How do our brain hemispheres cooperate to avoid false memories?

Cholinergic double duty: cue detection and attentional control

Cholinergic signaling in the cortex involves fast or transient signaling as well as a relatively slower neuromodulatory component. These two components of cholinergic activity mediate separate yet interacting aspects of cue detection and attentional control. The transient component appears to support the activation of cue-associated task or response sets, whereas the slower modulatory component stabilizes task-set and context representations, therefore potentially facilitating top-down control. Evidence from humans expressing genetic variants of the choline transporter as well as from patients with degenerating cholinergic systems supports the hypothesis that attentional control capacities depend on levels of cholinergic neuromodulation. Deficits in cholinergic-attentional control impact diverse cognitive functions, including timing, working memory, and complex movement control.

One is all you need: intrahemispheric processing benefits nonverbal visual recognition

Several attempts have been made to understand when and how the two hemispheres of the brain work together to encode and retrieve information during memory tasks, but it remains unclear whether they are equally capable of encoding and retrieval, particularly when the stimuli do not evoke a leftward processing asymmetry. Using a divided visual field paradigm, we presented nonverbal visual stimuli to one visual field/hemisphere at encoding, and at retrieval presented the stimuli either to the same or opposite visual field/hemisphere. Recognition responses were faster and more accurate when the stimuli were initially presented at encoding and retrieval to the same hemisphere (Experiment 1), even when delay intervals between study and test were short (Experiment 2). Taken together, these findings suggest that recognition decisions for stimuli initially presented to a single hemisphere occur more quickly at shorter lags, perhaps due to a stronger memory representation in the original hemisphere of input compared to the indirectly activated hemisphere. Our results are significant because they demonstrate that each hemisphere of the brain can function to encode and retrieve memory representations equally well, as long as the stimuli contain no linguistic information.