Probing the structures, binding energies, and spin-spin coupling constants of halogen-bonded Azine:ClF complexes

Types of noncovalent bonds within complexes of thiazole with CF4 and SiF4

The five-membered heteroaromatic thiazole molecule contains a number of electron-rich regions that could attract an electrophile, namely the N and S lone pairs that lie in the molecular plane, and π-system areas above the plane. The possibility of each of these sites engaging in a tetrel bond (TB) with CF4 and SiF4, as well as geometries that encompass a CH⋯F H-bond, was explored via DFT calculations. There are a number of minima that occur in the pairing of thiazole with CF4 that are very close in energy, but these complexes are weakly bound by less than 2 kcal mol-1 and the presence of a true TB is questionable. The inclusion of zero-point vibrational energies alters the energetic ordering, which is further modified when entropic effects are added. The preferred geometry would thus be sensitive to the temperature of an experiment. Replacement of CF4 by SiF4 leaves intact most of the configurations, and their tight energetic clustering, the ordering of which is again altered as the temperature rises. But there is one exception in that by far the most tightly bound complex involves a strong Si⋯N TB between SiF4 and the lone pair of the thiazole N, with an interaction energy of 30 kcal mol-1. Even accounting for its high deformation energy and entropic considerations, this structure remains as clearly the most stable at any temperature.

Relation between Halogen Bond Strength and IR and NMR Spectroscopic Markers

The relationship between the strength of a halogen bond (XB) and various IR and NMR spectroscopic quantities is assessed through DFT calculations. Three different Lewis acids place a Br or I atom on a phenyl ring; each is paired with a collection of N and O bases of varying electron donor power. The weakest of the XBs display a C-X bond contraction coupled with a blue shift in the associated frequency, whereas the reverse trends occur for the stronger bonds. The best correlations with the XB interaction energy are observed with the NMR shielding of the C atom directly bonded to X and the coupling constants involving the C-X bond and the C-H/F bond that lies ortho to the X substituent, but these correlations are not accurate enough for the quantitative assessment of energy. These correlations tend to improve as the Lewis acid becomes more potent, which makes for a wider range of XB strengths.

Heavy pnicogen atoms as electron donors in sigma-hole bonds

DFT calculations evaluate the strength of σ-hole bonds formed by ZH3 and ZMe3 (Z = N, P, As, Sb) acting as electron donor. Bond types considered include H-bond, halogen, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bond to perfluorinated Lewis acids FH, FBr, F2Se F3As, F4Ge, respectively, as well as their monofluorinated analogues. All of the Z atoms can engage in bonds of at least moderate strength, varying from 3 to more than 40 kcal mol-1. In most cases, N forms the strongest bonds, but the falloff from P to Sb is quite mild. However, this pattern is not characteristic of all cases, as for example in the halogen bonds, where the heavier Z atoms are comparable to, or even stronger than N. Most of the bonds are strengthened by replacing the three H atoms of ZH3 by methyl groups, better simulating the situation that would be generally encountered. Structural and NMR shielding data ought to facilitate the identification of these bonds within crystals or in solution.

Influence of Internal Noncovalent Bonds on Rotational Dynamics

While a good deal of information has accumulated concerning the manner in which an intramolecular noncovalent bond can affect the relative energies of various conformers, less is known about how such bonds might affect the dynamics of interconversion between them. A series of molecules are constructed in which symmetrically equivalent conformers containing a noncovalent bond can be interconverted by a bond rotation, the energy barrier to which is computed by quantum chemical methods. The rotation of a CF3 group attached to a phenyl ring is speeded up if a Se··F chalcogen bond can be formed with a SeH or SeF group placed in an ortho position, a bond that is present in and stabilizes the rotational transition state. The analogous SnF3 group can, on the other hand, engage in a Sn··Se tetrel bond in its global minimum. The energetic cost of breakage of this bond is not fully compensated by the appearance of a Se··F chalcogen bond in the rotational transition state. Other systems were designed by placing two phenyl rings on opposite ends of an octahedrally disposed SeF4 group. A high barrier inhibits their rotation with bulky Br atoms in ortho positions, but this barrier is lowered if Br is replaced by groups that can engage in either chalcogen (SeH or SeF) or pnicogen (AsH2) bonds with the F atoms in the rotational transition state. The barrier reduction is closely related to the strength of these noncovalent bonds.

Enhancement of Halogen Bond Strength by Intramolecular H-Bonds

Quantum calculations study the potential of an intramolecular H-bond between the halogen atom (X) of a halobenzene and a substituent placed ortho to it, to amplify the ability of X to engage in a halogen bond (XB) with a Lewis base. H-bonding substituents NH₂, CH₂CH₂OH, CH₂OH, OH, and COOH were added to halobenzenes (X = Cl, Br, I). The amino group had little effect, but those containing OH increased the CX···N XB energy to a NH₃ nucleophile by about 0.5 kcal/mol; the increment associated with COOH is larger, nearly 2 kcal/mol. These energy increments were approximately doubled if two such H-bonding substituents are present. Combining a pair of ortho COOH groups with an electron-withdrawing NO₂ group in the para position has a particularly large effect, raising the XB energy by about 4 kcal/mol, which can amount to as much as a 4-fold magnification.

Does a halogen bond require positive potential on the acid and negative potential on the base?

It is usually expected that formation of a halogen bond (XB) requires that a region of positive electrostatic potential associated with a σ or π-hole on the Lewis acid will interact with the negative potential of the base, either a lone pair or π-bond region. Quantum calculations of model systems suggest this not to be necessary. The placement of electron-withdrawing substituents on the base can reverse the sign of the potential in its lone pair or π-bond region to positive, and this base can nonetheless engage in a XB with the positive σ-hole of a Lewis acid. The reverse scenario is also possible in certain circumstances, as a negatively charged σ-hole can form a XB with the negative lone pair region of a base. Despite these classical Coulombic repulsions, the overall electrostatic interaction is attractive in these XBs, albeit only weakly so. The strengths of these bonds are surprisingly insensitive to changes in the partner molecule. For example, even a wide range in the depth of the σ-hole of the approaching acid yields only a minimal change in the strength of the XB to a base with a positive potential.

Factors contributing to halogen bond strength and stretch or contraction of internal covalent bond

The halogen bond formed by a series of Lewis acids TF₃X (T = C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb; X = Cl, Br, I) with NH₃ is studied by quantum chemical calculations. The interaction energy is closely mimicked by the depth of the σ-hole on the X atom as well as the full electrostatic energy. There is a first trend by which the hole is deepened if the T atom to which X is attached becomes more electron-withdrawing: C > Si > Ge > Sn > Pb. On the other hand, larger more polarizable T atoms are better able to transmit the electron-withdrawing power of the F substituents. The combination of these two opposing factors leaves PbF₃X forming the strongest XBs, followed by CF₃X, with SiF₃X engaging in the weakest bonds. The charge transfer from the NH₃ lone pair into the σ*(TX) antibonding orbital tends to elongate the covalent TX bond, and this force is largest for the heavier X and T atoms. On the other hand, the contraction of this bond deepens the σ-hole at the X atom, which would enhance both the electrostatic component and the full interaction energy. This bond-shortening effect is greatest for the lighter X atoms. The combination of these two opposing forces leaves the T-X bond contracting for X = Cl and Br, but lengthening for I.

Ability of Peripheral H Bonds to Strengthen a Halogen Bond

Quantum calculations study the manner in which the involvement of a halogen atom as a proton acceptor in one or more H bonds (HBs) affects the strength of the halogen bond (XB) it can form with a nucleophile aligned with the X σ-hole. A variety of Lewis acids wherein X = F, Cl, Br, and I are attached to a tetrel atom C or Ge engaged in a XB with nucleophile NH₃. One, two, and three HF molecules were positioned perpendicular to the XB axis so that they could form a HB to the X atom. Each such HB strengthened the XB by an increment of 1 kcal/mol or more that does not attenuate as each new HB is added, potentially increasing the interaction energy manyfold. Additionally, the presence of one or more HBs facilitates the formation of a XB by molecules which are reluctant to engage in such a bond in the absence of these auxiliary interactions. Even the F atom, which avoids such a XB, can be coaxed to participate in a XB of moderate strength by one or more of these external HBs.