Congenital talotarsal joint displacement and pes planovalgus: evaluation, conservative management, and surgical management

Subtalar arthroereisis with metallic implant is a safe and effective treatment for pediatric patients with symptomatic flexible flatfeet. A 10-year clinical and radiographic follow-up

BACKGROUND

Subtalar arthroereisis (SA) is an increasingly applied minimally invasive approach for flexible flat foot (FFF) not responsive to conservative treatment. This study aimed at evaluating the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of SA in pediatric patients with symptomatic FFF.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients (11.9 ± 1.6yy) underwent SA (74 feet), with outcomes assessed after a mean 10-year follow-up. Pain, quality of life, foot functionality, and alignment were evaluated using validated tools and radiographic parameters, calculated on weightbearing x-rays pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes reached excellent postoperative results (FFI: 9.1, AOFAS: 94.5) with a low 0.9 NRS pain (p < 0.01) and a 92 % satisfaction. All radiographic parameters improved significantly towards normal values: CP 17.5 ± 3.9, MA 4.3 ± 5.8, TCA 42.8 ± 6.2, TNCA 21.1 ± 8.5, TNU% 26.6 ± 8.4 (all p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

SA with a metallic endosinotarsal device provided significant long-term clinical and radiographic improvements, with low complication rates and high patient satisfaction, supporting its efficacy as a treatment option for pediatric symptomatic FFF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Recurrent Talotarsal Joint Dislocation Using a Type II Extraosseous Talotarsal Stabilization Implant-A Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Collapsing foot deformity (CFD) and its resulting sequelae caused by recurring talotarsal joint dislocation (RTTJD) affects pediatric and adult patients. An extraosseous talotarsal stabilization (EOTTS) procedure, a subset of subtalar arthroereisis (SA) procedures, is recommended as a minimally invasive, first in-line surgical treatment option for CFD. The aim of this multicenter, retrospective study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes measures in patients who were treated for RTTJD with Type II EOTTS implants. Sixty-seven cases having a median age of 38 years (range: 10-74) with more than 5 years of follow-up were included in this study. The mean postoperative visual analog scale and Maryland Foot Score was 1.0 ± 1.9 and 92.3 ± 11.3, respectively, indicating excellent clinical outcomes. Subjectively, 88% cases reported as being satisfied with the outcome, 94% cases said they would recommend EOTTS, and 93% said that, if necessary, they would repeat it on their contralateral foot. A subgroup analysis revealed that while not statistically significant, clinical outcomes were slightly better in pediatric patients compared to adults. Implant removal rate was 4.5% (3 cases), and these were in the adult group only. Rate of minor issues such as pain, stiffness, discomfort, etc. was 15%; however, no serious adverse effects or complications were observed in any patient. This study suggests that EOTTS is an effective surgical treatment option wherein successful long-term clinical outcomes with low failure rates can be achieved in a select patient population.

Efficacy of Personalized Foot Orthoses in Children with Flexible Flat Foot: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Pediatric flat foot (PFF) is a very frequent entity and a common concern for parents and health professionals. There is no established definition, diagnostic method, or clear treatment approach. There are multiple conservative and surgical treatments, the implantation of foot orthoses (FO) being the most used treatment. The evidence supporting FO is very thin. It is not clearly known what the effect of these is, nor when it is convenient to recommend them. The main objective of this protocol is to design a randomized controlled trial to determine if personalized FO, together with a specific exercise regimen, produce the same or better results regarding the signs and symptoms of PFF, compared to only specific exercises. In order to respond to the stated objectives, we have proposed a randomized controlled clinical trial, in which we intend to evaluate the efficacy of FO together with strengthening exercises, compared to a control group in which placebos will be implanted as FO treatment along with the same exercises as the experimental group. For this, four measurements will be taken throughout 18 months (pre-treatment, two during treatment and finally another post-treatment measurement). The combination of FO plus exercise is expected to improve the signs and symptoms (if present) of PFF compared to exercise alone and the placebo FO group. In addition, it is expected that in both conditions the biomechanics of the foot will improve compared to the initial measurements.

Short Term Clinico-Radiological Outcome of Extra Osseous Talo-Tarsal Stabilization (EOTTS) in Flat Foot: An Indian Perspective

INTRODUCTION

Flexible flat foot is one of the most common foot conditions found amongst any age group across the world. One very important reason for this condition is the incongruency or partial dislocation of one or more joints within the talo-tarsal mechanism. This flexible talo-tarsal malalignment is termed as recurrent talo-tarsal joint dislocation (RTTJD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2016 and 2018, 32 patients were advised Extra osseous talo-tarsal stabilization (EOTTS) as a standalone procedure for RTTJD following detailed clinical examination including foot posture index (FPI) scoring and weight-bearing radiographic evaluation. Subjective assessment was done through Maryland Foot Score (MFS) questionnaire. Radiological parameters like talar declination angle, talar second metatarsal angle and tibio-calcaneal valgus angle were assessed for preoperative and postoperative comparison. 15 patients (20 feet) underwent surgery and rest 17 patients (25 feet) became our control group. A retrospective record analysis of longitudinal data was done over a period of 4 years. The purpose of this study is to depict the short-term results of EOTTS procedure in terms of functional and radiological improvement and compare it with the non-surgical group.

RESULT

Significant improvement was seen in MFS from 67.31 ± 16.04 to 95.47 ± 4.36 over a mean follow-up period of 30.66 ± 7.09 months. Total FPI improved by 96.83 ± 4.80% at final follow-up of EOTTS group. Radiologically, maximum correction achieved was in coronal plane (93.07 ± 30.05%).

CONCLUSION

EOTTS, as a standalone procedure improved the foot radiological angles and restored the normal foot biomechanics significantly in presence of competent spring ligament and posterior tibial tendon. This procedure resulted in excellent patient satisfaction score as assessed by MFS questionnaire.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Interference Screw for the Treatment of Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot

Flexible flatfoot is a common deformity in the pediatric population and can cause a range of symptoms and reduce the quality of life. Subtalararthroereisis may be appropriate for pediatric population whose conservative management had failed to relief their symptoms typically for at least 6 months. Subtalararthroereisis has been developed for a long time, but the use of interference screw for the treatment of pediatric flexible flatfoot has not been reported. From January, 2016 to June, 2017, we operated on 21 children (39 feet) between the ages of 8 and 14 years. The clinical assessment was based on the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hind-foot scale and the Chippaux-Smirak Index (CSI) measurements. And the anatomical parameters assessment was based on the radiographs and photographs. The postoperative AOFAS scores and CSI measurements were improved compared with preoperative AOFAS scores and CSI measurements. Postoperative anatomical parameters achieved significantly better results than preoperative anatomical parameters. In conclusion, the use of interference screw in subtalararthroereisis for the treatment of pediatric flexible flatfoot deformity is an effective, simple and minimally invasive solution.

Pediatric Flatfeet-A Disease Entity That Demands Greater Attention and Treatment

Background: Pediatric flatfoot is a common deformity. Unfortunately, the common opinion has been that most children with this faulty foot structure will simply out-grow it, despite no radiographic evidence to support this claim. Every step on a deformed foot leads to excessive tissue strain and further joint damage. Many forms of conservative and surgical treatments have been offered. This study was aimed at investigating the effectiveness of non-surgical and surgical treatment options. Main Text: faulty-foot structure is the leading cause of many secondary orthopedic deformities. A wide range of treatments for pediatric flatfeet have been recommended from the "do-nothing" approach, observation, to irreversible reconstructive surgery. Most forms of conservative care lack evidence of osseous realignment and stability. A conservative surgical option of extra-osseous talotarsal joint stabilization provides patients an effective form of treatment without the complications associated with other irreversible surgical procedures. Conclusion: Pediatric flatfeet should not be ignored or downplayed. The sooner effective treatment is prescribed, the less damage will occur to other parts of the body. When possible, a more conservative corrective procedure should be performed prior to irreversible, joint destructive options.