Development of a Longitudinal Quality and Safety Curriculum for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows

A graduate medical education (GME) quality improvement curriculum leads to improved knowledge and participation in high quality improvement projects by trainees

BACKGROUND

There is increased awareness about the need for quality improvement (QI) education for trainees within clinical training programs. However, formal integration of a QI curriculum into graduate medical education (GME) remains a work-in-progress. We describe the creation and implementation of a novel, virtual QI curriculum complemented by virtual-based workshops.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of a GME QI curriculum on 1) trainee QI knowledge; 2) Quality of QI projects.

METHODS

The GME Quality Improvement curriculum was transitioned to an optional formal curriculum in 2020. It is led by three faculty with expertise in QI training and education. The team developed four, web-based learning modules that focused on fundamental QI concepts. These modules are completed monthly and are paired with virtual workshops that facilitate applying learned QI concepts to project development. We evaluated the effectiveness of the curriculum by assessing participants' performance on knowledge-based quizzes before and after each online module. We used IBM SPSS (version 28), to conduct a two-sided paired samples t-test, comparing each post-session test scores with their corresponding pre-session scores. The alpha, or statistical threshold significance threshold, was 0.05. Additionally, two independent judges with expertise in QI evaluated the quality of the projects presented at the annual QI showcase using a standardized scoring rubric. The poster evaluation forms included 8 questions, rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Projects were graded into 4 quartiles (poor, fair, good, excellent).

RESULTS

In the knowledge assessment quiz, the difference between the mean pre- and post-session quiz scores was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The average score of the quality of the projects presented at the annual showcase was 31, in the fourth quartile which was graded as "excellent" quality.

CONCLUSION

A GME-led QI curriculum was effective in improving knowledge of QI concepts and producing high-quality scholarly projects.

A realist synthesis of quality improvement curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: what works, for whom, and in what contexts?

BACKGROUND

With the integration of quality improvement (QI) into competency-based models of physician training, there is an increasing requirement for medical students and residents to demonstrate competence in QI. There may be factors that commonly facilitate or inhibit the desired outcomes of QI curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education. The purpose of this review was to synthesise attributes of QI curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education associated with curricular outcomes.

METHODS

A realist synthesis of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted to identify the common contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes of QI curricula in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education in order to develop a programme theory to articulate what works, for whom, and in what contexts.

RESULTS

18854 records underwent title and abstract screening, full texts of 609 records were appraised for eligibility, data were extracted from 358 studies, and 218 studies were included in the development and refinement of the final programme theory. Contexts included curricular strategies, levels of training, clinical settings, and organisational culture. Mechanisms were identified within the overall QI curricula itself (eg, clear expectations and deliverables, and protected time), in the didactic components (ie, content delivery strategies), and within the experiential components (eg, topic selection strategies, working with others, and mentorship). Mechanisms were often associated with certain contexts to promote educational and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This research describes the various pedagogical strategies for teaching QI to medical learners and highlights the contexts and mechanisms that could potentially account for differences in educational and clinical outcomes of QI curricula. Educators may benefit from considering these contexts and mechanisms in the design and implementation of QI curricula to optimise the outcomes of training in this competency area.

Improving Efficiency and Communication around Sedated Fracture Reductions in a Pediatric Emergency Department

Introduction

Procedural sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department (ED) is a time-consuming process requiring multidisciplinary coordination. We implemented a quality improvement initiative aimed at (1) decreasing mean ED length of stay (LOS) for children with sedated long bone fracture reductions by 15% over 12 months and (2) improving interdisciplinary communication around procedural sedation.

Methods

Pediatric emergency medicine fellows at a children's hospital designed and implemented an initiative targeting the efficiency of the sedation process. Interventions included a centralized sedation tracking board, a team member responsibility checklist, family handouts, early discharge initiatives, and postsedation review forms. We tracked progress via statistical process control charts and interdisciplinary communication by intermittent surveys.

Results

Pediatric emergency medicine fellows performed 2,246 sedations during the study period. Mean LOS decreased from 361 to 340 minutes (5.8%) after implementation and demonstrated sustainability over the postintervention period. One hundred eight providers completed the preimplementation communication survey, with 58 and 64 completing surveys at 4 and 9 months postimplementation, respectively. The proportion reporting somewhat or strong satisfaction with communication increased from 68% at baseline to 86% at 4 months (P = 0.02) and 92% at 9 months (P < 0.001 versus baseline).

Conclusions

A quality improvement initiative created a sustainable process to reduce ED LOS for sedated reductions while improving satisfaction with interdisciplinary communication.