Computed Tomography for the Evaluation of Suspected Airway Foreign Bodies

CT imaging of esophageal foreign bodies in children: a pictorial essay

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is common in children, particularly from 6 months to 3 years of age. As young children may be unable to provide a clinical history and the ingestion is often unwitnessed, imaging plays an important role in diagnosis, predicting outcomes and detecting complications that require surgical intervention. Since 2015, our institution's diagnostic algorithm for suspected airway foreign bodies has included a noncontrast airway FB CT (FB-CT) with the z-axis coverage spanning from the larynx to the proximal segmental bronchi of the lower lung zones. The effective dose of radiation from this FB-CT airway protocol is typically less than 1 mSv, compared to an effective dose of just under 1 mSv to up to 3 mSv for a fluoroscopic esophagram in children under 10 years of age and 1-3 mSv for a routine pediatric CT chest. In using the FB-CT airway protocol at our institution, we observed that esophageal rather than airway FBs were sometimes encountered on these exams. However, the confidence among radiologists for definitively diagnosing an esophageal foreign body on noncontrast CT was variable. Consequently, we created a teaching module of positive cases for our group of 21 pediatric body radiologists to increase their diagnostic confidence. This pictorial essay illustrates our institutional experience and can help others to confidently diagnose esophageal foreign bodies using a dedicated CT foreign body imaging protocol. At a similar radiation dose to a fluoroscopic esophagram, CT provides the additional advantage of an expedited diagnosis without the need for a radiologist on site.

Chest CT for the Diagnosis of Pediatric Esophageal Foreign Bodies

Foreign body ingestion is a common problem in children. Radiography is the mainstay of imaging, but many radiolucent items go undetected without further imaging by fluoroscopic esophagram. While studies in adults support the use of computed tomography (CT) for esophageal foreign body ingestion, CT has historically not been used in children given the typically higher radiation doses on CT compared with fluoroscopy. In distinction to an esophagram, CT does not require oral contrast nor presence of an onsite radiologist and can be interpreted remotely. At our institution, a dedicated CT protocol has been used for airway foreign bodies since 2015. Given the advantages of CT over esophagram, we retrospectively reviewed institutional radiation dose data from 2017 to 2020 for esophagrams, airway foreign body CT (FB-CT), and routine CT Chest to compare effective doses for each modality. For ages 1+ years, effective dose was lowest using the FB-CT protocol; esophagram mean dose showed the most variability, and was over double the dose of FB-CT for ages 5+ years. Routine CT chest doses were uniformly highest across all age ranges. Given these findings, we instituted a CT foreign body imaging protocol as the first-line imaging modality for radiolucent esophageal foreign body at our institution.

Protocol incorporating airway CT decreases negative bronchoscopy rates for suspected foreign bodies in pediatric patients

BACKGROUND

Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is the 4th leading cause of death in children between the ages 1-5. Although direct laryngoscopy and bronchoscopy (DL&B) is the reference standard for diagnosis of pediatric airway foreign bodies, there is a high negative bronchoscopy rate, exposing patients to unnecessary operative and anesthetic risks and costs.

METHODS

A clinical care protocol entailing the selective use of low-dose non-contrast airway computed tomography (CT) for children with an intermediate risk for FBA on the basis of clinical exam and chest radiography was implemented to decrease the negative DL&B rate. A retrospective review was conducted to compare negative bronchoscopy rates before and after implementation of the new protocol and the diagnostic performance characteristics of airway CT for airway foreign bodies were analyzed.

RESULTS

After implementation of the airway FB clinical care protocol entailing selective airway CT, the overall negative bronchoscopy rate decreased from an institutional historical rate of 37% (54/145) to 17% (10/56) (p = .06). The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of airway CT for FB was 91%, 100%, 100%, and 97% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose non-contrast airway CT is highly sensitive and specific for airway foreign bodies, and its selective use in a clinical care protocol for children with suspected foreign body aspiration could greatly reduce the negative bronchoscopy rate, thereby decreasing operative risks and costs.

Pediatric chest CT at chest radiograph doses: when is the ultralow-dose chest CT clinically appropriate?

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT) use in emergency departments represents a significant contribution to pediatric patients' exposure to ionizing radiation. Here, we evaluate whether ultralow-dose chest CT can be diagnostically adequate for other diagnoses and whether model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) can improve diagnostic adequacy compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) at ultralow doses.

METHODS

Twenty children underwent chest CTs: 10 standard-dose reconstructed with ASIR and 10 ultralow-dose reconstructed with ASIR and MBIR. Four radiologists assessed images for their adequacy to exclude five hypothetical diagnoses: foreign body, fracture, lung metastasis, pulmonary infection, and interstitial lung disease. Additionally, pairwise comparison for subjective image quality was used to compare ultralow-dose chest CT with ASIR and MBIR. Radiation dose and objective image noise measures were obtained.

RESULTS

For exclusion of an airway foreign body, the adequacy of ultralow-dose CT was comparable to standard-dose (p = 0.6). For the remaining diagnoses, ultralow-dose CT was inferior to standard-dose (p = 0.03-<0.001). MBIR partially recovered the adequacy of ultralow-dose CT to exclude pulmonary infection (p = 0.017), but was suboptimal for the other diagnoses. Image noise was significantly lower with MBIR compared to ASIR in ultralow-dose CT (p < 0.001), although subjective preference showed only a slight advantage of MBIR (58 versus 42%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultralow-dose chest CT may be adequate for airway assessment, but suboptimal for the evaluation parenchymal lung disease. Although MBIR improves objective and subjective image quality, it does not completely restore the diagnostic adequacy of ultralow-dose CT when compared to standard-dose CT.