Management of Calcaneal Fracture Malunion with Bone Block Distraction Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Staged Ilizarov distraction histogenesis and corrective reconstruction for severe malunited calcaneal fractures

PURPOSE

Severe calcaneal malunion is a clinical conundrum for the difficulty of calcaneal reconstruction without soft tissue complications. The aim of this study is to introduce the treatment strategy and preliminary results of staged Illizarov distraction histogenesis and corrective reconstruction for severe malunion of calcaneal fractures.

METHODS

From June 2014 to May 2020, 14 patients with severe calcaneal malunion treated with the staged strategy were retrospectively analyzed. At the first stage, calcaneal osteotomy and external fixation with Ilizarov frame were performed. The restoration of the approximate configuration of calcaneus and the expansion of contractural soft tissue were achieved by gradual calcaneal distraction. At the second stage, corrective reconstruction was performed and autogenous iliac crest bone graft was used. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at final follow-up.

RESULTS

The average time of Ilizarov distraction and total fixation was 21.4 days and 41.0 days at first-stage treatment. At a mean follow-up of 33.1 months, the average American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle and hindfoot score increased significantly from 24.0 to 72.4 (p < 0.01). And the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) score had improved remarkably from 8.2 to 2.4 (p < 0.01). Radiographs showed that talocalcaneal height, calcaneal width, calcaneal tuberosity height, hindfoot alignment angle, and talar declination angle were improved to a great extent (p < 0.01). Only one patient had minor pin site infection at first-stage treatment and one got superficial wound infection after second-stage surgery. No wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, or deep infection occurred.

CONCLUSION

Staged Ilizarov distraction histogenesis and corrective reconstruction is a safe and effective treatment strategy for reducing soft tissue complications and improving reconstruction results in surgical correction of severe calcaneal malunion.

Subtalar distraction arthrodesis for calcaneal malunion - comparison of structural freeze-dried versus autologous iliac bone graft

BACKGROUND

This study aims to analyze the outcomes of subtalar distraction arthrodesis (SDA) for calcaneal malunion using structural freeze-dried iliac allograft (FDIA) compared to using autologous iliac bone (AIB).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 57 consecutive cases (51 patients) of calcaneal malunion between March 2006 and December 2017. All patients were followed for an average of 22.8 months. All cases were treated by SDA using structural FDIA (17 cases, group 1), or AIB (40 cases, group 2). The outcome measures included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, and radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative 3, 6, and 12 months of AOFAS scores and VAS pain score were significantly better in group 2 than those in group 1 (p < 0.05, for all). There were 3 cases (17.6%) of nonunion in the group 1, whereas the group 2 had 2 cases (5.0%), which did not shown significant difference between two groups (p = 0.492). Although the mean pre-, postoperative, and final follow-up radiologic parameters in both groups were similar, (p > 0.05, for all) the difference of talocalcaneal height, talocalcaneal angle, and talar declination angle from postoperative to final follow-up were significantly bigger in the group 1. (p < 0.05, for all).

CONCLUSION

Although union rate was not significantly different between the two groups, we obtained more favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes in the autologous iliac bone group. Using FDIA without any orthobiological agent for SDA, there were significant more loss of radiological parameters due to inferior incorporation and biomechanical properties. When considering the SDA for calcaneal malunion, routine use of FDIA without any orthobiological agents as an interpositional graft for SDA is not recommended.