabad RK, Zeydan B, Houtchens M, Hellwig K. Sex effects across the lifespan in women with multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2020; 13:1756286420936166. [PMID: 32655689 PMCID: PMC7331774 DOI: 10.1177/1756286420936166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating central nervous system disorder that is more common in women, with onset often during reproductive years. The female:male sex ratio of MS rose in several regions over the last century, suggesting a possible sex by environmental interaction increasing MS risk in women. Since many with MS are in their childbearing years, family planning, including contraceptive and disease-modifying therapy (DMT) counselling, are important aspects of MS care in women. While some DMTs are likely harmful to the developing fetus, others can be used shortly before or until pregnancy is confirmed. Overall, pregnancy decreases risk of MS relapses, whereas relapse risk may increase postpartum, although pregnancy does not appear to be harmful for long-term prognosis of MS. However, ovarian aging may contribute to disability progression in women with MS. Here, we review sex effects across the lifespan in women with MS, including the effect of sex on MS susceptibility, effects of pregnancy on MS disease activity, and management strategies around pregnancy, including risks associated with DMT use before and during pregnancy, and while breastfeeding. We also review reproductive aging and sexual dysfunction in women with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen M Krysko
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Suite 221, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Jennifer S Graves
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, UCSD ACTRI, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ruth Dobson
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Neurology, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ayse Altintas
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department NEUROFARBA, Section of Neurosciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacqueline Bernard
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Simona Bonavita
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania, "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Riley Bove
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Paola Cavalla
- Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, City of Health and Science University Hospital of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marinella Clerico
- Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Torino, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Teresa Corona
- Clinical Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Disease, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Anisha Doshi
- Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London (UCL) Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Yara Fragoso
- Multiple Sclerosis & Headache Research Institute, Santos, SP, Brazil
| | - Dina Jacobs
- Department of Neurology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Vilija Jokubaitis
- Department of Neuroscience, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Doriana Landi
- Department of Systems Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis Center and Research Unit, Tor Vergata University and Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Monica Marta
- Neurosciences and Trauma Centre, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Luciana Midaglia
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Suma Shah
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mar Tintore
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Rhonda Voskuhl
- Department of Neurology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yujie Wang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rana K Zabad
- Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Burcu Zeydan
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Maria Houtchens
- Department of Neurology, Partners MS Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Andersen JB, Magyari M. Pharmacotherapeutic considerations in women with multiple sclerosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:1591-1602. [PMID: 32521172 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1774554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronically progressive disease of the central nervous system. The relapsing form of the disease predominantly affects women with onset between the ages 20 to 40 years. Therefore, timing, choice, and treatment options should take pregnancy planning into consideration to accommodate both the needs and safety of the mother and health of the fetus. AREAS COVERED In this review, the authors discuss and summarize the recent evidence of different pharmacotherapeutic possibilities in the treatment of women with MS. EXPERT OPINION There is evidence that disease modifying therapy reduces the risk of relapses and diminishes disability progression in people with relapsing MS. The disease is often diagnosed in the childbearing years, and thus pregnancy planning can possibly be a part of the pharmacotherapeutic considerations. The management of women planning pregnancy requires a balancing of risks. The clinician must consider the risks related to treatment discontinuation versus the risk of exposing the developing fetus to drugs that are potential fetotoxic. Randomized controlled trials of medication safety - if used during pregnancy, are prohibited for ethical reasons; hence, the evidence is continuously gathered from observational data, post-authorization studies and pregnancy registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna B Andersen
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital , Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melinda Magyari
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital , Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital , Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gava G, Visconti M, Salvi F, Bartolomei I, Seracchioli R, Meriggiola MC. Prevalence and Psychopathological Determinants of Sexual Dysfunction and Related Distress in Women With and Without Multiple Sclerosis. J Sex Med 2019; 16:833-842. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
9
|
Alspaugh A, Barroso J, Reibel M, Phillips S. Women's Contraceptive Perceptions, Beliefs, and Attitudes: An Integrative Review of Qualitative Research. J Midwifery Womens Health 2019; 65:64-84. [PMID: 31135081 DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Unintended pregnancy rates will remain high until researchers explore the lived experience of women's relationships with contraception. This integrative review examines the extant qualitative literature on women's contraception to illuminate common themes in women's perspectives through the lens of the feminist poststructuralist framework. METHODS A literature review of PubMed and CINAHL databases was completed for English-language studies conducted in the United States from January 2008 through September 2018 that qualitatively examined women's perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes regarding contraception. Reports, dissertations, mixed-methods research, and literature reviews were excluded. The sample, methods, and findings of 19 studies were reviewed. Themes were identified using the 5 major tenets of the feminist poststructuralist framework: discourse, power, language, subjectivity, and agency. RESULTS Themes of power imbalance between partners and health care providers; societal and communal discourses on femininity and motherhood; distrust of hormonal contraception; the ability to enhance personal agency through contraceptive decision making; and a need for open, patient-focused communication arose from the 19 studies included in the review. DISCUSSION Using a feminist poststructuralist framework to examine women's contraceptive perceptions illuminates and magnifies the many ways in which contraceptive beliefs and use are dependent on gender roles and power dynamics. Gaps in knowledge specific to older women and exploration of women's subjectivity should be addressed. Clinicians should evaluate the power structures inherent to their practice while providing woman-focused, evidence-based contraceptive education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Alspaugh
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Julie Barroso
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Melody Reibel
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Shannon Phillips
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ysrraelit MC, Correale J. Impact of sex hormones on immune function and multiple sclerosis development. Immunology 2019; 156:9-22. [PMID: 30222193 PMCID: PMC6283654 DOI: 10.1111/imm.13004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) affecting young people and leading to demyelination and neurodegeneration. The disease is clearly more common in women, in whom incidence has been rising. Gender differences include: earlier disease onset and more frequent relapses in women; and faster progression and worse outcomes in men. Hormone-related physiological conditions in women such as puberty, pregnancy, puerperium, and menopause also exert significant influence both on disease prevalence as well as on outcomes. Hormonal and/or genetic factors are therefore believed to be involved in regulating the course of disease. In this review, we discuss clinical evidence for the impact of sex hormones (estrogens, progesterone, prolactin, and testosterone) on MS and attempt to elucidate the hormonal and immunological mechanisms potentially underlying these changes. We also review current knowledge on the relationship between sex hormones and resident CNS cells and provide new insights in the context of MS. Understanding these molecular mechanisms may contribute to the development of new and safer treatments for both men and women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María C. Ysrraelit
- Department of NeurologyRaúl Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| | - Jorge Correale
- Department of NeurologyRaúl Carrea Institute for Neurological Research (FLENI)Buenos AiresArgentina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Böttcher B, Wildt L. Autoimmunerkrankungen und orale Kontrazeption. GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s10304-017-0148-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
12
|
Mathes T, Pieper D. Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: potential impact on body of evidence and workload. BMC Med Res Methodol 2017; 17:107. [PMID: 28716005 PMCID: PMC5513097 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-017-0391-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Distinguishing cohort studies from case series is difficult.We propose a conceptualization of cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies. The main aim of this conceptualization is to clarify the distinction between cohort studies and case series. We discuss the potential impact of the proposed conceptualization on the body of evidence and workload.All studies with exposure-based sampling gather multiple exposures (with at least two different exposures or levels of exposure) and enable calculation of relative risks that should be considered cohort studies in systematic reviews, including non-randomized studies. The term "enables/can" means that a predefined analytic comparison is not a prerequisite (i.e., the absolute risks per group and/or a risk ratio are provided). Instead, all studies for which sufficient data are available for reanalysis to compare different exposures (e.g., sufficient data in the publication) are classified as cohort studies.There are possibly large numbers of studies without a comparison for the exposure of interest but that do provide the necessary data to calculate effect measures for a comparison. Consequently, more studies could be included in a systematic review. Therefore, on the one hand, the outlined approach can increase the confidence in effect estimates and the strengths of conclusions. On the other hand, the workload would increase (e.g., additional data extraction and risk of bias assessment, as well as reanalyses).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Mathes
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Chair of Surgical Research, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Dawid Pieper
- Institute for Research in Operative Medicine, Chair of Surgical Research, Faculty of Health, School of Medicine, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kasatkin DS, Spirin NN, Vinogradova TV, Shytova AS. [An effect of disease-modifying drugs on the development of children born to mothers with multiple sclerosis]. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2017; 117:85-91. [PMID: 28617366 DOI: 10.17116/jnevro20171172285-91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate an effect of mother's treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMD) on the mental and physical development of the child in the first year of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty pregnancies resulted in birth of live babies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) were studied. The diagnosis of MS was made to the mother before conception of the child. Seven mothers did not receive DMD at the moment of conception (controls), 13 mother were treated with interferon-beta (IFN) and 10 with glatiramer acetate. A structure interview, examination of the child with the assessment of common anthropometric indices, the WHO scale for achievement of six milestones, medical history and statistical analysis were used. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION The data on the negative effect of MS on the growth and development of the fetus and the positive impact of treatment of the mother with DMD in the early stages of pregnancy on anthropometric indices and development of the child in the first year of life were confirmed. It has been concluded that DMD positively influence the disease course of the female patient and potentially improve the prognosis for her future offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Kasatkin
- Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia
| | - N N Spirin
- Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia
| | | | - A S Shytova
- Yaroslavl State Medical University, Yaroslavl, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mills EA, Mirza A, Mao-Draayer Y. Emerging Approaches for Validating and Managing Multiple Sclerosis Relapse. Front Neurol 2017; 8:116. [PMID: 28424654 PMCID: PMC5372802 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The autoimmune disease multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by relapses in the majority of patients. A definitive clinical diagnosis of relapse in MS can be complicated by the presence of an infection or comorbid disorder. In this mini-review, we describe efforts to develop enhanced imaging techniques and biomarker detection as future tools for relapse validation. There is emerging evidence of roles for meningeal inflammation, sex hormones, comorbid metabolic or mood disorders, and a dysregulated immune profile in the manifestation and severity of relapse. Specific subsets of immune cells likely drive the pathophysiology of relapse, and identification of a patient's unique immunological signature of relapse may help guide future diagnosis and treatment. Finally, these studies highlight the diversity in terms of relapse presentation, immunological signature, and response in patients with MS, indicating that going forward the best approach to assessment and treatment of relapse will be multifactorial and highly personalized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Mills
- Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ali Mirza
- Graduate Program in Immunology, Program in Biomedical Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Yang Mao-Draayer
- Graduate Program in Immunology, Program in Biomedical Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Houtchens MK, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK. Contraception for women with multiple sclerosis: Guidance for healthcare providers. Mult Scler 2017; 23:757-764. [PMID: 28338393 DOI: 10.1177/1352458517701314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Family planning is essential for any comprehensive treatment plan for women of reproductive age with multiple sclerosis (MS), including counseling on using effective contraception to optimally time desired and prevent unintended pregnancies. This topical review summarizes the first evidence-based recommendations on contraception safety for women with MS. In 2016, evidence-based recommendations for contraceptive use by women with MS were included in US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. They were developed after review of published scientific evidence on contraception safety and consultation with experts. We summarize and expand on the main conclusions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance. Most contraceptive methods appear based on current evidence to be safe for women with MS. The only restriction is use of combined hormonal contraceptives among women with MS with prolonged immobility because of concerns about possible venous thromboembolism. Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) do not appear to decrease the effectiveness of hormonal contraception although formal drug-drug interaction studies are limited. Neurologists can help women with MS make contraceptive choices that factor their level of disability, immobility, and medication use. For women with MS taking potentially teratogenic medications, highly effective methods that are long-acting (e.g. intrauterine devices, implants) might be the best option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria K Houtchens
- Department of Neurology, Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lauren B Zapata
- Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
| | - Kathryn M Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
| | - Maura K Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, Whiteman MK. Removing medical barriers to contraception - evidence-based recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016. Contraception 2016; 94:579-581. [PMID: 27589882 PMCID: PMC11283815 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn M Curtis
- Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341-3717.
| | - Naomi K Tepper
- Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341-3717
| | - Tara C Jatlaoui
- Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341-3717
| | - Maura K Whiteman
- Division of Reproductive Health, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, 30341-3717
| |
Collapse
|