The Goldilocks problem: Healthcare delivery models for children with medical complexity

Care Models and Discharge Services for Children With Medical Complexity

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Children with medical complexity (CMC) are high health care utilizers prompting hospitals to implement care models focused on this population, yet practices have not been evaluated on a national level. Our objective with this study is to describe the presence and structure of care models and the use of discharge services for CMC admitted to freestanding children's hospitals across the nation.

METHODS

We distributed an electronic survey to 48 hospitals within the Pediatric Health Information System exploring the availability of care models and discharge services for CMC. Care models were grouped by type and number present at each institution. Discharge services were grouped by low (never, rarely), medium (sometimes), and high (most of the time, always) frequency use.

RESULTS

Of 48 eligible hospitals, 33 completed the survey (69%). There were no significant differences between responders and non-responders for both hospital and patient characteristics. Most participants identified an outpatient care model (67%), whereas 21% had no dedicated care model for CMC in the inpatient or outpatient setting. High-frequency discharge services included durable medical equipment delivery, medication delivery, and communication with outpatient provider before discharge. Low-frequency discharge services included the use of a structured handoff tool for outpatient communication, personalized access plans, inpatient team follow-up with family after discharge, and the use of discharge checklists.

CONCLUSIONS

Children's hospitals vary largely in care model structure and discharge services. Future work is needed to evaluate the associations between care models and discharge services for CMC with various health care outcomes.

Provision of care for children with medical complexity in tertiary hospitals in England: qualitative interviews with health professionals

BACKGROUND

Due to medical and technological advancements, children with medical complexity are a growing population. Although previous research has identified models of care and experiences when caring for this population, the majority are the USA or Canadian based. Therefore, the aim was to identify models of care for children with medical complexity and barriers and facilitators to delivering high-quality care for this population from a 'free at point of care' national health service.

METHOD

Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with hospital clinicians across England and analysed using a thematic framework approach.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven clinicians from 11 hospital sites were interviewed. In 6 of the hospital sites, there were 14 services identified. Majority of services had a variety of components, some shared and some unique to the individual service. Clinicians faced barriers and facilitators when caring for this population as demonstrated across five categories.

CONCLUSIONS

There is limited guidance and evidence on the most effective and efficient models for providing care for this population. It is not possible to determine what a service should look like as there is no consensus on the most appropriate model of care as shown in this study. Due to their complex needs, this population require coordination to ensure high standards of care. However, this was not always possible as clinicians faced barriers such as time constraints, silo thinking and a lack of available housing.

Is it too complex? A survey of pediatric residency program's educational approach for the care of children with medical complexity

BACKGROUND

Although Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) regarding pediatric training in care for children with medical complexity (CMC) exist, it is unknown what US pediatric training programs provide for education related to care of CMC and whether educators perceive that pediatric residents are prepared to care for CMC upon graduation.

METHODS

From June, 2021 through March 2022, we surveyed US pediatric residency program delegates about practice settings, current educational offerings, perception of resident preparedness regarding care of CMC, and likelihood to implement CMC education in the future.

RESULTS

Response rate was 29% (56 /195). A third of responding programs (34%, n = 19) provide a specific educational CMC offering including combinations of traditional didactics (84%, n = 16), asynchronous modules/reading (63%, n = 12), experiential learning (58%, n = 11), and simulation-based didactics (26%, n = 5). The majority (93%, n = 52) of respondents agreed residents should be competent in providing primary care for CMC upon graduation and CMC should receive primary care from a resident (84%, n = 47). A total of 49% (n = 27) of respondents reported their residents are very or extremely well prepared to care for CMC after graduation. A total of 33% (n = 18) of programs reported CMC receive primary care from residents. Respondent average perception of resident preparedness was significantly higher in programs with educational offerings in five of eleven EPAs (nutrition and weight, transitions, feeding tubes, advocacy, and care coordination). The majority (78%, n = 29) of programs without educational offerings are at least somewhat likely to implement CMC curricula in the next three years.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric residency programs report residents should be competent in care for CMC upon graduation. Pediatric residents are exposed to a wide variety of clinical care models for CMC. The minority of responding programs have intentional CMC educational offerings. Of those programs that provide CMC education, the offerings are variable and are associated with a perception of improved preparedness to care for CMC upon graduation.