1
|
Cleeve A, Wallengren E, Brandell K, Lee S, Endler M, Reynolds-Wright J. No test medical abortion - a review of the evidence on selective use of preabortion testing. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2024:00001703-990000000-00146. [PMID: 39109610 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The last decade has seen a cascade of different telemedicine models for medical abortion (MA) being tested and implemented. Among these service delivery models is the 'no-test' MA model, in which care is provided remotely and eligibility for the MA is based on history alone. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the existing evidence for no-test MA. RECENT FINDINGS The evidence base for no-test MA relies heavily on cohort and noncomparative studies predominantly from high resource settings. Recent findings indicate that no-test MA is safe, effective, and highly acceptable. Diagnoses of ectopic pregnancy and underestimation of gestational age were rare. Identified advantages included shortening time to access MA and mitigating access barriers such as cost, and geographical barriers. Abortion seekers valued omitting the ultrasound citing reasons such as privacy concerns, costs, more flexibility, and control. The impacts of no-test MA on unscheduled postabortion contacts and visits and on contraceptive use were unclear due to limited evidence. SUMMARY No-test MA can be provided to complement other care pathways including those with some or no in-person care. Further research is needed to allow for widespread adoption of no-test MA and scale-up in a variety of contexts, including low-resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Cleeve
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and the WHO Collaborating Centre for Human Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emma Wallengren
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Brandell
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and the WHO Collaborating Centre for Human Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sabrina Lee
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Margit Endler
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, and the WHO Collaborating Centre for Human Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- University of Capetown, Department of Public Health, Capetown, South Africa
| | - John Reynolds-Wright
- Centre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration & Repair, University of Edinburgh, UK Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grossman D, Raifman S, Morris N, Arena A, Bachrach L, Beaman J, Biggs MA, Collins A, Hannum C, Ho S, Seibold-Simpson SM, Sobota M, Tocce K, Schwarz EB, Gold M. Mail-Order Pharmacy Dispensing of Mifepristone for Medication Abortion After In-Person Screening. JAMA Intern Med 2024; 184:873-881. [PMID: 38739404 PMCID: PMC11091818 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.1476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Importance Before 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration required mifepristone to be dispensed in person, limiting access to medication abortion. Objective To estimate the effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of dispensing mifepristone for medication abortion using a mail-order pharmacy. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study was conducted from January 2020 to May 2022 and included 11 clinics in 7 states (5 abortion clinics and 6 primary care sites, 4 of which were new to abortion provision). Eligible participants were seeking medication abortion at 63 or fewer days' gestation, spoke English or Spanish, were age 15 years or older, and were willing to take misoprostol buccally. After assessing eligibility for medication abortion through an in-person screening, mifepristone and misoprostol were prescribed using a mail-order pharmacy. Patients had standard follow-up care with the clinic. Clinical information was collected from medical records. Consenting participants completed online surveys about their experiences 3 and 14 days after enrolling. A total of 540 participants were enrolled; 10 withdrew or did not take medication. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to December 2023. Intervention Mifepristone, 200 mg, and misoprostol, 800 µg, prescribed to a mail-order pharmacy and mailed to participants instead of dispensed in person. Main Outcomes and Measures Proportion of patients with a complete abortion with medications only, reporting satisfaction with the medication abortion, and reporting timely delivery of medications. Results Clinical outcome information was obtained and analyzed for 510 abortions (96.2%) among 506 participants (median [IQR] age, 27 [23-31] years; 506 [100%] female; 194 [38.3%] Black, 88 [17.4%] Hispanic, 141 [27.9%] White, and 45 [8.9%] multiracial/other individuals). Of these, 436 participants (85.5%; 95% CI, 82.2%-88.4%) received medications within 3 days. Complete abortion occurred after medication use in 499 cases (97.8%; 95% CI, 96.2%-98.9%). There were 24 adverse events (4.7%) for which care was sought for medication abortion symptoms; 3 patients (0.6%; 95% CI, 0.1%-1.7%) experienced serious adverse events requiring hospitalization (1 with blood transfusion); however, no adverse events were associated with mail-order dispensing. Of 477 participants, 431 (90.4%; 95% CI, 87.3%-92.9%) indicated that they would use mail-order dispensing again for abortion care, and 435 participants (91.2%; 95% CI, 88.3%-93.6%) reported satisfaction with the medication abortion. Findings were similar to those of other published studies of medication abortion with in-person dispensing. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cohort study indicate that mail-order pharmacy dispensing of mifepristone for medication abortion was effective, acceptable to patients, and feasible, with a low prevalence of serious adverse events. This care model should be expanded to improve access to medication abortion services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Grossman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| | - Sarah Raifman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| | - Natalie Morris
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| | - Andrea Arena
- Department of Family Medicine, Brown University, Pawtucket, Rhode Island
| | - Lela Bachrach
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Jessica Beaman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco
| | - M. Antonia Biggs
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| | - Amy Collins
- Allegheny Reproductive Health Center, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia
| | | | - Stephanie Ho
- Highland Hospital, Alameda Health System, Oakland, California
| | | | - Mindy Sobota
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kristina Tocce
- Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Denver, Colorado
| | - Eleanor B. Schwarz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Marji Gold
- Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barrow A, Cohen C, Serpico J, Goodman M, Grossman D, Raifman S, Upadhyay U. Brief of over 300 reproductive health researchers as Amici Curiae in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2024. [PMID: 39074980 DOI: 10.1111/psrh.12281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
On January 30, 2024, over 300 researchers filed an amicus brief in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a United States (US) Supreme Court case that could have severely impacted access to mifepristone, one of the two drugs commonly used in medication abortion. The researchers summarize the legal challenges to the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) original approval of mifepristone in 2000 and its 2016 and 2021 decisions modifying mifepristone's Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program and label, the responses from the FDA and drug manufacturer to the challenges, and the potential implications of the Court's decision on access to mifepristone in the US. The researchers detail how the FDA relied on a robust scientific record analyzing tens of thousands of patient experiences that conclusively demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of the changes to the mifepristone REMS Program and label and urge the Supreme Court to rely on the clear scientific record and preserve access to mifepristone without reimposing restrictions. What follows is a reprint of this brief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Barrow
- University of California Los Angeles Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Cathren Cohen
- University of California Los Angeles Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jaclyn Serpico
- University of California Los Angeles Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Melissa Goodman
- University of California Los Angeles Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Daniel Grossman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Sarah Raifman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Ushma Upadhyay
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, University of California San Francisco, Oakland, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Upadhyay UD, Koenig LR, Meckstroth K, Ko J, Valladares ES, Biggs MA. Effectiveness and safety of telehealth medication abortion in the USA. Nat Med 2024; 30:1191-1198. [PMID: 38361123 PMCID: PMC11031403 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02834-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Telehealth abortion has become critical to addressing surges in demand in states where abortion remains legal but evidence on its effectiveness and safety is limited. California Home Abortion by Telehealth (CHAT) is a prospective study that follows pregnant people who obtained medication abortion via telehealth from three virtual clinics operating in 20 states and Washington, DC between April 2021 and January 2022. Individuals were screened using a standardized no-test protocol, primarily relying on their medical history to assess medical eligibility. We assessed effectiveness, defined as complete abortion after 200 mg mifepristone and 1,600 μg misoprostol (or lower) without additional intervention; safety was measured by the absence of serious adverse events. We estimated rates using multivariable logistic regression and multiple imputation to account for missing data. Among 6,034 abortions, 97.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 97.2-98.1%) were complete without subsequent known intervention or ongoing pregnancy after the initial treatment. Overall, 99.8% (99.6-99.9%) of abortions were not followed by serious adverse events. In total, 0.25% of patients experienced a serious abortion-related adverse event, 0.16% were treated for an ectopic pregnancy and 1.3% abortions were followed by emergency department visits. There were no differences in effectiveness or safety between synchronous and asynchronous models of care. Telehealth medication abortion is effective, safe and comparable to published rates of in-person medication abortion care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ushma D Upadhyay
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Leah R Koenig
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Karen Meckstroth
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ko
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - M Antonia Biggs
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Munson E, Hall KS. Opportunities for Increasing Access to Person-Centered Abortion Care Through Telehealth. Am J Public Health 2024; 114:152-154. [PMID: 38335496 PMCID: PMC10862225 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2023.307541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Munson
- Erica Munson and Kelli S. Hall are with the Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Kelli S Hall
- Erica Munson and Kelli S. Hall are with the Heilbrunn Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lerma K, Coplon L, Goyal V. Travel for abortion care: implications for clinical practice. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 35:476-483. [PMID: 37916900 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Traveling long distances to obtain abortion care due to restrictions and scarce availability is associated with significant obstacles. We review clinical strategies that can facilitate abortion access and outline considerations to ensure person-centered and equitable care. RECENT FINDINGS Establishing a patient's gestational duration prior to travel may be beneficial to ensure they are eligible for their desired abortion method at the preferred facility or to determine if a multiday procedure is required. If a local ultrasound cannot be obtained prior to travel, evidence demonstrates people can generally estimate their gestational duration accurately. If unable to provide care, clinicians should make timely referrals for abortion. Integration of telemedicine into abortion care is safe and well regarded by patients and should be implemented into service delivery where possible to reduce obstacles to care. Routine in-person follow-up care is not necessary. However, for those who want reassurance, formalized pathways to care should be established to ensure people have access to care in their community. To further minimize travel-related burdens, facilities should routinely offer information about funding and practical support, emotional support, and legal resources. SUMMARY There are many opportunities to optimize clinical practice to support those traveling for abortion care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaira Lerma
- Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Leah Coplon
- Abortion On Demand, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Vinita Goyal
- Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|