Bariatric Surgery and Work-Up of the Massive Weight Loss Patient

Predictive Value of Nutritional Markers for Wound Healing Complications in Bariatric Patients Undergoing Panniculectomy

BACKGROUND

Hypoproteinemia and nutritional deficiencies are common after bariatric surgery, and although massive weight loss (MWL) patients experience increased wound complication rates, the association has not been causatively determined.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated preoperative nutritional parameters and wound complications in MWL patients (postbariatric and diet-controlled) undergoing panniculectomy at 2 academic institutions.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-one consecutive patients undergoing elective panniculectomy after bariatric surgery or diet-controlled weight loss were identified. Patient demographics and nutritional indices (serum protein, albumin, and micronutrient levels) were analyzed. Complications including wound separation, infection, and operative debridements were compared. Post hoc comparisons tested for correlation between complications and nutritional markers.

RESULTS

Postbariatric patients lost an average of 151 lb and presented at an average of 32 months after gastric bypass. Diet-controlled weight loss patients lost an average of 124 lb. Despite MWL, albumin levels were higher in the bariatric group (3.8 vs 3.4 g/dL, P < 0.05). Conversely, bariatric patients experienced increased wound complications (27% vs 14%; P < 0.05). Factors which were found to correlate to increased risk of wound dehiscence and infection were elevated body mass index at time of panniculectomy and amount of tissue removed. Multivariate analysis did not show serum albumin or percent weight loss to independently predict complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric patients presenting for elective operations are at risk for protein and micronutrient deficiency. Despite aggressive replacement and normalization of nutritional markers, bariatric patients experience increased wound complications when compared to nonbariatric patients and traditional measures of nutritional evaluation for surgery may be insufficient in bariatric patients.

Panniculectomy Combined with Bariatric Surgery by Laparotomy: An Analysis of 325 Cases

Surgical treatment of obese patients is much debated in the literature because of the significant intraoperative risks related to comorbidities presented by this type of patients. Recent literature suggests that panniculectomy should follow bariatric surgery after the patient's weight loss has been stabilized. However, when performed by laparotomy, bariatric surgery can be combined with panniculectomy. This paper presents the analysis of 325 cases of patients undergoing abdominal panniculectomy combined with bariatric surgery. The study highlights the risks, complications, and benefits of the combined procedure and describes a standardized technique for excision of a large abdominal panniculus in a short operating time.

Preoperative evaluation of the body contouring patient: the cornerstone of patient safety

The obesity pandemic has resulted in increasing cases of bariatric surgery and subsequent issues related to excess skin and laxity for patients. This patient population requires unique insight and consideration as part of the preoperative evaluation. Nutritional derangements are common, psychosocial issues are prevalent, and the sequelae of past and present medical conditions can all affect surgical planning and outcomes. This article familiarizes the plastic surgeon with the issues of the body contouring candidate and provides tools that may assist in surgical planning.

"Supersize" panniculectomy: indications, technique, and results

BACKGROUND

Obesity remains a significant health problem associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Panniculectomy in the obese patient population aims at treating complications related to excess abdominal skin in an attempt to improve quality of life, increase mobility, and potentially prepare the patient for subsequent bariatric surgery or enrollment in a weight-loss program. We describe the indications and outcomes of "supersize" panniculectomy in the extreme obesity patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Duke University institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review of patients who underwent a "supersize" panniculectomy by a single surgeon during a 6-year period was conducted. Data on patient demographics, operative indication, preoperative imaging, concomitant operations, and postoperative complications were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients underwent a "supersize" panniculectomy for indications including immobility secondary to excess abdominal skin, panniculitis, ventral hernia, and presence of a gynecologic tumor. The mean pannus resection weight was 15.6 kg and the mean follow-up was 15.7 months. Twelve patients underwent preoperative abdominal computed tomographic imaging. Eleven patients underwent concomitant surgical procedures at the time of their panniculectomy. The overall wound complication rate for the "supersize" panniculectomy was 42.3% (11/26 patients). However, the rate of major complications, defined as those complications requiring a return to the operating room, was only 11.5% (3/26 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

"Supersize" panniculectomy is defined as a panniculectomy in the obese patient population with a resected pannus specimen weight greater than or equal to 10 kg, and a pannus formation that extends to the mid-thigh level or below. Despite the obstacles and reported high complication rates, the incidence of major complications in this series justifies the operative intervention in patients with an otherwise therapy-resistant "supersize" pannus. A preoperative computed tomographic imaging may rule out an underlying hernia in most cases and is recommended by the authors.

Early and long-term clinical outcomes of bilio-intestinal diversion in morbidly obese patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the early and long-term postoperative results of malabsorptive surgery in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2007, 102 morbidly obese patients were referred to the Department of Surgery "Pietro Valdoni", "Sapienza" University of Rome, Policlinico "Umberto I°", Rome, Italy for malabsorptive surgery. All patients underwent derivative biliodigestive surgery after they had been reviewed by a team of surgeons, physicians, dieticians, and psychologists.

RESULTS

There were no intra-operative complications, but two patients suffered postoperative pulmonary embolisms, which resolved with medical treatment. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7 days, with no early or late mortality. Maximum weight loss was reached 12-24 months after surgery, while the mean percentage excess weight loss at 3-5 years ranged from 45 to 64 %. Specific postoperative complications in the first 2 years after surgery were abdominal abscess (n = 2), gastroduodenal reflux (n = 4), and incisional hernia (n = 6). Diabetes resolved in 98 % of the diabetic patients within a few weeks after surgery and blood pressure normalised in 86.4 % of those who had had hypertension preoperatively. Obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity hypoventilation syndrome also improved significantly in 92 % of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Morbidly obese patients can undergo biliodigestive surgery safely with good long-term weight loss and quality of life expectancy.

Permanence of molecular features of obesity in subcutaneous adipose tissue of ex-obese subjects

OBJECTIVE

Bariatric surgery represents a powerful tool for morbid obesity treatment. However, after stabilization of weight loss that follows surgical interventions, ex-obese patients face the problem of residual tissues removal. Actually, it is unknown whether the characteristics of this residual subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) are 'restored' with regard to molecular and morphological features.

DESIGN

To clarify this issue, we compared the SAT gene expression profile of ex-obese patients (ExOB-SAT, mean body mass index (BMI): 27.2±1.3 kg m(-2)) with that of lean (normal weight, NW-SAT, mean BMI: 22.6±1.1 kg m(-2)), overweight (OW-SAT, BMI: 27.65±0.2 kg m(-2)) and obese patients, according to BMI classes (OB1-SAT: 30 > or = BMI < or = 34.9, OB2-SAT: 35 > or = BMI < or = 39.9, OB3-SAT: BMI > or = 40).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 58 samples of SAT were collected during surgical interventions. Gene expression levels were assessed by microarrays and significant genes were validated by RT-qPCR. Adipocyte hypertrophy, inflammatory infiltration and fibrosis were assessed by morphological techniques.

RESULTS

Global gene expression in ExOB-SAT was closely related to gene expression of OB3-SAT by hierarchical clustering procedures, in spite of different BMI. Metallothioneins (MT1A and MT2A) were the key over-expressed genes in both groups. At morphologic level, adipocyte hypertrophy and inflammatory infiltration improved after weight loss in ExOB-SAT, despite a persistence of fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results demonstrate that SAT gene expression is not fully restored, even after an extensive and stable weight loss. The persistence of 'obesity molecular features' in ExOB-SAT suggests that the molecular signature of adipose tissue is not solely dependent on weight loss and may need longer time period to completely disappear.

Central Venous Line Placement prior to Gastric Bypass Improves Operating Room Efficiency

Background. Bariatric surgery has increased across America. Venous access is difficult in these patients. Anesthesiologists often utilize valuable operating room (OR) time acquiring reliable intravenous lines. Our objective was to determine if outpatient central venous line (CVL) placement improves OR efficiency and professional reimbursement for CVL insertion. Methods. In our bariatric practice, selected surgery patients have outpatient CVLs placed during prophylactic vena cava filter placement. In a cohort of 268 gastric bypass patients operated between 1/01 and 11/06, we compared time-to-incision between 106 with pre-established CVLs and 162 without. In addition, we determined professional compensation rates for CVLs placed outpatient versus CVLs inserted in the OR. Results. Patients with preoperative (outpatient) CVLs required 35.6 ± 12.5 minutes to skin incision compared with 42.5 ± 13.9 minutes for controls (P < 0.0001), and 34.9% had skin incision in <30 minutes compared with 16.4% of controls. Radiologists collected 28.2% of outpatient billings for CPT code 36556, compared with anesthesiologists who collected <1% when placing CVLs in the OR. Conclusions. Outpatient CVLs prior to gastric bypass improve efficiency in the OR with earlier skin incision. Professional reimbursement is better for outpatient CVLs than intraoperative inpatient CVLs.

Biomechanical properties of skin in massive weight loss patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess skin strength in MWL patients relative to control cosmetic abdominoplasty patients biophysically, biochemically, and histologically. Growing success of weight loss programs has brought about an increase in the MWL population. Skin quality is thought to be impaired by MWL, but there are no compelling studies that have fully addressed the structural mechanisms involved.

METHODS

Skin from the medial and lateral abdomen was harvested fresh from patients undergoing cosmetic abdominoplasty (n = 6) or abdominal panniculectomy for MWL (n = 35), and burst strength was tested in the horizontal and vertical directions. Collagen content was measured, and histological studies were performed to assess epidermal and dermal thickness, vascularity as well as the morphology and density of the collagen fibers.

RESULTS

In all groups, skin stretched horizontally was stronger than skin stretched vertically (p < 0.001). The skin of MWL patients was stronger medially compared to the skin of cosmetic patients. (p = 0.047) Newly formed collagen was diminished in MWL than that in the control group, but the results were not statistically significant. Epidermal thickness was significantly higher medially in MWL (p = 0.049). Elastin fibers were decreased in the MWL group, while dermal vascularity was higher in the MWL group.

CONCLUSIONS

The skin of MWL patients demonstrated stronger mechanical parameters than that of cosmetic patients in the medial part of the abdomen; however, the decrease in elastic fibers associated with a decrease in newly formed collagen seemingly provides a contradiction. Skin changes with MWL merits further study to understand it more completely.

Multiple procedures and staging in the massive weight loss population

BACKGROUND

Unlike traditional plastic surgery patients who present with a specific anatomical complaint, massive weight loss patients often have multiple regions of concern. No single procedure can address the whole-body deformities associated with massive weight loss. The authors sought to quantify their clinical experience to provide evidence-based analysis of procedural combination in body contouring.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical database over a 5-year period. Procedure categories included breast, medial thigh lift, buttock and lateral thigh lift, upper back lift, brachioplasty, and abdomen. Analysis of variance was used to analyze differences between procedure combinations.

RESULTS

Six hundred nine massive weight loss patients underwent 661 cases involving 1070 procedures. Length of hospital stay increased with the number of procedures performed (p < 0.001). Second-stage cases (n = 60) had similar complication rates and length of hospital stay. Seroma and dehiscence were strongly correlated with the number of procedures (p < 0.001), as were tissue necrosis and infection (p = 0.02), whereas hematoma was unrelated (p = 0.25). Major complications did not increase in multiple-procedure cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large experience at a high-volume center, concomitant procedures were performed safely in carefully selected patients with low major complication rates. Although aggregate minor complication rates were predictably higher than in single-procedure cases, there was no significant increase on a per-procedure basis. Multiple procedures can be combined safely in the body contouring patient, with surgical staging offering a viable alternative for patients who are unable to undergo combined procedures.