Practical Considerations for Clinical PET/MR Imaging

PET/MRI for evaluation of patients with pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancers are the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA and outcomes remain poor despite improvements in imaging and treatment paradigms. Currently, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequently utilized for staging and restaging of these malignancies, but positron emission tomography (PET)/CT can play a role in troubleshooting and improve whole-body staging. PET/MRI is a novel imaging modality that allows for simultaneous acquisition of PET and MRI images, leading to improved image quality and potential increased sensitivity. Early studies suggest that PET/MRI may play a larger role in pancreatic cancer imaging in future. This manuscript will briefly discuss current imaging approaches to pancreatic cancer and outline existing evidence and published data supporting the use of PET/MRI for pancreatic cancers.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a 2022 update for radiologists

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PaNENs) are a unique group of pancreatic neoplasms with a wide range of clinical presentations and behaviors. Given their heterogeneous appearance and increasing detection on cross-sectional imaging, it is essential that radiologists understand the variable presentation and distinctions PaNENs display compared to other pancreatic neoplasms. Additionally, some of these neoplasms may be hormonally functional, and it is imperative that radiologists be aware of the common clinical presentations of hormonally active PaNENs. Knowledge of PaNEN pathology and treatments may influence which imaging modality is optimal for each patient. Each imaging modality used for PaNENs has distinct advantages and disadvantages, particularly in different treatment settings. Thus, the focus of this manuscript is to provide an update for the radiologist on PaNEN pathology, imaging, and treatments.

Advancements in Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Applications to Diagnostic Challenges in Neuroradiology

Since the clinical adoption of magnetic resonance (MR) in medical imaging, MR has proven to be a workhorse in diagnostic neuroradiology, with the ability to provide superb anatomic detail as well as additional functional and physiologic data, depending on the techniques utilized. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography has also shown irreplaceable diagnostic value in certain disease processes of the central nervous system by providing molecular and metabolic information through the development of numerous disease-specific PET tracers, many of which can be utilized as a diagnostic technique in and of themselves or can provide a valuable adjunct to information derived from MR. Despite these advances, many challenges still remain in neuroradiology, particularly in malignancy, neurodegenerative disease, epilepsy, and cerebrovascular disease. Through improvements in attenuation correction, motion correction, and PET detectors, combining the 2 modalities of PET and MR through simultaneous imaging has proven feasible and allows for improved spatial and temporal resolution without compromising either of the 2 individual modalities. The complementary information offered by both technologies has provided increased diagnostic accuracy in both research and many clinical applications in neuroradiology.

NEMA NU2-2012 performance measurements of the United Imaging uPMR790: an integrated PET/MR system

PURPOSE

In this paper, we aimed to evaluate the positron emission tomography (PET) performance of, to the best of our knowledge, the third commercially available whole-body integrated PET/magnetic resonance (MR) system.

METHODS

The PET system performance was measured following the NEMA standards with and without simultaneous MR operation. PET spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction, count-rate performance, accuracy of count losses and random corrections, image quality, and time-of-flight (TOF) resolution were quantitatively evaluated. Clinical scans were acquired at the PET/MR system and compared with images acquired at a PET/CT with the same digital detector technology.

RESULTS

Measurement results of essential PET performance were reported in the form of MR idle (MR pulsing). The axial, radial, and tangential spatial resolutions were measured as 2.72 mm (2.73 mm), 2.86 mm (2.85 mm), and 2.81 mm (2.82 mm) FWHM, respectively, at 1 cm radial offset. The NECR peak was measured as 129.2 kcps (129.5 kcps) at 14.7 kBq mL^-1 (14.2 kBq mL^-1). The scatter fraction at NECR peak was 37.9% (36.5%), and the maximum slice error below NECR was 4.1% (4.5%). Contrast recovery coefficients ranged from 51.8% (52.3%) for 10 mm hot sphere to 87.3% (87.2%) for 37 mm cold sphere. TOF resolution at 5.3 kBq mL^-1 was measured at 535 ps (540 ps). With point source, TOF was measured to be 474 ps (485 ps). Clinical scans revealed similar image quality from the PET/MR and the comparative PET/CT system.

CONCLUSION

The PET performance of the newly introduced integrated PET/MR system is not significantly affected by the simultaneous operation of an MR sequence (2-point DIXON sequence). Measurement results demonstrate comparable performance with other state-of-the-art PET/MR systems. The clinical benefits of high spatial resolution and long axial coverage remain to be further evaluated in specific clinical imaging applications.

Comparison of MRI Sequences in Whole-Body PET/MRI for Staging of Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of various MRI sequences used for whole-body (WB) ¹⁸F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/MRI staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This analysis is based on data from a prospective study that included 58 patients with untreated high-risk PCa who underwent integrated WB FCH PET/MRI (n = 10) or FCH PET/CT and WB MRI (n = 48). Metastatic sites were recorded. The standard of reference was histopathologic findings or clinical and imaging follow-up, or both. For each MRI sequence (Dixon T1-weighted, turbo inversion recovery magnitude, WB DWI, and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination [VIBE]), acquisition time was recorded, and conspicuity of metastatic lesions was qualitatively assessed by two radiologists using a 4-point ordinal scale (0-3).

RESULTS

Total WB acquisition times were 1 minute 25 seconds for Dixon T1-weighted, 15 minutes 7 seconds for turbo inversion recovery magnitude, 16 minutes 33 seconds for WB DWI, and 1 minute 28 seconds for gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE. The lesion detection rates were 88.3% (68/77) for Dixon T1-weighted, 94.8% (73/77) for turbo inversion recovery magnitude, 95.2% (40/42) for WB DWI, and 97.4% (75/77) for gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE sequences. Moderate or high conspicuity scores were assigned to 62.3% (48/77) of lesions for Dixon T1-weighted, 88.3% (68/77) of lesions for turbo inversion recovery magnitude, 90.5% (38/42) of lesions for WB DWI, and 92.2% (71/77) of lesions for gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE sequences. Conspicuity of metastases on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE and WB DWI sequences was higher than that on Dixon T1-weighted sequences (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Metastases from prostate cancer are best detected at DWI or gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE sequences. The most time-efficient sequence with the highest lesion detection rate and conspicuity is gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE.