Biodynamics of hallux abductovalgus etiology and preoperative evaluation

Surgical interventions for treating hallux valgus and bunions

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus (lateral angulation of the great toe towards the lesser toes, commonly known as bunions) presents in 23% to 35% of the population. This condition leads to poor balance and increases the risk of falling, adding to the difficulty in fitting into shoes and pain. Conservative (non-surgical) interventions treating pain rather than curing deformity are usually first-line treatments. When surgery is indicated, the overall best surgical procedure is an ever-evolving topic of discussion.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of different types of surgery compared with placebo or sham surgery, no treatment, non-surgical treatments and other surgical interventions for adults with hallux valgus.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries to 20 April 2023. We did not apply any language or publication restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for treating hallux valgus compared to placebo surgery or sham surgery, no treatment, non-surgical treatment or other surgical interventions. The major outcomes were pain, function, quality of life, participant global assessment of treatment success, reoperation (treatment failure), adverse events and serious adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias and the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 studies involving 1597 participants with hallux valgus. All studies included adults and most were women. One study compared surgery (V-shaped osteotomy) with no treatment and with non-surgical treatment. Fifteen studies compared different surgical techniques, including a V-shaped osteotomy (Chevron osteotomy), to other types of osteotomy. Nine studies compared different simple osteotomy techniques to each other or to a mid-shaft Z-shaped osteotomy (Scarf osteotomy). Most trials were susceptible to bias: in particular, selection (80%), performance (88%), detection (96%) and selective reporting (64%) biases. Surgery versus no treatment Surgery may result in a clinically important reduction in pain. At 12 months, mean pain was 39 points (0 to 100 visual analogue scale, 100 = worst pain) in the no treatment group and 21 points in the surgery group (mean difference (MD) -18.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -26.14 to -9.86; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may result in a slight increase in function. At 12 months, mean function was 66 points (0 to 100 American Orthopedics Foot and Ankle Scale (AOFAS), 100 = best function) in the no treatment group and 75 points in the surgery group (MD 9.00, 95% CI 5.16 to 12.84; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may result in little to no difference in quality of life. At 12 months, mean quality of life (0 to 100 on 15-dimension scale, 100 = higher quality of life) was 93 points in both groups (MD 0, 95% CI -2.12 to 2.12; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may result in a slight increase in participant global assessment of treatment success. At 12 months, mean participant global assessment of treatment success was 61 points (0 to 100 visual analogue scale, 100 = completely satisfied) in the no treatment group and 80 points in the surgery group (MD 19.00, 95% CI 8.11 to 29.89; 1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). Evidence was downgraded for bias due to lack of blinding and imprecision. Surgery may have little effect on reoperation (relative effect was not estimable), adverse events (risk ratio (RR) 8.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 159.53; 1 study, 140 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and serious adverse events (relative effect was not estimable), but we are uncertain. Surgery versus non-surgical treatment Surgery may result in a clinically important reduction in pain; a slight increase in function and participant global assessment of treatment success; and little to no difference in quality of life (1 study, 140 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect on reoperation, adverse events and serious adverse events (1 study, 140 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Complex versus simple osteotomies Complex osteotomies probably result in little to no difference in pain compared with simple osteotomies (7 studies, 414 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Complex osteotomies may increase reoperation (7 studies, 461 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference in participant global assessment of treatment success (8 studies, 462 participants; low-certainty evidence) and serious adverse events (12 studies; data not pooled; low-certainty evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of complex osteotomies on function and adverse events (very low-certainty evidence). No study reported quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There were no trials comparing surgery to placebo or sham. Surgery may result in a clinically important reduction in pain when compared to no treatment or non-surgical treatment. Surgery may also result in a slight increase in function and participant global assessment of treatment success compared to no treatment or non-surgical treatment. There may be little to no difference in quality of life between surgery and no treatment or non-surgical treatment. We are uncertain about the effect of surgery on reoperation (treatment failure), adverse events or serious adverse events, when compared to no treatment or non-surgical treatment. Complex and simple osteotomies demonstrated similar results for pain. Complex osteotomies may increase reoperation (treatment failure) and may result in little to no difference in participant global assessment of treatment success and serious adverse events compared to simple osteotomies. We are uncertain about the effect of complex osteotomies on function, quality of life and adverse events.

Modified Scarf Osteotomy with Medial Capsular Interposition Combined with Metatarsal Shortening Offset Osteotomy: A Comparison of Patients with Noninflammatory Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Foot

BACKGROUND

Patients who have noninflammatory arthritis of the feet may develop destructive changes on the first metatarsal head and painful dislocation of the metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint of 1 or more lesser toes. This aim of this study was to compare feet with noninflammatory arthritis and those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with respect to the clinical and radiographic outcomes after treatment of these destructive deformities with a modified Scarf osteotomy with medial capsular interposition into the newly formed first MTP joint, combined with metatarsal shortening offset osteotomy.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study of 93 feet (31 with noninflammatory arthritis and 62 with RA) was performed. Hallux and lesser-toe scores on the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scoring system, a self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q), and preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were significant improvements at the time of the final follow-up in the mean scores on the hallux and lesser-toe scales of the JSSF system and in the SAFE-Q score. The postoperative JSSF lesser-toes function score was better for the feet with noninflammatory arthritis feet than the feet with RA. There was no significant difference in the hallux valgus angle (HVA) between 1 month postoperatively and the final follow-up for both groups. Furthermore, the HVA showed a strong correlation between the 1-month and final follow-up values.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of the modified Scarf osteotomy with medial capsular interposition and shortening metatarsal offset osteotomy was useful and safe in feet with noninflammatory arthritis. The HVA at 1 month after surgery is useful to predict the HVA within 5 years after surgery. The postoperative clinical score for the lesser toes was better in the feet with noninflammatory arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Radiographic Analysis on the Distortion of the Anatomy of First Metatarsal Head in Dorsoplantar Projection

Background: The diagnostic of flat and crest-shaped of first metatarsal heads has been associated as an important risk factor for hallux deformities, such as hallux valgus and hallux rigidus. The rounded form of the first metatarsal head on the dorsoplantar radiograph of the foot has been believed to be associated with the development of hallux valgus. Purpose: The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of tube angulation on the distortion of first metatarsal head shape, and verify the real shape of the metatarsal head in anatomical dissection after an X-ray has been taken. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study at Universidad Complutense de Madrid, from December 2016 to June 2019, 103 feet from embalmed cadavers were included. We performed dorsoplantar radiograph tube angulation from 0° until 30° every 5° on all specimens; then, two observers verified the shape of the first metatarsal head in the radiographs and after its anatomic dissection. Kappa statistics and McNemar Bowker tests were used to assess and test for intra and interobserver agreement of metatarsal shape. Results: We calculated the intraobserver agreement, and the results showed that the first metatarsal head is distorted and crested only when the angle of the X-ray beam is at 20° of inclination (p < 0.001). The interobserver agreement showed good agreement at 0°, 5°, 10°, 20°, and 25° and was excellent at 30° (p < 0.001). Conclusion: All of the studies that we identified in the literature state that there are three types of shapes of the first metatarsal head and relate each type of head to the diagnosis of a foot pathology, such as hallux valgus or hallux rigidus. This study demonstrates that there is only the round-shaped form, and not three types of metatarsal head shape. Therefore, no diagnoses related to the shape of the first metatarsal head can be made.

A new minimally extended distal Chevron osteotomy (MEDCO) with percutaneous soft tissue release (PSTR) for treatment of moderate hallux valgus

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of moderate hallux valgus (HV) onwards by Chevron osteotomy and all variants described to date including the recent extended distal Chevron osteotomy (EDCO), yields improvable outcome but with recurrence rate. A new modification of this technique is needed to achieve better results.

METHODS

34 consecutive female patients suffering from moderate HV underwent a new minimally extended distal Chevron osteotomy (MEDCO) with percutaneous soft tissue release (PSTR). Outcome was assessed using pre-post operative VAS-Pain, AOFAS Hallux Score and radiological measurements. Mean age was 53.7 years, follow-up 2.7 years and satisfaction score 8.

RESULTS

VAS improved from 7 to 1 (p < 0.001) and AOFAS score from 64 to 90.7 (p < 0.001). Comparing postoperative HV and intermetatarsal (IM) angles of previous studies (either employing a Chevron osteotomy alone or a double Chevron-Akin) with our results, an improvement from 15.6/14.8 to 9.1 and 8.2 /8.8 to 5.6 respectively (p < 0.05) was achieved. Complication and recurrence rates were both 5.8%, lower than the documented rates of other techniques.

CONCLUSION

The modified technique in the present study was found to be a more effective and reliable method of correcting hallux valgus when compared to other previous procedures. It provides a higher level of satisfaction and excellent outcomes with low complication and recurrence rates. Furthermore, the percutaneous lateral incision improved the cosmetic results by avoiding formation of a dorsal first web space scar. Medial incision is also shorter than the one used for EDCO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Sesamoid malalignment in hallux valgus: Radiographic and MRI measurements and their correlation with internal derangement findings of the first metatarsophalangeal joint

OBJECTIVE

Sesamoid displacement (SD) and rotation are important components in the preoperative assessment of hallux valgus (HV). To date, Inter reader reliability (IRR) of SD on X-rays and MRI, correlations with hallux valgus angle (HVA), and qualitative changes of the hallux-sesamoid complex (HSC) on MRI have not been studied. The aim of this study was to correlate sesamoid malalignment with HV severity and findings of internal joint derangement.

METHODS

Two readers analyzed a series of 56 consecutive patients who had X-rays and MRI performed on the same foot within 3 months of each other. Multiple measures of SD on X-rays and MRI and the sesamoid rotation angle (SRA) on MRI were assessed and correlated with HVA and various qualitative features at the HSC including cartilage, plantar plate, and collateral ligament abnormalities.

RESULTS

We found excellent IRR (ICC = 0.79 - 0.99) for SRA on MR, but poor IRR for lateral sesamoid displacement (LDS) and tibial sesamoid position (TSP) scales on both modalities. Good IRR was also seen for morphologic abnormalities of HSC. The absolute value of the SRA on MR positively correlated with HVA ( p < 0.0001). LDS and TSP on both modalities lacked a significant correlation with HVA ( p > 0.05). No correlation was found between any measure of SD or rotation with HSC morphologic changes ( p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among different measures of sesamoid malalignment, sesamoid rotation angle measured on MRI can be used to judge the severity of HV; however, it does not correlate with qualitative morphologic abnormalities of the HSC.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The MRI measurement of SRA is a better indicator of sesamoid displacement relative to the HSC than standard AP radiographic measures of non-rotational sesamoid displacement; however, it should not be used to predict qualitative morphologic abnormalities of the HSC.