Focal nodular hyperplasia: typical and atypical MRI findings with emphasis on the use of contrast media

3D variable flip angle T1 mapping for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions at 3T: comparison with diffusion weighted imaging

BACKGROUND

Different methods have been used to improve the imaging diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLL). Among them, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has received more attention since it provides significant amount of information without radiation exposure. However, atypical imaging characteristics of FLL on MRI may complicate the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant FLL. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic value of T1 mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating of benign and malignant FLLs.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 294 FLLs, including 150 benign and 144 malignant lesions. Whole liver T1 mapping sequences were obtained before and 2 min after the administration of Gd-DTPA to acquire native T1 and enhanced T1 and ΔT1%. Additionally, DWI sequence was conducted to generate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. These quantitative parameters were compared using one-way analysis of variance, and the diagnostic accuracy of T1 mapping and ADC for FLLs was calculated by area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed regarding the native T1, enhanced T1, ΔT1%, and ADC between benign and malignant FLLs. Furthermore, the sensitivity and specificity of the parameters are as follows: native T1 0.797/0.702 (cut off value 1635.5 ms); enhanced T1, 0.911/0.976 (cutoff value 339.2 ms); ΔT1%, 0.901/0.905 (cutoff value 70.8%); and ADC, 0.975/0.952 (cutoff value 1.21 × 10^-3 mm²/s). The ideal cutoff values for native T1 and ADC in identifying cyst and haemangioma were 2422.9 ms (AUC 0.990, P < 0.01) and 2.077 × 10^-3 mm²/s (AUC 0.949, P < 0.01), respectively, with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.963/1 and 0.852/0.892, respectively. ADC was significantly positively correlated with T1 and ΔT1%, and significantly negatively correlated with enhanced T1.

CONCLUSION

The 3D Variable flip angle T1 mapping technique with Gd-DTPA has a high clinical potential for identifying benign and malignant FLLs. The enhanced T1 and ΔT1% values have similar diagnostic accuracy compared with DWI in evaluating FLLs. Native T1 shows better performance than DWI in distinguishing benign liver lesions, specifically, cysts, and haemangioma.

Oxaliplatin related multiple focal nodular hyperplasia mimicking metastasis from a gastric cancer

Introduction

The FOLFOX6 scheme is a combination drug chemotherapy that contains calcium leucovorin (folinic acid), fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin, the chronic use of chemotherapy with oxaliplatin can progress to focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), which is a benign hepatic lesion.

Case report

We present a case of a 26- year-old female diagnosed with an ovarian mixed germ cell tumor with extension to the peritoneum, treated with 12 cycles in 9 months with neoadjuvant chemotherapy FOLFOX 6 scheme and oophorectomy. A three-year follow-up CT showed three nodular and hypervascular hepatic lesions suspicious of metastatic disease; an MRI with liver-specific contrast confirmed the diagnosis of FNH.

Management and outcome

The patient continued her follow-up without other treatment and metastatic disease.

Discussion

While most multiple liver lesions in a patient with cancer will be suspicious of metastasis, a careful drug history should be obtained, as an oxaliplatin-related side effect to develop FNH has been reported. MRI with liver-specific contrast has a positive predictive value of 95% because of the biliary excretion through OATP1B3 transporter, expressed in functional hepatocytes and overexpressed in some liver tumors such as FNH, so it should be performed when FNH is suspected.

Hepatic tumors: pitfall in diagnostic imaging

On computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hepatocellular tumors are characterized based on typical imaging findings. However, hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular carcinoma can show uncommon appearances at CT and MRI, which may lead to diagnostic challenges. When assessing focal hepatic lesions, radiologists need to be aware of these atypical imaging findings to avoid misdiagnoses that can alter the management plan. The purpose of this review is to illustrate a variety of pitfalls and atypical features of hepatocellular tumors that can lead to misinterpretations providing specific clues to the correct diagnoses. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Intravoxel incoherent motion: application in differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma and focal nodular hyperplasia

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM)-related parameters of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) demonstrate differences that could be used to differentiate and improve diagnostic efficiency.

METHODS

A total of 27 patients, including 22 with HCC and 5 with FNH, underwent liver 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging for routine sequences. They were concurrently examined by IVIM diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) scanning with 11 different b values (0-800 s/mm2). IVIM-derived parameters, such as pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*), perfusion fraction (f), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCtotal), were quantified automatically by post-processing software and compared between HCC and FNH groups. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was then created to predict their diagnostic value.

RESULTS

D* was weak in terms of reproducibility among the other parameters. ADCtotal, D, and D* were significantly lower in the HCC group than in the FNH group, while f did not show a significant difference. ADCtotal and D had the largest area under the curve values (AUC; 0.915 and 0.897, respectively) and similarly high efficacy to differentiate the two conditions.

CONCLUSION

IVIM provides a new modality to differentiate the HCC and FNH. ADCtotal and D demonstrated outstanding and comparable diagnosing utility.

Multiple focal nodular hyperplasia: MRI features

PURPOSE

To describe MRI features of multiple Focal Nodular Hyperplasia (FNHs).

METHODS

40 consecutive subjects (37 females, mean age, 38.8years) were included. All studies were independently reviewed. This was an observational study to define the radiological features of multifocal FNH.

RESULTS

130 lesions were evaluated. The majority (88.5%), were peripheral in location. 92.3% lesions were lobulated. Marked enhancement was present in 94.6% lesions. In the portal venous and delayed phase, 46.2% and 47.7% lesions were mildly hyperintense. Central scar was present in 77% lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinctive features included predominant subcapsular location and mild hyperintensity in the delayed phase, seen in nearly 50% of FNHs.

Quantitative evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in focal liver lesions by using T1 mapping: differences between hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia and cavernous hemangioma

Objectives

To investigate the difference of T1 relaxation time on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and cavernous hemangioma of liver (CHL), and to quantitatively evaluate the uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in these three focal liver lesions (FLLs).

Results

The T1_P of CHL was significantly higher than those of HCC and FNH (P < 0.05). Reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary phase could be observed in all three types of lesions. There were significant differences of T1_P, T1_E, T1_D and T1_D% between FNH, CHL and HCC (P < 0.001). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that T1_D% was the best indicator for diagnostic differentiation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.702. Discriminant analysis using three variables (T1_P, T1_E, and T1_D%) showed that the classification accuracy was 88.2%.

Materials and Methods

74 patients diagnosed with focal liver lesions underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including T1 mapping were enrolled, consisting of 51 HCCs, 10 FNHs, and 13 CHLs. T1 relaxation times of these lesions were measured on pre-contrast (T1_P) and on hepatobiliary phase images at 20 minute after contrast (T1_E). The reduction of T1 relaxation time on hepatobiliary (T1_D) and the percentage reduction (T1_D%) was calculated. The differences of T1_P, T1_E, T1_D and T1_D% in these FLLs were analyzed. The usefulness of these parameters for classification of FLLs was evaluated.

Conclusions

Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA is different between in HCC, FNH and CHL. These three lesions can be distinguished using T1 mapping.

Focal nodular hyperplasia that mimicked a liver metastasis from a soft tissue sarcoma: a case report

Background

Imaging modalities (computed tomography (CT), ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) have only limited ability to distinguish liver focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from metastatic liver tumors. Here, we report a patient who underwent surgery for benign FNH that mimicked a liver metastasis from soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Case presentation

A 23-year-old man with a history of several surgeries for metastatic abdominal STS, developed a hepatic tumor accompanying peritoneal STS recurrence. He was diagnosed with a metastatic liver tumor from the STS, based on imaging studies for the hepatic tumor that showed a growing hypervascular lesion and hypo-intensity in hepatic phase on dynamic CT and MRI. However, when the liver and peritoneal tumors were resected, histological diagnosis showed the hepatic tumor to be benign liver FNH.

Conclusions

Although FNH should be considered as a differential diagnosis for hypervascular hepatic tumors, it has few typical findings, and its appropriate management is controversial. A lesion strongly suspected of being a metastatic liver tumor might require surgical resection.

Imaging of Hepatic Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: Pictorial Review and Diagnostic Strategy

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is the second most common benign solid liver lesion after hemangioma, occurring more frequently in young women. The prime differential diagnoses include hepatocellular adenoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and hypervascular metastasis. As the management of FNH is typically conservative, imaging plays a key role in diagnostic pathway, and misdiagnosis may have a major clinical effect. In this article, we describe the ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging features of FNH, underlining the importance of typical radiological features that allow a specific noninvasive diagnosis. We present a large spectrum of a typical imaging findings that FNH may present and discuss the up-to-date diagnostic strategy.

Evaluation of hepatic contrast enhancement with a hepatocyte-specific magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent (gadoxetic acid) in healthy dogs

OBJECTIVE

To determine, by means of MRI, the time to maximal contrast enhancement in T1-weighted images following IV administration of gadoxetic acid in healthy dogs and assess the impact of gadoxetic acid on the signal intensity of T2-weighted images.

ANIMALS

7 healthy dogs.

PROCEDURES

No hepatic abnormalities were detected during ultrasonographic examination. Each dog was anesthetized and positioned in dorsal recumbency for MRI. Transverse T1- and T2-weighted images of the liver were acquired prior to and following (at 5-minute intervals) IV injection of 0.1 mL of gadoxetic acid/kg. Signal intensity of the liver parenchyma was measured in 3 regions of interest in the T1- and T2-weighted images before and at various times point after contrast agent administration. Time versus signal-to-noise ratio curves were plotted to determine time to maximal contrast enhancement and contrast agent-related changes in signal intensity in T2-weighted images.

RESULTS

Analysis of T1-weighted images revealed that mean ± SD time to maximal enhancement after gadoxetic acid injection was 10.5 ± 3.99 minutes. Signal intensity of T2-weighted images was not significantly affected by gadoxetic acid administration. No injection-related adverse effects were observed in any dog.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results indicated that gadoxetic acid can be used for hepatic MRI in healthy dogs and the resultant hepatic enhancement patterns are similar to those described for humans. Maximal contrast enhancement occurred between 10 and 15 minutes after contrast agent injection; thus, T2-weighted images may be obtained in the interval between injection and maximal enhancement for a more time-efficient clinical protocol.

Focal liver lesions: Practical magnetic resonance imaging approach

With the widespread of cross-sectional imaging, a growth of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) has been observed. A reliable detection and characterization of FLL is critical for optimal patient management. Maximizing accuracy of imaging in the context of FLL is paramount in avoiding unnecessary biopsies, which may result in post-procedural complications. A tremendous development of new imaging techniques has taken place during these last years. Nowadays, Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in management of liver lesions, using a radiation-free technique and a safe contrast agent profile. MRI plays a key role in the non-invasive correct characterization of FLL. MRI is capable of providing comprehensive and highly accurate diagnostic information, with the additional advantage of lack of harmful ionizing radiation. These properties make MRI the mainstay for the noninvasive evaluation of focal liver lesions. In this paper we review the state-of-the-art MRI liver protocol, briefly discussing different sequence types, the unique characteristics of imaging non-cooperative patients and discuss the role of hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. A review of the imaging features of the most common benign and malignant FLL is presented, supplemented by a schematic representation of a simplistic practical approach on MRI.

Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma: The value of shear wave elastography for differential diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the clinical usefulness of shear wave elastography (SWE) during ultrasound for differentiating between focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs) and hepatocellular adenomas (HAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SWE was performed on 56 patients presenting with 76 liver lesions (57 FNHs and 19HAs) that were confirmed by MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) (n=55) or by histology (n=21). A mean elasticity value was obtained for each lesion. The ratios of the elasticity of the lesions to the elasticity of the surrounding liver were determined. The optimal elasticity cut-off value for distinguishing between the two lesion types was determined using ROC analysis. All lesions that were classified as "undetermined" after CEUS were reclassified using the elasticity values.

RESULTS

The mean elasticity value was 46.99 ± 31.15 kPa for FNHs and 12.08 ± 10.68 kPa for HAs (p<0.0001). The mean relative elasticity ratio values were 7.94 ± 6.43 and 1.91 ± 1.70, respectively (p<0.0001). The ROC analysis showed a maximal accuracy of 95% for identification with a cut-off of 18.8 kPa for lesion elasticity (accuracy of 96% with a cut-off of 1.98 for the relative elasticity ratio). A total of 68 CEUS were performed, and 17 lesions (25%) were classified as "undetermined" after CEUS. With these cut-off values 16 lesions (94.1%) were correctly reclassified as FNHs.

CONCLUSION

SWE is a useful adjunctive tool for differentiation between FNH and HA during ultrasound examination.

Current updates on the molecular genetics and magnetic resonance imaging of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) constitute benign hepatic neoplasms in adults. HCAs are monoclonal neoplasms characterised by an increased predilection to haemorrhage and also malignant transformation. On the other hand, FNH is a polyclonal tumour-like lesion that occurs in response to increased perfusion and has an uneventful clinical course. Recent advances in molecular genetics and genotype-phenotype correlation in these hepatocellular neoplasms have enabled a new classification system. FNHs are classified into the typical and atypical types based on histomorphological and imaging features. HCAs have been categorised into four subtypes: (1) HCAs with HNF-1α mutations are diffusely steatotic, do not undergo malignant transformation, and are associated with familial diabetes or adenomatosis. (2) Inflammatory HCAs are hypervascular with marked peliosis and a tendency to bleed. They are associated with obesity, alcohol and hepatic steatosis. (3) HCAs with β-catenin mutations are associated with male hormone administration and glycogen storage disease, frequently undergo malignant transformation and may simulate hepatocellular carcinoma on imaging. (4) The final type is unclassified HCAs. Each of these except the unclassified subtype has a few distinct imaging features, often enabling reasonably accurate diagnosis. Biopsy with immunohistochemical analysis is helpful in difficult cases and has strong implications for patient management.

TEACHING POINTS

• FNHs are benign polyclonal neoplasms with no risk of haemorrhage or malignancy. • HCAs are benign monoclonal neoplasms classified into four subtypes based on immunohistochemistry. • Inflammatory HCAs show an atoll sign with a risk of bleeding and malignant transformation. • HNF-1α HCAs are steatotic HCAs with minimal complications and the best prognosis. • β-Catenin HCA shows variable MRI features and a high risk of malignancy.

Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver in patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of monopolar and bipolar diffusion gradients for image quality and lesion detection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to compare diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences using a bipolar versus a monopolar single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) gradient design for image quality and for lesion detection and characterization in patients with liver disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 77 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent MRI including bipolar and monopolar DWI at 1.5 T were assessed. Two independent observers reviewed the DWI studies for image quality and the detection and characterization of liver lesions. The reference standard for diagnosis was established by consensus review of two different observers using imaging characteristics on conventional MRI sequences, lesion stability over time, pathologic correlation, or a combination of these findings. The estimated signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of liver parenchyma and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) of the liver and lesions were calculated for both sequences. ROC analysis was conducted to evaluate the performance of ADC for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

RESULTS

Eighty-five lesions, 50 HCCs and 35 benign lesions, were detected with the reference standard in 38 patients. There was equivalent image quality for the bipolar and monopolar sequences (p = 0.24-0.42). The HCC detection rate for observers 1 and 2 was slightly better with bipolar DWI (50.0% and 52.0%, respectively) compared with monopolar DWI (44.0% and 46.0%); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. The estimated SNR was higher with the monopolar sequence than with the bipolar sequence (p ≤ 0.001). The AUC for the ROC curve was 0.691 for bipolar DWI and 0.649 for monopolar DWI when ADC was used for the characterization of HCC, which is not a statistically significant difference (p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

The higher estimated SNR yielded by the monopolar DWI sequence did not translate into better HCC detection compared with the bipolar DWI sequence. ADC has a limited role for HCC characterization in patients with liver disease.

Immunostaining of glutamine synthetase is a sensitive and specific marker for diagnosing focal nodular hyperplasia in needle biopsy

AIMS

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) has characteristic histological features which may not be seen in needle biopsy specimens. We investigate the diagnostic role of glutamine synthetase (GS) in needle biopsy specimens.

METHODS

Sixty-one hepatic tumours were categorised into 20 'definite' FNHs, 13 'probable' FNHs, and 28 cases without specific diagnosis. Needle biopsy specimens of 92 non-tumourous lesions, 25 well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas (WDHCCs), and 4 high-grade dysplastic nodules (HGDNs) and resection specimens of 10 macroregenerative nodules were also selected for immunohistochemical stain of GS for comparison.

RESULTS

All 20 'definite' FNHs, nine 'probable' FNHs, and five cases without specific diagnosis expressed typical map-like staining pattern of GS. The demographic data of these five cases were similar to those of FNH. All cases of chronic hepatitis B and C, cirrhosis, macroregenerative nodule and peritumourous liver tissue showed normal pericentral/periseptal pattern. Fifteen of 25 WDHCCs and one HGDN showed diffuse pattern. Ten WDHCCs and two HGDNs showed negative staining. One HGDN showed mosaic pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunohistochemical staining of GS increases the diagnostic sensitivity of FNH in needle biopsy, especially in those without typical morphology. It also helps in differentiating FNH from other tumourous and non-tumourous lesions.

MR imaging of benign focal liver lesions

Focal liver lesions (FLLs) are commonly encountered on routine imaging studies. Most lesions detected are benign, but many are indeterminate at the time of initial imaging. This article reviews the important role of MR imaging for the detection and characterization of various benign FLLs while illustrating typical imaging appearances and potential pitfalls in interpretation. The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging and hepatocyte-specific contrast agents is also discussed.

Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging characteristics using high b values

OBJECTIVE

To qualitatively and quantitatively assess the presentation of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) at diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWMRI) using multiple high b values.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with 27 FNHs had liver DWMRI at 1.5 T using free-breathing acquisition and 3 b values (0, 600, 1000 s/mm). Focal nodular hyperplasias were evaluated qualitatively using visual analysis of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (DWMR) images and quantitatively using conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and normalized ADC measurements.

RESULTS

All FNHs (100%) were visible on b0 DWMR images; 26 of the 27 FNHs (96%), on b600 DWMR images; and 21 of the 27 FNHs (78%), on b1000 DWMR images. A total of 18 of the 27 FNHs (67%) exhibited a hyperintense central scar on the b0 DWMR images that remained visible on the b600 and b1000 DWMR images in 6 of the 27 FNHs (22%). Conventional ADC value of FNHs (1.318 × 10 mm/±0.208) was significantly lower than that of adjacent hepatic parenchyma (1.414 × 10 mm/s ± 1.95) (P = 0.0003), although a substantial overlap was found. The use of normalized ADC using the liver as reference organ resulted in a more restricted distribution of ADC values (variation coefficient, 5.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Focal nodular hyperplasias show a wide range of morphological features at DWMRI using high b values. Further studies are needed to fully investigate as to what extent normalized ADC may result in better lesion characterization.

Use of magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents in the liver and biliary tract

This article presents an overview of liver and biliary contrast agents including their mechanisms of action, dosage and elimination, current clinical indications, and potential future uses.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI in differentiating hepatocellular adenoma from focal nodular hyperplasia: prospective study of the additional value of gadoxetate disodium

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to prospectively determine the sensitivity of hepatobiliary phase gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI combined with standard MRI in differentiating focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Patients suspected of having FNH or HCA larger than 2 cm underwent gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI. Standard MRI was evaluated separately from the additional hepatobiliary phase by two blinded radiologists. For the largest lesion in each patient, findings were compared with histologic diagnosis. Sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and distinctive features were analyzed using McNemar and analysis of variance tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients completed the study. Histologic diagnosis revealed 24 HCAs and 28 FNHs. Characterization on standard MRI was inconclusive in 40% (21/52) and conclusive in 60% (31/52) of lesions. The sensitivity of standard MRI for HCA was 50% (12/24) with a PPV of 100% (12/12). The sensitivity for FNH was 68% (19/28) with a PPV of 95% (18/19). After review of hepatobiliary phase, the sensitivity for HCA improved to 96% (23/24) with a PPV of 96% (23/24). The sensitivity for FNH improved to 96% (27/28) with a PPV of 96% (27/28). Features with significant predictive value for diagnosis in HCA included bleeding (p < 0.001), fat (p = 0.010), and glycogen (p = 0.024). The presence of a central scar was predictive for FNH (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows high sensitivity of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI when standard series are combined with the hepatobiliary phase for differentiation of FNH and HCA in lesions larger than 2 cm.

Incidence and etiology of new liver lesions in pediatric patients previously treated for malignancy

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the time course, cause, and imaging characteristics of all new liver lesions in pediatric patients with a previously treated malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our hospital cancer registry was used to identify patients between 1980 and 2005 who met the following criteria: solid tumor, survival > 2 years after diagnosis, no liver lesions at a posttreatment baseline, and cross-sectional imaging follow-up of > 2 years. Final dictated reports of all cross-sectional imaging examinations including the abdomen were reviewed for any mention of new liver lesions. Positive reports were followed by consensus review of the images and clinical data. Patients were divided into three groups: those with suspected or proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), those with suspected or proven metastases, and those with other lesions. An exact Wilcoxon test was used to evaluate the differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Of 967 patients who met the initial inclusion criteria, 273 had adequate follow-up to be included in the study. Forty-six patients (16.8%) developed new liver lesions during the study period, and 14 of those 46 were classified into the FNH group (30.4%) and seven were classified into the metastasis group (15.2%). A significant difference was found in the median time to the development of FNH versus metastasis and other lesions (FNH, 92.9 months; metastasis, 43.2 months; other lesions, 18.5 months; p < 0.0001). A significant difference was also seen in the median length of follow-up between the groups (FNH, 115.6 months; metastasis, 57 months; other lesions, 50.8 months; p = 0.002). The imaging features of the groups also differed.

CONCLUSION

The most common liver lesion encountered in pediatric patients previously treated for malignancy was FNH, which occurred farther from the time of diagnosis and had different imaging characteristics from both metastases and other liver lesions.

Huge focal nodular hyperplasia difficult to distinguish from well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma

We present a 43-year-old man with huge focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) that was difficult to distinguish from well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). He previously had abnormal portal vein circulation due to hypoplasia of the intrahepatic portal vein, which was treated with a superior mesenteric vein-inferior vena cava shunt. Laboratory findings included predominantly indirect hyperbilirubinemia with concomitant elevation in aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and ammonia. Serum α-fetoprotein and des-γ-carboxy prothrombin were slightly elevated. Multidetector-row computed tomography detected the primary tumor in the left liver lobe, which partially showed a central stellate scar. Gd ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging showed some low-intensity areas in the tumor in the hepatocyte phase. 99mTc-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy showed normal intake of agent in the tumor. We could not rule out well-differentiated HCC. Extended left hepatectomy was performed. Final histopathological findings showed that most of the tumor was FNH against a background of portal vein hypoplasia with moderate atypia and hemorrhage. And immunohistochemical analysis revealed high expression of organic anion transporter (OATP) 1B3 and low expression of multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 2 in a part of the tumor. The patient has remained alive with no hepatic lesion for 1 year after surgery. We describe a case of huge FNH that was difficult to distinguish from well-differentiated HCC even by current fully preoperative imaging technology and demonstrate the effectiveness of curative surgical resection.

Characteristics and distinguishing features of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia on gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI in the characterization of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) and hepatocellular adenoma and to assess potential advantages of hepatocyte phase imaging in identifying features that distinguish FNH from hepatocellular adenoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI examinations of 12 patients with hepatocellular adenoma and 35 patients with FNH were retrospectively evaluated by three blinded readers. Diagnoses and confidence scores were recorded before and after disclosure of hepatocyte phase images. The data obtained were combined to create receiver operating characteristic curves, and the areas under the curves were compared. Imaging characteristics, including signal intensity, were recorded. Lesion-to-liver enhancement ratio was calculated for each contrast-enhanced phase.

RESULTS

The readers' average receiver operating characteristic area was significantly higher after disclosure of hepatocyte phase images (p=0.024). FNHs were correctly diagnosed in 74.3-97.1% of cases before and 97.1-100% of cases after the disclosure of hepatocyte phase images; hepatocellular adenoma was correctly diagnosed in 83-100% and 91.7-100% of cases (p>0.05). The presence of a central scar in FNH and fat on hepatocellular adenoma were the only morphologic features that were statistically significantly different (p<0.05). FNH had greater average contrast-enhanced signal intensity and enhancement ratio in all phases (p<0.001). A hepatocyte phase enhancement ratio of less than 0.7 was 100% specific and 91.6% sensitive for hepatocellular adenoma, with accuracy of 97.1% for these data.

CONCLUSION

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI had high accuracy in diagnosis of FNH and hepatocellular adenoma, and the hepatocyte phase improved their distinction. FNH enhances significantly more than hepatocellular adenoma. An enhancement ratio, particularly in the hepatocyte phase, can be potentially used as an additional distinguishing feature.

High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of benign hepatocellular lesions: quantitative and qualitative analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze the signal intensity (SI) of benign hepatocellular lesions in high-b-value diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) images and to compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of focal nodular hyperplasias (FNHs) with those of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by institutional review board, with waiver of informed consent. Inclusion criteria were consecutive patients with diagnosed FNH or HCA who underwent MR imaging with a DW sequence of the liver at three b values, 0, 150, and 600 sec/mm2. The final study population included 67 patients (seven men, 60 women) with 90 hepatocellular lesions (54 FNHs, 36 HCAs). The mean ADC was compared between the lesions and the liver. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ADC for differentiating HCAs and FNHs.

RESULTS

The mean ADC value of all FNHs and HCAs was significantly lower than that of the liver (P=.004). An ADC ratio below 15% was observed in 50 of 54 (93%) FNHs and in 29 of 36 (81%) HCAs. The mean ADC value of FNHs was significantly higher than that of HCAs (P<.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.760. With a cutoff value of 1.37×10(-3) mm2/sec, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating HCA from FNH were 70% and 76%, respectively. There was no significant difference in ADC values between HCA subtypes. The SI of most FNHs and HCAs (78 of 90, 87%) increased with increasing b values, whereas none showed a decrease in SI with increasing b values. When the DW MR criteria for benign and malignant liver tumors were applied, 44 of 90 (49%) lesions would have been considered malignant lesions, whereas the other lesions (46 of 90, 51%) would have been considered indeterminate.

CONCLUSION

On DW MR images, benign hepatocellular lesions often show findings that suggest restricted diffusion.

Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions: approach to imaging diagnosis

This article is a review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of incidental focal liver lesions. This review provides an overview of liver MRI protocol, diffusion-weighted imaging, and contrast agents. Additionally, the most commonly encountered benign and malignant lesions are discussed with emphasis on imaging appearance and the diagnostic performance of MRI based on a review of the literature.

Solid hypervascular liver lesions: accurate identification of true benign lesions on enhanced dynamic and hepatobiliary phase magnetic resonance imaging after gadobenate dimeglumine administration

PURPOSE

To evaluate hepatobiliary phase magnetic resonance imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine for differentiation of benign hypervascular liver lesions from malignant or high-risk lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Retrospective assessment was performed of 550 patients with 910 hypervascular lesions (302 focal nodular hyperplasia [FNH], 82 nodular regenerative hyperplasia [NRH], 59 hepatic adenoma or liver adenomatosis [HA/LA], 329 hepatocellular carcinomas [HCC], 12 fibrolamellar-HCC [FL-HCC], 21 peripheral cholangiocarcinomas [PCC], 105 metastases). Imaging was performed before and during the arterial, portal-venous, equilibrium, and hepatobiliary phases after gadobenate dimeglumine administration (0.05 mmol/kg). Histologic confirmation was available for ≥1 lesion per patient, except for patients with suspected FNH (diagnosis based on characteristic enhancement/follow-up). Lesion differentiation (benign/malignant) on the basis of contrast washout and lesion enhancement (hypo-/iso-/hyperintensity) was assessed (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV) relative to histology or final diagnosis.

RESULTS

On portal-venous or equilibrium phase images, washout was not seen for 208 of 526 (39.5%) malignant (HCC, FL-HCC, PCC, metastases) and high-risk (HA/LA) lesions. Conversely, only 5 of 384 (1.3%) true benign lesions (FNH/NRH) showed washout. Taking washout as indicating malignancy, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for malignant lesion identification during these phases was 61.8%, 98.7%, and 77.4%. On hepatobiliary phase images, 289 of 302 FNH, 82 of 82 NRH, 1 of 59 HA or LA, 62 of 341 HCC or FL-HCC, and 2 of 105 metastases were hyperintense or isointense. Taking iso- or hyperintensity as an indication for lesion benignity, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for benign lesion identification was 96.6%, 87.6%, 91.4%, 85.1%, and 97.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatobiliary phase imaging with gadobenate dimeglumine is accurate for distinguishing benign lesions from malignant or high-risk lesions. Biopsy should be considered for hypointense lesions on hepatobiliary phase images after gadobenate dimeglumine.

Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with GD-EOB-DTPA

Superior soft-tissue contrast affords magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) some advantages compared to computed tomography (CT) in both detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Because of its relatively recently introduction into clinical practice, a growing number of articles in the literature have demonstrated the usefulness of the hepatobiliary-specific MRI contrast agent gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in liver imaging. The purpose of this review is to demonstrate the typical enhancement patterns of the most common liver lesions using Gd-EOB-DTPA in daily clinical scenarios and briefly describe its mechanism of action. Radiologists interpreting liver MRI studies with this agent must be familiar with the appearance of focal lesions in the hepatocyte phase to avoid misinterpretation.

Variable MR imaging appearances of focal nodular hyperplasia in pediatric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is rare in the general pediatric population but is increasingly found in treated pediatric cancer patients. FNH can be incidentally found on CT and MRI and can be misdiagnosed as liver metastasis in patients with an oncological history.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the MR imaging findings of FNH in pediatric cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten children who had been treated for a primary malignancy and who were diagnosed with FNH from 2003 to 2010 were identified from a search for FNH in our pathology and radiology databases. Patients were included if they were treated for a primary malignancy and had undergone MR imaging of the liver including T1-weighted, T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences.

RESULTS

FNH from all patients (n=10) demonstrated typical homogeneous arterial enhancement on MRI. The FNH was often multiple and small (7/10 patients), lacking a central scar, with variable imaging characteristics including signal hyperintensity on both T1- and T2-weighted images (4/10 patients), especially in the setting of hepatic hemosiderosis.

CONCLUSION

FNH has a variable MR appearance in pediatric cancer patients and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hypervascular liver lesions.

Focal nodular hyperplasia with major sinusoidal dilatation: a misleading entity

Focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) is a benign liver lesion thought to be a non-specific response to locally increased blood flow. Although the diagnosis of FNH and hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) has made great progress over the last few years using modern imaging techniques, there are still in daily practice some difficulties concerning some atypical nodules. Here, the authors report the case of a 47-year-old woman with a single liver lesion thought to be, by imaging, an inflammatory HCA with major sinusoidal congestion. This nodule was revealed to be, at the microscopical level and after specific immunostaining and molecular analysis, an FNH with sinusoidal dilatation (so-called telangiectatic focal nodular hyperplasia).

Focal nodular hyperplasia: central scar enhancement pattern using Gadoxetate Disodium

PURPOSE

To illustrate the unusual enhancement pattern of the focal nodular hyperplasia central scar using Gadoxetate Disodium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 10-month period, six patients, with a total of seven focal nodular hyperplasia lesions with typical central scar, had MRI of the liver using Gadoxetate Disodium (Eovist, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Wayne, NJ). Four of the six patients had a prior Gadobenate Dimeglumine (Multihance, Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Princeton, NJ) -enhanced MRI of the liver performed within the previous year. The dynamic enhancement pattern of the central scar on the 10 liver MRIs was independently analyzed by two abdominal imaging radiologists who were blinded to the contrast agent used.

RESULTS

On the Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MRIs and during the arterial phase, 1-min, 2-min, and 3-min delay, none of the central scars demonstrated enhancement. However, all four of the lesions that were previously scanned using Gadobenate Dimeglumine demonstrated typical enhancement after a 3-min delay.

CONCLUSION

On Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MRIs of the liver, the central scar of focal nodular hyperplasia lesions does not typically demonstrate delayed enhancement.

Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA), to describe a workflow-optimized pulse sequence protocol, and to illustrate the imaging appearance of focal lesions in the noncirrhotic liver.

CONCLUSION

Gd-EOB-DTPA allows a comprehensive evaluation of the liver with the acquisition of both dynamic and hepatocyte phase images. This provides potential additional information, especially for the detection and characterization of small liver lesions. However, protocol optimization is necessary for improved image quality and workflow.

A benign liver tumor mimics hepatic metastasis from colon cancer

Background: Liver is the most common distant metastasized organ in advanced colon cancer. Surgical resection of metastatic lesions would offer the best chance of a long-term survival. An accurate diagnosis and evaluation of extent of disease is crucial in the management of liver metastasis. Objective: Report a benign hepatic condition mimicking liver metastasis in a colon cancer patient. Case presentation: A 53-year-old male with an early stage sigmoid colon cancer was treated with sigmoidectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin for six months. Annual computerized tomography of abdomen at two years after the surgery revealed three hypervascular nodules in the liver. Investigations including MRI of the liver and whole body FDG-F18 PET/CT demonstrated evidence consistent with non-metastatic liver nodules. Liver biopsy of one of the lesions led to the diagnosis of “focal nodular hyperplasia”. Conclusion: The possible etiology, diagnosis, and further management of this benign liver tumor, the focal nodular hyperplasia became clear.