Pre-expanded Supraclavicular Artery Perforator Flap

An overview of current assessment techniques for evaluating cutaneous perfusion in reconstructive surgery

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of modern techniques used in the assessment of cutaneous flaps in reconstructive surgery. It emphasizes the importance of preoperative planning and intra- and perioperative assessment of flap perfusion to ensure successful outcomes. Despite technological advancements, direct clinical assessment remains the gold standard. We categorized assessment techniques into non-invasive and invasive modalities, discussing their strengths and weaknesses. Non-invasive methods, such as acoustic Doppler sonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, hyperspectral imaging thermal imaging, and remote-photoplethysmography, offer accessibility and safety but may sacrifice specificity. Invasive techniques, including contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, near-infrared fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green, and implantable Doppler probe, provide high accuracy but introduce additional risks. We emphasize the need for a tailored decision-making process based on specific clinical scenarios, patient characteristics, procedural requirements, and surgeon expertise. It also discusses potential future advancements in flap assessment, including the integration of artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.

Sizeable Facial and Cervical Defect Repair using a Medial Arm Flap Combined With the Tissue Expansion Technique: Clinical Applications and Fifteen-year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to present the 15-year clinical results using a preexpanded pedicle medial arm flap for repairing massive facial and cervical defects.

METHODS

The process of our method is divided into 3 stages. In the first stage, the rectangle-shaped tissue expander was implanted subcutaneously in the medial arm region and serially inflated for ~3 months. In the second stage, the distal portion of the flap was to cover the defects, the proximal portion was overlapped with the residual lesion flap. The pedicle was divided 3 weeks later, and the extra tissue was reinserted back to the donor site.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients were retained. All donor sites were closed directly. Maximum and minimum sizes of preexpanded cervical flaps were 2015 cm2 to 5.54 cm2. In 2 cases, partial necrosis occurred at the distal end of the flap, while the remaining flap survived completely. The median duration of follow-up was 7.5 years. During follow-up, 24 patients (88.9%) had satisfactory outcomes and 3 patients (11.1%) had partially satisfactory results.

CONCLUSION

Using expanded pedicle medial arm flap for face or neck defects' reconstruction showed that it was safe and effective, and had satisfying results in the long-term follow-up. The flap based on the proximal pedicle has a more reliable blood supply.

A Comprehensive Review on the Supraclavicular Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

The supraclavicular artery flap (SCF) is a highly vascularized fasciocutaneous flap overlying the shoulder. The flap was first described in 1979 by Lamberty but did not gain popularity until much later due to lack of a reliable technique. The main advantages of using the SCF include avoiding microsurgical techniques, requiring only a single-stage operation, shorter operative time compared with alternative options, and a wider patient population including those with comorbidities who may be excluded from more extensive operations including free flaps surgeries. The SCF has been successfully performed on individuals with advanced age, poor nutrition, cachexia, obesity, diabetes, tobacco use, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, asthma, and steroid use. The largest disadvantages of the SCF include the possibility of distal tip necrosis, size limitation without pre-expansion, and a moderately visible donor site scar. The following review and meta-analysis of the SCF details its use historically as both an island and a pedicle flap, and its application in head and neck reconstruction.

Free Your Mind, Not Your Flap

The pedicled flap has been a mainstay of soft tissue reconstruction since the earliest days of plastic surgery. Advances in surgical technology and skill have led to an erosion in the use of pedicled flaps in favor of increasingly popular free tissue transfers. Still, regional flaps without microvascular anastomosis remain a valuable reconstructive tool. Although still requiring microsurgical skills, these flaps are of particular benefit in patients with few or poor quality recipient vessels, in those who cannot tolerate antiplatelet therapy, and in those who cannot tolerate the often-extended anesthesia time necessitated by microvascular anastomosis. Furthermore, pedicled flaps may significantly reduce total cost of a reconstruction procedure with similar outcomes. In this case series, we report challenging scenarios where microsurgical approaches may have been typical choices but were instead reconstructed by pedicled options with desired outcomes. Difficult soft tissue defects were successfully reconstructed with a variety of pedicled flaps. Soft tissue transfers to the abdomen, flank, shoulder, and back are presented. None of the reconstructions required microvascular anastomosis.

A 3D visualization layered anatomy for acromial arterial rete and flap design

BACKGROUND

The acromial arterial rete (AAR) is the junction between the skin blood supply of the cervical side and that of the upper arm, and it is the only site crossed by the trans-regional blood supply of the cervico-humeral flap (CHF). The aim of this study was to explore the structures of AAR to optimizing flap design.

METHODS

A body arteriography and spiral CT scan were performed on 33 whole adult corpses. The 3D reconstruction was used to perform continuous digital layered anatomy of the shoulder and upper chest; the acromion and acromioclavicular joint were used as the center to observe the source, route and distribution characteristics of a perforating branch and their anastomosis.

RESULTS

The perforating branches were separated from an acromial branch of the transverse cervical artery (97%), posterior humeral circumflex artery (95%), a deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial artery (95%), and the acromial branch of the thoracoacromial artery (93%). The diameter of the acromial branch of the transverse cervical artery at its initial location was 1.18 ± 0.37 mm; the trunk length was 12.53 ± 3.83 cm, and it was anastomosed with other blood vessels in three forms.

CONCLUSION

Deep fascia should be included in the flap design. Three kinds of pedicled transfer flaps can be designed with the acromial branch of transverse carotid artery as the vascular pedicle. Free flaps can be designed with the acromial branch of thoracoacromial artery as the vascular pedicle.

Prelaminated Supraclavicular Island Flap for Total Ear Reconstruction: A New Technique

Major ear reconstruction has progressed over the past years with the emergence of new techniques directed mainly to patients without available or usable local skin. However, microsurgical transfer requires specific training and eligible patients. The authors report a successful ear reconstruction with a prelaminated supraclavicular island flap in 3 stages, which may be a valuable resource for selected patients or when microsurgery is not available. Advantages and disadvantages of this new technique are discussed, and a possible solution to achieve a more satisfactory result is suggested.

Contemporary reconstruction after complex facial trauma

Complex facial trauma requires complex repair and solutions. This process is challenging for the surgeon who seeks to manage the expectations of the patient and family while achieving the best possible result. Historically, the use of pedicled flaps, and then free tissue transfer, were the primary techniques utilized. Advancements in soft-tissue reconstruction, such as perforator flaps and pre-expanded and prefabricated flaps, allow refinement of the soft-tissue reconstruction process to create the best initial soft-tissue coverage. The advent of contemporary technologies, such as virtual surgical planning, stereolithography and customized implants and plates, facilitates a tailored approach to the patient’s reconstructive needs for precise bony reconstruction. When surgical and technological techniques are combined in complementary multistage reconstructions, better reconstructive and aesthetic outcomes are achievable than ever before. In this review, the authors present a summary of the management of complex facial trauma based on the senior author’s broad experience. Initial management and contemporary reconstructive techniques and technology to provide optimal outcomes are reviewed. A case series of complex facial traumas and their reconstructive process is also presented to demonstrate how complementary staged procedures can yield an optimal result. We believe the reconstructive surgeon managing complex facial trauma should strive to incorporate contemporary technologies and techniques into their armamentarium to provide the best patient care.

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction: an Italian multi-institutional experience

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a thin and pliable pedicled flap that is easy and quick to harvest. Thanks to its particular features and high reliability, it is best indicated for the elderly or most fragile patients. SCAIF is very versatile, as it can be used for reconstruction of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, facial and cervical skin and tracheostomal defects. We began using this flap in four Italian tertiary referral centres, with several indications, both as first treatment and as salvage surgery. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the easy reproducibility of the flap among four different centres. A series of 28 patients underwent head and neck reconstructions with SCAIF with no recorded complications during flap harvesting. After the very first cases, harvesting time was approximately 45 minutes; 24 patients had successful flap integration at the recipient site, while the remaining 4 suffered from partial flap necrosis, two of whom needed revision surgery. Other minor complications were reported at the recipient site, always at the most distal and most delicate portion of the flap. Donor site was always closed primarily, with only three cases of partial suture dehiscence. We only selected the most fragile patients for SCAIF reconstruction, such as the elderly or those with one or more comorbidities; for this reason, we reported some serious systemic complications and one intraoperative death. SCAIF is an easy reproducible flap, with multiple possible indications. Its use as an alternative to free flaps in the head and neck region is nowadays under discussion. Its use should be encouraged among head and neck surgeons thanks to its various advantages.

Supraclavicular flap practice patterns and outcomes: A survey of 221 AHNS surgeons

OBJECTIVES

To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon supraclavicular flap (SCF) practice patterns and to identify variables associated with SCF complications.

METHODS

The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between November 11, 2016, and December 31, 2016. The primary outcome was frequency of SCF complications. Independent variables included demographics, training, practice patterns, and SCF techniques.

RESULTS

Adequate survey responses were obtained from 221 AHNS surgeons. Among these, 54.3% (n = 120) performed supraclavicular flaps (SCFs). Most surgeons used the SCF for cutaneous (n = 85; 78.7%) or parotid-temporal bone (n = 59; 54.6%) defects. Nearly one-third (n = 31; 29.8%) of surgeons experienced more than a "few" SCF complications. Surgeons experienced fewer pectoralis major flap (P < 0.001) and radial forearm free flap (P < 0.001) complications compared to SCF complications. Univariate analysis demonstrated no association between surgeons with "few" SCF complications and Doppler use in SCF design (P = 0.90), harvest location (P = 0.51), and pedicle skeletonization (P = 0.25). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that surgeons performing more than 30 SCFs compared to less than or equal to 30 SCFs had a greater odds of having "few" SCF complications (odds ratio 7.1, 95% confidence interval [1.1-43.9], P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

A majority of surgeons performing SCFs use the flap to reconstruct cutaneous and parotid-temporal bone defects. The significance of relatively higher SCF complications compared to other routine flaps should be explored further. Surgeon experience with the SCF appears to be significantly associated with SCF success, whereas training characteristics, practice patterns, and technical variations may not be associated with SCF outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 129:2012-2019, 2019.

[Research progress of pedicled flaps for defect repair and reconstruction after head and neck tumor resection]

Objective

To summarize the current status of pedicled flaps for defect repair and reconstruction after head and neck tumor resection, and to present its application prospects.

Methods

Related literature was reviewed, and the role evolution of pedicled flaps in the reconstruction of head and neck defects were discussed. The advance, anatomical basis, indications, advantages, disadvantages, and modification of several frequently used pedicled flaps were summarized.

Results

The evolution of pedicled flaps application showed a resurgence trend in recent years. Some new pedicled flaps, e.g., submental artery island flap, supraclavicular artery island flap, submandibular gland flap, and facial artery musculomucosal flap, can acquire equivalent or even superior outcome to free flaps in certain cases. Technological modification of some traditional pedicled flaps, e.g., nasolabial flap, pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap, temporalis myofascial flap, and temporoparietal fascial flap, can further broaden their indications. These traditional flaps still occupy an irreplaceable role, especially in patients with poor condition and institution with immature microsurgical techniques.

Conclusion

The pedicled flaps still plays an important role in head and neck reconstruction after tumor resection. In certain cases, they demonstrate some advantages over free flaps, e.g., more convenient harvest, more rapid recovery, less expenditure, and better functional and aesthetic effect.