Sculptra: the New Three-Dimensional Filler

A new nonsurgical combination approach for skin tightening and remodeling; Endoskin-A comparative study

INTRODUCTION

This article introduces a novel nonsurgical skin tightening and remodeling approach termed Endoskin, which combines internal laser therapy (1470 nm Diode laser) with injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA). The internal laser targets the superficial fat layer, stimulating collagen production and cellular rejuvenation, leading to gradual skin tightening and improved elasticity. Simultaneously, PLLA promotes collagen synthesis, strengthening the skin's foundation and restoring volume. This comprehensive exploration delves into Endoskin's mechanisms, clinical applications, and its differentiation from traditional methods.

METHODS

The study encompassed 234 participants, categorized into two groups: Group A received internal laser treatment and Group B received the combined Endoskin treatment. Patient satisfaction, assessed using a Likert scale unveiled significantly higher levels in Group B. Dermatologists, blinded to treatment details, also expressed greater satisfaction with the combination treatment outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The ensuing discussion emphasizes the synergistic effects of internal laser therapy and PLLA, presenting a multifaceted approach to skin rejuvenation. The study results underscore Endoskin's efficacy, safety, and its potential as a nonsurgical option for skin tightening and remodeling. The gradual and harmonious transformation aligns with natural aging, positioning Endoskin as an appealing choice for those seeking subtle yet impactful changes.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Endoskin demonstrates notable efficacy, reliability, and safety in achieving skin rejuvenation. Although further research is warranted to assess its long-term effects, the current findings position Endoskin as a promising option with a significantly higher level of overall patient and dermatologist satisfaction compared to internal laser treatment alone.

MRI in the evaluation of facial dermal fillers in normal and complicated cases

OBJECTIVES

To ascertain by MRI the presence of filler injected into facial soft tissue and characterize complications by contrast enhancement.

METHODS

Nineteen volunteers without complications were initially investigated to study the MRI features of facial fillers. We then studied another 26 patients with clinically diagnosed filler-related complications using contrast-enhanced MRI. TSE-T1-weighted, TSE-T2-weighted, fat-saturated TSE-T2-weighted, and TIRM axial and coronal scans were performed in all patients, and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed TSE-T1-weighted scans were performed in complicated patients, who were then treated with antibiotics. Patients with soft-tissue enhancement and those without enhancement but who did not respond to therapy underwent skin biopsy. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

MRI identified and quantified the extent of fillers. Contrast enhancement was detected in 9/26 patients, and skin biopsy consistently showed inflammatory granulomatous reaction, whereas in 5/17 patients without contrast enhancement, biopsy showed no granulomas. Fisher's exact test showed significant correlation (p < 0.001) between subcutaneous contrast enhancement and granulomatous reaction. Cervical lymph node enlargement (longitudinal axis >10 mm) was found in 16 complicated patients (65 %; levels IA/IB/IIA/IIB).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is a useful non-invasive tool for anatomical localization of facial dermal filler; IV gadolinium administration is advised in complicated cases for characterization of granulomatous reaction.

KEY POINTS

• MRI is a non-invasive tool for facial dermal filler detection and localization. • MRI-criteria to evaluate complicated/non-complicated cases after facial dermal filler injections are defined. • Contrast-enhanced MRI detects subcutaneous inflammatory granulomatous reaction due to dermal filler. • 65 % patients with filler-related complications showed lymph-node enlargement versus 31.5 % without complications. • Lymph node enlargement involved cervical levels (IA/IB/IIA/IIB) that drained treated facial areas.

Optimizing Injectable Poly-L-Lactic Acid Administration for Soft Tissue Augmentation: The Rationale for Three Treatment Sessions

BACKGROUND

The availability and variety of different injectable modalities has led to a dramatic increase in soft tissue augmentation procedures in recent years. Injectable poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is a synthetic, biodegradable polymer device approved in the United States for use in immunocompetent patients as a single regimen of up to four treatment sessions for correction of shallow to deep nasolabial fold contour deficiencies and other facial wrinkles. Injectable PLLA is also approved for restoration and/or correction of signs of facial fat loss (lipoatrophy) in individuals with HIV.

METHODS

The present article provides an overview of previous studies with injectable PLLA, and specifically focuses on the number of recommended treatment sessions and intervals between treatment sessions. The authors also provide two case studies to support their recommendations for an average of three treatment sessions.

RESULTS

Although the specific mechanisms remain hypothetical, injections of PLLA are believed to cause a cascade of cellular events that lead to collagen repair and subsequent restoration of facial volume. Because the development of a response to injectable PLLA is gradual and its duration of effect is long lasting, sufficient time between treatment sessions should be allocated to avoid overcorrection.

CONCLUSION

Studies of injectable PLLA support the hypothesized mode of operation, and the experience and clinical recommendations of the authors that suggest that three treatment sessions are an optimal regimen for use of injectable PLLA in the majority of patients.

Impact on facial rejuvenation with dermatological preparations

The treatment options for facial rejuvenation using dermatological, nonsurgical techniques have dramatically increased in the past 10 years. This follows the introduction of botulinum toxin and a variety of dermal fillers. The public interest in noninvasive treatments has changed the market beyond recognition with more physicians involved in providing services to satiate the demand. The impact on the public and medical profession is discussed.

[Fillers. An overview]

The demand for minimally invasive cosmetic procedures is increasing rapidly every year. In addition to botulinum toxin and laser treatments, the injection of dermal fillers is one of the most relevant methods. Dermal fillers can be used for a multitude of indications: wrinkles (fine to deep), lip augmentation, facial deformities, sunken scars, and HIV-related lipoatrophy in hands, neck and décolleté. There are currently 160 dermal fillers on the market. They differ greatly in terms of origin (own or cadaveric-derived, animal, bacterial fermentation or synthesis), duration of the effect and breakdown properties (temporary, semi-permanent, permanent), injection depth (dermal, subcutaneous, supraperiosteal), and risk profile. Physicians who administer dermal fillers should have a thorough knowledge of their characteristics and of the anatomy of the area to be treated. This is essential for correct administration and optimal aesthetic results. Prior to any treatment, details of the procedure, the desired effects, durability, and potential risks of the filler to be injected should be discussed with the patient. The choice of dermal filler, the injection technique, and the volume to be administered are determined according to the anatomic site, the type of defect, the desired effect, and physician experience.

Advances in minimally invasive facial rejuvenation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current cosmetic surgical practice for facial rejuvenation has undergone a significant change due to the introduction of technologies to improve the age-associated changes of the face. The most widely adopted methods of minimally invasive facial rejuvenation include the use of neuromuscular blocking agents and injectable fillers. The topic of minimally invasive procedures might include a variety of subjects including nutritional and hormonal modulation, light-based and laser-based therapies, minimal incision surgical procedures, as well as the use of botulinum toxin and fillers. The focus of this study will be on the minimally invasive facial rejuvenation efforts achieved by injection techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Botulinum A neurotoxin has been shown to be effective in the reduction of hyperfunctional lines in the upper and lower face. Anatomic areas that have been found to benefit include the glabella, the forehead, the periorbital area, lips, and the platysma muscle. The more recently introduced hyaluronic acid and other injectable fillers are receiving increasing usage. These temporary fillers have been found to improve creases and wrinkles, augment deep nasolabial folds, augment thin lips, and improve hollowing in the periorbital and other depressions and deformities.

SUMMARY

There has been a significant paradigm shift in the field of rejuvenation surgery. Injectable minimally invasive methods have been offered to remedy age-related and other acquired deformities of the head and neck region. These methods have provided temporary correction of undesirable characteristic that were traditionally approached with more invasive surgically oriented modalities.