1
|
Cely-Andrade L, Cárdenas-Garzón K, Enríquez-Santander LC, Saavedra-Avendano B, Ortiz-Avendano GA, Betancourt-Rojas LA, Guerrero-Conde JG. Effectiveness and safety of medication abortion via telemedicine versus in-person: A cohort of pregnant people in Colombia. Contraception 2024:110514. [PMID: 38879070 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effectiveness and safety of medication abortion (MAB) via telemedicine versus in-person in pregnant people with less than 12 gestational weeks in Colombia. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 23,362 pregnant people who requested MAB service from Profamilia (a Colombian non-governmental organization) in 2021-2022. The outcomes were success and safety of MAB. We performed a descriptive and a multivariate statistical analysis using the binary regression model to obtain an adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) to identify factors associated with abortion success. RESULTS In comparison to in-person care (n = 20,289), individuals in telemedicine (n = 3073) were predominantly from urban areas, belonged to a lower socioeconomic stratum, single and did not identify with any ethnic group. In-person users tended to have higher levels of education and accessed the service through private insurance (p < 0,05). There were no differences in the odd of a successful abortion based on the modality of care (aOR 1.18; 95% CI=0.87-1.59). The results were also the same with sensitivity analysis stratified: pregnant people who were nine weeks gestation or less (aOR 0.86; 95% CI=0.63-1.17) or more (aOR 0.87; 95% CI=0.28-2.65). CONCLUSION Telemedicine is an effective and safe option for MAB, as in-person care. Telemedicine has the potential to increase abortion access by extending the availability of providers and offering people a new option for obtaining care conveniently and privately, especially for women with disadvantaged socioeconomic and educational background. IMPLICATIONS This study demonstrates that medication abortion (MAB) administered via telemedicine produces outcomes akin to those of in-person care, providing a compelling rationale for its adoption, particularly in underserved regions. This approach can be replicated in other countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Collapse
|
2
|
Roth C. Abortion access in the Americas: a hemispheric and historical approach. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1284737. [PMID: 38125840 PMCID: PMC10730672 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1284737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
This perspective article situates the 2022 United States (U.S.) Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade (1973) within the broader history of abortion rights activism and legislation in the greater Americas. The U.S. public has stereotyped Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) as socially conservative regarding gender issues and anti-reproductive rights. But twenty-first-century LAC presents a more complicated landscape than this dominant narrative suggests. In the past 15 years, political, legislative, and public health advances and setbacks across the region provide both a blueprint for re-establishing access to safe and legal abortion and a warning on the consequences of the criminalization of abortion for the U.S. Employing a narrative approach that summarizes recent interdisciplinary literature, this perspective traces the history of the expansion of abortion access in the Americas. Mexico (2007, 2023), Uruguay (2012), Argentina (2020), and Colombia (2022) legalized abortion on demand within specific timeframes. These expansions coexist with severe restrictions on abortion in various nations including Haiti (1835), the Dominican Republic (1884, 2009), Honduras (1985, 2021), El Salvador (1997), and Nicaragua (2006), as well as some states in the United States (2022). This perspective finds that legalization occurs when feminist activists eschew U.S.-based feminist rhetoric of individual rights and choice to reframe abortion as a form of gender-based violence within a discourse of health and wellbeing as a human right. According to this perspective, restrictions on access to the procedure constitute a form of violence against women and people capable of bearing children and violate human rights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassia Roth
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
- Department of History, Franklin College of Arts & Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
- Latin American and Caribbean Studies Institute, Franklin College of Arts & Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Acre VN, Küng SA, Arce C, Yapu A, Iriondo D, Morales M. Reach, experience, and acceptability of an abortion self-care intervention in Bolivia: a mixed-methods evaluation. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2023; 31:2139888. [PMID: 36867125 PMCID: PMC9987779 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2139888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2018, Ipas Bolivia launched an abortion self-care (ASC) community intervention with the goal of increasing access to supportive, well-informed abortion support provided by community agents (CAs). Between September 2019 and July 2020, Ipas conducted a mixed-methods evaluation to assess the reach, outcomes, and acceptability of the intervention. We used logbook data maintained by CAs to capture demographic characteristics and ASC outcomes of people supported. We also conducted in-depth interviews with 25 women who had received support and 22 CAs who had provided support. 530 people accessed ASC support through the intervention, most of whom were young, single, educated women accessing abortion in the first trimester. Among the 302 people who self-managed their abortions, 99% reported having a successful abortion. No women reported adverse events. All women interviewed expressed satisfaction with the support provided by the CA and, in particular, with the information, lack of judgement, and respect they felt from CAs. CAs spoke highly about their experience and viewed their participation as a way to increase people's ability to exercise their reproductive rights. Obstacles included experiences of stigma, fears of legal repercussions, and difficulties dispelling misconceptions around abortion. Legal restrictions and abortion stigma continue to complicate access to safe abortion, and findings from this evaluation highlight important avenues for the effectiveness and expansion of ASC interventions, including legal support to people who have abortions and those who provide abortion support, building capacity of people as informed buyers, and ensuring that interventions reach rural and other often under-served people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie N Acre
- Senior Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Advisor, Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Correspondence:
| | | | | | - Adela Yapu
- Program Manager, Ipas Bolivia, La Paz, Bolivia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calderón-Villarreal A, Carrasco BIV, Friedman J, Schiavon R. Accompaniment on the edge: What can the US learn from Latin America about contested abortion care? PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 3:e0001922. [PMID: 37216338 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The US has stood as a reference point for abortion rights in the Americas since 1973, however in 2022, the US Supreme Court revoked the constitutional right to abortion. Facing similar circumstances, a huge number of grass roots accompanist networks have arisen throughout Latin America. These collectives are typically organized loosely within state and national networks that provide training and medication/supplies and promote advocacy and the expansion of new collectives. Extensive evidence and lived experience support the safety and effectiveness of self-managed medication abortion. Much can be learned from the Latin American accompanist model in the modern struggle for reproductive justice in the US. Accompaniment networks in Mexico have provided transborder abortion services-via misoprostol delivery-to US-based women living in states that required long travel or high costs to access services. Now, these transborder services will take on a new level of significance. Guaranteeing safe and low-cost access to abortion services is a key tenet of reproductive justice. Instead of relying on the political process alone to eventually provide abortion access through legal channels, an accompanist model provides an icon of resistance to oppressive legal shifts, and directly provides services to women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alhelí Calderón-Villarreal
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego (UCSD), San Diego, California, United States of America
- School of Public Health, San Diego State University (SDSU), San Diego, California, United States of America
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila (UAdeC), Torreon, Mexico
| | - Bianka Itzel Verduzco Carrasco
- Colectiva Feminista de Malas Estudiantes, Tijuana, Mexico
- Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC), Tijuana, Mexico
- Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa (UAS), Tijuana, Mexico
| | - Joseph Friedman
- University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Raffaela Schiavon
- Former Director of Ipas-Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
- Independent Consultant in Sexual and Reproductive Health, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shochet T, Berro Pizzarossa L, Larrea S, Blum J, Jelinska K, Comendant R, Sagaidac I. Self-managed abortion via the internet: Analysis of one year of service delivery data from Women Help Women. Gates Open Res 2023; 7:41. [PMID: 37123048 PMCID: PMC10130357 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.14369.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To better comprehend the demand for online medication abortion and to inform service delivery practice, we conducted an analysis of Women Help Women (WHW) service delivery statistics. The primary goals were to understand their user profile, evaluate self-reported outcomes and use of other medical services, and assess the overall experience both with the abortion itself and with the counseling and care provided by WHW. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated user characteristics, abortion outcomes, and acceptability of both the medication abortion and WHW’s services, using consultation data and corresponding evaluation data from a one-year period. For users who did not complete the evaluation form, WHW staff reviewed email correspondences to identify key outcomes. Results: From August 2016-July 2017, 3,307 individuals received abortion pills from WHW. Users were geographically located in thirty countries and correspondence was conducted in seven languages. Most reported their gestational age to be less than eight weeks. Of the 2,295 who took the pills and provided outcome information, almost all (99.1%, n=2275) reported that they were no longer pregnant. The majority (84.1%, n=1576/1875) used symptoms to confirm outcome; one fourth (22.8%, n=428) sought an ultrasound and one sixth (18.0%, n=338) used urine and/or serum testing. One in eight users (12.6%, n=292/2317) reported seeking additional medical care after taking the abortion pills. Most (87.5%, n=1551/1773) reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the abortion. Conclusions: Our study confirms that self-managed abortion is a process that people can do safely and effectively with community support and without medical supervision. In the context of a global backlash against abortion rights, self-managed abortion is an integral part of a spectrum of options for abortion care that must be made available to all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sara Larrea
- Women Help Women, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Independent Researcher, Amstersdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Rodica Comendant
- Women Help Women, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Reproductive Health Training Center, Chisinau, Moldova
| | - Irina Sagaidac
- Women Help Women, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Nicolae Testemitanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chisinau, Moldova
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Duffy D, Freeman C, Rodríguez S. Building infrastructures of abortion care in an un-caring state: acompañante's carework and abortion access in Peru. SIGNS 2023; 48:585-608. [PMID: 37324651 PMCID: PMC7614643 DOI: 10.1086/723296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
For abortion seekers, Peru is an uncaring state where legal and policy interventions have resulted in violence, persecution, and neglect. This state of abortion uncare is set within historic and ongoing denials of reproductive autonomy, coercive reproductive care, and the marginalisation of abortion. Abortion is not supported, even where legally permissible. Here we explore abortion care activism within the Peruvian context, foregrounding a key mobilisation that has emerged against a state of un-care - acompañante carework. Through interviews with people involved in abortion access and activism in Peru, we argue that acompañantes have constructed an infrastructure of abortion care in Peru through the bringing together of actors, technologies, and strategies. This infrastructure is shaped by a feminist ethic of care that differs from minority world care assumptions regarding high quality abortion care in three key ways: (i) care is provided beyond the state; (ii) care is holistic; and (iii) care is collective. We argue that US feminist debates relating to the emerging hyperrestrictive state of abortion un-care as well as broader research on feminist care can learn from acompañante activism strategically and conceptually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Duffy
- Faculty of Health Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester
| | - Cordelia Freeman
- Department of Geography, University of Exeter. Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4RJ
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
The influence of feminist abortion accompaniment on emotions related to abortion: A longitudinal observational study in Mexico. SSM Popul Health 2022; 19:101259. [PMID: 36238820 PMCID: PMC9552094 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Emotions can reflect how individuals internalize identities, social roles, and broader power structures, including abortion stigma. Abortion accompaniment, in the form of logistical, informational, and emotional support offered by individuals and organizations, takes a person-centered, feminist, and rights-based approach. We tested the extent to which abortion accompaniment may decrease negative and increase positive feelings an individual holds related to their abortion. Using observational longitudinal data collected between January 2017 and mid-2018, we compared negative and positive emotional responses to a personal abortion experience one month and six months following the abortion to emotions immediately prior to the abortion ("baseline"), among women travelling from outside of Mexico City to abortion clinics in Mexico City with and without support of the accompaniment organization, Fondo MARIA. We used doubly robust longitudinal mixed effects models with inverse probability weighting methods. At baseline, accompanied and unaccompanied participants experienced an average of 4.9 and 4.4 negative emotions out of eight respectively (i.e., anguish, nervousness, scared, anxious, sadness, guilt, anger, shame) and 1.7 and 1.9 positive emotions of out 4 respectively (happiness, calmness, decidedness, and relief). From our model results, women accompanied (n = 77) had larger decreases in negative feelings (p < .05) and larger increases in positive feelings (p < .01) toward their abortion compared to those who were not accompanied (n = 119) at six months. These changes led the majority of accompanied respondents to have primarily positive feelings about their abortion by endline. Abortion accompaniment through Fondo MARIA in Mexico City was associated with a larger decrease in negative feelings, particularly those related to stigma, and a larger increase in positive feelings six months after abortion. Accompaniment's focus on person-centered support, self-determination, and autonomy may enable people seeking abortion to view their decision as one that is valid and legitimate, and resist the predominant stigmatizing narratives framing abortion as something that is transgressive.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shukla A, Vazquez-Quesada L, Vieitez I, Acharya R, RamaRao S. Quality of care in abortion in the era of technological and medical advancements and self-care. Reprod Health 2022; 19:191. [PMID: 36109756 PMCID: PMC9479303 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01499-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Discussions around quality of abortion care have been focused mainly on service-delivery aspects inside healthcare facilities. More recently, with availability of medical abortion (MA), increase in its self-use, and emergence of other delivery platforms such as telemedicine, the responsibility of quality care has broadened to actors outside of facilities.
Body of text
This commentary discusses the meaning of quality of abortion care with the paradigm shift brought by medical and technological advancement in abortions, and raises questions on the role of the state in ensuring quality in abortion management—especially in settings where abortion is decriminalized, but also in countries where abortion is permitted under certain circumstances. It consolidates the experience gained thus far in the provision of safe abortion services and also serves as a forward-thinking tool to keep pace with the uptake of newer health technologies (e.g., availability of medical abortion drugs), service delivery platforms (e.g., telemedicine, online pharmacies), and abortion care providers (e.g., community based pharmacists).
Conclusions
This commentary provides context and rationale, and identifies areas for action that different stakeholders, including health advocates, policymakers, program managers, and women themselves, can adopt to fit into an alternative regime of abortion care.
Collapse
|
9
|
Peña M, Flores KF, Ponce MM, Serafín DF, Camarillo Zavala AM, Cruz CR, Salgado IGO, Rosado YO, Socarras T, López AP, Bousiéguez M. Telemedicine for medical abortion service provision in Mexico: A safety, feasibility, and acceptability study. Contraception 2022; 114:67-73. [PMID: 35753406 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to obtain evidence about the safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a direct-to-patient telemedicine medical abortion service in Mexico's private health sector. STUDY DESIGN A prospective observational one-group study to evaluate a telemedicine abortion service, referred to as TeleAborto, was conducted at three private clinics and one non-clinician community-based provider. Information about the study was provided by phone, websites, and social media. Abortion seekers were screened for eligibility and underwent any pre-abortion tests requested by the study site at services close to home. Eligible participants received packages with abortion medication, analgesics, and instructions and a remote follow-up contact was scheduled for 7-14 days later. Primary outcomes include abortion outcome, management of adverse events, acceptability, and feasibility measures such as package reception and follow-up contact, and challenges to get pre- and post-abortion tests. RESULTS We conducted 581 screenings and sent 378 study packages, all successfully received, reaching abortion seekers in all 32 states. All participants took medications before 70 days gestational age as per study protocol. Abortion outcome was determined for 87% participants (330/378); 93% (306/330) had a successful abortion without intervention and 18 with intervention; six individuals decided to continue the pregnancy. Participants reported high satisfaction with TeleAborto, citing convenience as their most valued aspect (85%; 264/311). CONCLUSIONS This study showed that guided self-management telemedicine abortion is safe, acceptable, and feasible in Mexico. The model has the potential to close the access gap for indigenous and rural populations, particularly those that rely on public sector services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Peña
- Gynuity Health Projects: 220 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017, United States
| | - Karla Figueroa Flores
- Gineclinic: Calz. Sta. Anita 148-b, Viaducto Piedad, Iztacalco, 08200 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Mariana Muñoz Ponce
- Gineclinic: Calz. Sta. Anita 148-b, Viaducto Piedad, Iztacalco, 08200 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Diana Facio Serafín
- Gineclinic: Calz. Sta. Anita 148-b, Viaducto Piedad, Iztacalco, 08200 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Ana María Camarillo Zavala
- Centro de Atención Integral a la Pareja, A.C: Av. Canal de Miramontes # 2342, Coapa, Avante, Coyoacán, 04460 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - César Ruiz Cruz
- Medieg: Gabriel Mancera # 803, Col del Valle Centro, Benito Juárez, 03100 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | | | - Yeni Ochoa Rosado
- Red de Mujeres y Hombres por una Opinión Pública con Perspectiva de Género en Campeche (RedMyH): Calle 55, # 14 int. 2 (entre calle 12 y calle 14) Col. Centro, Campeche, Campeche, Mexico
| | - Tania Socarras
- Planned Parenthood Global: 123 William Street, 10th floor, New York, New York 10038, United States
| | - Adrián Pacheco López
- Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC): 450 -13, Juárez, Cuauhtémoc, 06600 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Manuel Bousiéguez
- Gynuity Health Projects: 220 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10017, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Veldhuis S, Sánchez-Ramírez G, Darney BG. Locating Autonomous Abortion Accompanied by Feminist Activists in the Spectrum of Self-Managed Medication Abortion. Stud Fam Plann 2022; 53:377-387. [PMID: 35347718 DOI: 10.1111/sifp.12194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Diverse models of self-managed medication abortion exist-ranging from some interaction with medical personnel to completely autonomous abortion. In this commentary, we propose a new classification of self-managed medication abortion and describe the different modalities. We highlight autonomous abortion accompanied by feminist activists, called "acompañantes," as a community- and rights-based strategy that can be a safe alternative to clinical abortion services in clandestine as well as legal settings. To improve access, abortion needs to be decriminalized and governments must acknowledge and facilitate the diversity of safe abortion options so women may choose where, when, how, and with whom to abort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Veldhuis
- Department of Health, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas 29290, México
| | - Georgina Sánchez-Ramírez
- Department of Health, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas 29290, México
| | - Blair G Darney
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.,Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional (CISP), Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica (INSP), 62100 Cuernavaca, Morelos, México
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Veldhuis S, Sánchez-Ramírez G, Darney BG. “Sigue siendo un sistema precario”. Barreras de acceso a abortos clínicos: la experiencia de acompañantes en tres regiones mexicanas. CAD SAUDE PUBLICA 2022; 38:ES124221. [DOI: 10.1590/0102-311xes124221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
El objetivo de esta investigación fue la identificación de las barreras más recurrentes de acceso a abortos en contextos clínicos (clandestinos o legales), desde la perspectiva de acompañantes, activistas feministas que acompañan a mujeres que optaron por abortos autogestionados con medicamentos. Realizamos 14 entrevistas semiestructuradas con acompañantes en tres regiones mexicanas: Baja California y Chiapas, ambos contextos restrictivos, y la Ciudad de México, donde el aborto por voluntad es legal hasta las 12 semanas. Identificamos cuatro categorías en las cuales se entretejen las vulnerabilidades sociales de las mujeres que deciden abortar, la falta de información, persistencia de estigma, y la influencia del marco legal, los fallos en la atención del aborto, incluso en las clínicas de interrupción legal de embarazo (en la Ciudad de México), y mala calidad de los servicios prestados -maltrato, objeción de conciencia y denuncia de los proveedores de salud-, y, por último, los grupos anti-derechos y sus estrategias. En las tres regiones, el acceso a abortos clínicos sigue siendo un privilegio reservado para las mujeres que cuentan con los recursos económicos, logísticos y sociales indispensables para realizarlo en esos espacios. La existencia de un programa Interrupción Legal de Embarazo en solamente una entidad denota la existencia de una desigualdad jurídica y sanitaria. Los hallazgos de este estudio sobre mujeres acompañantes de abortos aportan elementos para que el Estado mexicano mejore el acceso a abortos seguros para todas las mujeres, sobre todo ahora que la Suprema Corte de la Justicia de la Nación decretó la despenalización, y la legalización inminente en todo el país.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Blair G. Darney
- Oregon Health & Science University, USA; Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|