Head-to-head comparison between direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tailoring oral anticoagulant treatment in the era of multi-drug therapies for PAH and CTEPH

The use of oral anticoagulants in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents distinct therapeutic challenges and benefits. In PAH, the benefits of oral anticoagulation are uncertain, with studies yielding mixed results on their efficacy and safety. Conversely, oral anticoagulants are a cornerstone in the treatment of CTEPH, where their use is consistently recommended to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. The choice between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a significant clinical question, as each type presents advantages and potential drawbacks. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concomitant PAH and CTEPH treatments complicate anticoagulant management, necessitating careful consideration of individual patient regimens. This review examines the current evidence on oral anticoagulant use in PAH and CTEPH and discusses the implications of DDIs within a context of multi-drug treatments, including targeted drugs in PAH.

Safety and Outcomes with Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin-K Antagonists in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a subtype of pulmonary hypertension characterized by organized thrombi inside the pulmonary vasculature, leading to an increase in pulmonary artery pressure. CTEPH is seen in about 3-4% of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and is associated with poor outcomes. Apart from surgical intervention, lifelong anticoagulation is the mainstay of CTEPH management. Traditionally, CTEPH is managed with vitamin-K antagonists (VKA); however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recently gaining popularity. However, the current literature comparing DOACs versus VKAs in CTEPH has inconsistent results. An electronic search of the major bibliographic databases was performed to retrieve studies comparing DOACs versus VKAs in CTEPH patients. For dichotomous outcomes, the odds ratio (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to generate forest plots. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. Ten studies were included with 3936 patients (1269 in the DOAC group and 2667 in the VKA group). Treatment with DOAC was associated with no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.35-1.71; P < 0.53), venous thromboembolism (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.59-2.40; P = 0.63), major bleeding (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.38-1.22; P = 0.20), and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.80-1.86; P = 0.37). Our analysis demonstrates that DOACs are noninferior to VKAs in terms of their safety and outcomes profile in CTEPH. Further trials are needed to evaluate more robust evidence and to compare additional outcomes.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: First Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are becoming increasingly popular clinically, but their safety and effectiveness profile in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is not well-established. Literature from the PubMed and EMBASE databases was systematically screened up to February 2024 to identify relevant studies on the use of DOACs in CTEPH patients. The bias risk of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. The quality of observational prospective cohorts was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. Data pooled from different studies were analyzed. Results from 4 studies were gathered, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 2 prospective cohorts, with a total of 2038 patients, of which 751 were on DOACs and 1287 were on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Similar rates of all-cause mortality (3.33% vs 3.33%, RD = -0.01%, 95% CI [-0.02%, 0.00%], P = .17), VTE recurrence (1.46% vs 2.12%, RD = -0.00%, 95% CI [-0.01%, 0.01%], P = .92) were observed. DOACs were associated with a nonsignificant reduction in bleeding events including major bleeding (2.22% vs 3.71%, RD = -0.01%, 95% CI [-0.04%, 0.01%], P = .30), any bleeding (5.33% vs 9.94%, RD = -0.03%, 95% CI [-0.07%, 0.01%], P = .10), and minor bleeding (4.17% vs 13.3%, RD = -0.06%, 95% CI [-0.23%, 0.10%], P = .45). Data pooled from existing perspective trials suggests the use of DOACs in CTEPH patients as an effective and safe alternative to VKAs.

[Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension]

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is an important late complication of acute pulmonary embolism, in which the thrombi transform into fibrous tissue, become integrated into the vessel wall, and lead to chronic obstructions. CTEPD is differentiated into cases without pulmonary hypertension (PH), characterized by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure up to 20 mmHg and a form with PH. Then, it is still referred to as chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).When there is suspicion of CTEPH, initial diagnostic tests should include echocardiography and ventilation/perfusion scan to detect perfusion defects. Subsequently, referral to a CTEPH center is recommended, where further imaging diagnostics and right heart catheterization are performed to determine the appropriate treatment.Currently, three treatment modalities are available. The treatment of choice is pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). For non-operable patients or patients with residual PH after PEA, PH-targeted medical therapy, and the interventional procedure of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) are available. Increasingly, PEA, BPA, and pharmacological therapy are combined in multimodal concepts.Patients require post-treatment follow-up, preferably at (CTE)PH centers. These centers are required to perform a minimum number of PEA surgeries (50/year) and BPA interventions (100/year).

Assessing the Role of a Malonamide Linker in the Design of Potent Dual Inhibitors of Factor Xa and Cholinesterases

The rational discovery of new peptidomimetic inhibitors of the coagulation factor Xa (fXa) could help set more effective therapeutic options (to prevent atrial fibrillation). In this respect, we explored the conformational impact on the enzyme inhibition potency of the malonamide bridge, compared to the glycinamide one, as a linker connecting the P1 benzamidine anchoring moiety to the P4 aryl group of novel selective fXa inhibitors. We carried out structure–activity relationship (SAR) studies aimed at investigating para- or meta-benzamidine as the P1 basic group as well as diversely decorated aryl moieties as P4 fragments. To this end, twenty-three malonamide derivatives were synthesized and tested as inhibitors of fXa and thrombin (thr); the molecular determinants behind potency and selectivity were also studied by employing molecular docking. The malonamide linker, compared to the glycinamide one, does significantly increase anti-fXa potency and selectivity. The meta-benzamidine (P1) derivatives bearing 2′,4′-difluoro-biphenyl as the P4 moiety proved to be highly potent reversible fXa-selective inhibitors, achieving inhibition constants (K_i) in the low nanomolar range. The most active compounds were also tested against cholinesterase (ChE) isoforms (acetyl- or butyrylcholinesterase, AChE, and BChE), and some of them returned single-digit micromolar inhibition potency against AChE and/or BChE, both being drug targets for symptomatic treatment of mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Compounds 19h and 22b were selected as selective fXa inhibitors with potential as multimodal neuroprotective agents.