Arthroscopic Treatment of Ankle Arthritis

Arthroscopic Treatment of Anterior Ankle Impingement

Arthroscopic reduction of tibiotalar osteophytes results in good to excellent results in the vast majority of patients. Pain is primarily due to synovial hypertrophy and anterior tibiotalar entrapment associated with the osteophytes. Osteophytes may be due to repetitive trauma such as sports, or associated with subtle or overt ankle instability. A minimally invasive approach results in rapid recovery and less risk than open interventions. In cases where anterior osteophytes have coexisting ankle instability and in many cases ancillary procedures such as ankle stabilization are performed.

Arthroscopy and Micronized Allogenic Cartilage Matrix Grafting for a Missed Talus Nonunion: A Case Report

CASE

A 33-year-old man who had experienced polytraumatic injury from a motorcycle collision 5 months previously presented to the clinic with right ankle pain. On physical examination, anterior ankle tenderness was present, and imaging revealed a previously unrecognized nondisplaced talar body fracture with a chondral defect. The patient underwent arthroscopy of the right ankle, which influenced the senior author to perform a medial malleolar osteotomy and subsequent open reduction internal fixation with micronized allogenic cartilage matrix.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopy provides valuable information for the surgical planning of talar nonunions, and allogenic cartilage matrix graft may provide benefit with associated chondral defects.

[The role of arthroscopy in diagnostics and treatment of arthritis of the ankle joint]

The arthroscopic treatment of arthritis of the ankle joint is very limited and is only indicated for early stages of arthritis with impingement, strictly localized forms and more for young patients. The most important aim of arthroscopy is to improve the range of motion (ROM) of the ankle by removal of bony projections (dorsal and ventral) and an extensive synovectomy with debridement. In cases of narrowing of the joint space to less than 2 mm and/or malalignment, the indications for arthroscopy should be considered very cautiously. This is independent of the localization of the narrowing, especially if the complete joint is affected. If necessary, arthroscopy can then be carried out as an additional intervention in cases of conversion osteotomy in order to improve the ROM.

Infinity ankle arthroplasty with traditional instrumentation and PSI prophecy system: preliminary results

Ankle arthrodesis has been considered the surgical Gold Standard for advanced ankle arthritis; prosthetic replacement of the tibio-talar joint played a secondary role.The introduction of last generation ankle prostheses lead to better outcome and a lower rate of complication. PSI represents the most recent innovations introduced on the market of ankle arthroplasty:PSI is proposed as a surgical technique capable of making ankle arthroplasty more accurate and more reproducible compared to standard referencing guides Aim of the study is to report early clinical and radiographic outcomes obtained from a single surgeon experience by implanting the same ankle prosthesis using a standard (STD) or a PSI instrumentation Unlike no difference in the average increment of normalized sub score related to function in each group (PSI vs STD), the analysis of normalized pain sub score pointed out a greater average improvement in the PSI group(+75%)compared to the STD group(+62%);this result has been adovacated to the absence of post operative gutter impingement syndrome in the PSI group compared to the STD referencing group. The analysis of radiographic angles revealed a more accurate and reproducible positioning of the components in the PSI group; ankle arthroplasty performed with PSI reported a reduction of both surgical times and the need of intraop.fluoroscopy. PSI ankle arthroplasty achived more accurate and reproducible clinical and radiographic results compared to STD instrumentation;long-term follow-up are needed to demonstrate whether a better positioning of the implant is associated with an increased survival of the prosthesis and therefore justifies the additional costs of PSI.