New insights into cortical development and plasticity: from molecules to behavior

A unified model for cross-modal plasticity and skill acquisition

Historically, cross-modal plasticity following early blindness has been largely studied in the context of visual deprivation. However, more recently, there has been a shift in focus towards understanding cross-modal plasticity from the perspective of skill acquisition: the striking plasticity observed in early blind individuals reflects the extraordinary perceptual and cognitive challenges they solve. Here, inspired by two seminal papers on skill learning (the "cortical recycling" theory) and cross-modal plasticity (the "metamodal" hypothesis) respectively, we present a unified hypothesis of cortical specialization that describes how shared functional, algorithmic, and structural constraints might mediate both types of plasticity.

Contour integration deficits at high spatial frequencies in children treated for anisometropic amblyopia

Purpose

This study was conducted to reexamine the question of whether children treated for anisometropic amblyopia have contour integration deficits. To do so, we used psychophysical methods that require global contour processing while minimizing the influence of low-level deficits: visibility, shape perception, and positional uncertainty.

Methods

Thirteen children with anisometropic amblyopia (age: 10.1 ± 1.8 years) and thirteen visually normal children (age: 10.8 ± 2.0 years) participated in this study. The stimuli were closed figures made up of Gabor patches either in noise or on a blank field. The contrast thresholds to detect a circular contour on a blank field, as well as the thresholds of aspect ratio and contour element number to discriminate a circular or elliptical contour in noise, were measured at Gabor spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, and 6 cpd for amblyopic eyes (AEs), fellow eyes (FEs), and normal control eyes. Visual acuities and contrast sensitivity functions for AEs and FEs and the Randot stereoacuity were measured before testing.

Results

The AEs showed contrast deficits and degraded shape perception compared to the FEs at higher spatial frequencies (6 cpd). When the influence of abnormal contrast sensitivity and shape perception were minimized, the AEs showed contour integration deficits at spatial frequencies 3 and 6 cpd. These deficits were not related to basic losses in contrast sensitivity and acuity, stereoacuity, and visual crowding. Besides, no significant difference was found between the fellow eyes of the amblyopic children and the normal control eyes in the performance of contour integration.

Conclusion

After eliminating or compensating for the low-level deficits, children treated for anisometropic amblyopia still show contour integration deficits, primarily at higher spatial frequencies, which might reflect the deficits in global processing caused by amblyopia. Contour integration deficits are likely independent of spatial vision deficits. Refractive correction and/or occlusion therapies may not be sufficient to fully restore contour integration deficits, which indicates the need for the development of clinical treatments to recover these deficits.

Gradistics: An underappreciated dimension in evolutionary space

The growth of complexity is an unsolved and underappreciated problem. We consider possible causes of this growth, hypotheses testing, molecular mechanisms, complexity measures, cases of simplification, and significance for biomedicine. We focus on a general ability of regulation, which is based on the growing information storage and processing capacities, as the main proxy of complexity. Natural selection is indifferent to complexity. However, complexification can be inferred from the same first principle, on which natural selection is founded. Natural selection depends on potentially unlimited reproduction under limited environmental conditions. Because of the demographic pressure, the simple ecological niches become fulfilled and diversified (due to species splitting and divergence). Diversification increases complexity of biocenoses. After the filling and diversification of simple niches, the more complex niches can arise. This is the 'atomic orbitals' (AO) model. Complexity has many shortcomings but it has an advantage. This advantage is ability to regulatory adaptation, including behavioral, formed in the evolution by means of genetic adaptation. Regulatory adaptation is much faster than genetic one because it is based on the information previously accumulated via genetic adaptation and learning. Regulatory adaptation further increases complexity of biocenoses. This is the 'regulatory advantage' (RA) model. The comparison of both models allows testable predictions. We focus on the animal evolution because of the appearance of higher regulatory level (nervous system), which is absent in other lineages, and relevance to humans (including biomedical aspects).

Restoration of Cone Sensitivity to Individuals with Congenital Photoreceptor Blindness within the Phase 1/2 Sepofarsen Trial

Purpose

To understand consequences of reconstituting cone photoreceptor function in congenital binocular blindness resulting from mutations in the centrosomal protein 290 (CEP290) gene.

Design

Phase 1b/2 open-label, multicenter, multiple-dose, dose-escalation trial.

Participants

A homogeneous subgroup of 5 participants with light perception (LP) vision at the time of enrollment (age range, 15–41 years) selected for detailed analyses. Medical histories of 4 participants were consistent with congenital binocular blindness, whereas 1 participant showed evidence of spatial vision in early life that was later lost.

Intervention

Participants received a single intravitreal injection of sepofarsen (160 or 320 μg) into the study eye.

Main Outcome Measures

Full-field stimulus testing (FST), visual acuity (VA), and transient pupillary light reflex (TPLR) were measured at baseline and for 3 months after the injection.

Results

All 5 participants with LP vision demonstrated severely abnormal FST and TPLR findings. At baseline, FST threshold estimates were 0.81 and 1.0 log cd/m² for control and study eyes, respectively. At 3 months, study eyes showed a large mean improvement of –1.75 log versus baseline (P < 0.001), whereas untreated control eyes were comparable with baseline. Blue minus red FST values were not different than 0 (P = 0.59), compatible with cone mediation of remnant vision. At baseline, TPLR response amplitude and latency estimates were 0.39 mm and 0.72 seconds, respectively, for control eyes, and 0.28 mm and 0.78 seconds, respectively, for study eyes. At 3 months, study eyes showed a mean improvement of 0.44 mm in amplitude and a mean acceleration of 0.29 seconds in latency versus baseline (P < 0.001), whereas control eyes showed no significant change versus baseline. Specialized tests performed in 1 participant confirmed and extended the standardized results from all 5 participants.

Conclusions

By subjective and objective evidence, intravitreal sepofarsen provides improvement of light sensitivity for individuals with LP vision. However, translation of increased light sensitivity to improved spatial vision may occur preferentially in those with a history of visual experience during early neurodevelopment. Interventions for congenital lack of spatial vision in CEP290-associated Leber congenital amaurosis may lead to better results if performed before visual cortex maturity.

Learning to see again: Perceptual learning of simulated abnormal on- off-cell population responses in sighted individuals

Many forms of artificial sight recovery, such as electronic implants and optogenetic proteins, generally cause simultaneous, rather than complementary firing of on- and off-center retinal cells. Here, using virtual patients—sighted individuals viewing distorted input—we examine whether plasticity might compensate for abnormal neuronal population responses. Five participants were dichoptically presented with a combination of original and contrast-reversed images. Each image (I) and its contrast-reverse (Iʹ) was filtered using a radial checkerboard (F) in Fourier space and its inverse (Fʹ). [I * F′] + [Iʹ * F] was presented to one eye, and [I * F] + [Iʹ * F′] was presented to the other, such that regions of the image that produced on-center responses in one eye produced off-center responses in the other eye, and vice versa. Participants continuously improved in a naturalistic object discrimination task over 20 one-hour sessions. Pre-training and post-training tests suggest that performance improvements were due to two learning processes: learning to recognize objects with reduced visual information and learning to suppress contrast-reversed image information in a non–eye-selective manner. These results suggest that, with training, it may be possible to adapt to the unnatural on- and off-cell population responses produced by electronic and optogenetic sight recovery technologies.

It Is Not Just in the Genes

Asymmetries in the functional and structural organization of the nervous system are widespread in the animal kingdom and especially characterize the human brain. Although there is little doubt that asymmetries arise through genetic and nongenetic factors, an overarching model to explain the development of functional lateralization patterns is still lacking. Current genetic psychology collects data on genes relevant to brain lateralizations, while animal research provides information on the cellular mechanisms mediating the effects of not only genetic but also environmental factors. This review combines data from human and animal research (especially on birds) and outlines a multi-level model for asymmetry formation. The relative impact of genetic and nongenetic factors varies between different developmental phases and neuronal structures. The basic lateralized organization of a brain is already established through genetically controlled embryonic events. During ongoing development, hemispheric specialization increases for specific functions and subsystems interact to shape the final functional organization of a brain. In particular, these developmental steps are influenced by environmental experiences, which regulate the fine-tuning of neural networks via processes that are referred to as ontogenetic plasticity. The plastic potential of the nervous system could be decisive for the evolutionary success of lateralized brains.