1
|
Triumbari EKA, Rufini V, Mingels C, Rominger A, Alavi A, Fanfani F, Badawi RD, Nardo L. Long Axial Field-of-View PET/CT Could Answer Unmet Needs in Gynecological Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2407. [PMID: 37173874 PMCID: PMC10177015 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Gynecological malignancies currently affect about 3.5 million women all over the world. Imaging of uterine, cervical, vaginal, ovarian, and vulvar cancer still presents several unmet needs when using conventional modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance, and standard positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Some of the current diagnostic limitations are represented by differential diagnosis between inflammatory and cancerous findings, detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis and metastases <1 cm, detection of cancer-associated vascular complications, effective assessment of post-therapy changes, as well as bone metabolism and osteoporosis assessment. As a result of recent advances in PET/CT instrumentation, new systems now offer a long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) to image between 106 cm and 194 cm (i.e., total-body PET) of the patient's body simultaneously and feature higher physical sensitivity and spatial resolution compared to standard PET/CT systems. LAFOV PET could overcome the forementioned limitations of conventional imaging and provide valuable global disease assessment, allowing for improved patient-tailored care. This article provides a comprehensive overview of these and other potential applications of LAFOV PET/CT imaging for patients with gynecological malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Katherine Anna Triumbari
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, G-STeP Radiopharmacy Research Core Facility, Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vittoria Rufini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Haematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiological Sciences, Radiotherapy and Haematology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Clemens Mingels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Abass Alavi
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- Woman, Child and Public Health Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Roma, Italy
| | - Ramsey D. Badawi
- Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Lorenzo Nardo
- Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mallum A, Mkhize T, Akudugu JM, Ngwa W, Vorster M. The Role of Positron Emission Tomography and Computed Tomographic (PET/CT) Imaging for Radiation Therapy Planning: A Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13:diagnostics13010053. [PMID: 36611345 PMCID: PMC9818506 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PET/CT is revolutionising radiotherapy treatment planning in many cancer sites. While its utility has been confirmed in some cancer sites, and is used in routine clinical practice, it is still at an experimental stage in many other cancer sites. This review discusses the utility of PET/CT in cancer sites where the role of PET/CT has been established in cases such as head and neck, cervix, brain, and lung cancers, as well as cancer sites where the role of PET/CT is still under investigation such as uterine, ovarian, and prostate cancers. Finally, the review touches on PET/CT utilisation in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abba Mallum
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital, Durban 4091, South Africa
- University of Maiduguri Teaching Hospital, Maiduguri 600104, Nigeria
- Correspondence: or
| | - Thokozani Mkhize
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inkosi Albert Central Hospital, Durban 4091, South Africa
| | - John M. Akudugu
- Division of Radiobiology, Department of Medical Imaging and Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg 7505, South Africa
| | - Wilfred Ngwa
- School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farmer Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mariza Vorster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inkosi Albert Central Hospital, Durban 4091, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Markovina S, Rendle KA, Cohen AC, Kuroki LM, Grover S, Schwarz JK. Improving cervical cancer survival-A multifaceted strategy to sustain progress for this global problem. Cancer 2022; 128:4074-4084. [PMID: 36239006 PMCID: PMC10042221 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is associated with profound socioeconomic and racial disparities in incidence, mortality, morbidity, and years of life lost. The last standard-of-care treatment innovation for locally advanced cervical cancer occurred in 1999, when cisplatin chemotherapy was added to pelvic radiation therapy (chemoradiation therapy). Chemoradiation therapy is associated with a 30%-50% failure rate, and there is currently no cure for recurrent or metastatic disease. The enormity of the worldwide clinical problem of cervical cancer morbidity and mortality as well as the egregiously unchanged mortality rate over the last several decades are recognized by the National Institutes of Health as urgent priorities. This is reflected within the Office of Research on Women's Health effort to advance National Institutes of Health research on the health of women, as highlighted in a recent symposium. In the current review, the authors address the state of the science and opportunities to improve cervical cancer survival with an emphasis on improving access, using technology in innovative and widely implementable ways, and improving current understanding of cervical cancer biology. LAY SUMMARY: Cervical cancer is associated with profound socioeconomic and racial disparities in incidence, mortality, morbidity, and years of life lost. In this review, the state of the science and opportunities to improve cervical cancer survival are presented with an emphasis on improving access, using technology in innovative and widely implementable ways, and improving current understanding of cervical cancer biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Markovina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - Katharine A. Rendle
- Departments of Family Medicine & Community Health and of Biostatistics, Informatics, and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander C. Cohen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - Lindsay M. Kuroki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| | - Surbhi Grover
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Julie K. Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
- Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yusufaly TI, Zou J, Nelson TJ, Williamson CW, Simon A, Singhal M, Liu H, Wong H, Saenz CC, Mayadev J, McHale MT, Yashar CM, Eskander R, Sharabi A, Hoh CK, Obrzut S, Mell LK. Improved Prognosis of Treatment Failure in Cervical Cancer with Nontumor PET/CT Radiomics. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1087-1093. [PMID: 34711618 PMCID: PMC9258568 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiomics has been applied to predict recurrence in several disease sites, but current approaches are typically restricted to analyzing tumor features, neglecting nontumor information in the rest of the body. The purpose of this work was to develop and validate a model incorporating nontumor radiomics, including whole-body features, to predict treatment outcomes in patients with previously untreated locoregionally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: We analyzed 127 cervical cancer patients treated definitively with chemoradiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy. All patients underwent pretreatment whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT. To quantify effects due to the tumor itself, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was directly contoured on the PET/CT image. Meanwhile, to quantify effects arising from the rest of the body, the planning target volume (PTV) was deformably registered from each planning CT to the PET/CT scan, and a semiautomated approach combining seed-growing and manual contour review generated whole-body muscle, bone, and fat segmentations on each PET/CT image. A total of 965 radiomic features were extracted for GTV, PTV, muscle, bone, and fat. Ninety-five patients were used to train a Cox model of disease recurrence including both radiomic and clinical features (age, stage, tumor grade, histology, and baseline complete blood cell counts), using bagging and split-sample-validation for feature reduction and model selection. To further avoid overfitting, the resulting models were tested for generalization on the remaining 32 patients, by calculating a risk score based on Cox regression and evaluating the c-index (c-index > 0.5 indicates predictive power). Results: Optimal performance was seen in a Cox model including 1 clinical biomarker (whether or not a tumor was stage III-IVA), 2 GTV radiomic biomarkers (PET gray-level size-zone matrix small area low gray level emphasis and zone entropy), 1 PTV radiomic biomarker (major axis length), and 1 whole-body radiomic biomarker (CT bone root mean square). In particular, stratification into high- and low-risk groups, based on the linear risk score from this Cox model, resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.019 (95% CI, 0.004, 0.082), an improvement over stratification based on clinical stage alone, which had a hazard ratio of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.16, 0.83). Conclusion: Incorporating nontumor radiomic biomarkers can improve the performance of prognostic models compared with using only clinical and tumor radiomic biomarkers. Future work should look to further test these models in larger, multiinstitutional cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahir I Yusufaly
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;
| | - Jingjing Zou
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health and Department of Mathematics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Tyler J Nelson
- Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Casey W Williamson
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Aaron Simon
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Hannah Liu
- Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Hank Wong
- Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Cheryl C Saenz
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; and
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Michael T McHale
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; and
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Ramez Eskander
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; and
| | - Andrew Sharabi
- Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Carl K Hoh
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Sebastian Obrzut
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Loren K Mell
- Center for Precision Radiation Medicine, La Jolla, California
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology-IV. Gynecologic and Genitourinary Malignancies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14123000. [PMID: 35740665 PMCID: PMC9220973 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With concurrently acquired positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT), a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan provides information to allow better visualization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies for PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The fourth report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gynecologic and genitourinary malignancies. Abstract Concurrently acquired positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET-CT) is an advanced imaging modality with diverse oncologic applications, including staging, therapeutic assessment, restaging and longitudinal surveillance. This series of six review articles focuses on providing practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use and interpretative strategies of PET-CT for oncologic indications in adult patients. In this fourth article of the series, the more common gynecological and adult genitourinary malignancies encountered in clinical practice are addressed, with an emphasis on Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and clinically available radiopharmaceuticals. The advent of new FDA-approved radiopharmaceuticals for prostate cancer imaging has revolutionized PET-CT imaging in this important disease, and these are addressed in this report. However, [18F]F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) remains the mainstay for PET-CT imaging of gynecologic and many other genitourinary malignancies. This information will serve as a guide for the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of gynecologic and genitourinary cancer patients for health care professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides guidance in the accurate interpretation of FDG PET-CT in gynecological and genitourinary malignancies for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.
Collapse
|
6
|
Khanna L, Prasad SR, Yedururi S, Parameswaran AM, Marcal LP, Sandrasegaran K, Tirumani SH, Menias CO, Katabathina VS. Second Malignancies after Radiation Therapy: Update on Pathogenesis and Cross-sectional Imaging Findings. Radiographics 2021; 41:876-894. [PMID: 33891523 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
A wide spectrum of second cancers occur as late complications of radiation therapy (RT) used to treat various malignancies. In addition to the type and dose of radiation, lifestyle, environmental, and genetic factors are important to the development of second malignancies in cancer survivors. Typically, RT-induced malignancies (RTIMs) are biologically aggressive cancers with a variable period of 5-10 years for hematologic malignancies and 10-60 years for solid tumors between RT and the development of the second cancer. Although carcinomas and leukemias commonly develop after low-dose RT, sarcomas occur in tissues or organs that receive high-dose RT. Angiosarcomas and unclassified pleomorphic sarcomas are the two most common RT-associated sarcomas; other sarcomas include malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, leiomyosarcomas, osteosarcomas, chondrosarcomas, and dedifferentiated or pleomorphic liposarcomas. Select RTIMs show tumor genetic characteristics that allow accurate diagnosis. Nearly all cutaneous angiosarcomas after RT for breast cancer and 90% of RT-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors are characterized by MYC gene amplifications and loss of H3 K27me3 expression, respectively. Classic papillary thyroid carcinomas that develop after RT frequently harbor RET/PTC rearrangements and have a favorable prognosis, despite their advanced stage at patient presentation. Select RTIMs demonstrate characteristic imaging findings and typically develop in the prior radiation field. Imaging is essential to early diagnosis, characterization, localization, and staging of RTIMs. Familiarity of radiologists with the diverse spectrum of RTIMs is essential for early diagnosis and optimal management. An invited commentary by Shapiro is available online. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lokesh Khanna
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Srinivasa R Prasad
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Sireesha Yedururi
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Anand M Parameswaran
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Leonardo P Marcal
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Kumar Sandrasegaran
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Sree Harsha Tirumani
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Christine O Menias
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| | - Venkata S Katabathina
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 (L.K., A.M.P., V.S.K.); Department of Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex (S.R.P., S.Y., L.P.M.); Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Ariz (K.S., C.O.M.); and Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reed N, Balega J, Barwick T, Buckley L, Burton K, Eminowicz G, Forrest J, Ganesan R, Harrand R, Holland C, Howe T, Ind T, Iyer R, Kaushik S, Music R, Sadozye A, Shanbhag S, Siddiqui N, Syed S, Percival N, Whitham NL, Nordin A, Fotopoulou C. British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) cervical cancer guidelines: Recommendations for practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 256:433-465. [PMID: 33143928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Cervix cancer in many countries is declining and screening programmes and immunisation will reduce the incidence in the next few decades. This guideline attempts to cover management of invasive disease reflecting diagnosis and imaging including new imaging and sentinel lymph node biopsies. Smaller volume disease is usually managed surgically whereas advanced disease is treated with (chemo)- radiation. It also includes discussion of fertility sparing procedures. Practices are changing frequently for all aspects of care usually in attempts to reduce complications and improve quality of life. The management of advanced disease is treated by chemotherapy and the use of newer agents is also discussed. Other sections discuss specialist situations such as cancer in pregnancy, rare cervical tumours, late effects and supportive measures and fertility preserving approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Reed
- Beatson Oncology Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | - Lynn Buckley
- Clinical Nurse Specialist, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Ind
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rema Iyer
- East Kent Hospitals University Foundation NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert Music
- Jo's Cervical Cancer Trustt, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Smruta Shanbhag
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sheeba Syed
- Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Natasha Lauren Whitham
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals (Royal Preston Hospital, Fulwood, Lancashire), United Kingdom
| | - Andy Nordin
- East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation Nhs Trust, Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother Hospital, Margate, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|