Successful completion of total and partial salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery

Primary fallopian tube carcinoma diagnosed 29 years after bilateral partial salpingectomy: A case report

Salpingectomy has a reported theoretical decreased risk of tubal and ovarian cancers. Here we describe a case 29 years after partial salpingectomy.

Complications after opportunistic salpingectomy compared with tubal ligation at cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative and postoperative complications in patients who underwent opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) (removal of the fallopian tubes for ovarian cancer risk reduction during another surgery) at the time of cesarean section (C-section) with those in patients who underwent tubal ligation.

DESIGN

A population-based, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

British Columbia, Canada.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 18,184 patients were included in this study, of whom 8,440 and 9,744 underwent OS and tubal ligation, respectively.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patients who underwent OS during a C-section were compared with those who underwent tubal ligation during a C-section.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We examined the perioperative outcomes, including operating room time, length of hospital stay, surgical complications such as infections, anemia, incision complications, injury to a pelvic organ, or operating room return; postoperative complications, including physician visits for a postoperative infection or visits that resulted in ultrasound or laboratory examinations and hospital readmissions in the 6 weeks after discharge; and likelihood to fill a prescription for antibiotics or analgesics.

RESULT(S)

The OS group had decreased odds of perioperative complications compared with the tubal ligation group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.99). Patients who underwent OS did not have increased risks of physician visits for surgical complications, such as infection, or hospital readmissions in the 6 weeks after hospital discharge. In addition, these patients had 18% and 23% increased odds of filling prescriptions for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.28) and opioids (aOR, 1.23%; 95% CI, 1.12-1.35), respectively.

CONCLUSION(S)

In this population-based, real-world study of OS at C-section, we report decreased perioperative complications and no difference in postoperative complications between patients who underwent OS and those who underwent tubal ligation. Patients who underwent OS had an increased likelihood of filling a prescription for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids in the 6 weeks after hospital discharge. This result should be interpreted with caution because we did not have data on over-the-counter medication use and, thus, not all prescription analgesics were captured in our data. Our data suggest that OS after C-section is a safe way to provide effective contraception and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Histopathologic and Preneoplastic Changes in Tubal Ligation Materials

Background and Objectives: To investigate histopathological changes and serous carcinoma precursors such as secretory cell outgrowths (SCOUTs) and p53 signature in the bilateral tubal ligation (BTL) materials used during cesarean section (S/C). Materials and Methods: In total, 138 patients underwent S/C and tubal sterilization (TS) between October 2020 and May 2021 at Konya City Hospital. Patients' data were obtained from the hospital's system. All data and findings were investigated and statistically evaluated. Results: The mean age was 34.62 years (22-44), the mean gravity was 4.89 (2-15) and the mean parity was 3.46 (1-10). In total, 5.79% SCOUT, 7.24% atypia and 9.42% p53 signatures were observed. Significant correlations were shown between the epithelial cell lineage and age between Ki-67, SCOUT, and gravity; between the Ki-67 results and gravity and parity; and between the p53 score and age. Conclusions: TS is a common, safe, and effective method worldwide. Today, BTL is increasing along with increasing S/C ratios. In addition to the reduced risk of ovarian cancers with ligation alone, precursor lesions such as hyperplasia, SCOUT, p53 signature, and STIL/Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) are encountered in the ampulla materials obtained. Considering the low rates of re-anastomosis, tubal excision may be recommended instead of ligation in women of relatively higher gravity and age.

Complete Compared With Partial Salpingectomy for Postpartum Sterilization

In this narrative review, we describe evidence regarding the associated risks, benefits, and cost effectiveness of postpartum complete salpingectomy compared with partial salpingectomy. Permanent contraception can be performed via several methods, but complete salpingectomy is becoming more common secondary to its coincident benefit of ovarian cancer risk reduction. Small prospective studies and larger retrospective cohort studies have demonstrated the feasibility and safety of complete salpingectomy in the postpartum period. Additionally, multiple cost-effectiveness analyses have demonstrated the cost effectiveness of this method secondary to ovarian cancer reduction over the life span. Although future larger cohort studies will allow for more precise estimates of the effect of complete salpingectomy on ovarian cancer risk and incidence of rare complications, current data suggest that complete salpingectomy should be offered to patients as a method of permanent contraception in the postpartum period.

A randomized controlled trial of 2 techniques of salpingectomy during cesarean delivery

BACKGROUND

Total salpingectomy during benign gynecologic surgery is recommended after completion of childbearing to reduce the risk of developing ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess operating time and complication rates of "traditional" salpingectomy using the "Knot and Cut" technique, compared with bipolar salpingectomy for sterilization at the time of cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial. Women undergoing planned cesarean delivery who desired sterilization were randomized to traditional salpingectomy or bipolar salpingectomy. The bipolar salpingectomy was performed using the LigaSure Precise. The primary outcome was the surgical time of the salpingectomy procedure. Secondary outcomes included total cesarean delivery time and associated bleeding parameters. We estimated that 42 patients would provide 80% power and a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 to identify a 10-minute difference in the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 26 women were randomized to bipolar salpingectomy and 25 to traditional salpingectomy. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. Six procedures were converted from traditional to bipolar salpingectomy, and 2 traditional salpingectomies failed. The surgical time (16.16±9.53 vs 5.19±3.57 minutes; P<.001), estimated blood loss (928.08±414.66 mL vs 677.15±380.42 mL; P=.029), and need for blood transfusion (20% vs 0%; P=.016) were significantly greater in the traditional salpingectomy than in the bipolar salpingectomy group. The cesarean delivery time was similar (88.92±17.87 vs 88.23±19.85 minutes; P=.89). Hospitalization time was significantly longer following traditional salpingectomy than bipolar salpingectomy (5.24±2.27 vs 3.92±2.01 days; P=.034).

CONCLUSION

"Traditional" salpingectomy is associated with longer surgical and hospitalization time, and greater blood loss and risk of blood transfusion compared with "bipolar" salpingectomy. In practices in which "bipolar" salpingectomy is available, it should be preferred over alternative methods of salpingectomy.

Benefits and Risks of Bilateral Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Tubal Ligation During Cesarean Delivery for Permanent Postpartum Contraception

Importance

Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy, but the most deadly female reproductive cancer in the United States. Epithelial ovarian cancer makes up approximately 90% of all cases and is responsible for more than 90% of ovarian cancer deaths. Elective salpingectomy has been shown to reduce ovarian cancer risk when performed at the time of a benign hysterectomy. Data regarding the risks and benefits of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy performed at the time of cesarean delivery are limited.

Objective

We aim to review the current evidence regarding safety and benefits of opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery compared with bilateral tubal ligation.

Evidence Acquisition

Original research articles, review articles, and guidelines on contraception were reviewed.

Conclusions and Relevance

Opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery is feasible and safe. Operative time may be increased up to 15 minutes for salpingectomy performed by suture ligation compared with standard tubal ligation. Women with a history of 3 or more cesarean deliveries are more likely to require an alternative procedure. It is important to counsel women that although opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy may significantly decrease the risk of ovarian cancer, it does not eliminate the risk entirely.

Efficacy and safety of sterilisation procedures to reduce the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review comparing salpingectomy with tubal ligation

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate current literature comparing salpingectomy for sterilisation with tubal ligation, regarding the effectiveness and safety, and assess the certainty of evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched. Randomised (RCT) and observational studies were included. Articles were quality assessed and data extracted by two independent authors. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Of 2020 articles, 17 were included. No study investigated the risk of EOC. No difference in anti-Müllerian hormone was reported in one RCT at caesarean section (CS). Two cohort studies evaluated ovarian function with surrogate measures and found no difference at caesarean section. Complications did not differ but were inconsistently reported. Laparoscopic tubal ligation was 7 min faster (95% CI 3.8-10.5). Operative time at caesarean section was dependent on the use of surgical devices. Certainty of evidence was low or very low for all estimates, indicating knowledge gaps. Reliable safety data on salpingectomy for sterilisation is lacking, and there is no effectiveness data. Presently, women cannot be properly counselled regarding salpingectomy for sterilisation.

Frequency and characteristics associated with opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery: A retrospective chart review

OBJECTIVES

To identify the frequency and characteristics associated with total salpingectomy (TS) versus occlusion or partial salpingectomy (PS) at the time of cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective chart review of cesarean deliveries with a concurrent permanent contraception procedure, from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2019 at 2 hospitals (community hospital and tertiary care academic center) within a single healthcare system. We assessed the proportion of TS versus PS at cesarean, and secondarily compared operative times between the 2 procedures.

RESULTS

We identified 2110 procedures during the 5-year period. Surgeons performed TS in 302 (14%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13%-16%) cases, and the annual rate varied from 14% to 18% over the study period (p = 0.14). Factors associated with increased likelihood of TS rather than PS included public insurance/self-pay (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 2.8, 95% CI 2.0-4.1), delivery at the community hospital (aOR 4.8, 95% CI 3.0-7.7), parity of 5 or more (aOR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.4), and presence of an obstetrician/gynecologist for cesarean delivery (aOR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.4). The total operative time for TS and PS differed at the academic center (90 vs 68 minutes, p < 0.001) but not at the community hospital (55 vs 54 minutes, p = 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights provider and institutional characteristics associated with TS compared to PS at the time of cesarean delivery, which may inform future programs aimed at increasing utilization of TS at cesarean delivery.

IMPLICATIONS

Access to TS at the time of cesarean delivery may provide pregnant women with a very effective permanent contraception method at a convenient time of concurrent cesarean. This study identifies patient factors that may influence access to TS as part of obstetrical care.

Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the differences in operative time and surgical outcomes between salpingectomy and standard tubal interruption at the time of cesarean delivery.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until July 2019 for articles reporting outcomes for women undergoing salpingectomy during cesarean delivery compared with women undergoing standard sterilization methods.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they included the main outcome of operative time or additional outcomes, which included infection, transfusion, readmission, change in hematocrit, and estimated blood loss. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment scale or Cochrane Handbook were used to assess quality of cohort and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), respectively. A random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled relative risk or weighted mean difference for each outcome with their 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic, and L'Abbé plots were inspected visually to assess for homogeneity.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

We identified 11 studies comprising 320,443 women undergoing total salpingectomy or standard sterilization methods at the time of cesarean delivery. Three RCTs and eight retrospective cohort studies were investigated separately by meta-analysis. When compared with standard sterilization methods, total operative time for patients receiving salpingectomy was significantly longer (6.3 minutes, 95% CI 3.5-9.1, seven studies, 7,303 patients) for cohort studies. With the three RCTs of 163 patients, total operative time was not significantly increased in women receiving salpingectomy (8.1 minutes, 95% CI -4.4 to 20.7). The salpingectomy group did not have an increased risk of wound infection, transfusion, readmission, reoperation, internal organ damage, blood loss, change in hemoglobin, or length of stay when compared with standard sterilization methods.

CONCLUSION

Salpingectomy at the time of cesarean delivery was associated with a small increase in operative time; however, it was not associated with an increased rate of surgical complications. This option should be considered for patients desiring sterilization during cesarean delivery.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42019145247.

A low-cost approach to salpingectomy at cesarean delivery

There is increasing adoption of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention at the time of gynecologic surgery, which includes the postpartum period. However, there is no consensus on an ideal surgical approach for the parturient vasculature. We describe a safe, low-cost, and accessible approach for bilateral salpingectomy during cesarean delivery that we call the "Mesosalpinx Isolation Salpingectomy Technique" (MIST) that can guide institutions to standardize their postpartum salpingectomy procedures when advanced vessel-sealing devices are not available. In the MIST technique, avascular windows are created within the mesosalpinx close to the tubal vessels. The vasculature is thus fully skeletonized and isolated from the adjacent mesosalpinx before suture ligation, which ensures security of the free-tie to the individual vessels and avoids sharp injury to the mesosalpinx. Not using vessel-sealing devices also eliminates the risk of thermal injury to the adjacent ovarian tissue and vasculature and potentially achieves a cost-savings for the hospital and patient. MIST has been performed in 141 cesarean deliveries in the past 4 years. There were no noted bleeding complications during the salpingectomy procedure, blood transfusions, or instances of postoperative surgical reexploration. In our experience, a surgeon who is new to the procedure takes approximately 15 minutes to complete a bilateral salpingectomy. Those surgeons who are experienced in MIST need only 5 minutes. A video is included that demonstrates the technique.

Complete salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and feasibility of complete salpingectomy during cesarean delivery in women desiring permanent sterilization.Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 2018. Study Selection: studies comparing total salpingectomy with tubal ligation during cesarean deliveries were included.Results: Nine studies involving a total of 1274 participants were eligible. Our analyses showed that the total operative time was slightly longer for the bilateral salpingectomy than for the tubal ligation group (MD = 5.81, 95% CI: 0.85-10.77). Two comparison groups were comparable with regard to intraoperative complications (RR = 1.42, 95% CI: 0.65-3.11), postoperative complications (RR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.83-3.48), estimated blood loss in total procedures, need for blood transfusion, operative complications, risk of postpartum hemorrhage, surgical site infection, ICU admission, need for presentation to hospital, short-term ovarian reserve, and completion rate of sterilization surgeries (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.80-1.00).Conclusion: Complete salpingectomy slightly prolonged surgical time by a reasonable range and showed similar safety profile and greater cost-effectiveness than tubal ligation as permanent sterilization procedures at cesarean delivery.

Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial

OBJECTIVE

To understand women's preferences for permanent contraception by salpingectomy or tubal occlusion following standardized counseling and evaluate the practicality of a future randomized trial.

STUDY DESIGN

We invited pregnant and non-pregnant women planning permanent contraception at the University of California, Davis (UCD) and University of Tennessee (UT) Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics to participate. We enrolled women when they received routine counseling and signed procedure consent. Participants received standardized information sheets reviewing permanent contraception options based on pregnancy status then completed an anonymous survey with questions about demographics, method preference, and willingness to participate in a hypothetical randomized trial comparing salpingectomy and tubal occlusion. We evaluated predictors for salpingectomy preference using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

From July 2015 to October 2016, we enrolled 75 women at UCD and 63 women at UT. Overall, respondents preferred salpingectomy (63.0%); among the 47 women not currently pregnant at both sites, 40 (85.1%) preferred salpingectomy, most commonly because of higher efficacy. Although population characteristics differed significantly between the sites, only UCD site (aOR 4.2; 95% CI 1.9, 9.4) and non-pregnancy status (aOR 4.2; 95% CI 1.6, 10.8) predicted preference for salpingectomy in the multivariable model. Most participants (n=84, 60.9%) would not be willing to be randomized to a theoretical trial comparing salpingectomy and tubal occlusion procedures.

CONCLUSION

Among a diverse group of women from two different areas in the U.S. given a choice of permanent contraception methods, salpingectomy is preferred over tubal occlusion. Most women planning a permanent contraceptive procedure would not agree to a randomized comparison of these methods.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

Salpingectomy, which offers theoretically higher efficacy and potentially greater ovarian cancer protection compared to tubal occlusion, is preferred by the majority of patients and should be offered to all women seeking permanent contraception. Differences in method choices less likely reflect the patient population and more likely the counseling provided.