Tarsometatarsal/Lisfranc joint

Morphologic analysis of the 1st and 2nd tarsometatarsal joint articular surfaces

Tarsometatarsal joint arthrodesis is used to treat a variety of injuries and deformities in the midfoot. However, the surgical technique has not been optimized, in part due to limited knowledge of morphologic features and variation in the related joints. Previous research has relied primarily on dissection-based anatomical analysis, but quantitative imaging may allow for a more sophisticated description of this complex. Here, we used quantitative micro-CT imaging to examine dimensions, distance maps, and curvature of the four articular surfaces in the first and second tarsometatarsal joints. Image segmentation, articular surface identification, and anatomic coordinate systems were all done with semi or fully automatic methods, and distance and size measurements were all taken utilizing these anatomic planes. Surface curvature was studied using Gaussian curvature and a newly defined measure of curvature similarity on the whole joint and on four subregions of each surface. These data show larger articular surfaces on the cuneiforms, rather than metatarsals, and define the generally tall and narrow articular surfaces seen in these joints. Curvature analysis shows minimally curved opposing convex surfaces. Our results are valuable for furthering knowledge of surgical anatomy in this poorly understood region of the foot.

Morphology of the Lisfranc Joint Complex

Lisfranc injuries are complicated injuries of the tarsometatarsal joint with high rates of sequelae. Both anatomy and injury of the Lisfranc joint are variably documented. Descriptions of these injuries and their associated structures vary greatly. The most injured structures are those of the Lisfranc joint complex, which involves the medial cuneiform, second and third metatarsals, and the dorsal, interosseous, and plantar Lisfranc ligaments. This study sought to examine morphology of the Lisfranc joint in cadavers. Twenty-two embalmed cadaveric feet were dissected (13 male, 9 female, 80.3 years ± 14.03) to isolate the bones and ligaments of the Lisfranc joint complex. The dorsal, interosseous, and plantar Lisfranc ligaments were present in each specimen. Each ligament was measured and morphology noted. The dissected dorsal Lisfranc ligament had consistent morphology (mean = 10.8 mm ± 1.79). The interosseous Lisfranc ligament had a consistent path, but 11/17 of specimens possessed a connection to the plantar Lisfranc ligament. The plantar Lisfranc ligament demonstrated wide variability with a Y-variant (n = 3) and a fan-shaped variant (n = 14). Ligament thickness was greatest in the interosseous Lisfranc ligament (mean = 13.74 ± 3.08) and least in the dorsal Lisfranc ligament (mean = 1.36 ± 0.42). While the objective of defining joint and ligament morphology was achieved, further questions were raised. Variations of the interosseous and plantar Lisfranc ligament may play a role in susceptibility to joint injury, and arthritic changes to the joints examined raise questions regarding the prevalence of arthritis in the uninjured Lisfranc joint.

Treatment of Lisfranc Injuries Using Interosseous Suture Button: A Retrospective Review of 84 Cases With a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up

Lisfranc fracture dislocation is an injury often encountered by the foot and ankle surgeon. This injury, depending on the severity and level of energy, has been shown to lead to posttraumatic osteoarthritis and chronic pain if undiagnosed or improperly managed. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the surgical repair with the use of an interosseous suture button for Lisfranc injuries with isolated ligamentous disruption. From 2008 through 2016, 104 patients were consecutively enrolled who underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the Lisfranc complex with a suture button and stabilization of the medial and intermediate cuneiform with a 4.0-mm screw. Eighty-four patients were available for a 3-year minimum follow-up. The mean return to full weightbearing was 11 days protected in a controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot. American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores improved from 30 and 8.4, respectfully, preoperatively to 90 and 1.3 postoperatively. The mean preoperative step-off between the second metatarsal base and intermediate cuneiform was found to be 3.15 mm. The immediate postreduction weightbearing radiograph measured 0.25 mm and 0.43 mm at the final follow-up evaluation, a difference that was found to be significant. There were no revision arthrodeses performed and no removal of the suture button during this time period. ORIF using an interosseous suture button appears to have an adequate medium-term patient satisfaction; however, there is evidence of minimal diastasis in some patients at 3 years postoperatively in ligamentous Lisfranc fracture dislocations.

Return to sport following Lisfranc injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Information regarding return rates (RR) and mean return times (RT) to sport following Lisfranc injuries remains limited.

METHODS

A systematic search of nine major databases was performed to identify all studies which recorded RR or RT to sport following lisfranc injuries.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included (n=366). For undisplaced (Stage 1) injuries managed nonoperatively (n=35), RR was 100% and RT was 4.0 (0-15) wks. For stable minimally-displaced (Stage 2) injuries managed nonoperatively (n=16), RR was 100% and RT was 9.1 (4-14) wks. For the operatively-managed injuries, Percutaneous Reduction Internal Fixation (PRIF) (n=42), showed significantly better RR and RT compared to both: Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) (n=139) (RR - 98% vs 78%, p<0.019; RT - 11.6 wks vs 19.6 wks, p<0.001); and Primary Partial Arthrodesis (PPA) (n=85) (RR - 98% vs 85%, p<0.047; RT - 11.6 wks vs 22.0 wks, p<0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Stage 1 and stable Stage 2 Lisfranc injuries show good results with nonoperative management. PRIF offers the best RR and RT from the operative methods, though this may not be possible with high-energy injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV. Systematic Review of Level I to Level IV Studies.

Tarsometatarsal joint complex injuries: A study of injury pattern in complete homolateral lesions

INTRODUCTION

Tarsometatarsal joint complex (TMC) is the anatomical structure of midfoot composed by metatarsals, tarsometatarsal (TMT) joints, cuneiforms, cuboid and navicular. TMC lesion are rare but critical since they cause severe disability if misdiagnosed. The knowledge of anatomic pattern of the lesion and biomechanics of the midfoot is the key for a successful diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to review a consecutive series of TMC injuries analyzing preoperative radiograph and CT scan to accurately define the pattern of ligament and bone injuries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed a series of 24 complete TMC injuries with homolateral dorsolateral dislocation. The total TMT joints involved were 120. We observed if the lesions were pure ligamentous or fracture-dislocation detecting the extent and the location of fractures. Twenty-nine lesions (24%) were pure dislocations and they were mainly localized in the first and fifth ray. The fracture-dislocations were 91 (76%) and 25 were fractures of the proximal row (cuneiforms and cuboid), 39 of the distal row (metatarsals), 27 of both the distal and proximal row.

RESULTS

Proximal fracture had a homogeneous distribution and they were more frequently simple than comminuted. Comminuted fractures were more frequent in the cuboid. In the proximal row, majority of partial articular fractures were localized in the dorsal side. Fracture-dislocations of the distal row were more frequent in the second metatarsal base (100%) and the partial articular fractures were always placed in the plantar side. In TMC injuries fracture-dislocations are more frequent than pure dislocations. Pure dislocations occur more often in the marginal rays that are characterized by weaker ligaments and larger mobility. The second ray, where there is the more stable joint of TMC, was never dislocated with a pure ligamentous lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

We suppose that plantar avulsion from the distal row and dorsal compression fracture of the proximal row is consistent with a direct force applied to the forefoot and direct dorsolaterally. The direction of the forces may explain why some fractures occur in the distal row, some in the proximal and some in both rows. The thickness of plantar ligaments may explain the frequency of plantar bone fragment avulsion.

Combined Innovative Portal Arthroscopy and Fluoroscopy-Assisted Reduction and Fixation in Subtle Injury of the Lisfranc Joint Complex: Analysis of 10 Cases

Subtle injuries of the Lisfranc joint complex are uncommon and difficult to diagnose clinically and thus are easily missed even by experienced orthopedic doctors. Misdiagnosed injuries can lead to chronic disability until eventual fusion surgery. We describe 10 cases diagnosed with subtle injury of the Lisfranc joint that were treated with combined innovative portal arthroscopy and fluoroscopy-assisted reduction and percutaneous screw fixation in an interfragmentary fashion. The distance between the first and second metatarsals (the Lisfranc distance) and that between the medial cuneiform and fifth metatarsal base (foot arch height) was measured before and after surgery. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society function score was evaluated perioperatively. The average preoperative and postoperative Lisfranc distance was 4.38 ± 0.39 mm and 2.68 ± 0.9 mm, the foot arch height was 12.63 ± 2.75 mm and 21.80 ± 3.50 mm, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 59.1 ± 5.69 and 86.8 ± 10.1, respectively. Of the 10 patients, 3 had excellent outcomes, 6 had good outcomes, and 1 had a fair outcome. In conclusion, we report a useful and minimally invasive surgery for acute, subacute, and even chronic subtle injury of the Lisfranc joint. The Lisfranc distance, foot arch height, and function of the foot were restored clinically, and all measurements showed statistically significant differences.

Immediate weightbearing after Lapidus arthrodesis with external fixation

A common surgical treatment of severe hallux abductovalgus deformity with coincident first ray hypermobility is metatarsal-cuneiform fusion or Lapidus procedure. The aim of the present study was to illustrate a reliable and novel method of fixation for Lapidus fusion using an external fixation device through a retrospective cohort investigation of consecutive patients. Twenty Lapidus fusions were performed in 19 patients, including 17 females (89.47%) and 2 males (10.53%). The mean age at surgery was 41 (range 20 to 64) years. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically pre- and postoperatively. The mean duration in the fixator was 12 (range 3 to 34) weeks. The mean interval to radiographic union was 9.2 (range 4.7 to 30.7) weeks in 18 of 20 feet (90%) and 2 (10%) were designated as nonunion. The mean follow-up period was 37 (range 5.6 to 211.1) weeks. The most common complication was pin tract infection in 5 patients (6 feet) and was treated with oral antibiotics; only 1 foot required early hardware removal. According to the visual analog scale, the mean patient pain score decreased significantly from 8.2 ± 2.7 to 0.83 ± 0.98 postoperatively (p < .001). Our results highlight that immediate weightbearing after Lapidus fusion with external fixation is a viable treatment option for the correction of severe hallux abductovalgus with associated hypermobility.